Impact of homeometric autoregulation using a stepwise change in heart rate on dP/dtmax and time to peak dP/dt with resynchronization therapy

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Norwegian South East heath Authorities

Background

We investigated the homeometric autoregulation utilizing a stepwise change in heart rate on dP/dtmax and time to peak dP/dt (Td) with biventricular pacing (BIVP) and the LV lead positioned in the apical, anterior and lateral positions. Pacing at low HR (LHR) and high heart rates (HHR) changes contractility through homeometric autoregulation (Bowditch effect) without changing the resynchronization itself.

Purpose

To determine the effect of a change in contractility through homeometric autoregulation on two different effect measures of resynchronization therapy.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients in heart failure with LBBB underwent CRT implantation with continuous LV pressure registration. The LV lead was first placed in either apical or anterior position followed by a permanent placement in a lateral position. Sequential BIVP pacing was performed for one minute, at a rate 10% above intrinsic heart rate (LHR = 75 ± 9bpm), before dP/dtmax measurements were recorded, and the sequence was repeated with pacing rate increased by 30% (HHR = 98 ± 11bpm). Td was defined as the time from pacemaker stimuli to peak dP/dt. Mixed linear models were used for statistics, numbers are estimated marginal means ± SEM. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

DP/dtmax was higher with HHR in lateral position (1036 ± 41mmHg/s) than with LHR (933mmHg/s). The same was observed for all other lead positions. However, there was no difference between lateral position with LHR and apical position with HHR (930 ± 44mmHg/s). There were no differences in Td between LHR and HHR, but Td was shorter with BIVP in lateral position at pacing LHR (158 ± 4ms) and HHR (155 ± 4ms) than in all other positions. Overall dP/dtmax increased by 10% from LHR to HHR (888 ± 41mmHg/s vs. 980 ± 41 mmHg/s), while overall Td decreased by 2.4% from 168 ± 4ms to 164 ± 4ms. We found a linear relationship between Td and dP/dtmax (R = 0.7) with β=-0.07 that would indicate a 6ms reduction in Td going from LHR to HHR. The overall change in Td from LHR to HHR could therefore be attributed to the change in dP/dtmax.

Conclusion

Homeometric regulation does not influence Td, but Td is sensitive to changes in resynchronization and pacing lead position. Td is shorter with BIVP in lateral position at both high and low HR as would be expected from a biomarker of resynchronization. HR influences dP/dtmax so distinction between optimal and non-optimal positions using dP/dtmax may be difficult without knowledge of homeometric state.

Comparison of adaptive and non-adaptive pacing modes on time-to-peak dP/dt in multipoint pacing or standard biventricular pacing with different degrees of intraventricular fusion

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Norwegian South-East Health Authorities

Background

We have investigated the timing of the peak left ventricular pressure rise, time to peak dP/dt (Td) as marker of resynchronization to be measured during implantation for detection of effective resynchronization. Td links the time domain (dyssynchrony) to the mechanical domain (pressure) as the dyssynergic muscular contractions resulting from electrical dyssynchrony delays pressure development and hence the timing of peak dP/dt, Td. Td shortens with resynchronization.

Purpose

In this study we investigated the acute changes in Td by comparing pacing the left ventricle (LV) with fusion of intrinsic right ventricular (RV) conduction (Adaptive, A) with pacing RV and LV (Non-Adaptive, NA), with and without multipoint pacing (MPP) and with different degrees of intraventricular pacing delays (RV-LV).

Methods

19 patients with sinus rhythm and LBBB undergoing CRT implantation were studied. We measured pressures with an indwelling LV pressure catheter. Td was calculated as the time from onset of pacing to peak dP/dt, and averaged in 10 subsequent beats at each stage of pacing. We used quadripolar LV pacing leads positioned in what was considered an optimal mid/basal posterolateral/ lateral branch of the coronary sinus and sequential pacing (DDD) was performed; Adaptive and Non-Adaptive pacing was performed at LV distal [LVdist], proximal electrode [LVprox] and at both electrodes as multipoint pacing [MPP]. VV-timing: LV pacing was performed relative to QRS onset (either as a result of intrinsic activation or RV pace, mean ± SD): 1. LV only -76 ± 21ms before QRS activation with minimal fusion with RV activation (LVonly); 2. -28 ± 14ms before QRS activation (Pre); 3. 12 ± 15ms after (Post) QRS activation. Linear mixed models were used for statistics of the pooled data. Results are estimated marginal means ±SEM, and only significant P < 0.05 changes are reported.

Results

Average Td (data pooled) with RVP was 173 ± 2ms, MPP 144 ± 0.4ms and BIVP 150 ± 0.4ms. When analyzing the interaction between pacingmode (A,NA), VV-timing (LVonly,Pre,Post) and electrode(LVdist,LVprox,MPP) in all interventions we found that Td was shorter (p < 0.01) with A(Post) for all electrode combinations [LVdist] 143 ± 4ms, [LVprox] 140 ± 4ms and [MPP] 134 ± 4ms, while Td with A(Pre) was shorter with [MPP] 139 ± 4ms only. A(post)[MPP] provided shorter Td than the other adaptive modes (p < 0.01). NA(Post)[MPP] at 145 ± 4ms and NA(Post)[LVdist] at 146 ± 4ms provided the shortest Td (p < 0.01) of the NA pacing modes, and Td with NA(Post)[MPP] was shorter (p < 0.01) than all NA pacing modes.

Conclusion

Td shortens the most with LV MPP timed to near simultaneous intrinsic RV activation, indicating a beneficial mechanical effect from Adaptive MPP compared to standard biventricular pacing.

The missing link- time to maximal rate of left ventricular pressure rise reflects resynchronization with biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Norwegian South East Health Authorities

Introduction

Resynchronization therapy effectively restores myocardial function. No measures exist that specifically quantifies resynchronization. A parameter that quantifies resynchronization should be able to detect effective resynchronization and should not respond to changes in contractility caused by heterometric regulation.  Left ventricular pacing (LVP) is associated with dyssynchronous contraction patterns, while biventricular pacing (BIVP) promotes resynchronization dependent on the pacing position of the LV electrode.

Purpose

We compared the acute differences between BIVP and LVP with regards to the preload dependent maximum rate of the LV pressure rise (dP/dtmax), and time to peak dP/dt (Td) to determine which better reflect dyssynchrony and resynchronization.

Methods

Twenty nine patients in heart failure with LBBB underwent CRT implantation with continuous LV pressure registration. The LV lead was first placed in either apical or anterior position followed by a permanent placement in a lateral position. Sequential LVP and BIVP pacing were performed for one minute, at a rate 10% above intrinsic heart rate, before dP/dtmax measurements were recorded. For LVP, BIVP and RVP a patient specific AV delay was used to avoid fusion with intrinsic conduction. Td was defined as the time from pacemaker stimuli to peak dP/dt. Mixed linear models were used for statistics, numbers are estimated marginal means ± SEM and are only reported when with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

We found no differences in dP/dtmax between BIVP (899 ± 37mmHg/s) and LVP (910 ± 37mmHg/s), while RVP (799 ± 37mmHg/s) was lower. Td was lower with BIVP (165 ± 4ms) than LVP (178 ± 4ms) and RVP (184 ± 4ms).  We found no differences in dP/dtmax between lateral (890 ± 35mmHg/s) and anterior (874 ± 38mmHg/s) while apical (824 ± 38mmHg/s) was lower. Td was lower in lateral (171 ± 4ms) than in anterior (179 ± 4ms) and apical (182 ± 4ms) positions. BIVP in lateral position (158 ± 4ms) was lower than any other pacingmode*position, with BIVP*anterior at 173 ± 4ms) and LVP*lateral at 170 ± 2ms. No difference was seen in dP/dtmax between  (BIVP + LVP)*(lateral + anterior) that was higher than all other pacingmode*positions.

Conclusion

Td shortens with BIVP and lateral position, and even more so with BIVP in lateral position and thus reflects resynchronization compared to all other combinations tested. DP/dtmax did not reflect resynchronization as BIVP/LVP and lateral/anterior performs equally good. There are no differences between dP/dtmax with any combination of pacing mode (BIVP + LVP) with position (anterior + lateral). This suggests that Td reflects resynchronization while dP/dtmax does not. Resynchronization with biventricular pacing in lateral position translates into a shorter Td and hence links electrical and mechanical events. Td could be the missing link between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony and may serve as a biomarker for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Time delay to peak left ventricular pressure rise identifies the substrate for dyssynchronous heart failure and detects disease modification with resynchronization- an observational clinical study

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Norwegian South East Health Authorities

Introduction

Identification of disease modification prior to implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy may help select the right patients, increase responder-rates and promote the utilization of CRT. We tested the hypothesis that shortening of time-to-peak left ventricular pressure rise (Td) with CRT is useful to predict long-term volumetric response (End-systolic volume (ESV) decrease >15%) to CRT.

Methods

Forty-five heart failure patients admitted for CRT implantation with a class I/IIa indication according to current ESC/AHA guidelines were included in the study. Td was measured from onset QRS at baseline and from onset of pacing with CRT.

Results

Baseline characteristics were mean age 63 ± 10 years , 71% males, NYHA class 2.5, 87% LBBB, QRS duration 173 ± 15ms, EF biplane 31 ± 1%, ESV 144 ± 12mL and end-diastolic volume 2044 ± 14mL. At 6-months follow-up six patients increased ESV by 5 ± 8%, while 37 responders (85%) had a mean ESV decrease of 40 ± 2%.  Responders presented with a higher Td at baseline compared to non-responders (163 ± 4ms vs 119 ± 9ms, p < 0.01). Td decreased to 156 ± 4ms (p = 0.02) with CRT in responders, while in non-responders Td increased to 147 ± 10ms (p < 0.01) with CRT. A decrease in Td of less than +3.5ms from baseline accurately identified responders to therapy (AUC 0.98, p < 0.01, sensitivity 97%, specificity 100%). AUC was 0.92 for baseline Td and a cut-off at 120ms yielded a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 80% to identify volumetric responders. A linear relationship between the change in Td from baseline and ESV decrease on long term was found (β=-61, R = 0.58, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Td at baseline and the shortening of Td with CRT accurately identifies responders to CRT, with incremental value on top of current guidelines, in a population with already high response rates. Td carries the potential to become the marker for prediction of long-term volumetric response in CRT candidates. Abstract Figure.

Regional myocardial work as determinant of heart failure in left bundle branch block

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): The Norwegian Health Association

Background

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) worsen prognosis in heart failure patients. LBBB may also cause heart failure in otherwise healthy individuals. The mechanical changes induced by LBBB are potential determinants of heart failure in these patients, but their relation to left ventricular (LV) systolic function is incompletely understood.

Purpose

This study investigates the contribution of regional contractile function to heart failure in patients with LBBB.

Methods

In 76 patients with LBBB and 11 healthy controls, myocardial strain was measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography and myocardial work by pressure-strain analysis. Patients with ischemic heart disease or myocardial scarring were excluded. LBBB patients were stratified by LV ejection fraction (EF) >50% (EFpreserved), 36-50% (EFmid), and ≤35% (EFlow). 62 LBBB patients subsequently underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation and was re-examined at 6 months.

Results

Septal work was significantly and successively reduced from controls, EFpreserved, EFmid, to EFlow (1977 ± 506, 1025 ± 342, 601 ± 494 and -41 ± 303 mmHg·%, respectively, all p < 0.01) (Figure 1). There was a strong correlation (R = 0.84, p < 0.01) between septal work and LVEF. In contrast, work in the LV lateral wall was preserved in both EFpreserved (2367 ± 459 mmHg·%) and EFmid (2252 ± 449 mmHg·%) vs controls (2062 ± 459 mmHg·%, all NS). In the EFlow group, however, LV lateral wall work was reduced (1473 ± 568 mmHg·%, p < 0.01 vs controls). Thus, lateral wall function was not correlated with LVEF in patients with LVEF >35% (NS). At six month CRT septal work was markedly increased (165 ± 485 vs 1288 ± 523 mmHg·%, p < 0.01) and LV lateral wall work reduced (1730 ± 620 vs 1264 ± 490 mmHg·%, p < 0.01). LVEF increased from 32 ± 8 to 47 ± 10 % (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Heart failure in LBBB patients is determined by degree of septal dysfunction. LV lateral wall function, on the other hand, is preserved in the early phase of heart failure and was only reduced in patients with severe heart failure. Further clinical studies should investigate if measuring LV lateral wall function can increase precision in patient selection for CRT.

Abstract Figure.

Elevated septal wall stress - a driver of left ventricular dysfunction in left bundle branch block?

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): The Norwegian Health Association

Background

Septal dysfunction is a main feature of left bundle branch block (LBBB), and increasing wall stress is a proposed mechanism of heart failure development in LBBB patients. To try to reveal the pathophysiologic pathway from dyssynchrony to heart failure, we investigated the relationship between septal and left ventricular (LV) lateral wall stress in patients with LBBB.

Hypothesis

Increased septal wall stress causes septal dysfunction in LBBB.

Methods

We included 24 LBBB-patients (65 ± 11 years, 11 males) with LV ejection fraction (EF) ranging from 18 to 67%, and 8 healthy controls (58 ± 10 years, 4 males). Wall stress was calculated at peak LV pressure (LVP) according to the law of La Place ([LVP x radius]/[wall thickness]). Wall thickness was measured using M-mode, and regional curvature was measured in mid-ventricular shortaxis from 2D echocardiographic images. We used a previously validated non-invasive method to estimate LVP from brachial blood pressure and adjusted for valvular events. Myocardial scar was ruled out by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

Wall stress was significantly higher in septum than LV lateral wall at peak LVP (48 ± 12 vs 37 ± 11 kPa, p < 0.01) in LBBB patients, while no difference was seen in the controls (Figure A). In patients, septal wall thickening showed a strong correlation with LVEF (r = 0.77, p < 0.01) (Figure B). Similar correlation was not significant for the LV lateral wall (r = 0.13, NS). Attenuation of septal wall thickening in LBBB-patients correlated well with increasing septal wall stress (r=-0.60, p < 0.01). Wall thickening and stress did not correlate in the LV lateral wall (r=-0.14, NS).

Conclusion

Increased septal wall stress is associated with reduced systolic thickening in patients with LBBB. Septal wall thickening, in contrast to LV lateral wall thickening, was correlated to global LV function. These findings suggest that septal remodeling which could have normalized septal wall stress, was not achieved and heart failure may develop.

Abstract Figure.

553 Acute re-distribution of regional left ventricular work by cardiac resynchronization therapy determines long-term remodelling

Background

In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block (LBBB), different regions of the left ventricle (LV) have been shown to perform different amounts of work. In this study, we investigate the acute impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on regional LV work distribution and its relation to long-term reverse-remodelling.

Methods

We recruited 140 heart failure patients, referred for CRT. Regional myocardial work was calculated from non-invasive echocardiographic segmental stress-strain-loop-area before and immediately after CRT. The magnitude of volumetric reverse-remodelling was determined from the change in LV end-systolic volume (ESV), 11 ± 3 months after implantation. Characteristics of patients with the lowest and highest quartile of LV ESV reverse remodelling (LV ESV reduction of less than 10% and LV ESV reduction of more than -48%) were compared.

Results

Before CRT, myocardial work showed significant differences among the walls of the LV (Figure A). CRT caused an acute re-distribution of myocardial work, on average with most increase in the septum and most decrease laterally (all walls p < 0.05) and lead to a homogeneous work distribution (Figure B). The acute change in the difference between lateral and septal wall work (Δ Lateral-to-septal work) correlated significantly with LV ESV reverse-remodelling (r = 0.63, p < 0.0001). The smallest changes in work were seen in the patients with the least LV ESV reverse remodelling (Figure C, red markers), while patients with the most LV ESV reverse remodelling showed the largest changes in work (Figure C, green markers). In multivariate linear regression analysis, including conventional parameters such as pre-implant QRS duration, LV ejection fraction, LV end-diastolic volume and global longitudinal strain, the re-distribution of work across the septal and lateral walls appeared as the strongest determinant of volumetric reverse-remodelling after CRT (R²=0.393, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The acute re-distribution of regional myocardial work between the septal and lateral wall of the left ventricle is an important determinant of long term reverse-remodelling after CRT-implantation. Our data suggest that modification of regional loading is the mode of action of CRT treatment.

Abstract 553 Figure.