Comparative analysis of 2 commercial molecular tests for the detection of gastroenteric viruses on stool samples.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2019;
96:114893. [PMID:
31677959 DOI:
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114893]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Our purpose was to compare the performance of 2 recently introduced molecular tests for the identification of gastrointestinal viral infections.
METHODS
One hundred fecal samples from pediatric patients were analyzed using 2 workflows, each including nucleic acids extraction and multiplex Real-Time PCR: Allplex™ GI-Virus Assay and FTD Viral gastroenteritis. The agreement was evaluated calculating Cohen's kappa and applying McNemar's test.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION
Allplex and FTD assays showed 100% overall agreement for Norovirus GI/GII and Sapovirus (κ: 1.00), and 99% for Astrovirus (κ: 0.66). A lower agreement was detected for Adenovirus (89%; κ: 0.72) and Rotavirus (91%, k: 0.53), owing to samples resulted positive only with FTD test. The discrepancies were attributed to a different efficiency of extraction/amplification and to the different Adenovirus serotype specificity of the tests since Allplex detects only AdVF40 and AdVF41. FTD test should be used when non enteric adenovirus could have a clinical significance.
Collapse