Bazinet M, Karakiewicz PI, Aprikian AG, Trudel C, Péloquin F, Dessureault J, Goyal M, Bégin LR, Elhilali MM. Reassessment of nonplanimetric transrectal ultrasound prostate volume estimates.
Urology 1996;
47:857-62. [PMID:
8677577 DOI:
10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00068-4]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of nonplanimetric transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) volume estimates because inaccurate volume estimates may potentially undermine the value of serum prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) in early prostate cancer detection.
METHODS
We prospectively evaluated 535 consecutive male patients with two consecutive volume determinations performed by the same ultrasonographer at the time of the same visit.
RESULTS
Pearson correlation coefficients between two consecutive gland volume estimates ranged from 0.82 to 0.85 depending on the formula used; however, these correlation coefficients corresponded to an average 25% difference between the first and second gland volume estimates.
CONCLUSIONS
Although two consecutive nonplanimetric TRUS volume estimates show statistically good correlation, clinically up to a 25% volume difference should be expected between two such volume estimates. In consequence, nonplanimetric TRUS volume estimates should be interpreted with caution, especially when used for PSAD calculation, in the early detection of prostate cancer.
Collapse