Structural analysis of two HLA-DR-presented autoantigenic epitopes: crucial role of peripheral but not central peptide residues for T-cell receptor recognition

Specific and major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted T-cell recognition of antigenic peptides is based on interactions of the T-cell receptor (TCR) with the MHC alpha helices and solvent exposed peptide residues termed TCR contacts. In the case of MHC class II-presented peptides, the latter are located in the positions p2/3, p5 and p7/8 between MHC anchor residues. For numerous epitopes, peptide substitution studies have identified the central residue p5 as primary TCR contact characterized by very low permissiveness for peptide substitution, while the more peripheral positions generally represent auxiliary TCR contacts. In structural studies of TCR/peptide/MHC complexes, this has been shown to be due to intimate contact between the TCR complementarity determining region (CDR) three loops and the central peptide residue. We asked whether this model also applied to two HLA-DR presented epitopes derived from an antigen targeted in type 1 diabetes. Large panels of epitope variants with mainly conservative single substitutions were tested for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II binding affinity and T cell stimulation. Both epitopes bind with high affinity to the presenting HLA-DR molecules. However, in striking contrast to the standard distribution of TCR contacts, recognition of the central p5 residue displayed high permissiveness even for non-conservative substitutions, while the more peripheral p2 and p8 TCR contacts showed very low permissiveness for substitution. This suggests that intimate TCR interaction with the central peptide residue is not always required for specific antigen recognition and can be compensated by interactions with positions normally acting as auxiliary contacts.

Identification of peptides from autoantigens GAD65 and IA-2 that bind to HLA class II molecules predisposing to or protecting from type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes is a T-cell-mediated disease in which presentation of autoantigens to CD4+ T-cells is thought to play a crucial role. Polymorphism of HLA class II genes accounts for 50% of the genetic risk of contracting type 1 diabetes. HLA-DQ and -DR molecules predisposing to or protecting from type 1 diabetes have been identified, but the molecular basis controlling these associations is as yet undefined. Apart from distinct thymic selection of autoreactive T-cells by susceptible and protective HLA molecules, exclusive presentation of autoantigenic peptides by type 1 diabetes-predisposing HLA molecules or, alternatively, induction of regulatory T-cells by protective alleles are potential mechanisms for modification of type 1 diabetes risk by HLA polymorphism. As a first step in exploring the role of HLA molecules in autoantigen-specific cellular responses in type 1 diabetes, we have screened peptides covering the sequence of two major autoantigens targeted by humoral and cellular immune responses, GAD65 and islet associated-2 (IA-2), for binding to class II molecules. We developed a sensitive novel competition binding assay allowing us to measure peptide binding on intact cells to 10 HLA-DR and 4 HLA-DQ molecules. For all tested alleles, multiple peptides binding with high affinity were identified. We report clustering of binding peptides in the COOH-terminal regions of GAD65 and IA-2, as well as highly promiscuous binding patterns of some peptides. Our results demonstrate that most peptides derived from the GAD and IA-2 autoantigens can bind to both type 1 diabetes-predisposing and type 1 diabetes-protective HLA molecules, although some exceptions were observed. The binding inventory presented here for GAD and IA-2 peptides can be useful for mapping natural epitopes and predicting peptide-specific responses induced by preventive immunization.

CTLA-4 gene polymorphism is associated with predisposition to coeliac disease

BACKGROUND

Susceptibility to coeliac disease is strongly associated with particular HLA class II alleles. However, non-HLA genetic factors are likely to be required for the development of the disease. Among candidate genes is the CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated) gene located on chromosome 2q33 in humans, which encodes a cell surface molecule providing a negative signal for T cell activation.

AIMS

To investigate CTLA-4 exon 1 polymorphism (position 49 A/G) in patients with coeliac disease.

PATIENTS

101 patients with coeliac disease and 130 healthy controls.

METHODS

Allele specific hybridisation and restriction enzyme digestion of polymerase chain reaction amplified genomic DNA.

RESULTS

The A allele of the CTLA-4 position 49 polymorphism was found on 82.2% of chromosomes in patients with coeliac disease compared with 65.8% in controls (p < 0.0001), mostly in the homozygous form (68.3% in patients versus 47.7% in controls; odds ratio (OR) 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37 to 4.06, p = 0.002). Four patients only had the G/G genotype compared with 21 controls (OR 0.21, CI 10.07 to 0.64, p = 0.002). These differences were maintained when subjects were stratified according to the HLA class II phenotype, in particular when patients and controls were matched for the presence of the predisposing HLA DQB1*02 (DQ2) allele or HLA-DQA1*0501/DQB1*02 heterodimer.

CONCLUSION

The CTLA-4 gene polymorphism is a non-HLA determinant that predisposes to coeliac disease. Whether it directly contributes to disease susceptibility or represents a marker for a locus in linkage disequilibrium with CTLA-4 needs further investigation.

Contribution of DRB1*04 variants to predisposition to or protection from insulin dependent diabetes mellitus is independent of dq

Certain DQ alpha/beta dimeric molecules have been shown to play a major role in determining susceptibility or resistance to IDDM. Whether or not predisposition associated with DR4 haplotypes is exclusively due to linkage to DQB1*0302 and DQA1*0301 alleles is still a controversial issue. A modifying effect of certain DRB1*04 subtypes on the susceptibility encoded by DQ alleles is possible, since not all DRB1*04-DQB1*0302 haplotypes are associated with the disease. The distribution of DRB1*04 subtypes was analysed in 240 DR4-positive Caucasian IDDM patients and 110 DR4-positive healthy controls using allele-specific hybridization after genomic amplification. Although an important contribution to IDDM predisposition was encoded by the DQB1*0302 allele which was found in the majority of patients (94.2% vs 64.7% in controls, Odd's ratio OR = 8.8, P < 0.0001), differences between DRB1*04 variants persisted after the effect of the DQB1 locus was removed by matching patients and controls for DQB1*0302. Thus, the DRB1*0402 allele conferred a strong IDDM-predisposing effect (OR = 3.1, P < 0.02) which was highly significant in the absence of DR3 on the second haplotype (OR = 5.6, P < 0.0001) but was not visible among DR3/4 heterozygote individuals. Conversely, the DRB1*0404 allele conferred a strong protective effect (OR = 0.26, P < 0.0001) which was dominant even in the presence of the associated high risk DR3 haplotype (OR = 0.21, P < 0.03). These data indicate that DQ molecules are not the sole contributors to the DR4-associated IDDM predisposition, and that peculiar DR4 subtypes play a significant role in susceptibility to or protection from the disease. DRB1*0402 differs from DRB1*0404 by only two acidic residues at positions 70 and 71 within the peptide binding groove, instead of amide and basic amino acids. This might induce changes of peptide binding specificity that correlate with the genetic linkage of IDDM predisposition.