First International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions)

The purpose of this study is to obtain a consensus for the therapy of B3 lesions. The first International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions) including atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), classical lobular neoplasia (LN), papillary lesions (PL), benign phyllodes tumors (PT), and radial scars (RS) took place in January 2016 in Zurich, Switzerland organized by the International Breast Ultrasound School and the Swiss Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy group-a subgroup of the Swiss Society of Senology. Consensus recommendations for the management and follow-up surveillance of these B3 lesions were developed and areas of research priorities were identified. The consensus recommendation for FEA, LN, PL, and RS diagnosed on core needle biopsy or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) is to therapeutically excise the lesion seen on imaging by VAB and no longer by open surgery, with follow-up surveillance imaging for 5 years. The consensus recommendation for ADH and PT is, with some exceptions, therapeutic first-line open surgical excision. Minimally invasive management of selected B3 lesions with therapeutic VAB is acceptable as an alternative to first-line surgical excision.

Inferior rectus recession--an effective procedure?

AIMS

To examine the postoperative stability of inferior rectus recession, with particular reference to the incidence of progressive overcorrection.

METHODS

The results of consecutive patients undergoing inferior rectus recession over a 3 year period were reviewed.

RESULTS

21 patients underwent inferior rectus recession, using an adjustable suture technique in all but three cases. In 16 patients additional vertical muscle surgery was performed at the time of the inferior rectus recession. All patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months postoperatively, with a mean follow up of 9.3 months. At the final postoperative visit 11 patients were well aligned, eight were undercorrected, and two were overcorrected. In five of the eight undercorrected cases, the residual deviation was the result of postoperative drift in the direction of the preoperative deviation, following an initially good alignment. Review of the results failed to reveal any factor predictive for this postoperative drift.

CONCLUSION

The risk of postoperative overcorrection following inferior rectus recession should be considered, but in this study, undercorrection occurred more frequently than overcorrection. The possible reasons for overcorrection and undercorrection are discussed.