Sharp truth: health care workers remain at risk of bloodborne infection

BACKGROUND

In 2013, new regulations for the prevention of sharps injuries were introduced in the UK. All health care employers are required to provide the safest possible working environment by preventing or controlling the risk of sharps injuries.

AIMS

To analyse data on significant occupational sharps injuries among health care workers in England, Wales and Northern Ireland before the introduction of the 2013 regulations and to assess bloodborne virus seroconversions among health care workers sustaining a blood or body fluid exposure.

METHODS

Analysis of 10 years of information on percutaneous and mucocutaneous exposures to blood or other body fluids from source patients infected with a bloodborne virus, collected in England, Wales and Northern Ireland through routine surveillance of health care workers reported for the period 2002-11.

RESULTS

A total of 2947 sharps injuries involving a source patient infected with a bloodborne virus were reported by health care workers. Significant sharps injuries were 67% higher in 2011 compared with 2002. Sharps injuries involving an HIV-, hepatitis B virus- or hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected source patient increased by 107, 69 and 60%, respectively, between 2002 and 2011. During the study period, 14 health care workers acquired HCV following a sharps injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that during a 10-year period prior to the introduction of new regulations in 2013, health care workers were at risk of occupationally acquired bloodborne virus infection. To prevent sharps injuries, health care service employers should adopt safety-engineered devices, institute safe systems of work and promote adherence to standard infection control procedures.

Universal treatment success among healthcare workers diagnosed with occupationally acquired acute hepatitis C

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of occupationally acquired hepatitis C. In the UK, 17 HCWs were diagnosed with occupationally acquired acute hepatitis C between 2002 and 2011. All 17 cases involved percutaneous injuries from hollowbore needles, 16 known to be contaminated with blood. Of these 17 HCWs, 15 received antiviral therapy and 14 are known to have achieved viral clearance. Treatment success was irrespective of genotype. The successful treatment of HCWs emphasizes the need for UK guidelines on the management of occupationally acquired acute hepatitis C.

Occupational transmission of hepatitis C in healthcare workers and factors associated with seroconversion: UK surveillance data

The study aims were to describe a case series of occupationally acquired hepatitis C (HCV) infections in UK healthcare workers and examine factors associated with transmission using exposure data reported to the Health Protection Agency between July 1997 and December 2007. Fifteen reported cases of documented HCV seroconversion occurred after percutaneous exposure, the majority from hollow-bore needles used in the source patient's vein or artery and contaminated with blood or blood-stained fluid. The seroconversion rate was 2.2% (14/626). In multivariable analysis of healthcare workers with percutaneous exposure to blood or blood-stained fluid, we demonstrate that blood sampling procedures (odds ratio [OR], 5.75; 95% CI, 1.33-24.91; P = 0.01) and depth of injury (OR for deep vs superficial injury, 21.99; 95% CI, 2.02-239.61; P = 0.02) are independently associated with a greater risk of HCV seroconversion. This is the first UK study of occupationally acquired HCV in healthcare workers. It has reinforced our knowledge of risk factors for HCV transmission. Most of these exposures and transmissions were preventable. Healthcare employers should provide regular education on the risks of occupational exposure and prevention through standard infection control procedures. They should ensure the availability of effective prevention measures and facilitate prompt reporting and adequate follow-up of exposures.