1
|
Villodre C, Taccogna L, Zapater P, Cantó M, Mena L, Ramia JM, Lluís F, Afonso N, Aguilella V, Aguiló J, Alados JC, Alberich M, Apio AB, Balongo R, Bra E, Bravo-Gutiérrez A, Briceño FJ, Cabañas J, Cánovas G, Caravaca I, Carbonell S, Carrera-Dacosta E, Castro EE, Caula C, Choolani-Bhojwani E, Codina A, Corral S, Cuenca C, Curbelo-Peña Y, Delgado-Morales MM, Delgado-Plasencia L, Doménech E, Estévez AM, Feria AM, Gascón-Domínguez MA, Gianchandani R, González C, Hevia RJ, González MA, Hidalgo JM, Lainez M, Lluís N, López F, López-Fernández J, López-Ruíz JA, Lora-Cumplido P, Madrazo Z, Marchena J, de la Cuadra MB, Martín S, Casas MI, Martínez P, Mena-Mateos A, Morales-García D, Mulas C, Muñoz-Forner E, Naranjo A, Navarro-Sánchez A, Oliver I, Ortega I, Ortega-Higueruelo R, Ortega-Ruiz S, Osorio J, Padín MH, Pamies JJ, Paredes M, Pareja-Ciuró F, Parra J, Pérez-Guarinós CV, Pérez-Saborido B, Pintor-Tortolero J, Plua-Muñiz K, Rey M, Rodríguez I, Ruiz C, Ruíz R, Ruiz S, Sánchez A, Sánchez D, Sánchez R, Sánchez-Cabezudo F, Sánchez-Santos R, Santos J, Serrano-Paz MP, Soria-Aledo V, Tallón-Aguilar L, Valdivia-Risco JH, Vallverdú-Cartié H, Varela C, Villar-Del-Moral J, Zambudio N. Simplified risk-prediction for benchmarking and quality improvement in emergency general surgery. Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study. Int J Surg 2022; 97:106168. [PMID: 34785344 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Emergency General Surgery (EGS) conditions account for millions of deaths worldwide, yet it is practiced without benchmarking-based quality improvement programs. The aim of this observational, prospective, multicenter, nationwide study was to determine the best benchmark cutoff points in EGS, as a reference to guide improvement measures. METHODS Over a 6-month period, 38 centers (5% of all public hospitals) attending EGS patients on a 24-h, 7-days a week basis, enrolled consecutive patients requiring an emergent/urgent surgical procedure. Patients were stratified into cohorts of low (i.e., expected morbidity risk <33%), middle and high risk using the novel m-LUCENTUM calculator. RESULTS A total of 7258 patients were included; age (mean ± SD) was 51.1 ± 21.5 years, 43.2% were female. Benchmark cutoffs in the low-risk cohort (5639 patients, 77.7% of total) were: use of laparoscopy ≥40.9%, length of hospital stays ≤3 days, any complication within 30 days ≤ 17.7%, and 30-day mortality ≤1.1%. The variables with the greatest impact were septicemia on length of hospital stay (21 days; adjusted beta coefficient 16.8; 95% CI: 15.3 to 18.3; P < .001), and respiratory failure on mortality (risk-adjusted population attributable fraction 44.6%, 95% CI 29.6 to 59.6, P < .001). Use of laparoscopy (odds ratio 0.764, 95% CI 0.678 to 0.861; P < .001), and intraoperative blood loss (101-500 mL: odds ratio 2.699, 95% CI 2.152 to 3.380; P < .001; and 500-1000 mL: odds ratio 2.875, 95% CI 1.403 to 5.858; P = .013) were associated with increased morbidity. CONCLUSIONS This study offers, for the first time, clinically-based benchmark values in EGS and identifies measures for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Villodre
- Hospital Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canarias, Spain Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain Hospital Lluís Alcanyís de Xàtiva, Valencia, Spain Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain Hospital Marina Baixa, Alicante, Spain Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Infanta Elena, Huelva, Spain Hospital Infanta Cristina, Parla, Madrid, Spain Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain Hospital Reina Sofía de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain H. Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Hospital Pontevedra, Spain Hospital Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain Hospital Mutua Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Barcelona, Spain POVISA, Pontevedra, Spain Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bizkaia, Spain Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain Hospital de Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain Hospital Clínico de Valencia, Valencia, Spain Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain Hospital Vírgen de la Macarena, Sevilla, Spain Hospital Cabueñes, Gijón, Spain Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén, Spain Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Tarragona, Spain Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid, Spain Complejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas, Almería, Spain Hospital Sant Pau i Santa Tecla, Tarragona, Spain Hospital General Rafael Méndez de Lorca, Murcia, Spain Hospital Vírgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain Hospital del Vinalopó, Alicante, Spain Hospital Universitario del Vinalopó, Alicante, Spain Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain Department of Surgery, General University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain Department of Clinical Pharmacology, General University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain Computing, BomhardIP, Alicante, Spain Department of Clinical Documentation, General University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain Institute of Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Figueras J, Sabater L, Planellas P, Muñoz-Forner E, Lopez-Ben S, Falgueras L, Sala-Palau C, Albiol M, Ortega-Serrano J, Castro-Gutierrez E. Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2014; 100:1597-605. [PMID: 24264781 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) remains the single most important source of morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The primary aim of this randomized clinical trial comparing PG with PJ after PD was to test the hypothesis that invaginated PG would result in a lower rate and severity of pancreatic fistula. METHODS Patients undergoing PD were randomized to receive either a duct-to-duct PJ or a double-layer invaginated PG. The primary endpoint was the rate of pancreatic fistula, using the definition of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of severe abdominal complications (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or above), endocrine and exocrine function. RESULTS Of 123 patients randomized, 58 underwent PJ and 65 had PG. The incidence of pancreatic fistula was significantly higher following PJ than for PG (20 of 58 versus 10 of 65 respectively; P = 0.014), as was the severity of pancreatic fistula (grade A: 2 versus 5 per cent; grade B-C: 33 versus 11 per cent; P = 0.006). The hospital readmission rate for complications was significantly lower after PG (6 versus 24 per cent; P = 0.005), weight loss was lower (P = 0.025) and exocrine function better (P = 0.022). CONCLUSION The rate and severity of pancreatic fistula was significantly lower with this PG technique compared with that following PJ. REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN58328599 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Figueras
- Departments of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, 'Dr Josep Trueta' Hospital, Institute of Biomedical Research of Girona (IDIBGI), Girona
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|