Cutaneous reactions after COVID-19 vaccination in Turkey: A multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

In this study covering all of Turkey, we aimed to define cutaneous and systemic adverse reactions in our patient population after COVID-19 vaccination with the Sinovac/CoronaVac (inactivated SARS-CoV-2) and Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccines.

METHODS

This prospective, cross-sectional study included individuals presenting to the dermatology or emergency outpatient clinics of a total of 19 centers after having been vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccines. Systemic, local injection site, and non-local cutaneous reactions after vaccination were identified, and their rates were determined.

RESULTS

Of the 2290 individuals vaccinated between April 15 and July 15, 2021, 2097 (91.6%) received the CoronaVac vaccine and 183 (8%) BioNTech. Systemic reactions were observed at a rate of 31.0% after the first CoronaVac dose, 31.1% after the second CoronaVac dose, 46.4% after the first BioNTech dose, and 46.2% after the second BioNTech dose. Local injection site reactions were detected at a rate of 35.6% after the first CoronaVac dose, 35.7% after the second CoronaVac dose, 86.9% after the first BioNTech dose, and 94.1% after the second BioNTech dose. A total of 133 non-local cutaneous reactions were identified after the CoronaVac vaccine (2.9% after the first dose and 3.5% after the second dose), with the most common being urticaria/angioedema, pityriasis rosea, herpes zoster, and maculopapular rash. After BioNTech, 39 non-local cutaneous reactions were observed to have developed (24.8% after the first dose and 5% after the second dose), and the most common were herpes zoster, delayed large local reaction, pityriasis rosea, and urticaria/angioedema in order of frequency. Existing autoimmune diseases were triggered in 2.1% of the patients vaccinated with CoronaVac and 8.2% of those vaccinated with BioNTech.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no comprehensive data on cutaneous adverse reactions specific to the CoronaVac vaccine. We determined the frequency of adverse reactions from the dermatologist's point of view after CoronaVac and BioNTech vaccination and identified a wide spectrum of non-local cutaneous reactions. Our data show that CoronaVac is associated with less harmful reactions while BioNTech may result in more serious reactions, such as herpes zoster, anaphylaxis, and triggering of autoimmunity. However, most of these reactions were self-limiting or required little therapeutic intervention.

A marker of systemic inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa patients without cardiovascular disease: aortic arch calcification

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to investigate whether there is a relationship between aortic arch calcification (AAC) and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) in HS patients without cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

In this study, patients over 18 years of age who applied to the dermatology outpatient clinic between January 2023 and February 2024 were followed up with the diagnosis of HS without cardiovascular disease, and a healthy control group matched in terms of age and gender were included retrospectively.

RESULTS

In total, 130 patients with HS without cardiovascular disease and 130 control patients were included in the study. AAC was significantly higher in the HS group compared to the control group (p = 0.028). In the multivariate analysis, we found that age and HS were independent predictors of AAC (OR: 1.048 (1.009-1.089); p = 0.015, OR: 3.158 (1.181-8.445); p = 0.022, respectively). When we divided the groups as having AAC (grade 1-3) and not having AAC (grade 0), the rate of HS disease was significantly higher in the group with AAC compared to the group without AAC (75.0% vs. 47.5% p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

AAC is observed more frequently in patients with HS without cardiovascular disease than in healthy individuals. Moreover, HS can be considered as an independent predictor of AAC. AAC may contribute to developing treatment strategies in HS patients without cardiovascular disease.