Integration of persistence in the 5P-medicine approach for age-related chronic diseases

5P medicine is defined as Personalized, Predictive, Preventive, Participatory, and Population-based. 5P medicine may be improved by including a factor that could provide information about the therapeutic value of a particular drug treatment and measure its effectiveness in clinical practice. We propose that this factor may be treatment persistence, and that its addition to 5P medicine would allow to define a new improved 6P medicine. Persistence is the length of time between initiation and the last dose, which immediately precedes discontinuation, that is, a definitive suspension of the treatment. By including this sixth P, the persistence, we would be able to present the value of a treatment for each individual patient with its own characteristics, state of the disease, with more than one age-related diseases and patient journey. Persistence is a concept of the value of a treatment that includes the three main stakeholders of the pharmacotherapeutic process: Patient, Physician, and Pharmacist. Persistence is becoming a useful measure to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of therapies in real-world setting in chronic diseases. Drug treatments with longer persistence are more likely to provide better disease control and to be amenable to dose adjustment in order to optimize treatment cost in age-related chronic diseases. Long-term persistence could be a measure of a drug´s real-world performance and has been shown to aid in clinical decision-making.

Humanization Guide of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy for patients with inflammatory immune-mediated diseases

OBJECTIVE

This study reports on the results of a project conducted by the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy with patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, with the following objectives: to understand  the experience of patients living with these diseases and the role of healthcare workers in such experience, and to identify opportunities to promote or boost humanization in hospital pharmacy units.

METHOD

A user-centered design methodology was used, implementing exploratory and qualitative research tools. Led by a managing  team made up of experts in the methodology, a variety of people participated  in this project. The team comprised representatives of patients with  immunemediated inflammatory diseases, healthcare workers responsible for  their care, members of the immune-mediated inflammatory disease working  group of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy, and members of two patient advocacy organizations (Spanish Association of Persons with Chronic Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases and the Spanish  association of Patients with Psoriasis). The research tools used included  indepth interviews, patients' diaries, ethnographic studies, and co-creation workshops.

RESULTS

Five initiatives were identified as best practices to be implemented: The creation of functional or comprehensive care units; shared  medical records; integration of patient-reported outcomes with patient  experiences; implementation of the "capacity, motivation, opportunity"  pharmaceutical care model; and a closer interaction with patient advocacy  organizations. Six opportunities to improve the current situation were selected  as priority areas for hospital pharmacy departments: spreading knowledge  about immune-mediated inflammatory diseases; promoting a multidisciplinary  approach to these diseases; generating awareness on the  role of hospital pharmacists; revisiting the internal organization of pharmacy  departments; establishing closer relationships with patients; and seeing things  from the patients' point of view. Ten smart humanization initiatives were  proposed and classified in an impact-effort matrix: "Demystifying IMID", "IMID  teen challenge", "Patient‑care academy", "Satellite consultation", "IMID  network", "A click away from the pharmacy", Medicines poker", "Patient-to- patient consultation", "Pharma-friendly consultation", and "Patient-centered  IMID sessions".

CONCLUSIONS

This Annex to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy's Guidelines for the Humanization of Hospital Pharmacy Units intends  to promote a humanizing culture, bringing to the fore the unique value  of every single patient suffering from an immune-mediated  inflammatory disease, including their family and friends and their beliefs and  needs, preserving their dignity.

Efficiency of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients: dosing patterns and effectiveness in daily clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective, multicentre, observational study aimed to assess the mean annual doses and associated costs of three anti-tumour necrosis factor agents in daily clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis patients, correlating these costs with disease activity.

METHODS

Adult rheumatoid arthritis patients were treated and followed at the Rheumatology departments of two Spanish hospitals for at least 6 months, with adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab over a 4-year period. ANOVA and multivariate statistical analyses of dosing patterns, disease activity and annualised costs were carried out.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients, comprising 215 cases, met the inclusion criteria (73 on adalimumab, 81 etanercept and 61 infliximab). Compared to recommended doses, mean doses of adalimumab and etanercept decreased by 7% and 19%, respectively, while the mean dose of infliximab increased by 36%. There were no statistical differences between treatments in terms of clinical effectiveness. The hazard of dose escalation was significantly higher for either adalimumab (4.4-fold) or infliximab (11.8-fold) compared to etanercept (p<0.05). Clinical control was achieved and maintained in more than half of the patients treated with reduced doses of etanercept. Associated mean patient-year costs were significantly higher in adalimumab patients (€11.962.58) (etanercept €9.594.73; infliximab €10.094.53; [p<0.05]).

CONCLUSIONS

In rheumatoid arthritis patients, it is possible to reduce doses and associated costs of biological therapies while controlling disease activity. Mean doses used in our clinical practice were significantly lower with etanercept than with the anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies, adalimumab and infliximab. Dose differences impact directly on associated patient-year costs, and thus on treatment efficiency.