Efficacy and safety of TM5614 in combination with paclitaxel in the treatment of paclitaxel-resistant cutaneous angiosarcoma: Phase II study protocol

Cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS) is an endothelial cell-derived, highly aggressive type of vascular tumour. Although chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel (PTX) is recognized as a first-line therapy for CAS, second-line therapy for CAS remains controversial, and there is no standard therapy for taxane-resistant CAS. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is associated with poor clinical outcomes, and elevated levels of PAI-1 in both tissue and serum are correlated with poor response to therapy in various cancers, including skin cancers. Since PAI-1 protects endothelial cells from Fas ligand-mediated apoptosis, PAI-1 inhibition might induce apoptosis of endothelial cell-derived tumours such as CAS. This is a single-arm, open-label, multi-institutional, Phase 2 clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of PTX in combination with TM5614 (PAI-1 inhibitor) in patients with PTX-resistant CAS. PTX will be administered for 28 weeks, with oral administration of TM5614. The primary endpoint of this study will be the overall response rate (ORR) at 28 weeks after starting treatment (central image evaluation). The secondary endpoint will include the ORR at 28 weeks after starting treatment (investigator evaluation), ORR at 8 weeks and 16 weeks after initiation of treatment (central and investigator evaluation), progression-free survival, overall survival, disease control rate and safety profiles. Assuming the null hypothesis of a response rate of 13.6% and an alternative hypothesis of 45%, a minimum of 15 patients are required to achieve a two-sided, Type I error of 5% and power of 70% based on the exact binomial distribution. Data quality control will be conducted by a combination of centralized (remote) and on-site monitoring. This study will contribute to the development of novel combination therapy for PTX-resistant CAS patients, which remains an unmet clinical need.

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease-like uveitis after drug therapy including BRAF/MEK inhibitors in melanoma patients with HLA-DRB1*04

The combination of BRAF kinase inhibitors (BRAFis) and MEK kinase inhibitors (MEKis) is one of the most promising chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of BRAF-mutant melanoma. Although BRAFi plus MEKi combined therapy is widely used for the treatment of BRAFV600 -mutated melanoma, the incidence of uveitis caused by BRAFi plus MEKi is limited. In this report, we described five cases (two men and three women) of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease-like uveitis in melanoma patients who received BRAFi plus MEKi combined therapy. Of note, all the patients had the HLA-DRB1*04 haplotype, which is frequently detected in VKH-like non-infectious uveitis. On the other hand, among BRAFi plus MEKi-treated patients who did not develop VKH disease-like uveitis, only one of five (20%) patients had the HLA-DRB1*04 haplotype. Collectively, BRAFi/MEKi might induce severe VKH disease-like uveitis in melanoma patients with the HLA-DRB1*04 haplotype.

Tubulointerstitial Nephritis in an Advanced Melanoma Patient Treated with Encorafenib plus Binimetinib Combination Therapy

Encorafenib plus binimetinib combination therapy is one of the first-line therapies for advanced melanoma, and it is known to cause a different profile of adverse events (AEs) than dabrafenib plus trametinib combination therapy. Of such AEs, tubulointerstitial nephritis caused by BRAF plus MEK inhibitors combination therapy is limited. In this report, a case of tubulointerstitial nephritis that developed in a rheumatoid arthritis patient with advanced melanoma treated with encorafenib plus dabrafenib combination therapy is presented.

Quantitative Analysis of Immune-Reactive Cells among Leukocytes Is Useful for the Diagnosis of Drug Eruptions Caused by Bexarotene

Bexarotene is a third-generation retinoid X receptor-selective retinoid that has been approved for use in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs). Since the objective response rate of bexarotene is relatively high, with no racial differences, bexarotene can be administered to patients with phototherapy-resistant early CTCL as one of the first-line therapies in real-world clinical practice. Although various adverse events caused by bexarotene have been reported, there have been no reports of drug eruptions caused by bexarotene. One of the possible reasons is that it is difficult to distinguish a drug eruption from recurrence of CTCL, histologically. In this report, drug eruptions in 2 patients with CTCL treated with bexarotene diagnosed by quantitative analysis of immunohistochemical staining by digital microscopy are described.

Matrix Metalloproteinase 28-Bearing Microcystic Adnexal Carcinoma on the Back

Although microcystic adnexal carcinoma (MAC) recurs and expands locally without metastases to the lymph nodes and other organs, its biological behavior remains unknown. In this report, a case of a giant MAC on the back treated with radical excision and curative radiation therapy and its characteristic dermoscopic findings are presented. In addition, immunohistochemical staining showed the expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 28 on the tumor cells and MMP12 and periostin in the stroma. The present case suggests the possible biological behaviors of MAC and might provide a possible target for the treatment of MAC in the future.

Dermoscopy findings of hidroacanthoma simplex

Hidroacanthoma simplex (HAS), also known as intraepidermal eccrine poroma, is a rare eccrine adnexal tumor that tends to be misdiagnosed as other types of benign skin tumor, including clonal seborrheic keratosis. Notably, HAS is sometimes misdiagnosed and treated by cryosurgery as seborrheic keratosis, which could trigger the later development of porocarcinoma. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of HAS is indispensable for dermatologists to avoid the development of malignant tumors by an unsuitable treatment. In this report, we present the characteristic dermoscopy findings of HAS. Indeed, the dermoscopy findings might be related to the melanin-rich necrotic cells in the epidermis, which are quite different from dermoscopy findings of clonal seborrheic keratosis. As a previous report suggested, it is difficult for a dermatologist to differentiate HAS from clonal seborrheic keratosis by the naked eye. Our findings might be supportive for the early diagnosis of HAS.