Epidemiology and Survival of Systemic Sclerosis-Sarcoidosis Overlap Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the epidemiology, manifestations, serology, comorbidities, and survival among patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) with and without sarcoidosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing patients with SSc with and without sarcoidosis. All patients fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for SSc. Sarcoidosis was based on physician diagnosis and/or confirmatory biopsy. The primary outcome was time from diagnosis to all-cause mortality. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

We included 1977 patients (1971 with SSc, 6 with SSc-sarcoidosis) with a SSc-sarcoidosis prevalence of 0.30%. Sarcoidosis frequently preceded SSc (66.66%). The most frequent sarcoidosis manifestations were pulmonary (66.66%), lymphadenopathy (66.66%), arthritis (50%), cutaneous (33.33%), and hepatic (16.66%). Patients with SSc and SSc-sarcoidosis had female to male sex ratios of 4.5:1 vs 5:1 and median ages of SSc onset of 48.3 vs 43.8 years, respectively. Interstitial lung disease (35% vs 66.66%) and pulmonary hypertension (24.91% vs 50%) tended to occur more frequently whereas abnormal nailfold capillaries (34.7% vs 16.66%) and digital ulcers (33.33% vs 16.66%) tended to occur less frequently among patients with SSc-sarcoidosis, but the differences were not significant. There was an increased frequency of stroke among the patients with SSc-sarcoidosis (relative risk 8.59, 95% CI 1.02-72.00). The median survival times were 23.4 years for SSc-sarcoidosis and 18.6 years for SSc, with no differences in survival curves (log-rank test, P = 0.55).

CONCLUSION

Sarcoidosis in SSc is rare but appears to occur more frequently than in the general population. It is associated with pulmonary, lymph node, cutaneous, joint, and hepatic involvement. Stroke occurs more frequently in patients with SSc-sarcoidosis but with no differences in survival.

Prevalence and metric of depression and anxiety in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review and synthesize literature on 1) the overall prevalence of depression and anxiety in SLE patients in identified studies, and 2) the pooled prevalence per metrics of depression and anxiety in adult SLE patients.

METHODS

This review used (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) PRISMA guidelines and in-depth searches in four databases (1954-2016; Ovid-based Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL) to identify articles on the prevalence of depression and/or anxiety in adult SLE patients. Included studies were critically appraised and analyzed. The prevalence of depression and anxiety was studied for all included studies, and whenever possible, pooled prevalence (PP) was determined for more commonly used metrics. Statistical and publication bias was assessed using funnel plots.

RESULT

A total of 3103 references were identified, 226 were selected for detailed review and 72 were included in the final analysis.

OVERALL PREVALENCE

The depression PP, obtained from 69 studies representing 23,386 SLE patients, was 35.0% (95% CI: 29.9%-40.3%). The anxiety PP, obtained from 38 studies representing 4439 SLE patients, was 25.8% (95% CI: 19.2%-32.9%).

PREVALENCE PER METRICS USED

The more commonly used instruments included the Centre for Epidemiological Studies - Depression (CES-D), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS-A/D), and Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression/Anxiety (HAM-D/A)]. The CES-D was utilized in 13 studies including 1856 SLE patients; depression PP was 41.5% (95% CI: 35.1%-48.1%). The BDI was utilized in 14 studies including 1355 SLE patients and the BAI in 3 studies including 489 patients; depression PP was 39.9% (95% CI: 31.1%-49.1) and anxiety PP was 38.4% (95% CI: 34.2%-42.8%). The HADS-D was utilized in 14 studies including 1238 SLE patients and the HADS-A in 12 studies including 1099 patients respectively; its depression PP was 24.4% (95% CI: 19.1%-30.1%) and anxiety PP was 38.3% (95% CI: 29.1%-47.9%). The HAM-D was utilized in 4 studies including 267 SLE patients and the HAM-A in 4 studies including 213 patients respectively; its depression PP was 40.0% (95% CI: 23.0%-59.0%) and anxiety PP was 39.0% (95% CI: 32.0%-45.0%).

CONCLUSION

There was high variability in the prevalence of depression and anxiety, ranging from 8.7%-78.6% and 1.1%-71.4%, respectively. This could be attributed to the lack of consistency in the metrics used and its definition for depression and anxiety in SLE. Studies that used a specific metric, such as the CES-D, BDI or HAM-D, yielded similar depression prevalence. The HADS-D had the lowest prevalence. All metrics of anxiety yielded similar anxiety prevalence.

Impact of belimumab on patient-reported outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus: review of clinical studies

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune, multisystem rheumatic disease with significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide valuable data on patient perceptions across a variety of domains, such as HRQoL, pain, fatigue, and depression. The measurement and results of PROs with respect to HRQoL in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on belimumab (B-lymphocyte stimulator inhibitor) in SLE are reviewed here, including BLISS-52 and BLISS-76, as well as publications related to belimumab trials that included HRQoL data. Other trials that evaluated belimumab did not include HRQoL data and were therefore not included in the analysis. The BLISS-52 and BLISS-76 RCTs met their primary endpoints and demonstrated improvements in PROs, measured by the 36-item Short Form Health Survey, EuroQol 5 Dimensions, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale. Belimumab was shown overall to improve PROs in adult autoantibody-positive lupus patients.