Does multiorgan versus kidney-only cadaveric organ procurement affect graft outcomes?

INTRODUCTION

The majority of kidney grafts in most European countries still come from deceased donors who provide other organs. We analyzed whether multiorgan procurement portends a worse functional outcome compared with kidney-only harvesting.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 1043 consecutive brain-dead donor kidney transplantations performed at a single academic institution from September 2002 to June 2011. The graft outcomes using kidney-only donors (n = 243) were compared with multiorgan donor grafts (n = 800) analyzing donor age, gender, cause of death, duration of mechanical ventilation, renal function, and cold ischemic interval. We compared delayed graft function and serum creatinine values at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months posttransplantation as well as graft survivals. This methodology was also applied to the subset of expanded criteria donors: 179 kidney-only versus 474 multiorgan. The influence of donor variables on graft survival was also analyzed in a Cox regression model. Immunosuppressive regimens and preservation solutions were similar in both groups.

RESULTS

Kidney-only donors were older than their multiorgan counterparts (53.1 versus 44.8, P < .0005) and predominantly male (76.5% versus 62.6% male donors, P < .0005). Other donor variables were comparable. Kidney-only donor grafts showed a slightly higher incidence of delayed function (27.2 versus 21.1%, P = .049), but the mean serum creatinine values were similar at all intervals. No differences were observed in 7-year graft survival: 80.7% versus 79.9%. Expanded criteria donor grafts showed overlapping results, except for a higher rate of donor oligoanuria and a lower 1-month mean creatinine among kidney-only donors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of harvested organs did not influence graft survival.

DISCUSSION

Immediate and long-term outcomes of kidney grafts did not correlate with the number of organs harvested from the donor. The longer explantation time associated with multiorgan procurement did not seem to affect graft function.

Urinothorax as an unusual type of pleural effusion - clinical report and review

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that there are a great number of established etiologies for pleural effusion, there are grounds for believing that there are also causes from unusual pathophysiological mechanisms, seen in certain clinical contexts and from potential iatrogenic interventions. Urinothorax is such a rare type of pleural effusion as there are fewer than 70 cases reported worldwide.

CLINICAL CASE

A patient with a persistent left pleural effusion was admitted to the Urology ward for a lithiasic obstructive uropathy with hydronephrosis. A left percutaneous nephrostomy was performed. The effusion was unclassified at the initial workup and recurred after first drainage. A second approach confirmed a citrine fluid with borderline criteria for exudate, ammoniacal odour and an elusive pleural fluid-to-serum creatinine ratio. A retroperitoneal urinoma was recognized on CT, and the patient underwent a left nephrectomy with resolution of the pleural effusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinothorax most frequently develops in patients with excretory uropathy or blunt abdominal trauma, although other mechanisms have been reported. Traditionally, a pleural fluid to serum creatinine ratio higher than one is a hallmark of this condition. In certain settings, taking this diagnosis into account at an early stage might be crucial for a good outcome.

Do intraoperative hemodynamic factors of the recipient influence renal graft function?

PURPOSE

To assess the importance of intraoperative management of recipient hemodynamics for immediate versus delayed graft function.

METHODS

The retrospective study of 1966 consecutive renal transplants performed in our department between June 1980 and December 2009 analyzed several perioperative hemodynamic factors: central venous pressure (CVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) as well as volumes of fluids, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), albumin, and whole blood transfusions. We examined their influence on renal graft function parameters: immediate diuresis, serum creatinine levels, acute rejection, chronic transplant dysfunction, and graft survival.

RESULTS

Mean CVP was 9.23 ± 2.65 mm Hg and its variations showed no impact on graft function. We verified a twofold greater risk of chronic allograft dysfunction among patients with CVP ≥ 11 mm Hg (P < .001). Mean MAP was 93.74 ± 13.6 mm Hg; graft survivals among subjects with MAP ≥ 93 mm Hg were greater than those of patients with MAP < 93 mm Hg (P = .04). On average, 2303.6 ± 957.4 mL of saline solutions were infused during surgery. Patients who received whole blood transfusions (48%) showed a greater incidence of acute rejection episodes (ARE) (P = .049) and chronic graft dysfunction (P < .001). Patients who received FFP (55.7%), showed a higher incidence of ARE (P < .001). Only 4.6% of patients (n = 91) received human albumin with a lower incidence of ARE (P = .045) and chronic graft dysfunction (P = .024). Logistic binary regression analysis revealed that plasma administration was an independent risk factor for ARE (P < .001) and chronic dysfunction (P = .028). Volume administration (≥ 2500 mL) was also an independent risk factor for chronic allograft dysfunction (P = .016). Using Cox regression, we verified volume administration ≥ 2500 mL to be the only independent risk factor for graft failure (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

MAP ≥ 93 mm Hg and perioperative fluid administration <2500 mL were associated with greater graft survival. Albumin infusion seemed to be a protective factor, while CVP ≥ 11 mm Hg, whole blood, and FFP transfusions were associated with higher rates of ARE and chronic graft dysfunction.

Pretransplantation overweight and obesity: does it really affect kidney transplantation outcomes?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare kidney transplant outcomes among pretransplantation overweight and obese patients with those with normal weight.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a sample of 448 kidney transplantations performed between 1984 and 2008 in our institution. We compared of initial graft function, postoperative length of stay, surgical complications, acute and chronic rejection rates, creatinine serum levels, and patient and graft survival, between normal weight, overweight, and obesity groups.

RESULTS

Overweight was detected on 28.3% of the patients, and obesity on 5.8%. A male predominance was noted among the normal and overweight groups, and the opposite in the obesity group: namely, male:female ratios of 2.17:1, 3.37:1, and 0.37:1, respectively. Mean age was lower in the normal weight group (41.51 years) versus 48.36 and 46.08 years in the overweight and obesity groups, respectively. Compared with the normal weight group, recipient creatinine serum levels between 1 and 6 months were higher among the obese group, but not the overweight one. Both overweight and obese groups showed significantly higher incidences of delayed graft function (26.8% and 26.9%, respectively) versus 16.9% in the normal weight group (P = .028) and longer surgery times, ie, greater than 3 hours in 22.8% and 42.3%, respectively, versus 20.7% of the normal weight patients. Surgical complication rates were higher in both non-normal weight groups (17.3% and 26.9% vs 15.9% in the normal weight group), especially lymphocele formation and wound dehiscence (P = .031 and P < .0005, respectively). However, no differences were detected concerning postoperative length of stay, graft loss, acute or chronic rejection, and graft or patient survival.

CONCLUSION

Pretransplantation overweight and obesity did not seem to significantly affect kidney transplantation in the medium and long terms. The early posttransplantation period can however be disturbed by an increased incidence of surgical complications and reversible degradation of some graft functional parameters.