1
|
412 Sacubitril/valsartan promotes cardiac reverse remodeling and preserves renal function in a real-world heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) population. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez319.1183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
none
Aims. To evaluate the effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan (S/V) on clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters and outcomes in a real-world population with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Methods and results. Prospective study enrolling consecutive patients with HFrEF treated with S/V.The primary outcome was HF rehospitalization;secondary outcomes were all-cause death, cardiac death and the composite of cardiac death and HF rehospitalization at 12 months follow up.The clinical outcome was compared with a retrospective cohort of 90 HFrEF patients treated with standard medical therapy by using propensity score weighting. At 6 months follow-up, changes in symptoms, echocardiographic parameters, eGFR and furosemide dose were also evaluated. The study population consisted of 90 patients (66.1 ± 11.7 years). At 6 months FU, a significant improvement in NYHA class, LVEF (from 31.0% to 34.0%; p = 0.001), LVESV (from 115.0 to 101.0 mL; p = 0.033) and sPAP (from 31.0 to 25.0 mmHg; p = 0.024) was observed. Moreover, S/V did not affect negatively eGFR and was associated with a significantly lower dose of furosemide prescribed. The propensity score weighting adjusted regression analysis showed a significantly lower risk for HF rehospitalization (HR, 0.131; 95% CI, 0.034-0.503; p = 0.003) and the composite outcome (HR, 0.162; 95% CI, 0.053-0.492; p = 0.001) among patients treated with S/V as compared to the standard therapy group.
Conclusions
In this real-world HFrEF population, S/V reduced HF rehospitalization and cardiac death at 1 year. Moreover, S/V improved significantly NYHA class, LVEF, LVESV and sPAP at 6 months, preserving renal function and reducing the need of furosemide.
Table Study outcomes Unadjusted model HR 95% CI p-value HF rehospitalization 0.273 0.101-0.740 0.011 Cardiac death 0.443 0.137-1.440 0.176 Composite outcome 0.331 0.155-0.710 0.005 All-cause death 0.666 0.272-1.628 0.372 Adjusted model HR 95% CI p-value HF rehospitalization 0.131 0.034-0.503 0.003 Cardiac death 0.259 0.047-1.415 0.119 Composite outcome 0.162 0.053-0.492 0.001 All-cause death 0.713 0.201-2.529 0.601 Adjusted and unadjusted HR for the study outcomes.
Abstract 412 Figure.
Collapse
|
2
|
P330 Blunted heart rate reserve during vasodilator stress echocardiography in diabetic and renal failure patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez319.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
None
Background
A blunted heart rate reserve (HRR) during dipyridamole stress echo (SE) is a marker of cardiac autonomic dysfunction associated with poor outcome, independently of inducible ischemia, underlying coronary artery disease (CAD) and beta-blocker therapy. Patients with diabetes and/or renal failure have higher prevalence of underlying autonomic dysfunction.
Aim. To assess the value of HRR in patients undergoing dipyridamole SE.
Methods
We prospectively recruited a sample of 61 patients with known or suspected CAD (mean age 75 ± 10 years; 34 males, 55,7%; 50% on beta-blockers at the time of testing). Coexistent atrial fibrillation or previous pacemaker implantation were considered as exclusion criteria. Three groups were identified a priori: non-diabetic with normal renal function (n = 43, Group 1); diabetics, with normal renal function (n = 14, Group 2); severely impaired renal function on dialysis (n = 4, Group 3). All patients underwent dipyridamole SE (0.84 mg/kg in 10"). Wall motion score Index (WMSI) was calculated with a 17-segment score of left ventricle, each segment scored from 1= normal to 4= dyskinetic. HRR was measured by ECG as the peak/rest HR ratio.
Results
A positive SE (stress WMSI> rest WMSI) was present in 2 patients of Group 1 (4.7%), 4 of Group 2 (28.6%) and no patient in Group 3. Heart rate was different, although not significant, among the 3 groups both at rest (66.1 ± 11.1 vs 64.6 ± 8.5 vs 79.0 ± 8.0, p = 0.050) and at peak stress (83.8 ± 12.6 vs 75.3 ± 10.3 vs 86.5 ± 11.1, p = 0.059). Of note, HRR was statistically different among groups (1.29 ± 0.20 vs 1.19 ± 0.14 vs 1.09 ± 0.06, p < 0.047; see figure). There was no difference in HRR between patients off and on-beta-blockers (1.19 ± 0.16 vs 1.24 ± 0.24, p = 0.421) and with or without positive SE (1.20 ± 0.14 vs 1.25 ± 0.20, p = 0.530). Overall, HRR ≤ 1.17 (median value) was reported in 39.5% of Group 1, 71.4% of Group 2, and 100% of Group 3 pts (p = 0.024). No significant correlations between HRR and peak WMSI (p = 0.183) or age (0.062) were reported.
Conclusion
HRR is frequently abnormal in patients referred for SE testing, especially in presence of concomitant diabetes and advanced renal failure. The blunted chronotropic response is a simple, imaging independent marker of cardiac autonomic dysfunction and may usefully complement the conventional evaluation with regional wall motion abnormalities during vasodilator SE.
Abstract P330 Figure title: HRR box plots
Collapse
|