Comparison of the safety and efficacy of cyclosporine minimization versus cyclosporine elimination in de novo renal allograft patients receiving sirolimus

The safety and efficacy of concentration-controlled use of sirolimus (SRL) and cyclosporine (CsA) followed by CsA minimization (CsAm) or elimination (CsAe) beginning at week 13 was compared in a phase 4, open-label, randomized (1:1) trial of renal transplant recipients enrolled between March 2004 and November 2005. The primary endpoint was renal function, measured at 12 months using the Nankivell formula, in patients remaining on therapy. Though a total enrollment of 140 patients in each group was planned to provide an 80% power to detect a difference in means, only 207 subjects were enrolled in this study. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups, with 98.1% recipients of first grafts, 69.1% from living donors, and 7.2% diabetics. At 12 months, there were no differences in renal function (61.08 vs 65.24 mL/min, P = .132); incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (14.3% vs 22.5%, P = .152); and patient (89.5% vs 92.2%, P = .632), graft (87.6% vs 88.2%, P = .999), and death-censored graft (98.1% vs 94.1%, P = .166) survivals between CsAm and CsAe groups, respectively. There were no differences in the overall rate of study-drug discontinuation (32.4% vs 36.3%, P = .562) but more patients discontinued because of lack of efficacy/graft loss in the CsAe group (4.8% vs 14.7%, P = .018). This study was underpowered to demonstrate the superiority of one regimen over the other. In summary, SRL immunotherapy combined with CsA minimization or elimination showed comparative safety and efficacy. Both regimens offer potential treatment options for de novo renal allograft recipients.

Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporine

The use of sirolimus (SRL) in combination with full doses of cyclosporin A (CsA) results in reduced one-year kidney allograft function, which is associated with shorter long-term allograft survival. We determined the effect of reduced CsA exposure on graft function in patients receiving SRL and prednisone. Ninety recipients of living kidney transplants receiving SRL (2 mg/day, po) were compared to 35 recipients receiving azathioprine (AZA, 2 mg kg-1 day-1, po). All patients also received CsA (8-10 mg kg-1 day-1, po) and prednisone (0.5 mg kg-1 day-1). Efficacy end-point was a composite of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death at one year. Graft function was measured by creatinine, creatinine clearance, and graft function deterioration between 3 and 12 months (delta1/Cr). CsA concentrations in patients receiving SRL were 26% lower. No differences in one-year composite efficacy end-point were observed comparing SRL and AZA groups (18 vs 20%) or in the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (14.4 and 14.3%). There were no differences in mean +/- SD creatinine (1.65 +/- 0.46 vs 1.60 +/- 0.43 mg/dl, P = 0.48) or calculated creatinine clearances (61 +/- 15 vs 62 +/- 13 ml/min, P = 0.58) at one year. Mean +/- SD delta1/Cr (-11 +/- 17 vs -14 +/- 15%, P = 0.7) or the percentage of patients with >20% (26 vs 31%, P = 0.6) or >30% delta1/Cr (19 vs 17%, P = 1) did not differ between the two groups. The use of 2-mg fixed oral doses of SRL and reduced CsA exposure was effective in preventing acute rejection and preserving allograft function.

Systemic and hepatic hemodynamics in hepatosplenic Manson's schistosomiasis with and without propranolol

Systemic and hepatic hemodynamics were prospectively studied in 11 patients with Manson's schistosomiasis and portal hypertension, as well as alterations resulting from the use of propranolol. It was decided that patients whose portal pressure was reduced by 30% with the use of the drug would not undergo surgery and that treatment would consist of the chronic use of propranolol, associated with sclerosis of esophageal varices. This objective was not met by any of the patients whose portal pressure was measured and the study was interrupted. Results show that patients with Manson's schistosomiasis and portal hypertension have hyperdynamic circulation, mild pulmonary hypertension, greatly increased splenic blood flow, and preservation of total hepatic blood flow. Administration of propranolol corrects hyperdynamic circulation, aggravates pulmonary hypertension, does not alter portal pressure and reduces the sectorial portal blood flows, especially of the azygos vein, with maintenance of total hepatic blood flow. These data favor the hypothesis of portal overflow in the physiopathology of portal hypertension of schistosomiasis.