Differences in attitudes and beliefs toward end-of-life care between hematologic and solid tumor oncology specialists

BACKGROUND

Patients with hematologic malignancies often receive aggressive care at the end-of-life. To better understand the end-of-life decision-making process among oncology specialists, we compared the cancer treatment recommendations, and attitudes and beliefs toward palliative care between hematologic and solid tumor specialists.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomly surveyed 120 hematologic and 120 solid tumor oncology specialists at our institution. Respondents completed a survey examining various aspects of end-of-life care, including palliative systemic therapy using standardized case vignettes and palliative care proficiency.

RESULTS

Of 240 clinicians, 182 (76%) clinicians responded. Compared with solid tumor specialists, hematologic specialists were more likely to favor prescribing systemic therapy with moderate toxicity and no survival benefit for patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 4 and an expected survival of 1 month (median preference 4 versus 1, in which 1 = strong against treatment and 7 = strongly recommend treatment, P < 0.0001). This decision was highly polarized. Hematologic specialists felt less comfortable discussing death and dying (72% versus 88%, P = 0.007) and hospice referrals (81% versus 93%, P = 0.02), and were more likely to feel a sense of failure with disease progression (46% versus 31%, P = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, hematologic specialty [odds ratio (OR) 2.77, P = 0.002] and comfort level with prescribing treatment to ECOG 4 patients (OR 3.79, P = 0.02) were associated with the decision to treat in the last month of life.

CONCLUSIONS

We found significant differences in attitudes and beliefs toward end-of-life care between hematologic and solid tumor specialists, and identified opportunities to standardize end-of-life care.

A phase II study of cetuximab (C225) in combination with chemoradiation (CRT) in patients (pts) with stage III A/B non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An interim report of the RTOG 0324 trial

7531

Background: Cetuximab (C225) is a chimerized monoclonal antibody that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). NSCLC commonly expresses the EGFR, which is associated with aggressive tumor behavior and poor clinical outcome. Preclinical model systems demonstrate radiosensitization following molecular inhibition of EGFR signaling. Methods: We report a phase II trial testing the combination of C225 with CRT in unresectable stage III NSCLC with a planned sample size of 84 PTS. Eligibility criteria included Zubrod performance status (PS) = 1, weight loss = 5% over past 3 months, FEV1 = 1.2 l, adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. PTS received an initial dose of C225 (400 mg/m2) on day 1 of week 1, then weekly doses of C225 (250 mg/m2) until completion of therapy (weeks 2 –17). During week 2, patients started CRT (63 Gy/35 fractions) with weekly carboplatin (C) AUC 2 and paclitaxel (P) 45 mg/m2 × 6 doses followed by C (AUC 6) and P (200 mg/m2) × 2 cycles (weeks 12–17). Interim monitoring for severe (grade = 3) or excessive non-hematologic toxicities occurred after pts had been treated and followed for at least 90 days after RT. Primary endpoints include safety and compliance of concurrent C225 and CRT. Results: 93 pts were enrolled with 87 evaluable pts. Pts characteristics: 57% male, median age 64 years (range 42–85), 47% PS 0, 46% stage IIIA. Median follow-up is 14 months. Response rate is 62% (n=54) and 12 month overall survival (OS) is 68% (# at risk=56). Adverse events related to treatment include 20% (n=17) of pts with grade 4 hematologic toxicities and 7 pts who had grade 3 esophagitis. There was 1 infection related death, 1 death NOS, and 3 pts who died of pulmonary complications (adult respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonitis, and hypoxia). Conclusions: The combination of C225 with CRT is feasible. Further study will be needed to determine whether the addition C225 to CRT enhances toxicity or efficacy. Complete compliance and toxicity data along with 18 month OS will be reported.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The impact of induction chemotherapy on the outcome of second-line therapy with pemetrexed or docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Using data from a large phase III study of previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that showed similar efficacy for pemetrexed and docetaxel, this retrospective analysis evaluates the impact of first-line chemotherapy on the outcome of second-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 571 patients with advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Comparisons were made based on type of first-line therapy [gemcitabine + platinum (GP), taxane + platinum (TP), or other therapies (OT)], response to initial therapy, time since initial therapy, and clinical characteristics. The two second-line treatment groups were pooled for this analysis due to similar efficacy and were assumed to have no interaction with the first-line therapies.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were generally balanced. By multivariate analysis, gender, stage at diagnosis, performance status (PS), and best response to first-line therapy significantly influenced overall survival (OS). Additional factors by univariate analysis, histology, and time elapsed from first- to second-line therapy significantly influenced OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Future trials in the second-line setting should stratify patients by gender, stage at diagnosis, PS, and best response to first-line therapy.

Postoperative radiotherapy increases locoregional control of patients with stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with Stage IIB and Stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the treatment records of 98 patients (58 men and 40 women; median age 61 years, range 31-91) with Stage IIB and Stage IIIA NSCLC who were treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery at our institution between January 1990 and December 2000. Patients were grouped by treatment (chemotherapy/surgery alone vs. chemotherapy/surgery/RT), by disease stage and nodal classification. The rates of local control (LC), disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the 98 patients, 40 had Stage IIB and 58 had Stage IIIA. The clinical disease stage and N stage were significantly greater in those patients who underwent RT than in those who did not; however, no statistically significant differences were identified in the additional characteristics between those receiving and not receiving RT within each stage or nodal group. The overall 5-year actuarial LC rate was 81% in the RT group and 54% in the chemotherapy/surgery-alone group (p = 0.07). Postoperative RT significantly improved the 5-year LC rate in patients with Stage IIIA disease (from 35% to 82%, p = 0.01). Postoperative RT did not significantly improve the 5-year OS rate (30% with RT vs. 49% without) for all patients or for patients with Stage IIIA disease. The disease-specific survival and disease-free survival rates did not differ between the treatment groups. Patients who responded to induction chemotherapy had a significantly greater 5-year OS rate (49%) than did those with stable or progressive disease (22%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative RT in patients with Stage IIIA NSCLC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery significantly improved LC without improving OS. Significantly improved survival was observed in all patients who responded to induction chemotherapy compared with those with stable or progressive disease.

A retrospective analysis of the outcome of patients who have received two prior chemotherapy regimens including platinum and docetaxel for recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer

With the availability of chemotherapy agents for first- and second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the patient population that requires subsequent chemotherapy is increasing. This retrospective analysis was performed to describe the clinical course after two standard or approved chemotherapy agents in patients with good overall performance status. Data were selected from patients with advanced NSCLC who had received third- or fourth-line chemotherapy after two prior chemotherapy regimens that included platinum and docetaxel given concurrently or sequentially. Prior regiments had failed due to discase progression within 90 days of chemotherapy, or unacceptable toxicity. Examination of over 700 patient records between January 1993 and January 2000 at one US and one European cancer centre revealed 43 patients that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Response rates decreased with each line of treatment: first line, 20.9%; second line, 16.3%; third line, 2.3%; and fourth line, 0%. The disease control rate (response plus stable disease) also decreased dramatically from first- to fourth-line treatment, although it was higher for second-line treatment (74.4%) than for first-line treatment (62.8%). The median overall survival time from diagnosis was 16.4 months. The median overall survival time from the start of the last treatment (either third or fourth line) was 4 months. Patients with stage III disease at diagnosis had a longer overall survival from diagnosis than patients with stage IV disease (P=0.02). This review highlights the need for novel therapy approaches for patients with recurrent NSCLC who have failed second-line therapy and provides a baseline for the statistical design of such studies.

Adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer in sequence with cisplatin to tumors of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the safety and tolerability of adenovirus-mediated p53 (Adp53) gene transfer in sequence with cisplatin when given by intratumor injection in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC and abnormal p53 function were enrolled onto cohorts receiving escalating dose levels of Adp53 (1 x 10(6) to 1 x 10(11) plaque-forming units [PFU]). Patients were administered intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 and study vector on day 4 for a total of up to six courses (28 days per course). Apoptosis was determined by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl- transferase-dUTP nick-end labeling assay. Evidence of vector-specific sequences were determined using reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Vector dissemination and biodistribution was monitored using a series of assays (cytopathic effects assay, Ad5 hexon enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, vector-specific polymerase chain reaction assay, and antibody response assay).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (median age, 64 years) received a total of 83 intratumor injections with Adp53. The maximum dose administered was 1 x 10(11) PFU per dose. Transient fever related to Adp53 injection developed in eight of 24 patients. Seventeen patients achieved a best clinical response of stable disease, two patients achieved a partial response, four patients had progressive disease, and one patient was not assessable. A mean apoptotic index between baseline and follow-up measurements increased from 0.010 to 0.044 (P =.011). Intratumor transgene mRNA was identified in 43% of assessable patients.

CONCLUSION

Intratumoral injection with Adp53 in combination with cisplatin is well tolerated, and there is evidence of clinical activity.

New options in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

The options for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were expanded by the introduction of the taxanes. As a single agent, docetaxel produced response rates ranging from 15 to 22% in evaluable patients in the second-line setting, with median duration of responses ranging from 5.6 to 7.5 months. To confirm the results observed in the phase II studies, a phase III trial was conducted. Three-hundred and seventy-three patients with advanced NSCLC who had failed prior platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized to receive docetaxel 100 mg/m2, docetaxel 75 mg/m2 or a reference arm consisting of vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Efficacy, safety and quality of life (using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale) were assessed. Data from this study are forthcoming and may confirm the benefits provided by the inclusion of docetaxel in the second-line treatment of NSCLC. Docetaxel is also an active single agent in the first-line setting, with response rates ranging from 24 to 38% in evaluable patients, with a median survival of 6-13 months. Based on the single-agent activity, it was logical to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel in combination with other active agents. As such, docetaxel has been studied in with numerous other agents such as vinorelbine, gemcitabine, platinums, etc. Notably cisplatin and carboplatin has shown promising rates of response and response duration in phase II trials. These combinations have now entered randomized phase III study.

Phase I study of paclitaxel administered by ten-day continuous infusion

PURPOSE

Pre-clinical data have suggested that prolonged exposure to paclitaxel enhances its cytotoxicity, but various clinical trials utilizing long-term infusions of paclitaxel have been limited by unacceptable hematologic toxicity, most notably significant neutropenia. A phase I study of paclitaxel administered over 10 days, was performed to evaluate the hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities as well as to determine the maximum-tolerated dose for the 10-day infusion duration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine solid tumor patients (predominantly non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer) were treated with paclitaxel at doses ranging from 5 mg/m2/day to 25 mg/m2/day administered as a 10-day continuous infusion via a pump every 21 days. Dose escalation was permitted within individual patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity, ANC < or = 500 or platelet count < or = 25,000 for > or = 7 days or febrile neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the highest dose level at which less than two out of six patients developed DLT. All of the patients had received prior chemotherapy; approximately two-thirds had received prior radiation as well. All patients received standard pre-medications for paclitaxel, including anti-histamines and corticosteroids. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not used.

RESULTS

A total of 110 courses of paclitaxel were administered to 29 patients. The incidence of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity was quite low among the patients treated at dose levels below 17 mg/m2/day. At higher doses, non-hematologic toxicities including arthralgias, myalgias, fatigue, nausea, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were seen, although nearly all of the toxicities were less than grade 3 (NCI toxicity criteria). Hematologic toxicity mostly consisted of neutropenia and was more common at dose levels of 17 mg/m2/day or higher. Nevertheless, even at the highest dose levels (21 mg/m2/day and 25 mg/m2/day) grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in only 50% of patients. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity occurred in 2 of 4 patients treated at the 25 mg/m2/day dose level.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel can be safely administered as a 10-day infusion. The MTD for this schedule is 210 mg/m2. Unlike the 96-hour paclitaxel infusions, dose-reduction for myelosuppression may not be necessary because the MTD of paclitaxel when administered over a 10-day infusion is similar to the MTD of paclitaxel when infused over 3 or 24 hours.

Adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies in animal models have demonstrated tumor regression following intratumoral administration of an adenovirus vector containing wild-type p53 complementary DNA (Ad-p53). Therefore, in a phase I clinical trial, we administered Ad-p53 to 28 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose cancers had progressed on conventional treatments.

METHODS

Patients received up to six, monthly intratumoral injections of Ad-p53 by use of computed tomography-guided percutaneous fine-needle injection (23 patients) or bronchoscopy (five patients). The doses ranged from 10(6) plaque-forming units (PFU) to 10(11) PFU.

RESULTS

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis showed the presence of adenovirus vector DNA in 18 (86%) of 21 patients with evaluable posttreatment biopsy specimens; vector-specific p53 messenger RNA was detected by means of reverse transcription-PCR analysis in 12 (46%) of 26 patients. Apoptosis (programmed cell death) was demonstrated by increased terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated biotin uridine triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining in posttreatment biopsy specimens from 11 patients. Vector-related toxicity was minimal (National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria: grade 3 = one patient; grade 4 = no patients) in 84 courses of treatment, despite repeated injections (up to six) in 23 patients. Therapeutic activity in 25 evaluable patients included partial responses in two patients (8%) and disease stabilization (range, 2-14 months) in 16 patients (64%); the remaining seven patients (28%) exhibited disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated intratumoral injections of Ad-p53 appear to be well tolerated, result in transgene expression of wild-type p53, and seem to mediate antitumor activity in a subset of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Long-term follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomized trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy and surgery with surgery alone in resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer

Our previously reported randomized study of patients with untreated, potentially resectable clinical stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer found that patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy and surgery had a significant increase in median survival compared to patients treated with surgery alone. We have now re-analyzed the results of the study with a median time from random allocation to analysis for all patients of 82 months. The increase in survival conferred by perioperative chemotherapy was maintained during the period of extended observation.

Integration of filgrastim into chemoradiation for limited small cell lung cancer: a Phase I study

PURPOSE

Recent studies document the value of early combined modality therapy of small cell lung cancer, but also indicate that early thoracic radiation adds to myelosuppression and can complicate further chemotherapy. Other studies indicate that simultaneous use of growth factors with thoracic radiation may be deleterious. However, temporal separation of growth factor use from cytotoxic therapy may allow dose intensity to be maintained/enhanced during combined modality treatment. We sought to integrate filgrastim into a novel chemoradiation regimen for patients with limited small cell lung cancer using an approach that separated growth factor administration from both chemotherapy and thoracic radiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-seven patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer were enrolled in a Phase I trial of cisplatin, ifosfamide/mesna, oral etoposide, and thoracic radiation (1.5 Gy b.i.d. x 30 fractions days 1-19 cycle 1) +/- filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day). Filgrastim was given on days 20-25 of cycle 1 after completion of radiation and following completion of oral etoposide in subsequent cycles. The primary end point was determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of chemotherapy. Serial cohorts were treated with and without filgrastim.

RESULTS

Because of dose-limiting thrombocytopenia, primarily, and nonhematologic toxicity, the MTDs with and without filgrastim were identical (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 i.v., both given days 1-3, and etoposide 40 mg/m2 p.o. days 1-14). Filgrastim use shortened the duration of neutropenia at the MTD (median 4 vs. 7 days), but was not associated with a reduction in febrile neutropenia. Although growth factor administration did not allow dose escalation of this regimen, it did allow chemotherapy doses to be maintained at the MTD more frequently through four cycles of therapy. In the 24 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 100% (71% partial and 29% complete).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite careful attention to the timing of growth factor with chemoradiation, the administration of filgrastim with this regimen did not allow dose escalation. As in many other recent studies of hematopoietic growth factors given prophylactically with chemotherapy, the duration of neutropenia at the MTD was shortened and the need for dose reduction throughout treatment was reduced in patients receiving filgrastim at the MTD.

Cisplatin, ifosfamide, and prolonged oral etoposide in the treatment of patients with extensive small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and prolonged oral etoposide (PIE) was studied in patients with extensive small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) in a Phase I trial followed by a Phase II trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), characterize toxicity, and estimate response and median survival rates.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients were treated between October 1991 and December 1994. Doses for the initial cohort were cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2/day with mesna (all given intravenously on Days 1-3), and oral etoposide 50 mg/m2 on Days 4-17. This cycle was repeated every 4 weeks for up to 6 cycles. The MTD was reached for the first 9 patients. For these 9 patients and the next 24 patients, who were entered in the Phase II trial, response and survival were estimated.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicity was manifested as Grade 4 neutropenia in 3 of 3 patients (associated with fever in 2 of 3), and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was encountered in 2 of 3 patients at the second dose level. Of 6 patients treated at the first dose level, 4 achieved targeted myelosuppression (absolute granulocyte count nadir <1000), but only 1 experienced Grade 4 neutropenia, defining this level as the MTD. Grade 4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia was observed in 36 (24%) of a total of 152 courses administered at or below the MTD. Nonhematologic toxicity above Grade 2 was uncommon, excluding nausea and vomiting. Overall objective response rate was 93% of 30 evaluable patients: 5 (17%) complete responses and 23 partial responses (76%). Median failure free and overall survival durations were 36 and 54 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and oral etoposide produced encouraging failure free and overall median survival rates in patients with extensive SCLC. These results warrant further evaluation of this regimen in the initial therapy of patients with limited stage disease.

A randomized trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy and surgery with surgery alone in resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer have a low survival rate following standard surgical treatment. Nonrandomized trials in which induction chemotherapy or a combination of chemotherapy and radiation prior to surgery were used to treat patients with regionally advanced primary cancers have suggested that survival is improved when compared with treatment by surgery alone.

PURPOSE

We performed a prospective, randomized study of patients with previously untreated, potentially resectable clinical stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer to compare the results of perioperative chemotherapy and surgery with those of surgery alone.

METHODS

This trial was designed to test the null hypothesis that the proportion of patients surviving 3 years is 12% for either treatment group against the alternate hypothesis that the 3-year survival rate would be 12% in the surgery alone group and 32% in the perioperative chemotherapy group. The estimated required sample size was 65 patients in each group. The trial was terminated at an early time according to the method of O'Brien and Fleming following a single unplanned interim analysis. The decision to terminate the trial was based on ethical considerations, the magnitude of the treatment effect, and the high degree of statistical significance attained. In total, 60 patients were randomly assigned between 1987 and 1993 to receive either six cycles of perioperative chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin) and surgery (28 patients) or surgery alone (32 patients). For patients in the former group, tumor measurements were made before each course of chemotherapy and the clinical tumor response was evaluated after three cycles of chemotherapy; they then underwent surgical resection. Patients who had documented tumor regression after preoperative chemotherapy received three additional cycles of chemotherapy after surgery.

RESULTS

After three cycles of preoperative chemotherapy, the rate of clinical major response was 35%. Patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy and surgery had an estimated median survival of 64 months compared with 11 months for patients who had surgery alone (P < .008 by log-rank test; P < .018 by Wilcoxon test). The estimated 2- and 3-year survival rates were 60% and 56% for the perioperative chemotherapy patients and 25% and 15% for those who had surgery alone, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial, the treatment strategy using perioperative chemotherapy and surgery was more effective than surgery alone.

IMPLICATIONS

This clinical trial strengthens the validity of using perioperative chemotherapy in the management of patients with resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. Further investigation of the perioperative chemotherapy strategy in earlier stage lung cancer is warranted.

Phase II study of sulofenur (LY 186641). A novel antineoplastic agent in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Sulofenur is a member of a new class of antineoplastic agents with a novel chemical structure and unique pharmacological and biological properties. Preclinical studies have demonstrated a wide spectrum of anti-tumor activity against murine solid tumors and human tumor xenografts. In phase I trials, only mild toxicities were observed. Twenty-six patients (pts), two of whom were inevaluable, with advanced non small cell lung cancer without prior chemotherapy were entered on this phase II trial. Pts received 800 mg/m2 sulofenur po Monday-Friday x 21 days, q 28 days. Seventeen male and 9 female pts with median performance status 1 received a median of 2 courses. Twenty pts had stage IV disease and 19 pts had adenocarcinoma, 6 squamous cell and 1 undifferentiated carcinoma. The main toxicity was grade 1 to 3 anemia in 16 (62%) pts, with hemolysis noted in 9 pts. Although methemoglobinemia was observed in 19 pts, it was severe in only 3 pts. Transient elevation of alkaline phosphatase was seen in 11 pts and one pt had a minor abnormality in glucose metabolism. Other common chemotherapy related side effects such as granulocytopenia or alopecia were not encountered with this agent. Of 24 evaluable pts, two pts had stable disease or minor response and 22 pts had progressive disease. In conclusion although sulofenur had only minor side effects, in the dosage and schedule used, it did not produce any significant response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.