Alexithymia, recognition of facial emotion and inference in patients with Eating Disorders (ED) or Substance Abuse Disorders (SAD)

Alexythimia is a psychological construct characterized by difficulty describing emotions and distinguishing them from somatic components of the emotional activation. Patients with eating disorders (ED) or substance use disorders (SAD) commonly present also impairment of recognition of facial expressions and deficits in social inference. Patients with ED and SAD may present impulsiveness, difficulty in emotion-focused coping skills, and search for a concrete relief from psychological suffering. The purpose of study is to compare the ED, SAD and healthy controls (HC), in several variables, including Alexythimia, empathy, and ability to recognize emotions, social inference. Thirty-two patients with ED, 27 patients with SAD and 31 HC were recruited between September 2016 and April 2016 at the psychiatric ward of Novara Hospital, nursing home of Nebbiuno and the nursing home of Viverone. We administrated to patients the same battery of tests, composed by Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20), Facial Emotion Identification Test (FEIT), the awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT), temperament and Character Inventory (TCI), Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), Symptoms Checklist-90 (SCL-90). The two clinical groups showed differences in TAS, FEIT and TASIT, highlighting Alexythimic tracts, difficulty in recognizing emotions and deficit of social inference, compared to HCs. The TCI and SCL-90 have also highlighted the common psychopathological characteristics and temperamental in patients with ED and SAD. Alexythimia is particularly represented in patients with ED and SAD, and could represent a maintenance factor, together with deficits in emotions recognition and social inference. The similarities between ED and TD seem to suggest the possibility of shared core features.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

The Outcome of A Counseling Intervention. The Experience of the Counseling Service UPO

Background.

Counseling addresses the emotional social, work, school and physical health concerns that people may have at different stages in their lives. It focuses on typical life stresses and more severe issues. It may be addressed to individuals, groups, organisations.

Aim and methods.

The objective of our study was to assess the outcome of a counseling intervention offered to students of the University of Piemonte Orientale, aged between 18 and 20 years. Baseline features and reasons for consultation will be described and the outcome will be assessed with CGI (Clinical Global Impression) and HONOS (Health of the Nation Outcome Scales) at T0 (time 0), T1 (4 weeks) and T2 (8 months). We will present the data of the period between 1st January 2014 to 31st December 2016.

Results/discussion.

Data analysis is ongoing. The results will be discussed in the light of the current literature about counseling services for university student.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Socio-Demographic and Clinical Features of Patients Referred to Emergency Room Psychiatric Consultation Between 2006 and 2015. A Comparison Between Migrants and Natives

In recent decades, Italy has become a desirable destination for immigrants. It should be noted that the organization of mental health services in Italy strongly relies on outpatient services, while the psychiatric wards usually accommodate patients in acute phases of their disorder. Nonetheless, migrants’ first contact often happen in a psychiatry ward when they are in a severe and acute psychopathological condition. The research was performed in the Emergency Department (ED) of the Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy. We collected data about 3781 consecutive patients, 3247 Italian natives and 421 migrants, assessed in the ER of the Maggiore della Carità Hospital, and referred to psychiatric assessment after ER triage. From 1st January 2006 to 31st December 2007, only data for migrant patients were available. From 1st January 2008 to 31st December 2015, data were available for all consecutive patients assessed in the ER. An experienced psychiatrist assessed patients with a clinical interview, including the assessment of suicidal intent, suicidal behaviors and attempts. The psychiatrist filled in for each patient a data sheet, reporting demographic data and clinical features. The high frequency of substance use disorders was higher in the migrant population than in the native one. The request for psychiatric consultation for self-injury behaviors was more frequent in migrants and also suicide attempts were more common. Nonetheless, being a migrant was not a predictor of suicide attempt in our sample.

Several differences were found between migrants and natives in socio-demographic, clinical and treatment variables. Clinical implications will be discussed.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Surgery-first or orthognathic surgery approach: Psychosocial and physical changes

Introduction

Two surgical approaches exist for malocclusion: in the surgery-first approach the orthognathic surgery precedes the orthodontic treatment, treating facial esthetics first and then occlusion, whereas in the conventional approach (the orthodontics-first approach) the orthodontic treatment precedes the orthognathic surgery, treating occlusion first and then facial esthetics. The advantages of the surgery-first approach include the fact that patient's dental function, and facial esthetics are restored and improved soon after the beginning of treatment. Moreover, the entire treatment lasts only 1 to 1.5 years or less and orthodontic management is easier to achieve.

Aims

Our study aims to compare patients undergoing surgery-first or orthognathic surgery approach as for as self-esteem, satisfaction with their appearance in the pre- and postoperative care, quality of life and psychosocial changes, are concerned.

Methods

We recruited 50 patients undergoing surgery-first or orthognathic surgery approach at SC Maxillo-Facciale of Novara between October 2014 and December 2017. Assessment were performed at baseline (T0) and at follow-up (T1: 5 weeks; T2: 5–6 months), with Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI: only at T0), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Resilience Scale for Adult (RSA), Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ), Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14).

Results

Data collection is still ongoing. We expect to find a better quality of life and higher self-esteem in patients undergoing surgery first approach.

Conclusion

Satisfaction is crucial for patients’ adherence to treatment and to avoid revolving door. Clinical implications will be discussed.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Anger Expression, Impulsivity And Expressed Emotion: a Comparison Between Patients With Eating Disorder And Schizophrenia

Introduction

The level of express emotion (EE) is a measure of the attitude of close relatives towards a patient and include dimensions as critical comments, hostility and emotional over-involvement. Anger and impulsivity may lead to self-injurious and aggressive behaviours, and often represent an obstacle to treatment.

Aims

To compare anger expression, impulsivity and expressed emotion in ED and SCHZ, and to explore the different level of caregivers’ EE in the two groups.

Methods

Twenty-five female with ED diagnosis and 25 patients with schizophrenia, were recruited at the Psychiatry Ward and outpatient Service of AOU – Novara, during one year period. Patient's assessment included Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), Structured Clinical Interview (SCID 1-2), Level of Expressed Emotion Scale (LEE), Paykel scale, State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAY 1-2), State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXY), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11).

Results

Levels of anxiety (both state and trait) are higher in the ED group than in SCHZ. As far as the STAXY is concerned, SCHZ patients score higher than ED ones on control over anger, while general index of anger expression was higher in ED patients. We did not find significant differences in EE between two groups, except for the patient's emotional response of the patient to the disease, which was greater among SCHZ. Both SCHZ and ED patients scored higher on the LEE, Paykel and STAY than their caregivers.

Conclusions

SCHZ and ED patients show different patterns of anxiety and anger, but similar profile as far as EE is concerned. Implications for treatment will be discussed.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Reliable variables in the exsanguinated patient which indicate damage control and predict outcome

BACKGROUND

Exsanguination as a syndrome is ill defined. The objectives of this study were to investigate the relationship between survival and patient characteristics--vital signs, factors relating to injury and treatment; determine if threshold levels of pH, temperature, and highest estimated blood loss can predict survival; and identify predictive factors for survival and to initiate damage control.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective 6-year study was conducted, 1993 to 1998. In all, 548 patients met one or more criteria: (1) estimated blood loss > or =2,000 mL during trauma operation; (2) required > or =1,500 mL packed red blood cells (PRBC) during resuscitation; or (3) diagnosis of exsanguination. Analysis was made in two phases: (1) death versus survival in emergency department (ED); (2) death versus survival in operating room (OR). Statistical methods were Fisher's exact test, Student's t test, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

For 548 patients, mean Revised Trauma Score 4.38, mean Injury Severity Score 32. Penetrating injuries 82% versus blunt injuries 18%. Vital statistics in emergency department: mean blood pressure 63 mm Hg, heart rate 78 beats per minute. Mean OR pH 7.15 and temperature 34.3 degrees C. Mortality was 379 of 548 (69%). Predictive factors for mortality (means): pH < or =7.2, temperature <34 degrees C, OR blood replacement >4,000 mL, total OR fluid replacement >10,000 mL, estimated blood loss >15 mL/minute (P <0.001). Analysis 1: death versus survival in ED, logistic regression. Independent risk factors for survival: penetrating trauma, spontaneous ventilation, and no ED thoracotomy (P <0.001; probability of survival 0.99613). Analysis 2: death versus survival in OR, logistic regression. Independent risk factors for survival: ISS < or =20, spontaneous ventilation in ED, OR PRBC replacement <4,000 mL, no ED or OR thoracotomy, absence of abdominal vascular injury (P <0.001, max R(2) 0.55, concordance 89%).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival rates can be predicted in exsanguinating patients. "Damage control" should be performed using these criteria. Knowledge of these patterns can be valuable in treatment selection.

Penetrating esophageal injuries: multicenter study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to define the period of time after which delays in management incurred by investigations cause increased morbidity and mortality. The outcome study is intended to correlate time with death from esophageal causes, overall complications, esophageal related complications, and surgical intensive care unit length of stay.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 34 trauma centers in the United States, under the auspices of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-institutional Trials Committee over a span of 10.5 years. Patients surviving to reach the operating room (OR) were divided into two groups: those that underwent diagnostic studies to identify their injuries (preoperative evaluation group) and those that went immediately to the OR (no preoperative evaluation group). Statistical methods included Fisher's exact test, Student's T test, and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The study involved 405 patients: 355 male patients (86.5%) and 50 female patients (13.5%). The mean Revised Trauma Score was 6.3, the mean Injury Severity Score was 28, and the mean time interval to the OR was 6.5 hours. There were associated injuries in 356 patients (88%), and an overall complication rate of 53.5%. Overall mortality was 78 of 405 (19%). Three hundred forty-six patients survived to reach the OR: 171 in the preoperative evaluation group and 175 in the no preoperative evaluation group. No statistically significant differences were noted in the two groups in the following parameters: number of patients, age, Injury Severity Score, admission blood pressure, anatomic location of injury (cervical or thoracic), surgical management (primary repair, resection and anastomosis, resection and diversion, flaps), number of associated injuries, and mortality. Average length of time to the OR was 13 hours in the preoperative evaluation group versus 1 hour in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001). Overall complications occurred in 134 in the preoperative evaluation group versus 87 in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001), and 74 (41%) esophageal related complications occurred in the preoperative evaluation group versus 32 (19%) in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.003). Mean surgical intensive care unit length of stay was 11 days in the preoperative evaluation group versus 7 days in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.012). Logistic regression analysis identified as independent risk factors for the development of esophageal related complications included time delays in preoperative evaluation (odds ratio, 3.13), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grade >2 (odds ratio, 2.62), and resection and diversion (odds ratio, 4.47).

CONCLUSION

Esophageal injuries carry a high morbidity and mortality. Increased esophageal related morbidity occurs with the diagnostic workup and its inherent delay in operative repair of these injuries. For centers practicing selective management of penetrating neck injuries and transmediastinal gunshot wounds, rapid diagnosis and definitive repair should be made a high priority.

Operative management and outcome of 302 abdominal vascular injuries

BACKGROUND

Abdominal vascular injuries incur high mortality rates. The purposes of this study are (1) review institutional experience, (2) determine additive effect on mortality of multiple vessel injuries, (3) determine mortality of combined arterial and venous injuries, and (4) correlate mortality with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) for abdominal vascular injury.

METHODS

A retrospective 6-year study was made at an urban level I trauma center of patients with abdominal vascular injuries. Main outcome measure was survival.

RESULTS

(1) There was a total of 302 patients, mean age 28, mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) 25 (range 4 to 75). Mechanism of injury was penetrating in 266 (88%), blunt in 36 (12%). Emergency Department thoracotomy was done in 43 of 302 (14%), 504 vessels were injured: arteries 238(47%), veins 266(53%). Surgical management was ligation 245, primary repair 141, prosthetic interposition grafts 24, autogenous 2. Overall mortality was 162 of 302 (54%). (2) Mortality multiple vessels injured: 1 vessel 160 (45%), 2 vessels 102 (60%), 3 vessels 33 (73%), >4 vessels 5 (100%). Mortality arterial injuries: aorta isolated (I) 78% versus combined with other arterial injuries (C) 82.4%, superior mesenteric artery (SMA) I 47.6% versus C 71.4%, iliac I 53% versus C 72.7%, renal I 37.5% versus C 66.7%. Venous injuries: inferior vena cava (IVC) isolated (I) 70% versus combined with other venous injuries (C) 77.7%, superior mesenteric vein (SMV) I 52.7% versus C 65%, IMV I 16% versus C 50%. (3) Specific mortality combined arterial and venous injuries: aorta plus IVC 93%, SMA plus SMV 43%, iliac artery plus vein 45.5%. (4) Mortality versus AAST-OIS: grade II 25%, grade III 32%, grade IV 65%, grade V 88%.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal vascular injuries are highly lethal. Multiple arterial and venous injuries increase mortality. Mortality correlates with AAST-OIS for abdominal vascular injury.