Concurrent systemic therapy with radiotherapy for the treatment of poor-risk patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the therapeutic approach to poor-risk patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), despite the increasing number of these patients in current clinical practice. In terms of survival, the combination of concurrent systemic therapy with standard radiotherapy might be advantageous over radiotherapy alone. The purpose of this review is to ascertain the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the combination of concurrent systemic therapy and standard radiotherapy in these patients.

METHODS

A computer-based literature search was carried out using PubMed and Science Direct for relevant publications; data reported at major conferences in abstract form were also included.

RESULTS

In unresectable stage III NSCLC, advanced age, poor performance status, weight loss and comorbidities are factors that influence treatment options and disease outcomes in clinical practice. Prospective studies including poor-risk patients have been reviewed. Trials specifically recruiting poor-risk patients have been separated into those using chemotherapy and those using targeted agents with or without chemotherapy. Only two phase III studies specifically including poor-risk patients have been published. Some recent studies suggested that tolerable radio-sensitizing therapy combined with radiotherapy can provide longer survival outcomes than those reported earlier with chemo-radiotherapy or with radiotherapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an unmet need to develop well-designed clinical trials with tolerable combinations of systemic therapy and radiotherapy specifically tailored to this lung cancer population. Such trials should incorporate careful comorbidity measurement and, in older adults, a validated geriatric assessment.

Prospective assessment of XRCC3, XPD and Aurora kinase A single-nucleotide polymorphisms in advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE

New therapeutic approaches are being developed based on findings that several genetic abnormalities underlying non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can influence chemosensitivity. The identification of molecular markers, useful for therapeutic decisions in lung cancer, is thus crucial for disease management. The present study evaluated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in XRCC3, XPD and Aurora kinase A in NSCLC patients in order to assess whether these biomarkers were able to predict the outcomes of the patients.

METHODS

The Spanish Lung Cancer Group prospectively assessed this clinical study. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed stage IV or IIIB (with malignant pleural effusion) NSCLC, which had not previously been treated with chemotherapy, and a World Health Organization performance status (PS) of 0-1. Patients received intravenous doses of vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles. Venous blood was collected from each, and genomic DNA was isolated. SNPs in XRCC3 T241M, XPD K751Q, XPD D312N, AURORA 91, AURORA 169 were assessed.

RESULTS

The study included 180 patients. Median age was 62 years; 87 % were male; 34 % had PS 0; and 83 % had stage IV disease. The median number of cycles was 4. Time to progression was 5.1 months (95 % CI, 4.2-5.9). Overall median survival was 8.6 months (95 % CI, 7.1-10.1). There was no significant association between SNPs in XRCC3 T241M, XPD K751Q, XPD D312N, AURORA 91, AURORA 169 in outcome or toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that SNPs in XRCC3, XPD or Aurora kinase A cannot predict outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in MDR1 gen correlates with outcome in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with cisplatin plus vinorelbine

New therapeutic approaches are being developed based on the findings that several genetic abnormalities underlying NSCLC could influence chemosensitivity. In this study, we assessed whether the presence of polymorphisms in ERCC1, XPD, RRM1 and MDR1 genes can affect the efficacy and the tolerability of cisplatin and vinorelbine in NSCLC patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eligible patients had histological confirmed stage IV or IIIB (with malignant pleural effusion) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with chemotherapy; World Health Organization performance status (PS) 0-1. Patients received intravenous doses of vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on day 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m² on day 1, every 21 days, for a maximum of eight cycles.

RESULTS

94 patients were included. Median age was 61 years; 84% were male; WHO performance status (PS) was 0 in 24%; and 88% of patients had stage IV disease. The median number of cycles was 6. Overall median survival was 10.92 months (95% CI 9.0-12.9). Overall median time to progression was 5.89 months (95% CI 5.2-6.6). Results of the multivariate analysis for time to progression showed that ECOG 0 (hazard ratio [HR] ECOG 1 vs. ECOG 0, 1.74; p=0.036), MDR13435CC (HR CT vs. CC, 2.01; p=0.017; HR TT vs. CC, 1.54; p=0.22), and decreasing age (HR of age, 0.97; p=0.016) were the most powerful prognostic factors significantly related to lower risk of progression. Whereas ECOG 0 was the only prognostic factor for survival (HR ECOG 1 vs. ECOG 0, 3.02; p=0.001). There was no significant association between any of the SNPs analysed and the occurrence of vinorelbine and cisplatin-related toxicity.

CONCLUSION

In our results, the most important prognostic factors associated with lower risk of progression were MDR1 3435 CC genotype, PS 0 and younger age.

Phase I trial of vorinostat in combination with erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations after erlotinib progression

e19057

Background: Vorinostat (SAHA) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that induces differentiation, growth arrest and apoptosis of malignant cells. In vitro, there is a synergistic interaction of vorinostat in combination with gefitinib in NSCLC cell lines. Moreover, vorinostat increases levels of E-cadherin, p21, and downregulates expression of phospho-AKT and phospho-ERK1/2. These molecular findings could reverse resistance to erlotinib in mutant patients. Methods: We conducted a standard 3+3 Phase I trial of oral erlotinib 150 mg QD in combination with oral vorinostat (dose level 1 [DL1], 300 mg QD on days 1–7 every 21 days; DL2, 400 mg QD on days 1–7 every every 21 days, and; DL3, 400 mg QD on days 1–7 and 15–21 in a 28-day cycle). Cycles were repeated for a maximum of 6 cycles until progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity. Pts with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations (Exon 19 and 21) after erlotinib progression and ECOG ≤2 were eligible. The main objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), drug activity and safety of the combination regimen. Results: Thirteen patients have been enrolled up to date, with 9 patients available for this interim analysis (median age, 59 years; range 41–77). One patient (DL3 cohort) experienced a dose limiting toxicity (Grade 3 diarrhoea). The MTD has not been reached. The most common drug-related toxicities of any grade in the first cycle of treatment were anemia (77.8%), skin alterations (66.7%), diarrhoea (66.7%), xerostomy (55.6%), asymptomatic changes in liver function tests (55.6%), and asthenia (55.6%). There were no Grade ≥3 drug-related adverse events during first cycle of treatment and the global analysis of cycles showed asthenia (11.1%), somnolence (11.1%) and hyporexia (11.1%). Four pts discontinued treatment, all due to PD. Of 9 evaluable pts for efficacy, 6 had stable disease as best response (median duration of treatment 6.0 months, range 4–12). Final data will be presented at ASCO meeting. Conclusions: Although accrual continues to determine the MTD, the combination of vorinostat and erlotinib appears to be well tolerated and effective in this group of advanced NSCLC pts with EGFR mutations after erlotinib progression.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized phase II study of three doses of the integrin inhibitor cilengitide versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients (pts) with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

8014

Background: Cilengitide (EMD 121974) is the most advanced compound in clinical development of a new class of oncology drugs, the integrin inhibitors. Integrins (heterodimeric transmembrane receptors) play key roles in cell interactions. Cilengitide selectively inhibits the cell-surface integrins αVβ3 and αVβ5 on activated endothelial cells during angiogenesis and on tumor cells. Methods: Multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase II study in 140 pts with relapsed stage IV NSCLC. Pts received 1 of 3 cilengitide doses (240 [n=35], 400 [n=35], or 600 [n=36] mg/m2) twice weekly or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (n=34) once every 3-week cycle for 6 months. Responding pts could continue cilengitide for up to 1 year. Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Median age (range) was 60 (33–80) years; 94 pts were male (67%); 83% of pts had KPS ≥80%. Median PFS (95% CI) was 54 (43–64), 63 (53–66), 63 (42–67), and 67 (61–123) days for cilengitide 240, 400, 600, and docetaxel 75 mg/m2, respectively. Median OS (95% CI) was 173 (81–197), 117 (92–209), 181 (90–326), and 194 (135–298) days, respectively. One-year survival rate (95% CI) was 13% (1–24%), 13% (0–26%), 29% (12–37%), and 27% (10–43%), respectively. Survival was similar with cilengitide 600 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2: median OS 181 versus 194 days and 1-year survival rate (95% CI) 29% (12–37%) versus 27% (10–43%). Five docetaxel pts (15%) had a partial response. Most pts (98%) had ≥1 adverse event (AE). Most common AEs were dyspnea (33%), nausea (30%), tumor progression (29%), and cough (23%). Dyspnea and tumor progression were more common with cilengitide than with docetaxel. Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were more common with docetaxel (n=13, 41%) than cilengitide 240 (n=2, 6%), 400 (n=4, 11%), or 600 (n=4, 11%) mg/m2. For cilengitide, these were nausea, chest pain, dyspnea, and fatigue. Conclusions: PFS in the docetaxel group was greater than that of cilengitide at all doses. However, cilengitide monotherapy at a dose of 600 mg/m2 showed similar OS to docetaxel and better tolerability. Combination studies with standard chemotherapy and cilengitide are warranted.

[Table: see text]

Characteristics and outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) carrying epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations who progress after initial erlotinib (E) response

8064

Background: Most NSCLC pts with EGFR mutations respond to E; however, resistance to this tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) can be acquired. The resistant T790M mutation has been identified in 50% of progressing pts. We assessed pt characteristics and outcome to additional treatment in 55 EGFR mutated pts after progression to E. Results: Pts mean age was 59±12.5 years; 65% females; 94% never-smokers; 54 adenocarcinoma. 35 pts (63%) were PS ≤2; main metastasis sites were lung (39/71%), bone (21/38%) and liver (10/18%). 22 and 25 pts received E as first- or second-line treatment, respectively. Mutations in tumor were: 65% DelE19 (Δ746–750), 35% L858R mutation; with 31% and 20% serum detection respectively. For the complete cohort, overall response rate (ORR) with E was 78% and time to progression (TTP) was 11.2 months (m) (range, 4–29 m). After progressing to E, 8 pts were re-biopsied, of whom 2 had the T790M mutation; 9 had the T790M mutation in serum (16%). 49% received platinum-based chemotherapy, 14.5% E plus another agent (bevacizumab, fulvestrant, vorinostat), 25.5% single-agent chemotherapy and 11% a non-reversible TKI (HKI-272). ORR for first-line post-E treatments was 33% (CR 1/PR 9) and median TTP was 8 m (range, 4.1–11.8 m). There were no differences in TTP according to gender (p = 0.10), type of mutation (p = 0.63) or severity of skin toxicity (p = 0.16). 11 pts received a second-line post-E treatment with E plus chemotherapy, achieving an ORR of 40%. Median survival was 27 m for all 55 pts (range, 22.9–31.1 m). Conclusions: Pts with EGFR mutations present a biologically different disease which continued to be sensitive to other treatments after progressing to E.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Multicenter prospective trial of customized erlotinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations: Final results of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) trial

8023

Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib and the feasibility of screening for EGFR mutations in advanced NSCLC p (chemonaive or relapsed after 2 prior chemotherapy regimens). Methods: Exon 19 deletions and L858R mutations in tumor and paired serum DNA were assessed in one central laboratory, using three different techniques. Results: From April 2005 to December 2008, 2507 p were screened. EGFR mutations were detected in 358 p; 217 were entered on the trial: 158 (72.8%) female; 148 (68.2%) never-smokers; 176 (81.1%) adenocarcinoma; 134 (62.3%) exon 19 deletion, 83 (37.7%) L858R mutation; 112 (51.6%) first-line, 104 (48.4%) second-line. Response in 139/197 evaluable p (70.6%); complete response (CR) in 24 p (12.2%). Odds ratio for response: 3 for p with exon 19 deletion (P=0.001). Time to progression (TTP): 14 months (m). Median survival (MS): 27 m. MS according to response shown in table. Cox model for TTP showed that male gender (hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; P=0.001), L858R mutation (HR, 1.8; P=0.008), and mutated EGFR in serum (HR,1.6; P=0.03) had a negative impact. Conclusions: A multicenter study of customized erlotinib, using a central screening laboratory, is feasible and shows the outstanding benefit to p for selecting erlotinib treatment based on EGFR mutation status. The SLCG has initiated a randomized trial of first-line erlotinib vs chemotherapy.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Continued high activity of figitumumab (CP-751,871) combination therapy in squamous lung cancer

8072

Background: Figitumumab (CP-751,871) is a fully human, IgG2monoclonal antibody against the insulin-like growth factor type I receptor (IGF-IR). We reported in a randomized phase II study (ASCO 2008), preliminary evidence of high activity of the combination of paclitaxel (T), carboplatin (C) and figitumumab (F) in advanced treatment-naïve NSCLC of squamous cell histology (n=11 pts). A single arm trial extension cohort was conducted to confirm those findings. Methods: Fifty-six pts with non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC were enrolled. Pts received T (200 mg/m2), C (AUC of 6) and F (20 mg/kg) q3weeks for up to 6 cycles; pts with response (PR) or stable disease were eligible to continue F as single agent until disease progression. Statistical hypotheses were 30% (null) versus 50% (response of interest). Protein expression of the IGF-IR in core tumor biopsies was quantified using automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) technology. Results: Pts were 72% male, 28% >70 years old and 91% stage IV. Median number of treatment cycles was 4, with 46% of pts receiving single agent F beyond cycle 4. TCF was well tolerated. The most common all-causality grade 3, 4 CTCAE adverse events were neutropenia (21%), hyperglycemia (14%) and fatigue (14%). Hyperglycemia adverse events almost always occurred within the first treatment cycle and were manageable with standard measures. Responses in squamous pts are currently 25 out of 40 pts according to RECIST, with final response assessment still pending for 7 additional pts (≥53%, p<0.001). One complete response and 7 striking PRs (50–80% tumor size reduction at cycle 2) were observed. Tumor size reductions with F maintenance treatment were also seen in 2 pts. Median progression free survival has not been yet reached at 4 months follow up. A trend (p=0.1) for higher IGF-IR expression in patients responding to TCF was observed in a small data set (n=12). Median tumor IGF-IR expression in pts responding to TCF therapy and non-responders were respectively 6287 and 4131 AQUA scores. Analysis of IGF-IR and other members of the IGF-IR pathway continues. Conclusions: These data further support the activity of figitumumab combination therapy in pts with squamous NSCLC.

[Table: see text]

14–3-3 σ and checkpoint with forkhead and ring finger (CHFR) methylation in serum in erlotinib-treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p) with EGFR mutations

7600

Background: 14–3-3 proteins have 130 potential binding partners, including Cbl. 14–3-3 expression can prevent mutant EGFR binding to Cbl, impairing ubiquitination and endocytosis. 14–3-3s is frequently methylated in NSCLC; we hypothesized that in the presence of EGFR mutations, methylated 14–3-3s could permit the formation of the EGFR-Cbl complex. CHFR is a checkpoint that delays entry into metaphase in response to mitotic stress. Methods: 73 stage IV NSCLC p with EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation received first- or second-line erlotinib single therapy. 14–3-3s and CHFR methylation was examined in the baseline serum of these p. Results: Median age, 63 (range, 26–83); females, 48 p (65.8%); Caucasian, 72 p, Asian, 1 p; never-smokers, 45 p, ex-smokers, 21 p, smokers, 7 p; adenocarcinoma, 64 p, large cell carcinoma, 9. PS: 0, 19 p, 1, 42 p, 2–3, 12 p. 14–3-3s was methylated in 39.7% and CHFR in 42.5% of p. No differences in p characteristics were observed according to methylation status. Complete response was observed in 11.1% of p, and partial response in 75.4%. Overall response was 86.5%. There was a trend toward a higher response rate in p with unmethylated CHFR (94.4% vs 76.6%; P=ns). Overall median time to progression (TTP) and survival (MS) have not been reached either in first- or second-line. However, when split according to methylation status, there was a trend toward better TTP and MS in both first- and second-line in p with methylated 14–3-3s. TTP in second-line in p with methylated 14–3-3s has not been reached, while it was 10.8 months (m) for p with unmethylated 14–3-3s (P=ns). TTP in second-line in p with methylated CHFR was 5.2 m but was not reached for p with unmethylated CHFR (P=0.05). Conclusions: Methylated 14–3-3s can permit Cbl binding to mutant EGFR and predict longer-lasting response to erlotinib in p with EGFR mutations. The precise role of CHFR warrants further research. Complete data will be presented.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

XPD 312 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in stage IIIA-B non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p) <59 years (y) treated with chemotherapy followed by surgery

7652

Background: SNPs in DNA repair genes may affect response to cytotoxic therapy. We investigated SNPs in XPD codons 751 and 312 and in RRM1 −37 in 109 stage IIIA (N2) and IIIB NSCLC p treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and correlated results with event- free (EFS) and median (MS) survival. Methods: p eligible for surgery received cisplatin day (d) 1, gemcitabine d 1,8, docetaxel d 1,8,15, every 3 weeks for 3 cycles, followed by thoracotomy. DNA was extracted from baseline peripheral lymphocytes and genotyping was performed by Taqman. Results: Median age, 60 y (range 31–77); 92 males (84%); 45 squamous cell (41%). 4 p (3.9%) attained complete response; 55 (53.9%) partial response. 75 p underwent surgery (62 complete, 13 incomplete resection); remaining 34 p were unresectable. Median follow-up was 15.7 months (m) (range, 0.5–74). MS for p still alive is 49.8 m (range, 6.7–74). MS: 48 m with complete resection, 13 m with incomplete resection, 17 m for unresected p. In the univariate analysis of survival, age <59 y (P=0.03), resection (P<0.001) and XPD312 AspAsp (P=0.05) emerged as predictive markers of longer survival. For all 109 p, those with XPD312 AspAsp had longer EFS and MS than p with Asn variants ( Table ). In addition, for 51 p <59 y, EFS was longer for 24 p with XPD312 AspAsp (36.4 m) than for 27 p with Asn variants (9.8 m) (P=0.009); MS in this group of younger p was 45.4 m for AspAsp vs 15.8 m for Asn (P=0.04). No other significant correlation between SNPs and survival was observed ( Table ). Conclusions: Interaction between SNPs, age and risk of lung cancer has previously been described. XPD312 AspAsp in p <59 y predicts longer survival in stage IIIA (N2) and IIIB NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

[Table: see text]

Skin rash as surrogate marker of efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib

7602

Background: Erlotinib is an orally EGFR TKI approved for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Its most frequent and specific toxicity is a rash which generally occurs in a dose-dependent manner. A relationship between rash and clinical outcome have been suggested. Methods: The TargeT trial was an open-label, non-randomized, phase II study carried out in 101 Spanish institutions. Patients (p) with confirmed NSCLC (stage IIIB-IV) were treated with 150 mg/day po until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary objective was time to progression. Here we report a retrospective analysis describing outcomes in terms of response and survival in the group of patients who developed rash and those who did not. Results: Data were available for 1,255 p. Key baseline characteristics were similar in p with and without rash. Median age 65y (range 26–95) Most p were male (75%); active/former smoker (82%) 51% adenocarcinoma histolog. ECOG PS 0/1/2 were (%) 20/53/27. The % p receiving erlotinib as 1st/2nd/3rd- line treatment were 26/39/35. 698 patients were evaluable for response. Objective response rate (ORR) 12.6% with 51% control disease rate. Skin rash of any grade was observed in 73.4% p, among these p, responses were observed in 14.3%. In p with no rash ORR was 8.1% (p=0.03). Control disease rate was significantly higher among p experiencing rash (56.6%) than those without rash (35.48%; p<0.0001). Median time to progression for p with rash were 3.8 mo (95% CI: 3.4–4.3), compared with 2.3 mo (95% CI: 2.1–2.6) in those with no rash (p<0.001). Similar trend was found in overall survival 6.5 mo (95% CI: 6.1–7.3) in p with rash versus 2.3 mo (95% CI: 2.3–2.7; p<0.001). In addition p who developed rash grade =2 had significantly longer TTP (4.2 m; 95% CI 3.6–4.8; p<0.001) and OS (7.9 mo; 95% CI 6.5–8.8). Conclusions: This retrospective analysis suggest a correlation between skin rash development and severity and treatment outcome. Skin rash seems to be a surrogate marker of efficacy. Studies to prospectively investigate the association between increased dosing of erlotinib, skin rash and optimal response are currently ongoing. However, data from our analysis indicate that skin toxicity is neither sufficient nor necessary condition for an optimal outcome.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cisplatin (CDDP) plus vinorelbine (VRB) as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Molecular correlates

7692

Background: The combination of cisplatin plus vinorelbine is a reference regimen as first-line therapy in advanced NSCLC. The correlation between predictive genetic markers and clinical endpoints may improve the prediction of treatment success and thereby the tailoring of chemotherapy. In this trial, predictive genetic markers of response to CDDP/VRB were examined in genomic DNA and cDNA derived from tumors and circulating tumors. Methods: 238 chemonaive p with stage IIIB (pleural effusion or supraclavicular lymph nodes)- IV or recurrent NSCLC were accrued at 35 sites between April 2004 and January 2006. Treatment consisted of CDDP 75 mg/m2 IV day 1 plus VRB 25 mg/m2 IV or 60–80 mg/m2 oral, days 1, 8 every 21 days. DNA samples were collected from primary tumors for the assessment of microtubule associated protein 4 (MAP4) and from serum for the checkpoint forkhead-associated and ring finger (CHFR) methylation. Results: Data on 198 p is available. Median age 62 years (38–80); males: 83.8%; smokers: 77.8%; PS 0–1: 95.3%; adenocarcinoma, 48.9% / squamous, 32.8%; stage IIIB: 16.7%, IV: 83.3%. Median cycles: 4 (1–12). Hematological toxicities (%p): grade 3/4 neutropenia, 9.6%/7.6%; grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, 0.5%/0.5%; grade 3 anemia, 2%. Febrile neutropenia appeared in 14 cycles / 10 p (1.8%/5,1%). Non-hematological toxicities (%p): pulmonary grade 3/4, 3.0%/2.5%; nausea/vomiting grade 3/4, 7.6%/0.5%; asthenia grade 3, 13.2%; pain grade 3, 6.6%; infection grade 3, 4.1%; neurotoxicity grade 3, 0.5%. Efficacy in evaluable population: CR, 2.3%; PR, 30.8%; ORR, 33.1% (95% CI, 26.1% to 40.2%); SD, 39.7%. With a median follow up of 6.7 months, median survival for the whole population was 9 months (m), progression free survival 5.07 m, event free survival 4.8 m, 1-year survival 39.9%. Conclusions: The tolerability, efficacy and survival results of this trial confirm that CDDP/VRB is effective as first-line therapy, presenting a favorable toxicity profile in p with advanced NSCLC. Complete data on genetic markers will be presented.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Concomitant chemoradiation plus induction (I) or consolidation (C) chemotherapy (CT) with docetaxel (D) and gemcitabine (G) for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p). Results of the randomized SLCG 0008 phase II trial

7620

Background: Neither the optimal sequence of treatment nor the best combination CT is yet well-defined in p receiving concomitant therapy Methods: P with unresectable stage III NSCLC with IK ≥ 70 and weight loss < 5% were initially randomized to sequential treatment (arm A), concurrent CT/TRT followed by consolidation CT (arm B) or induction CT followed by CT/TRT (arm C). Based on RTOG 9410 results, arm A was closed and the study continues with two concomitant arms (B, C). All p receive 2 cycles of D 40 mg/m2 d1, 8 plus G 1,200 mg/m2 d1, 8 as I or C therapy. Concomitant treatment includes D 20 mg/m2 and carboplatin (Cb) AUC 2 weekly plus 60 Gy TRT. Results: From May 01 to Jun 06, 151 p were included (A: 19, B: 66, C: 66). Due to the early closing of arm A, only data of evaluable arms B and C p are shown: toxicity 127 p (B: 63, C: 64) and response 110 p (B: 53, C: 57). All groups are well-matched for baseline disease characteristics. Toxicity grade 3–4 by CTC and RTOG criteria was: esophagitis 19.5% (arm B) and 14.2% (arm C); pneumonitis 8.8 % (arm B) and 10% (arm C). Neutropenia during I or C therapy: 22% (B) and 6.2% (C). Thrombocytopenia 8% (B) and 3% (C). Neutropenia during concomitant therapy: 6.3% (B) and 6% (C). No thrombocytopenia or severe anemia was found during CT/TRT. The reduction CT rate was superior in consolidation (35%) than in induction (15%) and in arm C during concomitant therapy (22.4% C, 6.5% B). Delay of CT dose was similar in B and C arms during I or C (22% B, 20% C) but superior in arm C during concurrent treatment (19.6% B, 30.6% C). The final response rates were 57% (B) and 56.9% (C). A trend for longer time to progression (TTP) was found (B: 7.6 months (m) and C: 9.2 m; p= 0.12) but with similar overall survival (B: 14.3 m and C: 14.7 m; p=0.38). Conclusions: Non- platinum CT plus concomitant chemoradiation offer similar response rate and a favorable hematological toxicity profile in unresectable stage III NSCLC p. No differences in OS but a trend for longer TTP in the arm C (I followed by concurrent approach) has been found. Final data are pending in order to select the best sequence for further studies.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Are trends in recruitment of older patients in clinical trials (CT) changing?

16007

Background: It has been widely reported that older patients are underrepresented in CT. This barrier has been extensively studied and some efforts have been made to increase older patient participation. This study was performed to characterize and evaluate the enrolment of elderly patients in CT in a cancer centre (Barcelona, Spain). Methods: A database-based analysis of patients entered in CT of any cancer type in a single institution between 1998 and 2005 was performed. (1) During the first 6-month period in 2005 we selected opened age-unspecified trials (AUT). Rates of patients of 74 Y entered in those trials (between 2001–2005) were analysed and compared with the corresponding rates on target population (new patients seen in Oncology Department in the first 6-month period in 2005). (2) Averages of age of CT patients in two periods of time: 1998–1999 and 2004–2005 were compared. Chi-squared and T-student analyses were used. Results: 2029 patients were entered in CT between 1998–2005. There were 1006 FTSP patients during the first 6-month period of 2005. The number of patients entered in AUT (19 trials among 71 opened [27%]) between 2001–2005 was 277. Table 1 summarizes the data by age groups. Statistically significant differences were found only between >74 y patients in CT and FTSP populations. Average age was 57.4 during 1998–1999, and 60.5 during 2004–2005 (p: 0.004). Conclusions: The number of patients >74 Y accrued in CT in a single cancer centre has clearly increased over time, maybe due to the rise of life expectancy, better patient care and the efforts in improving recruitment rates. In spite of the increase, this patient population remains underrepresented in general cancer CT.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Docetaxel-based induction therapy prior to radiotherapy with or without docetaxel for non-small-cell lung cancer

This trial aimed to assess the feasibility and tumour control of concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone after docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC received two 21-day cycles of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel (85 mg m(-2), day 1) plus cisplatin (40 mg m(-2), days 1 and 2). Patients without disease progression on day 43 were randomised to radiotherapy (2 Gy for 5 days week(-1); total 60 Gy) alone or with docetaxel 20 mg m(-2) once weekly every 6 weeks. Of 108 patients who received induction chemotherapy, 104 were evaluable for response. After induction chemotherapy, the overall response rate (ORR) was 44%; 91 (88%) patients had no disease progression and 89 were subsequently randomised to local treatment. After randomised therapy, the ORR was 53% (chemoradiotherapy 58%; radiotherapy 48%). Median survival and time to progression were 14.9 and 7.8 months, respectively, for chemoradiotherapy and 14.0 and 7.5 months, respectively, for radiotherapy. The most common toxicities during induction chemotherapy and randomised therapy were grades 3-4 neutropenia and grade 3 lymphocytopenia, respectively. Docetaxel-cisplatin induction therapy followed by concurrent docetaxel and thoracic radiotherapy is a feasible treatment option, showing good clinical activity and tolerability, for locally advanced NSCLC.

Epidermal growth factor receptor activating mutations in Spanish gefitinib-treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

North American and Japanese non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation via tyrosine kinase (TK) mutations respond dramatically to gefitinib treatment. To date, however, the frequency and effect of EGFR TK mutations have not been examined in European patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-three Spanish advanced NSCLC patients who had progressed after chemotherapy, were treated with compassionate use of gefitinib. Patients were selected on the basis of available tumor tissue. Tumor genomic DNA was retrieved from paraffin-embedded tissue obtained by laser capture microdissection. EGFR mutations in exons 19 and 21 were examined by direct sequencing.

RESULTS

EGFR mutations were found in 10 of 83 (12%) of patients. All mutations were found in adenocarcinomas, more frequently in females (P=0.007) and non-smokers (P=0.01). Response was observed in 60% of patients with mutations and 8.8% of patients with wild-type EGFR (P=0.001). Time to progression for patients with mutations was 12.3 months, compared with 3.6 months for patients with wild-type EGFR (P=0.002). Median survival was 13 months for patients with mutations and 4.9 months for those with wild-type EGFR (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR TK mutational analysis is a novel predictive test for selecting lung adenocarcinoma patients for targeted therapy with EGFR TK inhibitors.

Treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome by endovascular stent insertion. Experience on 52 patients with lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is a frequent presentation of malignancies involving the mediastinum and can seriously compromise treatment options and prognosis. Stenting of superior vena cava is a well-known but not so commonly used technique to alleviate this syndrome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 1993 and December 2000 we performed 52 stenting procedures in patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

RESULTS

Phlebographic resolution of the obstruction was achieved in 100% of cases with symptomatic and subjective improvement in more than 80%. One major complication was observed due to bleeding during anticoagulation. Re-obstruction of the stent occurred in only 17% of the cases, the majority due to disease progression. Improvement of the syndrome allowed hydration necessary for full dose platinum treatment when indicated in patients affected by lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Stenting of the superior vena cava syndrome is a safe and effective procedure achieving a rapid alleviation of symptoms in almost all patients, and allowing for full dose treatment in lung cancer patients. This procedure could change the traditional poorer prognosis attributed to non-small cell lung cancer patients presenting with this syndrome.

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus a cisplatin-based triplet versus nonplatinum sequential doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Spanish Lung Cancer Group phase III randomized trial

PURPOSE

To compare the survival benefit obtained with cisplatin plus gemcitabine, a cisplatin-based triplet, and nonplatinum sequential doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage IIIB to IV NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 plus gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for six cycles (CG); cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for six cycles (CGV); or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 plus vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 plus ifosfamide 3 g/m2 day 1, every 3 weeks for three cycles (GV-VI).

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-seven patients were assigned to treatment (182 CG, 188 CGV, 187 GV-VI). Response rates were significantly inferior for the nonplatinum sequential doublet (CG, 42%; CGV, 41%; GV-VI, 27%; CG v GV-VI, P =.003). No differences in median survival or time to progression were observed. Toxicity was higher for the triplet: grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (GC, 32%; CGV, 57%; GV-VI, 27%; P <.05); neutropenic fever (CG, 4%; CGV, 19%; GV-VI, 5%; P <.0001); grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia (CG, 19%; CGV, 23%; GV-VI, 3%; P =.0001); and grade 3 to 4 emesis (GC, 22%; GCV, 32%; GV-VI, 6%; P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of these results, CG remains a standard regimen for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Three-week schedule of irinotecan and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentre phase II study

A phase II multicentre study of a 3-week schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin providing the highest recommended dose intensity of both agents in combination, was conducted in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Seventy-four stage IIIB (not suitable for radiotherapy) or stage IV NSCLC patients were enrolled to receive CPT-11 200 mg/m(2) i.v. and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 every 3 weeks. Relative dose-intensities for CPT-11 and cisplatin were 92 and 95%, respectively. No complete responses were observed. Twenty-five patients out of 73 obtained a partial response (34.2%). Partial responses were confirmed in 18 patients (24.7%: 95% CI, 15.3-36.1%). Median survival overall was 8.2 months, 9.7 months for patients with baseline performance status (PS) 0 and 1, and 4 months for patients with PS 2. The 1-year survival rate was 31%. Major clinical toxicities were grade 3 and 4 delayed diarrhoea (29% of patients) and febrile neutropenia (14% of patients). In conclusion, the present once-every-3-week schedule of CPT-11 and cisplatin is feasible and active in PS 0-1 advanced NSCLC patients, but results do not seem superior to those reported with other schedules.

Lenograstim as support for ACE chemotherapy of small-cell lung cancer: a phase III, multicenter, randomized study

This phase III study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of lenograstim as support for ACE (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide) chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. Patients were randomized to receive up to six 3-week cycles of either ACE alone (n = 139) or ACE with lenograstim support (150 microg/m2/day subcutaneously, days 4-13, n = 141). Compared with the chemotherapy-alone group, the lenograstim support group was more likely to achieve neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count, > or =1.5 x 10(9) cells/l) by day 14 (95.8-100% vs. 14.3-24.1% across the cycles) and less likely to experience at least one infectious episode (36.7 vs. 54.0%; p = 0.004), chemotherapy delay (51.8 vs. 56.2%; NS), or dose reduction (17.3 vs. 27.7%; p = 0.037). Objective response and event-free and overall survival rates were similar. Lenograstim was well tolerated. Lenograstim may allow the interval between cycles of ACE to be reduced to 2 weeks; such dose intensification may lead to more favorable objective response and survival rates.