Efficacy of self-management program associated with a spa therapy for knee osteoarthritis patients (GETT 2): a research protocol for a randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis is a chronic pathology that involves multidisciplinary management. Self-management for patients is an essential element, present in all international guidelines. During the time of the spa therapy, the patient is receptive to take the advantage of self-management workshops. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of 18 days spa therapy associated with a self-management intervention in patients with knee osteoarthritis in comparison with spa therapy alone on a priority objective, personalized and determined with the patient, chosen in the list of 5 objectives determined during the self-management initial assessment.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Two hundred fifty participants with knee osteoarthritis will participate to this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled study. All patients will benefit 18 days of spa therapy and patients randomized in the intervention group will participate to 6 self-management workshops. Randomization will be centralized. The allocation ratio will be 1:1. Data analysts and assessor will be blinded. The primary outcome is the effectiveness of the educational workshops associated with spa therapy in comparison with spa therapy alone on a priority objective, measured by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). The secondary outcomes are disability, health-related quality of life, and pain intensity.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics were approved by the CPP Sud-Méditerranée II. The results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at PRM, rheumatology, and orthopedics conferences. The results will also be disseminated to patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number NCT03550547. Registered 8 June 2018. Date and version identifier of the protocol. Version N°6 of March 12, 2018.

Perceived barriers to and facilitators of physical activity in people with knee osteoarthritis: Development of the Evaluation of the Perception of Physical Activity questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The physical activity (PA) level of individuals with knee osteoarthritis is lower than in the general population. International recommendations recommend a non-pharmacological intervention including a self-management education program, weight loss and an adapted exercise program. However, we have no scale assessing the perceived barriers to and facilitators of PA in this population.

OBJECTIVE

We constructed and validated a self-administered questionnaire assessing perceived barriers to and facilitators of regular practice of PA in people with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews identified 24 barriers and facilitators. We developed a 24-item questionnaire, Evaluation of the Perception of Physical Activity (EPPA) that was completed by 548 individuals with knee osteoarthritis, to assess acceptability, construct validity, internal consistency and convergent validity. Participants also completed the Knee Osteoarthritis Fears and Beliefs Questionnaire (KOFBeQ), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Reliability and sensitivity to change were evaluated in a second group of 168 people with knee osteoarthritis at a 3-week spa therapy resort.

RESULTS

Factorial analysis identified 17 items grouped into 4 subscales (Barriers, Facilitators, Motivation and Beliefs). The internal consistency was good for Barriers, Facilitators and Motivation subscales (Cronbach α>0.70) and intermediate for the Beliefs subscale (Cronbach α=0.64). The EPPA subscale scores were significantly correlated with KOFBeQ and WOMAC scores but not associated with IPAQ physical activity level. Reliability was good for all subscales, with intraclass correlation coefficients>0.60. A sensitivity to change was found for only the Beliefs subscale, with a moderate effect size.

CONCLUSIONS

The EPPA questionnaire has good psychometric properties and can help guide the management of knee osteoarthritis. It can be used in research for evaluating the perception of physical activity.

Comparison of psychometric properties between the Labin, a new electronic dynamometer, and the Jamar: Preliminary results in healthy subjects

Many instruments exist for measuring grip strength. The Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer is currently the gold standard. The Labin is a prototype electronic dynamometer that can also measure maximum grip strength. The main objective was to compare the Labin dynamometer with the gold standard instrument, the Jamar, in a healthy population, and secondarily to compare discomfort during use. A single-center exploratory study was conducted. The subjects enrolled had to be aged between 20 and 60, be volunteers and give consent. The required number of subjects was 30. The subjects were positioned according to American Society of Hand Therapists recommendations. Maximum grip force was measured in kilograms using the mean of three successive trials. The first dynamometer used was chosen randomly. The handle's discomfort during use was rated on a simple verbal scale from 0 to 10. Thirty-four subjects were included. The concordance coefficient for peak torque between the Labin and Jamar dynamometers was 0.90 for the dominant hand and 0.83 for the non-dominant hand. The intraclass correlation coefficient for peak torque with the Labin was 0.81 [0.69; 0.89] for the dominant hand and 0.86 [0.76; 0.92] for the non-dominant hand. In our study, we have shown that the Labin prototype has acceptable validity and reproducibility. The Labin will need to be tested in pathological conditions next.

Evaluation of 'I-Preventive': a digital preventive tool for musculoskeletal disorders in computer workers-a pilot cluster randomised trial

OBJECTIVES

I-Preventive is a digital preventive tool for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in computer workers. We sought to determine its impact on pain in computer workers with upper limb MSDs and visual discomfort.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot cluster randomised trial in 2 different sites of a tyre factory in France. We randomised 200 employees to either an intervention group (I-Preventive) or control group, each comprising symptomatic and asymptomatic employees. The workers were followed up for 5 months. The main outcome was overall recovery from symptoms following 1 month's intervention based on Nordic-style and eyestrain questionnaires.

RESULTS

We included 185/200 workers: 96 in the intervention group (mean age 41.8±1.4 years; 88.5% males) and 79 in the control group (mean age 42.9±12.0 years; 94.5% males). The most painful areas (numerical scale ≥2) were the neck (40.0%), upper back (18.8%) and shoulders (15.7%). For the most painful anatomical area, the Nordic score significantly decreased after 1 month in the intervention group (p=0.038); no change was observed in the control group (p=0.59). After 1 month's use, the intervention group reported less pain in the painful area and less visual discomfort symptoms (p=0.02). Adherence to the I-Preventive program was 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

I-Preventive is effective in the short term on musculoskeletal symptoms and visual discomfort by promoting active breaks and eyestrain treatment. This easy-to-use digital tool allows each worker to focus on areas of their choice via personalised, easy exercises that can be performed in the workplace.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02350244; Pre-results.

French validation of the Foot Function Index (FFI)

OBJECTIVE

French validation of the Foot Function Index (FFI), self-questionnaire designed to evaluate rheumatoid foot according to 3 domains: pain, disability and activity restriction.

METHODS

The first step consisted of translation/back translation and cultural adaptation according to the validated methodology. The second stage was a prospective validation on 53 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who filled out the FFI. The following data were collected: pain (Visual Analog Scale), disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire) and activity restrictions (McMaster Toronto Arthritis questionnaire). A test/retest procedure was performed 15 days later. The statistical analyses focused on acceptability, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha and Principal Component Analysis), test-retest reproducibility (concordance coefficients), external validity (correlation coefficients) and responsiveness to change.

RESULTS

The FFI-F is a culturally acceptable version for French patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.85 to 0.97. Reproducibility was correct (correlation coefficients>0.56). External validity and responsiveness to change were good.

CONCLUSION

The use of a rigorous methodology allowed the validation of the FFI in the French language (FFI-F). This tool can be used in routine practice and clinical research for evaluating the rheumatoid foot. The FFI-F could be used in other pathologies with foot-related functional impairments.

Transcultural validation of the Risk Assessment and Predictor Tool (RAPT) to predict discharge outcomes after total hip replacement

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relevance of the RAPT (Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool), among a cohort of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHOD

Prospective study of a cohort of patients evaluated before and after THA. The difference between the postoperative orientation predicted by the RAPT and the real one is assessed. Clinical, environmental and psychosocial criteria that could significantly change the orientation are discussed.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-four patients (94 women and 40 men) were included. The average age was 71.6 (±10) years. Primary hip osteoarthritis was the indication for surgery in 78% of cases. The average length of stay in the surgery ward was 10 (±3) days. It was significantly higher for patients referred to a rehabilitation ward (P<0.0001). Sixty-six percent of patients were referred to a rehabilitation ward and 34% returned directly home. The average length of stay in rehabilitation ward was 27 (±13) days. The validity of the RAPT as a help decision tool has been confirmed. Thus, a low RAPT score was significantly associated with more frequent referral to a rehabilitation ward, conversely, a high RAPT score is significantly related to more frequent direct return to home.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the usefulness of the RAPT to help in patient orientation decision after total hip arthroplasty. The patient preference remains the main variable for orientation after THA. By the way, the patient preference must not be integrated into the RAPT, but need to be collected and be discussed with the patient.

Validation of an educational booklet targeted to patients candidate for total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent condition and the leading reason for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). No consensus exists about the optimal content of preoperative patient information and, to the best of our knowledge, no validated information document is available. Our objective here was to obtain validation by healthcare professionals and patients of an educational booklet for patients awaiting TKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The booklet was developed and validated in six phases: systematic literature review, drafting of the first version, critical revision by a panel of experts, modification of the booklet, validation by a multidisciplinary panel of experts, and validation by two groups of patients, one composed of patients awaiting TKA and the other of patients in the immediate post-TKA period. We assessed the impact of the booklet based on knowledge and belief scores before and 2 days after receiving the booklet.

RESULTS

Critical revision of the first draft led to changes to meet the concerns voiced by the experts. Knowledge improved only in the patient group given the booklet preoperatively (from 6/10 to 9/10, P=0.005). The booklet did not modify beliefs in either patient group.

DISCUSSION

We used a rigorous methodology to develop and validate the contents of an educational booklet. Receiving this document before TKA resulted in improved patient knowledge but had no impact on beliefs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.