[Medication reconciliation at hospital discharge focusing on patient with hypertension: Analysis of the output prescription]

PURPOSE

To describe pharmacists' interventions made at patients hospital discharge from Department of Hypertension.

METHODS

This is a single-center and prospective study over an 8-week period. At hospital discharge, the pharmacist compared pre-admission and inpatient medications with discharge orders and written instructions. Pharmacists' interventions were then classified in 4 categories. All variances and discrepancies were discussed with the prescribing physician when possible.

RESULTS

Over the 8-week period, 154 cases were analyzed. Pharmacists' interventions at discharge underwent 48 times on 21% of the patients (n=33) but none was clinically relevant. Among these 48 cases, 40% (n=19) were rated as "inappropriate administration", 27% (n=13) were classified as "incomplete prescription", 19% (n=9) were "variances" and 4% (n=2) were due to "omission prescription". In 10% of the cases (n=5), discrepancies appeared without any possible further analysis as no discussion with the prescriber occurred.

CONCLUSION

One fifth of all patients analyzed was the subject of a pharmacists' intervention. The complementary action of the pharmacist improves the consistency of the prescriptions and strengthens patient safety.

[Place of clinical pharmacist in the management of drugs in patients with hypertension]

PURPOSE

To synthesize pharmacists' interventions made in the department of internal medicine and hypertension of university hospital of Toulouse and assess the impact on medication orders.

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective study using pharmacists' interventions recorded between September 2013 and March 2014 on the Act-IP(©) website of the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy. The clinical pharmacist is present everyday in the unit to establish the medication reconciliation of new patients (the process of comparing a patient's medication orders to all of the medications that the patient has been taking), and analysis of medication orders. When a risk of iatrogenic drug is identified, a therapeutic change is proposed to the prescriber.

RESULTS

A total of 2491 medication orders were analyzed for 7 months, leading to 39 pharmacists' interventions (1.6 pharmacists' interventions per 100 medication orders). The most commonly identified drug-related problems were improper administration (33%, n=13), not prescribed drug (21%, n=8), non-conformity to guidelines (18%, n=7), supratherapeutic dose (15%, n=6), and 13% (n=5) targeted prescribed treatment not administered, underdosing, incorrect administration or drug interaction. The most relevant molecules were atorvastatin (10%), bromazepam (8%) and levothyroxine (8%) and only 2 interventions targeted antihypertensive drugs. The rate of physicians' acceptance was 92%.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists' interventions mainly concern the co-prescriptions of antihypertensive drugs and very few antihypertensive drugs. The clinical pharmacist contributes to preventing iatrogenic in patients with hypertension with a very good acceptance by the clinician.