An interactive task-based method for the avoidance of metal artifacts in CBCT

PURPOSE

Intraoperative cone-beam CT imaging enables 3D validation of implant positioning and fracture reduction for orthopedic and trauma surgeries. However, the emergence of metal artifacts, especially in the vicinity of metallic objects, severely degrades the clinical value of the imaging modality. In previous works, metal artifact avoidance (MAA) methods have been shown to reduce metal artifacts by adapting the scanning trajectory. Yet, these methods fail to translate to clinical practice due to remaining methodological constraints and missing workflow integration.

METHODS

In this work, we propose a method to compute the spatial distribution and calibrated strengths of expected artifacts for a given tilted circular trajectory. By visualizing this as an overlay changing with the C-Arm's tilt, we enable the clinician to interactively choose an optimal trajectory while factoring in the procedural context and clinical task. We then evaluate this method in a realistic human cadaver study and compare the achieved image quality to acquisitions optimized using global metrics.

RESULTS

We assess the effectiveness of the compared methods by evaluation of image quality gradings of depicted pedicle screws. We find that both global metrics as well as the proposed visualization of artifact distribution enable a drastic improvement compared to standard non-tilted scans. Furthermore, the novel interactive visualization yields a significant improvement in subjective image quality compared to the state-of-the-art global metrics. Additionally we show that by formulating an imaging task, the proposed method allows to selectively optimize image quality and avoid artifacts in the region of interest.

CONCLUSION

We propose a method to spatially resolve predicted artifacts and provide a calibrated measure for artifact strength grading. This interactive MAA method proved practical and effective in reducing metal artifacts in the conducted cadaver study. We believe this study serves as a crucial step toward clinical application of an MAA system to improve image quality and enhance the clinical validation of implant placement.

Temporary Cast Application in Dislocated Ankle Fractures Leads to High Rates of Secondary Loss of Reduction: Does the Lauge-Hansen Injury Type Matter?

BACKGROUND

For the temporary treatment of ankle fracture dislocations (AFDs), previous studies indicate higher rates of secondary loss of reduction (LOR) with splint immobilization, prompting consideration for expanding indications for external fixation (ExFix). However, these studies did not investigate the influence of fracture morphology to further improve patient selection. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of Lauge-Hansen injury type on the LOR rate in bimalleolar or trimalleolar AFDs for temporary cast vs ExFix immobilization.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with isolated AFD cases treated at our institution from 2011 to 2020 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria required radiographs depicting initial dislocation and appropriate reduction after Cast or ExFix immobilization. Exclusion criteria encompassed concomitant injuries, open fractures, conservative management as well as surgery performed within 48 hours or at a different facility. Patients were grouped by temporary treatment (Cast or ExFix). The primary endpoint was LOR prior to definitive surgery across various Lauge-Hansen types.

RESULTS

The LOR rate was significantly higher in the cast group (40/152, 26.3%) compared to the ExFix group (5/191, 2.6%; P < .0001). In the cast group, LOR was associated with an increase in time to definitive surgery by a mean of 3 days (P < .002). During cast treatment, LOR was significantly more likely for pronation abduction (P = .001) and supination external rotation injuries (P < .0001), whereas no significant differences were observed for pronation external rotation (P = .006), supination adduction (P > .99), and fractures not classifiable (P > .99).

CONCLUSION

In cases of AFDs resulting from supination external rotation or pronation abduction trauma according to the Lauge-Hansen classification, especially in the setting of an additional posterior malleolar fracture, primary application of external fixation should be considered to reduce the risk for secondary loss of reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Comparison of iCT-based navigation and fluoroscopic-guidance for atlantoaxial screw placement in 78 patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Studies have shown biomechanical superiority of cervical pedicle screw placement over other techniques. However, accurate placement is challenging due to the inherent risk of neurovascular complications. Navigation technology based on intraoperative 3D imaging allows highly accurate screw placement, yet studies specifically investigating screw placement in patients with traumatic atlantoaxial injuries are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare atlantoaxial screw placement as treatment of traumatic instabilities using iCT-based navigation or fluoroscopic-guidance with intraoperative 3D control scans.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients with traumatic atlantoaxial injuries treated operatively with dorsal stabilization of C1 and C2. Patients were either assigned to the intraoperative navigation or fluoroscopic-guidance group. Screw accuracy, procedure time, and revisions were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were included in this study with 51 patients in the navigation group and 27 patients in the fluoroscopic-guidance group. In total, 312 screws were placed in C1 and C2. Screw accuracy was high in both groups; however, pedicle perforations > 1 mm occurred significantly more often in the fluoroscopic-guidance group (P = 0.02). Procedure time was on average 23 min shorter in the navigation group (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes to the available data showing that navigated atlantoaxial screw placement proves to be feasible as well as highly accurate compared to the fluoroscopic-guidance technique without prolonging the time needed for surgery. When comparing these data with other studies, the application of different classification systems for assessment of screw accuracy should be considered.

Comparison of 3D-navigation and fluoroscopic guidance in percutaneous pedicle screw placement for traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction

Introduction

Fractures of the thoracolumbar junction are the most common vertebral fractures and can require surgical treatment. Several studies have shown that the accuracy of pedicle screw placement can be improved by the use of 3D-navigation. Still only few studies have focused on the use of navigation in traumatic spine injuries.

Research question

The aim of this study was to compare the screw placement accuracy and radiation exposure for 3D-navigated and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement in traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction.

Materials and methods

In this single-center study 25 patients undergoing 3D-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw placement for traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2) were compared to a control group of 25 patients using fluoroscopy. Screw accuracy was determined in postoperative CT-scans using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification system. Additionally, duration of surgery, dose area product, fluoroscopy time and intraoperative complications were compared between the groups.

Results

The accuracy of 3D-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw placement was 92.66 % while an accuracy of 88.08 % was achieved using standard fluoroscopy (p = 0.19). The fluoroscopy time was significantly less in the navigation group compared to the control group (p = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in radiation exposure, duration of surgery or intraoperative complications between the groups.

Discussion and conclusion

The results suggest that 3D-navigation facilitates higher accuracy in percutaneous pedicle screw placement of traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction, although limitations should be considered. In this study 3D-navigation did not increase fluoroscopy time, while radiation exposure and surgery time were comparable.

Effect of changing the acquisition trajectory of the 3D C-arm (CBCT) on image quality in spine surgery: experimental study using an artificial bone model

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative 3D imaging using cone-beam CT (CBCT) provides improved assessment of implant position and reduction in spine surgery, is used for navigated surgical techniques, and therefore leads to improved quality of care. However, in some cases the image quality is not sufficient to correctly assess pedicle screw position and reduction, especially due to metal artifacts. The aim of this study was to investigate whether changing the acquisition trajectory of the CBCT in relation to the pedicle screw position during dorsal instrumentation of the spine can reduce metal artifacts and consequently improve image quality as well as clinical assessability on the artificial bone model.

METHODS

An artificial bone model was instrumented with pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine region (Th10 to L5). Then, the acquisition trajectory of the CBCT (Cios Spin, Siemens, Germany) to the pedicle screws was systematically changed in 5° steps in angulation (- 30° to + 30°) and swivel (- 30° to + 30°). Subsequently, radiological evaluation was performed by three blinded, qualified raters on image quality using 9 questions (including anatomical structures, implant position, appearance of artifacts) with a score (1-5 points). For statistical evaluation, the image quality of the different acquisition trajectories was compared to the standard acquisition trajectory and checked for significant differences.

RESULTS

The angulated acquisition trajectory increased the score for subjective image quality (p < 0.001) as well as the clinical assessability of pedicle screw position (p < 0.001) highly significant with particularly strong effects on subjective image quality in the vertebral pedicle region (d = 1.06). Swivel of the acquisition trajectory significantly improved all queried domains of subjective image quality (p < 0.001) as well as clinical assessability of pedicle screw position (p < 0.001). The data show that maximizing the angulation or swivel angle toward 30° provides the best tested subjective image quality. Angulation and swivel of the acquisition trajectory result in a clinically relevant improvement in image quality in intraoperative 3D imaging (CBCT) during dorsal instrumentation of the spine.

Radiation exposure for pedicle screw placement with three different navigation system and imaging combinations in a sawbone model

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that pedicle screw placement using navigation can potentially reduce radiation exposure of surgical personnel compared to conventional methods. Spinal navigation is based on an interaction of a navigation software and 3D imaging. The 3D image data can be acquired using different imaging modalities such as iCT and CBCT. These imaging modalities vary regarding acquisition technique and field of view. The current literature varies greatly in study design, in form of dose registration, as well as navigation systems and imaging modalities analyzed. Therefore, the aim of this study was a standardized comparison of three navigation and imaging system combinations in an experimental setting in an artificial spine model.

METHODS

In this experimental study dorsal instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine was performed using three imaging/navigation system combinations. The system combinations applied were the iCT/Curve, cCBCT/Pulse and oCBCT/StealthStation. Referencing scans were obtained with each imaging modality and served as basis for the respective navigation system. In each group 10 artificial spine models received bilateral dorsal instrumentation from T11-S1. 2 referencing and control scans were acquired with the CBCTs, since their field of view could only depict up to five vertebrae in one scan. The field of view of the iCT enabled the depiction of T11-S1 in one scan. After instrumentation the region of interest was scanned again for evaluation of the screw position, therefore only one referencing and one control scan were obtained. Two dose meters were installed in a spine bed ventral of L1 and S1. The dose measurements in each location and in total were analyzed for each system combination. Time demand regarding screw placement was also assessed for all system combinations.

RESULTS

The mean radiation dose in the iCT group measured 1,6 ± 1,1 mGy. In the cCBCT group the mean was 3,6 ± 0,3 mGy and in the oCBCT group 10,3 ± 5,7 mGy were measured. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant (p < 0.0001) difference between the three groups. The multiple comparisions by the Kruskall-Wallis test showed no significant difference for the comparison of iCT and cCBCT (p1 = 0,13). Significant differences were found for the direct comparison of iCT and oCBCT (p2 < 0,0001), as well as cCBCT and oCBCT (p3 = 0,02). Statistical analysis showed that significantly (iCT vs. oCBCT p = 0,0434; cCBCT vs. oCBCT p = 0,0083) less time was needed for oCBCT based navigated pedicle screw placement compared to the other system combinations (iCT vs. cCBCT p = 0,871).

CONCLUSION

Under standardized conditions oCBCT navigation demanded twice as much radiation as the cCBCT for the same number of scans, while the radiation exposure measured for the iCT and cCBCT for one scan was comparable. Yet, time effort was significantly less for oCBCT based navigation. However, for transferability into clinical practice additional studies should follow evaluating parameters regarding feasibility and clinical outcome under standardized conditions.

Influence of quality of reduction using radiological criteria on kinematics and kinetics in ankle fractures with unstable syndesmotic injury

BACKGROUND

In ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury, the anatomic reduction of the ankle mortise is crucial for preventing osteoarthritis. Yet, no studies have analysed the effect of surgical reduction after unstable ankle fractures on patients' active functional outcome.

METHODS

The Intraoperative 3D imaging data of patients surgically treated between 2012 and 2019 for ankle fracture with concomitant syndesmotic injury were reviewed. 58 patients were allocated to two groups depending on whether the criteria for radiologically optimal reduction were met (39 patients) or not (19 patients). Criteria for optimal reduction were composed of objectively measured and subjectively rated data. After undertaking the Olerud/Molander ankle score, a gait analysis and several active function tests using 3D motion capture were performed in order to evaluate kinetic and kinematic differences between both groups.

FINDINGS

Patients showed deficits of range of motion and balance parameters on the injured ankle, however, there were no significant differences between both groups.

INTERPRETATION

Although, the data did not show that radiological reduction criteria have a statistically significant effect on active functional outcome after a mean follow up time of 5.7 years, tendencies for a better outcome of patients that met the criteria could be seen. It also must be taken into consideration that results are limited by case number and allocation ratio, which made a sub-analysis of the separate reduction criteria unfeasible.

Implications of navigation in thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement on screw accuracy and screw diameter/pedicle width ratio

Introduction

There is ample evidence that higher accuracy can be achieved in thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement by using spinal navigation. Still, to date, the evidence regarding the influence of the use of navigation on the screw diameter to pedicle width ratio remains limited.

Research question

The aim of this study was to investigate the implications of navigation in thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement not only on screw accuracy, but on the screw diameter to pedicle width ratio as well.

Material and methods

In this single-center single-surgeon study, 45 Patients undergoing navigated thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement were prospectively included. The results were compared with a matched comparison group of patients in which screw placement was performed under fluoroscopic guidance. The screw accuracy and the screw diameter to pedicle width ratio of every screw were compared between the groups.

Results

Screw accuracy was significantly higher in the navigation group compared to the fluoroscopic guidance group, alongside with a significant increase of the screw diameter to pedicle width ratio by approximately 10%. In addition, both the intraoperative radiation dose and the operating time tended to be lower in the study group.

Conclusion

This study was able to show that navigated thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement not only increases the accuracy of screw placement but also facilitates the selection of the adequate screw sizes, which according to the literature has positive effects on fixation strength. Meanwhile, the use of navigation did not negatively affect the time needed for surgery or the patient's intraoperative exposure to radiation.

Comparing Temporary Immobilization Using Cast and External Fixator in Unimalleolar Ankle Fracture Dislocations: A Retrospective Case Series

Studies have reported a high percentage of ankle fracture dislocations with secondary loss of reduction during primary treatment with a splint or cast. This study aimed to assess the rate of secondary loss of reduction in unimalleolar ankle fracture dislocations treated primarily with a cast or external fixator, identify the potential influence of fracture morphology, and investigate the potential implications. Unimalleolar ankle fracture dislocations with and without posterior malleolar fracture between 2011 and 2020 were included. Patients were categorized into two groups, depending on the method of temporary treatment. Fracture morphology, time to definitive surgery, and soft-tissue complications were compared. Of 102 patients, loss of reduction tended to occur more often in the cast group (17.3%) than in the external fixator group (6.0%). The presence of a posterior malleolar fracture did not have a significant influence on loss of reduction in cast immobilization; however, the fragment proved to be significantly bigger in cases with loss of reduction. No statistically significant differences in soft tissue complications or time to definitive surgery were found. Surgeons should consider the application of interval external fixation in the primary treatment of unimalleolar ankle fracture dislocations with additional posterior malleolar fractures.

Is the postoperative pedicle screw position after dorsal instrumentation with or without intraoperative cone beam CT imaging worse in patients with obesity than in normal-weight patients?

Background

Intraoperative cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging in dorsal instrumentation facilitates pedicle screw positioning. However, in patients with obesity, the benefit may be reduced due to artifacts that affect image quality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative CBCT leads to an improved postoperative screw position compared to conventional fluoroscopy independent of body weight.

Methods

A total of 71 patients (18 patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m², 53 patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m²) who underwent dorsal instrumentation with intraoperative CBCT imaging were included in study groups one (SG1) and two (SG2). Two control groups (CG1 and CG2) were randomly sampled to include 22 patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m² and 60 patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m² who underwent dorsal instrumentation without intraoperative CBCT imaging. The pedicle screw position in postoperative computed tomography was assessed using the Gertzbein–Robbins classification.

Results

In SG1 (BMI > 30 kg/m²), a total of 107 (83.6%) pedicle screws showed no relevant perforation (type A + B), and 21 (16.4%) pedicle screws showed relevant perforation (type C − E). In SG2 (BMI < 30 kg/m²), 328 (90.9%) screws were classified as type A + B, and 33 (9.1%) screws were classified as type C − E. In CG1 (BMI > 30 kg/m²), 102 (76.1%) pedicle screws showed no relevant perforation (type A + B), and 32 (23.9%) pedicle screws showed relevant perforation (type C − E). In CG2 (BMI < 30 kg/m²), 279 (76.9%) screws were classified as type A + B, and 84 (23.1%) screws were classified as type C − E. There were significant differences between the values of SG1 and SG2 (p = 0.03) and between the values of SG2 and CG2 (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

CBCT imaging in dorsal instrumentation can lead to an improved pedicle screw position among both patients with obesity and normal-weight patients. However, patients with obesity showed significantly worse pedicle screw positions postoperatively after dorsal instrumentation with intraoperative CBCT imaging than normal-weight patients.

First Clinical Experience with a Novel 3D C-Arm-Based System for Navigated Percutaneous Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement

Background and Objectives: Navigated pedicle screw placement is becoming increasingly popular, as it has been shown to reduce the rate of screw misplacement. We present our intraoperative workflow and initial experience in terms of safety, efficiency, and clinical feasibility with a novel system for a 3D C-arm cone beam computed-tomography-based navigation of thoracolumbar pedicle screws. Materials and Methods: The first 20 consecutive cases of C-arm cone beam computed-tomography-based percutaneous pedicle screw placement using a novel navigation system were included in this study. Procedural data including screw placement time and patient radiation dose were prospectively collected. Final pedicle screw accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein–Robbins grading system. Results: In total, 156 screws were placed. The screw accuracy was 94.9%. All the pedicle breaches occurred on the lateral pedicle wall, and none caused clinical complications. On average, a time of 2:42 min was required to place a screw. The mean intraoperative patient radiation exposure was 7.46 mSv. Conclusions: In summary, the investigated combination of C-arm CBCT-based navigation proved to be easy to implement and highly reliable. It facilitates the accurate and efficient percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine. The careful use of intraoperative imaging maintains the intraoperative radiation exposure to the patient at a moderate level.

Comparison of three imaging and navigation systems regarding accuracy of pedicle screw placement in a sawbone model

3D-navigated pedicle screw placement is increasingly performed as the accuracy has been shown to be considerably higher compared to fluoroscopy-guidance. While different imaging and navigation devices can be used, there are few studies comparing these under similar conditions. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of two combinations most used in the literature for spinal navigation and a recently approved combination of imaging device and navigation system. With each combination of imaging system and navigation interface, 160 navigated screws were placed percutaneously in spine levels T11-S1 in ten artificial spine models. 470 screws were included in the final evaluation. Two blinded observers classified screw placement according to the Gertzbein Robbins grading system. Grades A and B were considered acceptable and Grades C-E unacceptable. Weighted kappa was used to calculate reliability between the observers. Mean accuracy was 94.9% (149/157) for iCT/Curve, 97.5% (154/158) for C-arm CBCT/Pulse and 89.0% for CBCT/StealthStation (138/155). The differences between the different combinations were not statistically significant except for the comparison of C-arm CBCT/Pulse and CBCT/StealthStation (p = 0.003). Relevant perforations of the medial pedicle wall were only seen in the CBCT group. Weighted interrater reliability was found to be 0.896 for iCT, 0.424 for C-arm CBCT and 0.709 for CBCT. Under quasi-identical conditions, higher screw accuracy was achieved with the combinations iCT/Curve and C-arm CBCT/Pulse compared with CBCT/StealthStation. However, the exact reasons for the difference in accuracy remain unclear. Weighted interrater reliability for Gertzbein Robbins grading was moderate for C-arm CBCT, substantial for CBCT and almost perfect for iCT.

Software-Automated Implant Detection for Intraoperative 3D Imaging-First Clinical Evaluation on 214 Data Sets

Previous studies have demonstrated a frequent occurrence of screw/K-wire malpositioning during surgical fracture treatment under 2D fluoroscopy and a correspondingly high revision rate as a result of using intraoperative 3D imaging. In order to facilitate and accelerate the diagnosis of implant malpositioning in 3D data sets, this study investigates two versions of an implant detection software for mobile 3D C-arms in terms of their detection performance based on comparison with manual evaluation. The 3D data sets of patients who had received surgical fracture treatment at five anatomical regions were extracted from the research database. First, manual evaluation of the data sets was performed, and the number of implanted implants was assessed. For 25 data sets, the time required by four investigators to adjust each implant was monitored. Subsequently, the evaluation was performed using both software versions based on the following detection parameters: true-positive-rate, false-negative-rate, false-detection-rate and positive predictive value. Furthermore, the causes of false positive and false negative detected implants depending on the anatomical region were investigated. Two hundred fourteen data sets with overall 1767 implants were included. The detection parameters were significantly improved (p<.001) from version 1 to version 2 of the implant detection software. Automatic evaluation required an average of 4.1±0.4 s while manual evaluation was completed in 136.15±72.9 s (p<.001), with a statistically significant difference between experienced and inexperienced users (p=.005). In summary, version 2 of the implant detection software achieved significantly better results. The time saved by using the software could contribute to optimizing the intraoperative workflow.