Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation: A multicenter pre-post intervention safety evaluation of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator function

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) appears to be beneficial in selected patients with therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, high-dose radiotherapy used for STAR-treatment may affect functioning of the patients' implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) by direct effects of radiation on ICD components or cardiac tissue. Currently, the effect of STAR on ICD functioning remains unknown.

METHODS

A retrospective pre-post multicenter study evaluating ICD functioning in the 12-month before and after STAR was performed. Patients with (non)ischemic cardiomyopathies with therapy-refractory VT and ICD who underwent STAR were included and the occurrence of ICD-related adverse events was collected. Evaluated ICD parameters included sensing, capture threshold and impedance. A linear mixed-effects model was used to investigate the association between STAR, radiotherapy dose and changes in lead parameters over time.

RESULTS

In total, 43 patients (88% male) were included in this study. All patients had an ICD with an additional right atrial lead in 34 (79%) and a ventricular lead in 17 (40%) patients. Median ICD-generator dose was 0.1 Gy and lead tip dose ranged from 0-32 Gy. In one patient (2%), a reset occurred during treatment, but otherwise, STAR and radiotherapy dose were not associated with clinically relevant alterations in ICD leads parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

STAR treatment did not result in major ICD malfunction. Only one radiotherapy related adverse event occurred during the study follow-up without patient harm. No clinically relevant alterations in ICD functioning were observed after STAR in any of the leads. With the reported doses STAR appears to be safe.

Dosimetric Impact of Systematic Mediastinal Staging via Endobronchial Ultrasound for Patients with Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: The SEISMIC Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The SEISMIC trial aims to find the best method for mediastinal staging in patients with lung cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy. Currently, CT or PET-CT scans are standard in clinical practice, but histological evaluation of the mediastinum is performed on a case-by-case basis. The study will examine the effect of systematic histological evaluation using Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) on radiotherapy target volumes. The hypothesis of this study is that differences in staging between the diagnostic PET-CT and EBUS would result in reduced tumor coverage and/or increased doses to organs at risk (OAR).

MATERIALS/METHODS

SEISMIC is a prospective multicenter international cohort study. Patients were enrolled from Australia, the Netherlands, USA and Canada after regional IRB approvals. Patients were treated with 4DCT simulation. Two iGTV and PTV target volumes were delineated for each patient with discordant staging according to both PET-CT and EBUS, as were OARs. Two VMAT plans were generated for each patient based on either PET-CT or EBUS target volumes using knowledge-based planning methodology. Plans aimed to achieve institutional guidelines for target coverage and OAR dose constraints, with a prescribed dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Target coverage and OAR doses for the PET- and EBUS-defined volumes were compared.

RESULTS

In 156 patients, EBUS showed a larger extent of disease than PET in 18 (11.5%) and a smaller extent of lymph node (LN) involvement than PET in 49 (31.4%). Out of 67 patients with PET-EBUS discordant results, 25 underwent upfront radiotherapy and were included in the study. EBUS revealed PET-occult LN involvement in 11/25 patients (44%). In these patients, 10/11 patients received <95% of the prescribed dose to PET-occult LN iGTVs; the median [range] minimum dose to the EBUS iGTV was 9.2 Gy [0.1 - 57.9 Gy]. When planning based on EBUS LN involvement, all patients received ≥95% of the prescribed dose to the iGTV (the median [range] minimum dose to the EBUS iGTV was 58.9 Gy [58.1 - 60.5 Gy]). This resulted in increased median [range] doses to OARs; mean lung dose increased by 1.1 Gy [0.3 - 8.4 Gy], esophagus mean dose increased by 3.6 Gy [0.2 - 24.8 Gy], and mean heart dose increased by 0.5 Gy [-0.6 - 8.5 Gy].

CONCLUSION

Systematic endoscopic evaluation of the mediastinum had a significant effect on tumor coverage in a clinically meaningful proportion of cases and consequent plan adaptation impacted on organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. Results suggest systematic mediastinal LN staging should be considered in all patients prior to curative-intent radiotherapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL ID

ACTRN12617000333314.