The learning environment for junior doctor training--what hinders, what helps

As part of a larger study on learning outcomes for the first year of postgraduate medical training (already reported), semi-structured interviews with middle grade trainees were used to explore their perceptions of trainee development during this first training year. Data generated focused not only on learning outcomes, but also on important process issues. Dissatisfaction was expressed with formal and informal teaching and learning opportunities. Factors that enhance the learning environment were identified. These included being supported, a feeling of being a valued member of the team, being stretched but not over stretched, having a broad range of experiences, knowing the system, having a clear remit and being well organized. Factors inhibiting the learning environment included fractured working patterns, insufficient time with patients and seniors, as well as the converse of many of the enhancing factors. The process issues gathered in this paper will be of interest to those involved in the delivery of training for junior doctors.

Using a 360 degrees diagnostic screening tool to provide an evidence trail of junior doctor performance throughout their first postgraduate year

New medical graduates in the UK are known as Preregistration House Officers (PRHOs). At the end of this first postgraduate year, the Postgraduate Dean is responsible for allowing the PRHO to be fully registered with the General Medical Council. During the period 1999-2002 Professor Miriam Friedman Ben-David designed a more robust approach to appraisal and assessment of PRHOs, which provided educational feedback to all trainees, allowed any poor performers to be detected at an early stage, and provided 'hard' observable evidence for certification decisions. This paper describes the more recent development of her work resulting from further piloting of her system. The key tool, a 360 degrees diagnostic questionnaire, is designed to identify strengths and weaknesses in individual performance. It is presently being used as a screening tool to identify any trainees needing additional support and further assessment. The tool also forms part of an evidence trail for all PRHOs and helps inform formative assessment as well as contributing, along with other evidence, to full registration decisions. The evaluation of this tool, also described in this paper, shows the feasibility of implementing such a system on a wider scale and illustrates the successful balance made between robustness and feasibility.

Exit learning outcomes for the PRHO year: an evidence base for informed decisions

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate potential learning outcomes for pre-registration house officer (PRHO) training and develop an evidence base for informed decision making.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A 2-stage Delphi process was employed to establish the opinions of Scottish stakeholders with regard to learning outcomes for the PRHO year.

PARTICIPANTS

Doctors involved in the provision of PRHO training, including deans, postgraduate tutors and general practitioners (GPs) with trainees, were invited to participate in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Respondents rated a range of outcomes according to which they believed should be included or excluded from the PRHO training year.

RESULTS

Learning outcomes identified for PRHOs were grouped under the 12-domain framework of the 3-circle model: 'What the doctor can do', 'How they approach their practice' and 'Their professionalism'. Based on the consensus opinions gained in the Delphi study, the ratings were classified into priority groupings. Priority 1 contained 45 of the original 81 learning outcomes, representing each area of the 3-circle model, with emphasis on the domains of clinical skills, patient investigation/management, communication, appropriate attitudes and personal development. Health promotion and disease prevention was the only domain not represented at priority 1. Priority 2 contained 24 outcomes with emphasis on the understanding of clinical skills, patient management and personal development. Priority 3 contained 12 outcomes indicating a lack of emphasis for some outcomes, particularly the role of the doctor and health promotion.

CONCLUSION

Consensus on the learning outcomes for PRHO training has been achieved, providing an evidence base for curriculum planning. The relative priority assigned to these outcomes can facilitate the use of the evidence. This evidence base should be referred to when reviewing any PRHO training programme.

New doctors' perceptions of their educational development during their first year of postgraduate training

The General Medical Council (GMC) in the UK describes a wide range of competences in which the new medical graduate should develop during the first postgraduate year. New graduates are known as pre-registration house officers (PRHOs). In this study, semi-structured open interviews with PRHOs approaching the end of their first postgraduate year were used to explore the trainees' perceptions of their development. After the interview their views on the importance given in their experience to the GMC's competences were explored though a questionnaire. Most noticeable from the interview data was the PRHOs'emphasis in the development of generic skills required of working in the 'real world'--skills such as communication, team working and the ability to cope with responsibility. In some outcomes, their noticeable progression, e.g. communication, or lack of progression, e.g. health promotion, reflected their views on the importance given. With other outcomes there was a paradox, e.g. practical skills were rated highly but were not noticeably developed; the role of the doctor was noticeably developed but was not highly rated. Overall the PRHOs developed most strongly in the 'professionalism' domain with not all the skills in the 'tasks' domain being similarly developed. This study helps to define the benefits and opportunities of the PRHO year, as currently perceived by the trainees, and should be of interest to those involved in the planning and delivery of postgraduate training.

New doctors' perceptions of their educational development during their first year of postgraduate training

The General Medical Council (GMC) in the UK describes a wide range of competences in which the new medical graduate should develop during the first postgraduate year. New graduates are known as pre-registration house officers (PRHOs). In this study, semi-structured open interviews with PRHOs approaching the end of their first postgraduate year were used to explore the trainees' perceptions of their development. After the interview their views on the importance given in their experience to the GMC's competences were explored though a questionnaire. Most noticeable from the interview data was the PRHOs'emphasis in the development of generic skills required of working in the 'real world'--skills such as communication, team working and the ability to cope with responsibility. In some outcomes, their noticeable progression, e.g. communication, or lack of progression, e.g. health promotion, reflected their views on the importance given. With other outcomes there was a paradox, e.g. practical skills were rated highly but were not noticeably developed; the role of the doctor was noticeably developed but was not highly rated. Overall the PRHOs developed most strongly in the 'professionalism' domain with not all the skills in the 'tasks' domain being similarly developed. This study helps to define the benefits and opportunities of the PRHO year, as currently perceived by the trainees, and should be of interest to those involved in the planning and delivery of postgraduate training.

Developing the teaching instinct, 1: feedback

The first in a new series of short educational programmes covering a range of important topics in medical education. Each programme defines the topic, provides some background information, presents some practical tips, gives some theoretical underpinning where relevant, provides some further reading and suggests an activity which can be carried out independently or with colleagues. The series has been designed in collaboration with NHS Education for Scotland as an aid to all engaged as trainers or teachers in the healthcare professions.

A framework for developing excellence as a clinical educator

The current emphasis on providing quality undergraduate and postgraduate medical education has focused attention on the educational responsibilities of all doctors. There is a greater awareness of the need to train doctors as educators and courses have been set up to satisfy this need. Some courses, such as those on how to conduct appraisal, are specific to one task facing a medical educator. Other courses take a broader view and relate educational theory to practice. In this paper we describe an outcome-based approach in which competence in teaching is defined in terms of 12 learning outcomes. The framework provides a holistic approach to the roles of the teacher and supports the professionalism of teaching. Such a framework provides the basis for the development of a curriculum for teaching excellence. It helps to define important competences for different categories of teachers, communicate the areas to be addressed in a course, identify gaps in course provision, evaluate courses, assist in staff planning and allow individuals to assess their personal learning needs. The framework is presented to encourage wider debate.

An 'interactive' poster display

Posters are a commonly used method of communication at scientific meetings. How can a significant amount of information be provided on a limited surface area, in a manner that will interest the viewer? This article describes a simple and inexpensive answer. By being interactive, a poster display overcomes the problems normally associated with posters.