Learning from the challenges of undertaking an evaluation of a multi-partner housing support initiative delivered within a hospital setting

Objectives

We present learning from a mixed-methods evaluation of a housing support initiative for hospital inpatients.

Study design

A mixed-methods process evaluation.

Methods

A social housing provider delivered a housing support service in two hospitals (mental health unit and general hospital). Healthcare providers, the social housing provider and academic researchers designed and undertook a co-produced, mixed-methods process evaluation of the intervention. The evaluation included questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, analysis of routinely collected data and economic analysis. Despite commitment from the partners, the evaluation faced challenges. We reflect on the lessons learnt within our discussion paper.

Results

Despite the commitment of the partners, we faced several challenges.

We took an iterative approach to the design and processes of the evaluation to respond to arising challenges. Recruitment of service-users was more difficult than anticipated, requiring additional staff resources. Given the small-scale nature of the intervention, and the quality of data recorded in hospital records, the planned economic analysis was not feasible. Positive factors facilitating evaluation included involvement of staff delivering the intervention, as well as managers. Being able to offer payment to partner organisations for staff time also facilitated ongoing engagement.

Conclusions

Multi-partner evaluations are useful, however, researchers and partners need to be prepared to take an iterative, resource intensive approach. Both availability and quality of routine data, and the resources required to support data collection, may limit feasibility of specific methods when evaluating small-scale cross-sector initiatives. Thus, this necessitates a flexible approach to design and analysis.

Canine coronavirus subtype 2a associated with outbreaks of fatal diarrhoea in bush dog (Speothos venaticus) groups

INTRODUCTION

Three outbreaks of fatal diarrhoea occurred in bush dog (Speothos venaticus) groups at two zoological collections in the United Kingdom between 2009 and 2017. In all cases, the predominant clinical signs were diarrhoea, anorexia and severe loss of condition. Despite supportive treatment, a number of fatalities occurred during each outbreak. Common gross post mortem findings were emaciation, with erythema, mucosal haemorrhage, and ulceration of the gastrointestinal tract. Histopathological features included villus blunting and fusion, crypt epithelial loss and lymphoid depletion, supporting a viral aetiology and canine coronavirus was suspected. Diagnosis was confirmed on the basis of serology (rising antibody titres) and the detection of viral nucleic acid using polymerase chain reaction. The canine coronavirus was subtyped as type 2a, which is known to cause systemic fatal disease in immature domestic dogs. To the authors' knowledge, these are the first reported cases of fatal diarrhoea associated with canine coronavirus type 2a in bush dogs. These outbreaks suggest that adult bush dogs are highly susceptible to canine coronavirus infection and may succumb to viral enteritis.

Exploring young people's perspectives of inequalities in health: a qualitative study

Background

Reducing inequalities in health is an enduring global public health challenge. Worryingly in England, inequalities across some groups and places are worsening, highlighted and exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic. While there has been growing interest in exploring public understandings of health inequalities, few studies have explored the views of young people. Our study seeks to redress this by exploring young people's perspectives of inequalities in health.

Methods

Working with existing youth organisations, we recruited young people (aged 13-21) from six youth groups in areas of high deprivation across three geographical locations in England. Each group took part in three interlinked focus groups (n = 18), the majority of which were run online using video conferencing platforms. Focus groups were co-delivered with partnering youth organisations during 2021. They involved participatory concept mapping activities, and the discussion of health related news articles.

Results

Key themes emerged around young people's perspectives of: i) factors influencing health within their local area; ii) understandings of inequalities in health; and iii) key messages to convey to those with a role in addressing health inequalities at a place level.

Conclusions

Our study highlights the importance of exploring and understanding young people's perspectives of inequalities in order to better shape policies which are supported by the communities and people they impact.

Key messages

Young people have a nuanced, experiential understanding of key factors influencing their health and inequalities in health within their local areas. Building upon young people’s understandings of inequalities in health provides opportunities to mobilise support for policies seeking to change the distribution of key social determinants.

Reducing inequalities in child health: a case study in an English local authority

Background

Many health outcomes for children and young people in England, UK remain poor compared to international peers, with persistent inequalities across the country. Our study sought to understand, from the perspectives of local stakeholders, the key factors affecting the development and implementation of policy to improve child health and reduce inequalities.

Methods

We carried out a detailed case study in an English local authority area. Our fieldwork comprised: documentary review of local policies, observation of key strategic and operational meetings and semi-structured interviews with local stakeholders. We followed Jessop's (2016) approach in using specific policy areas and policies (mental health, obesity and the early years) as 'entry points' to understand the local context.

Results

First, and most importantly, there was an overriding consensus that local action to reduce inequalities in child health is hampered by a persistent unequal distribution of the social determinants of health. Second, local stakeholders highlighted the damaging impact of austerity measures and poverty in the UK, which, they argued, had impacted most upon the most vulnerable. Third, while national policies often provided a framework and incentive for local action, there was an emphasis on the importance of local knowledge and place-based approaches, developed through close work with communities.

Conclusions

Our study highlights the need for progressive policies to begin to reduce the uneven distribution of the social determinants of health to enable local stakeholders to make progress in tackling inequalities in child health. It emphasises the futility of funding national policies to improve child health and reduce inequalities in the context of greatly reduced budgets for local authorities. National policy should also facilitate the mobilisation of context specific knowledge, produced in conjunction with community members.

Key messages

Our work evidences the pressing need to address structural inequalities and adequately resource and facilitate work to reduce inequalities at a local level. National policy should facilitate the mobilisation of context specific knowledge, produced in conjunction with community members.

A qualitative study of the impact of the UK 'bedroom tax'

Background

The implementation of the ‘Removal of the Spare Room Subsidy’ in April 2013, commonly known as the ‘bedroom tax’, affects an estimated 660 000 working age social housing tenants in the UK, reducing weekly incomes by £12–£22. This study aimed to examine the impact of this tax on health and wellbeing in a North East England community in which 68.5% of residents live in social housing.

Methods

Qualitative study using interviews and a focus group with 38 social housing tenants and 12 service providers.

Results

Income reduction affected purchasing power for essentials, particularly food and utilities. Participants recounted negative impacts on mental health, family relationships and community networks. The hardship and debt that people experienced adversely affected their social relationships and ability to carry out normal social roles. Residents and service providers highlighted negative impacts on the neighbourhood, as well as added pressure on already strained local services.

Conclusions

The bedroom tax has increased poverty and had broad-ranging adverse effects on health, wellbeing and social relationships within this community. These findings strengthen the arguments for revoking this tax.