[Effect of biliary obstruction on lipoprotein(a) concentration]

OBJECTIVES

This study was appointed to determine the correlation between the concentration of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], apolipoproteins and lipids with biochemical parameters of liver function in a group of patients with reversible cholestasis. We have also determined the concentration of these parameters once solved the biliary obstruction process.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighteen adults over 17 years with extrahepatic cholestasis were included in the study on a prospective basis, and we determined in them biochemical liver function parameters and lipoprotein metabolism parameters, particularly Lp(a) before and after unblocking.

RESULTS

The concentration of Lp(a) prior to desobstruction was inverse and statistically significantly correlated with the concentration of gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (correlation coefficient [r] = -0.757, P = .018). The concentration of Lp(a) (median = 2.66 mg/dL, interquartile range = 5,62) showed a statistically significant increase (median = 9.72 mg/dL, interquartile range = 28.76, P < .001), once the unblocking was performed. Concentrations of total cholesterol and triglycerides had a statistically significant decrease, and HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-1 showed a statistically significant increase once the unblocking was carried out.

CONCLUSIONS

The concentration of Lp(a) is decreased during cholestasis, although there is a significant simultaneous hypercholesterolemia. Cholestasis has a causal role in lowering Lp(a), because the unblocking of bile duct recovers Lp(a) concentration. Our study supports the concept that bile acids exert a controlling effect on the synthesis of Lp(a) and open a mechanism for the treatment of hyper Lp(a).

Effects of long-term cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and acid inhibition on Barrett's oesophagus

BACKGROUND

There is an overexpression of cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX-2) in Barrett's oesophagus (BO).

AIM

To determine the long-term effect of a COX-2 inhibitor on cellular mechanisms involved in BO.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in BO patients allocated to continue the usual proton pump inhibitor (PPI) alone treatment, or PPI combined with rofecoxib (25 mg/day) for 6 months. Cell proliferation index and COX-2 expression in BO glands was determined in biopsy specimens at baseline and after treatment. Cell apoptosis, cyclin D1, p53 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression was also explored in a subset of patients. Student-t test and the U-Mann-Whitney test were used for quantitative and ordinal variables.

RESULTS

Of 62 patients, 58 completed the study. A higher proportion of patients on rofecoxib + PPI exhibited a decrease in COX-2 expression compared to those treated with PPI alone, but cell proliferation index was not affected. Unlike PPI alone, rofecoxib + PPI was associated with an increase in the apoptotic cell index, a decrease in p53 cell staining and VEGF expression in mucosal vessels. No effect on low-grade dysplasia or cyclin D1 was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of rofecoxib to PPI therapy does not affect cell proliferation index in BO cells after 6 months of therapy, but does reduce COX-2 and VEGF expression and increases cell apoptosis.

A nationwide study of mortality associated with hospital admission due to severe gastrointestinal events and those associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use

BACKGROUND

The worst outcome of gastrointestinal complications is death. Data regarding those associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) or aspirin use are scarce.

AIM

To determine mortality associated with hospital admission due to major gastrointestinal (GI) events and NSAID/aspirin use.

METHODS

The study was based on actual count of deaths from two different data sets from 2001. Study 1 was carried out in 26 general hospitals serving 7,901,198 people. Study 2 used a database from 197 general hospitals, representative of the 269 hospitals in the Spanish National Health System. Information regarding gastrointestinal complications and deaths was obtained throughout the Minimum Basic Data Set (CIE-9-MC) provided by participating hospitals. Deaths attributed to NSAID/aspirin use were estimated on the basis of prospectively collected data from hospitals of study 1.

RESULTS

The incidence of hospital admission due to major GI events of the entire (upper and lower) gastrointestinal tract was 121.9 events/100,000 persons/year, but those related to the upper GI tract were six times more frequent. Mortality rate was 5.57% (95% CI = 4.9-6.7), and 5.62% (95% CI = 4.8-6.8) in study 1 and study 2, respectively. Death rate attributed to NSAID/aspirin use was between 21.0 and 24.8 cases/million people, respectively, or 15.3 deaths/100,000 NSAID/aspirin users. Up to one-third of all NSAID/aspirin deaths can be attributed to low-dose aspirin use.

CONCLUSION

Mortality rates associated with either major upper or lower GI events are similar but upper GI events were more frequent. Deaths attributed to NSAID/ASA use were high but previous reports may have provided an overestimate and one-third of them can be due to low-dose aspirin use.

Low frequency of upper gastrointestinal complications in a cohort of high-risk patients taking low-dose aspirin or NSAIDS and omeprazole

BACKGROUND

There is very little information available on the incidence of complications and on the best prevention therapy in high-risk patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or aspirin. Randomized-controlled trials in such patients are rare for ethical reasons. We studied the incidence of gastrointestinal complications in high-risk patients taking long-term low-dose aspirin or non-aspirin-NSAIDs combined with omeprazole in a real-life clinical setting.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, prospective and observational study including 247 consecutive high-risk patients who had a clinical indication for long-term treatment with either low-dose aspirin or non-aspirin NSAIDs and omeprazole therapy. The occurrence of gastrointestinal complications was measured.

RESULTS

In addition to a recent history of peptic ulcer bleeding, all patients had at least 1 other risk factor and 112 (45.3%) had 3 or more risk factors; 78.9% were taking low-dose aspirin and the remainder non-aspirin NSAIDs. Mean follow-up was 14.6 +/- 10.38 months. Three patients taking low-dose aspirin developed upper gastrointestinal bleeding (1.2%; 95% CI 0.3-3.5; 1.0 event/100 patients/year). This was similar to the rate observed in studies involving non-high-risk patients taking low-dose aspirin and higher than that observed in patients not taking low-dose aspirin. Two additional patients developed a lower gastrointestinal bleeding event (0.81% (0.04%-3.12%); 0.67 events/100 patients/year), which was within the range expected in NSAID users.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of omeprazole in the high-risk patient taking low-dose aspirin or NSAIDs seems to be a safe therapeutic approach in this population and is associated with a low frequency of upper gastrointestinal complications.

Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with non-aspirin cardiovascular drugs, analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with non-aspirin cardiovascular drug therapy, common analgesics and individual nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

The case group was made up of 1122 consecutive patients admitted with bleeding from a peptic lesion. The 2231 control subjects consisted of 1109 patients hospitalized for other reasons and 1122 outpatients from the same geographical area. The relative risk was calculated by unconditional logistic regression after adjusting for confounding factors.

RESULTS

The use of the antiplatelet agent triflusal, and other commonly used cardiovascular drugs, such as beta-receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers, was not associated with increased risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduced the risk of bleeding by 30% (odds ratio 0.7; 95% confidence interval 0.5-0.96). Use of ketorolac (odds ratio 59.4; 95% confidence interval 7.7-454) and piroxicam (odds ratio 19.6; 95% confidence interval 9.3-35.3) carried the highest risk. Use of paracetamol and tramadol was not associated with increased risk of bleeding, but the non-narcotic agent metamizol was associated with a small increase in risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (odds ratio 2.6; 95% confidence interval 1.3-5.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the antiplatelet agent triflusal and other cardiovascular drugs apart from low-dose aspirin was not associated with gastrointestinal bleeding. The use of either NSAIDs or aspirin increased the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding but, among the analgesics, only metamizol induced a small increase in the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Helicobacter pylori increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking low-dose aspirin

AIM

To evaluate the role of Helicobacter pylori infection and other clinical factors in the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking low-dose aspirin.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A case-control study was carried out of consecutive current users of low-dose aspirin admitted because of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Within a cohort of 695 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, 98 patients had taken low-dose aspirin and no other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Controls were 147 low-dose aspirin users without upper gastrointestinal bleeding of similar age, sex and extent of aspirin use as cases. H. pylori infection was determined by CagA/VacA serology and 13C-urea breath test in all cases and controls. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) are provided.

RESULTS

H. pylori infection was identified as an independent risk factor of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in this population (OR, 4.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.0-10.9), but the presence of CagA-positive serology was not. Other risk factors identified were a previous ulcer history (OR, 15.2; 95% CI, 3.8-60.1), alcohol use (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.7-10.4) and use of calcium channel blockers (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.25-5.14). Antisecretory therapy (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.02-0.3) and nitrovasodilators (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.6) decreased the risk of bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori infection is a risk factor for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in low-dose aspirin users, which might have therapeutic implications in high-risk patients.

Nitrovasodilators, low-dose aspirin, other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND The relation between medications that release nitric oxide, such as nitroglycerin and other nitrovasodilators, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding is uncertain. In animals, these medications reduce the gastric damage induced by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Nitric oxide, however, inhibits platelet aggregation and may contribute to bleeding from an ulcer.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study to determine the risk of bleeding in patients taking nitrovasodilators, low-dose aspirin, or other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. The case group was made up of 1122 consecutive patients admitted to one of four hospitals with bleeding from a peptic lesion. The 2231 control subjects were 1109 patients hospitalized for other reasons and 1122 outpatients from the same geographic area.

RESULTS

In the week before admission, 520 (46.3 percent) of the patients with bleeding had taken a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug other than low-dose aspirin, 120 (10.7 percent) had taken low-dose aspirin (< or = 300 mg per day), 60 (5.3 percent) a nitrovasodilator, and 135 (12.0 percent) an antisecretory agent such as a histamine H2-receptor antagonist or a proton-pump inhibitor. In multivariate models that adjusted for age, sex, and clinical risk factors, the use of a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug other than low-dose aspirin was independently associated with an increased risk of bleeding from a peptic ulcer (odds ratio, 7.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 4.5 to 12.0), as was the use of low-dose aspirin alone (odds ratio, 2.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 3.3). The use of a nitrovasodilator was associated with a decreased risk of bleeding (odds ratio, 0.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 0.9), as was antisecretory therapy (odds ratio, 0.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 0.8). In patients taking any type of nonsteroidai antiinflammatory drug, the use of a nitrovasodilator or antisecretory therapy was independently associated with a decreased risk of bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of nitrovasodilator drugs is independently associated with a decreased risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Effects of nitrate and prophylactic aspirin on upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective case-control study

Experimental studies suggest that nitric-oxide releasing drugs reduce gastroduodenal damage induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, but it is not known whether these agents have this effect in humans. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who receive aspirin and nitrates for vascular occlusive diseases. This was a retrospective case-control study of 736 consecutive patients admitted with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, compared with 1472 age- and sex-matched hospital controls. Chronic low-dose aspirin regimens had been used by 12.6% of cases and 5.7% of controls, nitrates by 4.8% and 5.8%, and combined nitrates and low-dose aspirin by 2.7% and 1.9%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis identified low-dose aspirin use as an independent risk factor for gastrointestinal bleeding, whereas nitrate use was found to be a protective factor. The combination of both nitrate and low-dose aspirin was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding.

Evidence of aspirin use in both upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Current studies lack appropriate data on aspirin and other risk factors for gastrointestinal perforation. The aim of this study was to obtain the best estimate on aspirin and nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use in these patients.

METHODS

In 76 consecutive patients with gastrointestinal perforation and 152 matched controls, a detailed clinical history supplemented with an objective test of current aspirin use (platelet cyclooxygenase activity) was obtained.

RESULTS

Of the 76 cases, 78.9% were upper and 21% lower gastrointestinal perforations. Evidence of NSAID use was found in 71% of cases (70% upper, 75% lower) vs. 26.9% of controls (odds ratio, 6.64; 95% confidence interval, 3.6-12.2; P < 0.0001). The objective test showed 12.7% more aspirin users than clinical history alone. NSAID use was aspirin (alone or combined) in 66.6% of cases, and 59.25% was nonprescription. Other independent risk factors were smoking, alcohol, and a history of arthritis or peptic ulcer but not a positive Helicobacter pylori serology. Age, but not NSAID use, affected perforation-associated mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

NSAID use is strongly associated with an increased risk of both upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation. The high prevalence of aspirin (over-the-counter) use suggests that future introduction of new NSAIDs may not have a major impact on decreasing gastrointestinal complications if other measures are not taken. Concomitant NSAID use, smoking, and alcohol use is a pervasive association.

[Omeprazole and cimetidine in the treatment of upper digestive hemorrhage]

AIM

To compare the efficacy of omeprazole (40 mgs/12 h i.v.) and cimetidine (1,200 mgs/i.v./day) in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Randomized, prospective open clinical trial. The end points are: mortality, surgical requirements, transfusion requirements, and length of hospitalization in Bleeding Unit and Hospital.

PATIENTS

We study patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding from peptic sources (duodenal ulcer, gastriculcer, acute gastric erosions and peptic esophagitis). 462 patients are evaluated and 282 finally included.

RESULTS

151 patients were given cimetidine and 131 omeprazole. No significant differences in any of the end points were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of omeprazole does not improve cimetidine efficacy in the entire group of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

[The endoscopic management of postoperative biliary fistulae]

We report a series of 15 patients with a postoperative biliary fistula treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy. The exact location of the bile leak was revealed by ERCP in 13 cases (87%): cystic duct remnant in 6 (39%), intrahepatic biliary tree in 4 (26%), and main bile duct in 3 (20%). In all cases a distal obstacle (ie: retained stones, hydatid material) to bile flow was also found in ERCP. Treatment consisted of endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent removal of the distal obstacle, and could be completed in 13 (87%) cases. In our experience the treatment of postoperative biliary fistula with a distal obstruction bile flow by endoscopic sphincterotomy is a safe and effective procedure, and should be recommended as the first option in those patients.