Cardiac Sparing with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Enabled Total Body Irradiation (CS VMAT-TBI)

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) enabled total body irradiation (TBI) has replaced conventional TBI in our institution given the improved treatment accuracy, patient comfort, and dose modulation ability. The risk of cardiovascular disease is several folds higher among transplant patients who receive TBI, likely related to dose to the heart. We hypothesize that a cardiac-sparing (CS) VMAT-TBI technique is feasible and can meaningfully reduce dose to the heart while still adequately covering nearby lymphatic tissue.

MATERIALS/METHODS

VMAT-TBI is delivered via multi-isocentric external beams in a frame-based setup. Heart is contoured as per published guidelines. A lymph node contour, which includes tonsils, neck nodal stations, mediastinal, abdominal, retroperitoneal, and pelvic nodes is created. Coverage of the lymph node contour is prioritized over organ-sparing during inverse optimization; with a goal of V90% greater than 99.5% and mean dose less than 800 cGy for the lymph nodes and heart, respectively. An IRB-approved retrospective review was performed with mean heart dose collected for all patients treated with CS VMAT-TBI and compared to a representative cohort of five patients treated with VMAT-TBI without cardiac sparing.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were treated with CS VMAT-TBI between 2020-2022 with a median follow up time of 11.5 months. Mean heart dose was 796 ± 71 cGy in the CS VMAT-TBI compared to 1247 ± 29 cGy in the VMAT-TBI group without cardiac sparing (p < 0.001). Of those treated with CS VMAT-TBI, three patients relapsed; one relapse occurred in bone marrow only, one relapse occurred in bone marrow and cervical, thoracic, and intra-abdominal lymphoid tissues, and one patient was simulated but never received induction therapy due to overt progression. 100-day relapse-free survival and overall survival were 82.5% and 86.2%, respectively. Median survival time has not been met.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac sparing is feasible in VMAT-TBI and is associated with significant decrease in mean heart dose of ∼450 cGy. This is estimated to confer a 33.3% decreased absolute risk for lifetime major coronary events compared to patients treated with VMAT-TBI without cardiac sparing. Although limited by short follow-up time, there does not appear to be a significant risk for early relapse despite de-escalating cardiac tissue, likely due to prioritizing coverage of lymph nodes. Prospective clinical studies are needed to further validate cardiac and other organ at risk sparing VMAT-TBI techniques.

Tracking Changes in Global Longitudinal Strain in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Thoracic Radiation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Thoracic radiation improves survival in many lung cancer patients. However, radiation-induced cardiotoxicity is a major source of morbidity and mortality in such patients. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), a novel echocardiography (ECHO) method of assessing left ventricular function, has been shown to predict long-term adverse cardiovascular risk in diverse patient populations. We hypothesized that receipt of thoracic radiation is associated with GLS changes in lung cancer patients.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with lung cancer treated at our institution between 2005-2020 who had ECHOs performed both before and after RT, and in whom GLS was extractable. ECHO Board-Certified cardio-oncologists measured GLS and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from these ECHOs.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients met inclusion criteria. Median time to ECHO was 78 days prior and 172 days after RT. Two chamber (2C), 3C, 4C, and average GLS were significantly decreased after RT on paired t-test [mean difference (SD) 2.23 (3.29), 2.99 (2.78), 2.25 (3.63), 2.51 (2.66) respectively, all p < 0.001]. Thirteen patients (32.5%) had abnormal GLS (<18%) prior to RT. 5 of those 13 patients (38.5%) had abnormal LVEF (< 50%). 27/40 patients (67.5%) had an abnormal GLS or clinically significant (≥15%) drop in GLS after RT. This difference (32.5% patients pre-RT vs 67.5% post-RT) was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Among patients (n = 27) who had normal LVEF before RT, 1 patient (3.7%) developed abnormal LVEF (<50%) after RT. Backwards logistic regression showed significant interaction between heart volume receiving 5 Gray and change in GLS.

CONCLUSION

This cohort exhibited a significant decrease in 2C, 3C, 4C, and average GLS after RT. ∼1/3 of patients had abnormal GLS at baseline (suggesting a high-risk group for cardiac complications) and 67.5% of patients had clinically significant decrease in GLS after RT. Among the patients with normal GLS before RT, although 51.9% of patients demonstrated a clinically significant drop in GLS after RT, only 3.7% of patients developed abnormal LVEF, suggesting that this is a late occurrence. GLS changes may serve as a valuable tool for early identification of patients who are at high risk for future cardiac complications after receiving thoracic radiation.