OP0221 EFFICACY OF SECUKINUMAB IN ENTHESITIS-RELATED ARTHRITIS: RESULTS FROM A RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL, PHASE 3 STUDY (JUNIPERA)

Background

Enthesitis-related Arthritis (ERA) is a category of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) characterised by heterogeneous and insidious manifestations comprising axial and/or peripheral arthritis, and enthesitis.1 Secukinumab (SEC) demonstrated efficacy and safety in both ERA and juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA) in the JUNIPERA trial.2

Objectives

To evaluate the rate of flare risk reduction and efficacy of SEC on axial and peripheral manifestations in patients (pts) with active ERA.

Methods

ERA pts (2 to <18 years of age) with active disease (both ≥3 active joints and ≥1 active enthesitis site) were included. In the open-label (OL) treatment-period (TP)1, s.c. SEC (75/150 mg in pts <50/ ≥50 kg) was administered at baseline (BL), and at Week (Wk) 1–4, 8 and 12. Pts who achieved at least JIA-ACR30 response at Wk 12 were randomised into the double-blinded TP2 to continue SEC or placebo (PBO) every 4 wk until a disease flare, or up to Wk 100. The primary endpoint was time to flare in ERA and JPsA pts. The juvenile spondyloarthritis disease activity Index (JSpADA) is a disease activity assessment tool that contains 8 items to measure axial and peripheral disease activity.3 Evaluation of axial and peripheral manifestations at the end of TP1 and TP2 in pts who experienced these symptoms at BL included modified Schober test (lumbar flexion), inflammatory back pain, FABER (Flexion, ABduction, External Rotation) test, JIA-ACR responses, Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS)-27, and resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis for peripheral disease. These outcomes were also used to assess JIA disease course at the end of TP2.

Results

A total of 52/86 (60.5%) pts with ERA were enrolled in the OL period TP1 (mean age, 13.7 years; male, 78.8%). In total, 51/52 (98.1%) pts completed TP1 and 41/44 (93.2%) completed TP2. At BL, mean JADAS-27 was 14.8, mean JSpADA index was 3.9, mean enthesitis and dactylitis counts were 2.7 and 0.4, respectively, mean number of active joints was 6.2 and of mean joints with limited range of motion 4.9. The relative risk reduction of experiencing a disease flare in TP2 was 55% (HR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.16–1.28, p=0.075) in ERA pts (Figure 1). The overall axial and peripheral disease symptoms improved over time and are presented in the Table 1. At the end of TP1, 84.6% (44/52) of pts achieved JIA-ACR 30 and 65.4% (34/52) achieved JIA-ACR 70. Clinically relevant reduction of functional ability as assessed by Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) also occurred (see Table 1).

Table 1.

Resolution of axial and peripheral disease symptoms and JIA ACR responses at the end of TP1 and 2

Clinical response, mean (SD) change from BL (unless otherwise stated)TP1-Wk 12End of TP2*SEC (N=52)SEC (N=22)PBO (N=22)JSpADA index−2.4 (1.7)−2.7 (1.7)−2.3 (2.1)JSpADA Schöber, %58.3100.0100.0Inflammatory back pain, %77.8100.050.0FABER test, %52.6100.083.3Clinical sacroiliitis, %53.3100.050.0Enthesitis−2.2 (1.9)−2.5 (2.1)−1.3 (1.8)Dactylitis−0.2 (0.8)−0.2 (1)−0.1 (0.4)JIA ACR30, %84.690.968.2JIA ACR50, %78.881.868.2JIA ACR70, %65.468.254.5JIA ACR90, %32.745.550.0JIA ACR100, %26.936.445.5Inactive disease, %38.550.050.0CHAQ−0.5 (0.5)−0.6 (0.7)−0.4 (0.5)CRP, median (SD) change from BL−1.8 (38.7)−5.8 (38.3)0 (35.9)JADAS-27−9.6 (7.5)−11.0 (8.9)−7.6 (8.9)Resolution of enthesitis#, %72.378.683.3Resolution of dactylitis#, %5066.70

*End of TP2 is based on individual pts’ last visit at TP2. #At BL, in TP1, enthesitis (n= 46); dactylitis (n=5). In TP2, no. of pts who had presence at BL and showed complete resolution at the end of TP2: enthesitis, SEC 14, PBO 18; dactylitis, SEC 3, PBO, 0. CRP, C-reactive protein

Conclusion

In pts with ERA, SEC demonstrated longer time to disease flare vs PBO and exhibited rapid and sustained improvement of axial and peripheral manifestations up to Wk 104.

References

[1]Pagnini I, et al. Front Med 2021;8:6673052.

[2]Brunner H, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021;73 (suppl 10).

[3]Weiss PF, et al. Arthritis Care Res 2014;66:1775-82.

Disclosure of Interests

Nicolino Ruperto Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmith and Kline, Pfizer, SOBI and UCB, Paid instructor for: Eli Lilly and Pfizer, Consultant of: Ablynx, Amgen, Astrazeneca-Medimmune, Aurinia, Bayer, Bristol Myers and Squibb, Cambridge Healthcare Research (CHR), Celegene, Domain therapeutic, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, GlaxoSmith and Kline, Idorsia, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SOBI and UCB, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers and Squibb, Eli Lilly, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Pfizer and SOBI, Elena Chertok: None declared, Joke Dehoorne Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Roche, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Roche, Gerd Horneff Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, MSD, Tilmann Kallinich Speakers bureau: Roche, Ingrid Louw Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, BMS, Consultant of: Pfizer, Abbvie, Janssen, Amgen and Cipla, Sandrine Compeyrot-Lacassagne: None declared, Bernard Lauwerys Employee of: UCB Pharma, Neil Martin: None declared, Katherine Marzan Grant/research support from: Novartis, Sanofi, William Knibbe Speakers bureau: Novartis, Amgen, UCB, Abbvie, Ruvie Martin Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Xuan Zhu Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, sarah whelan Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Luminita Pricop Shareholder of: Novartis, Employee of: Novartis, Alberto Martini Speakers bureau: Aurinia, Bristol Myers and Squibb, Eli Lilly, EMD, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche and Serono, Consultant of: Aurinia, Bristol Myers and Squibb, Eli Lilly and EMD, Daniel J Lovell Consultant of: Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Hoffman LaRoche, Novartis, UBC, Grant/research support from: Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Hoffman LaRoche, Novartis, UBC, Hermine Brunner Consultant of: Novartis, Grant/research support from: Novartis

Weekly Lonapegsomatropin in Treatment-Naïve Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency: The Phase 3 heiGHt Trial

CONTEXT

For children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD), treatment burden with daily somatropin injections [human growth hormone (hGH)] is high, which may lead to poor adherence and suboptimal overall treatment outcomes. Lonapegsomatropin (TransCon hGH) is an investigational long-acting, once-weekly prodrug for the treatment of GHD.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly lonapegsomatropin vs daily somatropin.

DESIGN

The heiGHt trial was a randomized, open-label, active-controlled, 52-week Phase 3 trial (NCT02781727).

SETTING

This trial took place at 73 sites across 15 countries.

PATIENTS

This trial enrolled and dosed 161 treatment-naïve, prepubertal patients with GHD.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive lonapegsomatropin 0.24 mg hGH/kg/week or an equivalent weekly dose of somatropin delivered daily.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary end point was annualized height velocity (AHV) at week 52. Secondary efficacy end points included change from baseline in height SD scores (SDS).

RESULTS

Least squares (LS) mean (SE) AHV at 52 weeks was 11.2 (0.2) cm/year for lonapegsomatropin vs 10.3 (0.3) cm/year for daily somatropin (P = 0.009), with lonapegsomatropin demonstrating both noninferiority and superiority over daily somatropin. LS mean (SE) height SDS increased from baseline to week 52 by 1.10 (0.04) vs 0.96 (0.05) in the weekly lonapegsomatropin vs daily somatropin groups (P = 0.01). Bone age/chronological age ratio, adverse events, tolerability, and immunogenicity were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The trial met its primary objective of noninferiority in AHV and further showed superiority of lonapegsomatropin compared to daily somatropin, with similar safety, in treatment-naïve children with GHD.

Efficacy and Safety of up to 2 Years of Treatment With TransCon hGH (Lonapegsomatropin) in Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency

Background: Once-weekly TransCon hGH (lonapegsomatropin) is an investigational long-acting prodrug of somatropin in development for GHD. In the pivotal 52-week phase 3 heiGHt trial, lonapegsomatropin demonstrated superior annualized height velocity (AHV) compared to the same weekly dose of daily somatropin in treatment-naïve children with GHD. In the 26-week fliGHt trial, switch from daily somatropin to lonapegsomatropin provided continued growth and maintained a good safety profile. Methods: Results are reported from heiGHt and fliGHt subjects who continued into the open-label long-term extension enliGHten trial (data cut: June 1^st 2020). Subjects received either lonapegsomatropin (Group A; vial/syringe) or daily somatropin (Group B; pen device) in heiGHt, or lonapegsomatropin in fliGHt (Group C; vial/syringe). Upon entry into enliGHten, all subjects received lonapegsomatropin via vial/syringe, with subsequent switch to TransCon hGH Auto-Injector when available. Average IGF-1 was obtained on post-dose Day 5 (±1) in enliGHten. A by-visit ANCOVA model was used for numeric efficacy endpoints. Results: A total of 298 (98%) subjects continued into enliGHten. (A: n=103; B: n=55; C: n=140). The treatment difference in LS mean ∆ height SDS (A vs B) at the end of heiGHt (Week 52, 1.10 vs 0.96, P=0.015) was sustained through Week 104 (1.61 vs 1.49, P=0.158). For Group C, height SDS improved from −1.42 at fliGHt baseline to −0.69 at Week 78. AHV was within the expected range for 2^nd year therapy. Among children who switched (B), an attenuation in the expected 2^nd year decline of AHV suggested that lonapegsomatropin had an improved treatment effect relative to the previous daily somatropin. Mean (SD) average IGF-1 SDS remained stable and generally within the expected range for all groups (Week 104, A: 0.95 [1.22], B: 1.04 [1.25]; Week 78, C:1.81 [1.08]). An improvement in injection site tolerability was observed after switching to the TransCon hGH Auto-Injector; subjects and parents also indicated overall ease-of-use of the device (assessed by the Device Usability Questionnaire). With continued lonapegsomatropin treatment, the AE profile remained consistent with what was observed in the parent trials, with no new safety signals. Throughout enliGHten and the parent trials, non-neutralizing low-titer anti-hGH binding antibodies were detected post-dose in a total of 15 subjects (5.0%). Lab parameters were stable and generally remained within the normal range throughout the trials. As of the data cut, 2 subjects have achieved near adult height (AHV <2 cm/year over the last 9 months or bone age >14 [females] or >16 [males]) and thus have completed the trial. Conclusions: Children treated with lonapegsomatropin showed continued improvement of height SDS through their 2nd year of therapy. Lonapegsomatropin continued to demonstrate a safety profile comparable to that of daily somatropin therapy.

OR17-4 Transcon Growth Hormone In The Treatment Of Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency: Results Of The Phase 3 Height Trial

TransCon Growth Hormone in the Treatment of Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency: Results of the Phase 3 heiGHt TrialBackground TransCon Growth Hormone is a sustained-release recombinant human growth hormone (hGH; somatropin) prodrug in development as a long-acting GH (LAGH) for children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). In its prodrug form, TransCon hGH is inactive with hGH transiently bound to a TransCon carrier via a TransCon linker. Upon injection and triggered by physiological pH and temperature, unmodified recombinant hGH is sustainably released and thus designed to maintain the same mode-of-action and distribution as daily hGH replacement therapy but with once-weekly dosing. In a 6-month phase 2 trial of TransCon hGH vs. a daily hGH in children with GHD, mean annualized height velocity (AHV) for TransCon hGH was 12.9 cm/y compared to 11.6 cm/y for a daily hGH at an equivalent hGH dose (0.21 mg/kg/wk). The subsequent pivotal phase 3 global heiGHt Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02781727) was designed to investigate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of weekly TransCon hGH versus daily hGH over 52 weeks in treatment-naive prepubertal children with GHD. Methods Subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio and received either once-weekly TransCon hGH 0.24 mg hGH/kg/wk or dose-equivalent once-daily Genotropin over 52 weeks. Key baseline demographics variables included age, gender, height standard deviation score (SDS), IGF-1 SDS, peak stimulated GH, and bone age delay. Study endpoints included AHV, IGF-1 response, immunogenicity, and safety. Results At baseline, the mean age of study participants, of whom 82% were male, was 8.5 years. Mean height SDS was -2.93, and mean IGF-1 SDS was -2.04. Mean peak stimulated GH was 5.77 µg/L, and mean bone delay was 2.63 years. The final sample size (n=161) was larger than planned (n=150) which strengthens the study power for noninferiority. Top-line results, including AHV, change in height SDS, serum IGF-1 levels, change in bone age, and adverse events, will be available for presentation at ENDO 2019. Conclusion Only LAGHs based on unmodified hGH have obtained approval in Europe or the United States. By February 2019, all subjects will have completed their participation in this pivotal trial of a LAGH designed to release unmodified hGH, with top-line analyses available in March. The heiGHt Trial was well-powered to demonstrate noninferiority between TransCon hGH and a daily hGH, with baseline demographic variables in the range of recent GH trials.