1
|
Bousquet J, Bewick M, Cano A, Eklund P, Fico G, Goswami N, Guldemond NA, Henderson D, Hinkema MJ, Liotta G, Mair A, Molloy W, Monaco A, Monsonis-Paya I, Nizinska A, Papadopoulos H, Pavlickova A, Pecorelli S, Prados-Torres A, Roller-Wirnsberger RE, Somekh D, Vera-Muñoz C, Visser F, Farrell J, Malva J, Andersen Ranberg K, Camuzat T, Carriazo AM, Crooks G, Gutter Z, Iaccarino G, Manuel de Keenoy E, Moda G, Rodriguez-Mañas L, Vontetsianos T, Abreu C, Alonso J, Alonso-Bouzon C, Ankri J, Arredondo MT, Avolio F, Bedbrook A, Białoszewski AZ, Blain H, Bourret R, Cabrera-Umpierrez MF, Catala A, O'Caoimh R, Cesari M, Chavannes NH, Correia-da-Sousa J, Dedeu T, Ferrando M, Ferri M, Fokkens WJ, Garcia-Lizana F, Guérin O, Hellings PW, Haahtela T, Illario M, Inzerilli MC, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Kardas P, Keil T, Maggio M, Mendez-Zorrilla A, Menditto E, Mercier J, Michel JP, Murray R, Nogues M, O'Byrne-Maguire I, Pappa D, Parent AS, Pastorino M, Robalo-Cordeiro C, Samolinski B, Siciliano P, Teixeira AM, Tsartara SI, Valiulis A, Vandenplas O, Vasankari T, Vellas B, Vollenbroek-Hutten M, Wickman M, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T, Barbagallo M, Canonica GW, Klimek L, Maggi S, Aberer W, Akdis C, Adcock IM, Agache I, Albera C, Alonso-Trujillo F, Angel Guarcia M, Annesi-Maesano I, et alBousquet J, Bewick M, Cano A, Eklund P, Fico G, Goswami N, Guldemond NA, Henderson D, Hinkema MJ, Liotta G, Mair A, Molloy W, Monaco A, Monsonis-Paya I, Nizinska A, Papadopoulos H, Pavlickova A, Pecorelli S, Prados-Torres A, Roller-Wirnsberger RE, Somekh D, Vera-Muñoz C, Visser F, Farrell J, Malva J, Andersen Ranberg K, Camuzat T, Carriazo AM, Crooks G, Gutter Z, Iaccarino G, Manuel de Keenoy E, Moda G, Rodriguez-Mañas L, Vontetsianos T, Abreu C, Alonso J, Alonso-Bouzon C, Ankri J, Arredondo MT, Avolio F, Bedbrook A, Białoszewski AZ, Blain H, Bourret R, Cabrera-Umpierrez MF, Catala A, O'Caoimh R, Cesari M, Chavannes NH, Correia-da-Sousa J, Dedeu T, Ferrando M, Ferri M, Fokkens WJ, Garcia-Lizana F, Guérin O, Hellings PW, Haahtela T, Illario M, Inzerilli MC, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Kardas P, Keil T, Maggio M, Mendez-Zorrilla A, Menditto E, Mercier J, Michel JP, Murray R, Nogues M, O'Byrne-Maguire I, Pappa D, Parent AS, Pastorino M, Robalo-Cordeiro C, Samolinski B, Siciliano P, Teixeira AM, Tsartara SI, Valiulis A, Vandenplas O, Vasankari T, Vellas B, Vollenbroek-Hutten M, Wickman M, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T, Barbagallo M, Canonica GW, Klimek L, Maggi S, Aberer W, Akdis C, Adcock IM, Agache I, Albera C, Alonso-Trujillo F, Angel Guarcia M, Annesi-Maesano I, Apostolo J, Arshad SH, Attalin V, Avignon A, Bachert C, Baroni I, Bel E, Benson M, Bescos C, Blasi F, Barbara C, Bergmann KC, Bernard PL, Bonini S, Bousquet PJ, Branchini B, Brightling CE, Bruguière V, Bunu C, Bush A, Caimmi DP, Calderon MA, Canovas G, Cardona V, Carlsen KH, Cesario A, Chkhartishvili E, Chiron R, Chivato T, Chung KF, d'Angelantonio M, De Carlo G, Cholley D, Chorin F, Combe B, Compas B, Costa DJ, Costa E, Coste O, Coupet AL, Crepaldi G, Custovic A, Dahl R, Dahlen SE, Demoly P, Devillier P, Didier A, Dinh-Xuan AT, Djukanovic R, Dokic D, Du Toit G, Dubakiene R, Dupeyron A, Emuzyte R, Fiocchi A, Wagner A, Fletcher M, Fonseca J, Fougère B, Gamkrelidze A, Garces G, Garcia-Aymeric J, Garcia-Zapirain B, Gemicioğlu B, Gouder C, Hellquist-Dahl B, Hermosilla-Gimeno I, Héve D, Holland C, Humbert M, Hyland M, Johnston SL, Just J, Jutel M, Kaidashev IP, Khaitov M, Kalayci O, Kalyoncu AF, Keijser W, Kerstjens H, Knezović J, Kowalski M, Koppelman GH, Kotska T, Kovac M, Kull I, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Lepore V, MacNee W, Maggio M, Magnan A, Majer I, Manning P, Marcucci M, Marti T, Masoli M, Melen E, Miculinic N, Mihaltan F, Milenkovic B, Millot-Keurinck J, Mlinarić H, Momas I, Montefort S, Morais-Almeida M, Moreno-Casbas T, Mösges R, Mullol J, Nadif R, Nalin M, Navarro-Pardo E, Nekam K, Ninot G, Paccard D, Pais S, Palummeri E, Panzner P, Papadopoulos NK, Papanikolaou C, Passalacqua G, Pastor E, Perrot M, Plavec D, Popov TA, Postma DS, Price D, Raffort N, Reuzeau JC, Robine JM, Rodenas F, Robusto F, Roche N, Romano A, Romano V, Rosado-Pinto J, Roubille F, Ruiz F, Ryan D, Salcedo T, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schulz H, Schunemann HJ, Serrano E, Sheikh A, Shields M, Siafakas N, Scichilone N, Siciliano P, Skrindo I, Smit HA, Sourdet S, Sousa-Costa E, Spranger O, Sooronbaev T, Sruk V, Sterk PJ, Todo-Bom A, Touchon J, Tramontano D, Triggiani M, Tsartara SI, Valero AL, Valovirta E, van Ganse E, van Hage M, van den Berge M, Vandenplas O, Ventura MT, Vergara I, Vezzani G, Vidal D, Viegi G, Wagemann M, Whalley B, Wickman M, Wilson N, Yiallouros PK, Žagar M, Zaidi A, Zidarn M, Hoogerwerf EJ, Usero J, Zuffada R, Senn A, de Oliveira-Alves B. Building Bridges for Innovation in Ageing: Synergies between Action Groups of the EIP on AHA. J Nutr Health Aging 2017; 21:92-104. [PMID: 27999855 DOI: 10.1007/s12603-016-0803-1] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2016] [Accepted: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The Strategic Implementation Plan of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP on AHA) proposed six Action Groups. After almost three years of activity, many achievements have been obtained through commitments or collaborative work of the Action Groups. However, they have often worked in silos and, consequently, synergies between Action Groups have been proposed to strengthen the triple win of the EIP on AHA. The paper presents the methodology and current status of the Task Force on EIP on AHA synergies. Synergies are in line with the Action Groups' new Renovated Action Plan (2016-2018) to ensure that their future objectives are coherent and fully connected. The outcomes and impact of synergies are using the Monitoring and Assessment Framework for the EIP on AHA (MAFEIP). Eight proposals for synergies have been approved by the Task Force: Five cross-cutting synergies which can be used for all current and future synergies as they consider overarching domains (appropriate polypharmacy, citizen empowerment, teaching and coaching on AHA, deployment of synergies to EU regions, Responsible Research and Innovation), and three cross-cutting synergies focussing on current Action Group activities (falls, frailty, integrated care and chronic respiratory diseases).
Collapse
|
|
8 |
38 |
2
|
de Manuel Keenoy E, David M, Mora J, Prieto L, Domingo C, Orueta J, Valía E, Ródenas F, Pauws S, op den Buijs J, Simmons M, Contel J, Martí T, Baroni I, Nalin M, Robusto F, Lepore V, Avolio F, Bedbrook A, Bousquet J. Activation of Stratification Strategies and Results of the interventions on frail patients of Healthcare Services (ASSEHS) DG Sanco Project No. 2013 12 04. Eur Geriatr Med 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurger.2014.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
|
11 |
9 |
3
|
Nacchiero E, Maruccia M, Elia R, Robusto F, Giudice G, Manrique OJ, Campisi CC. LYMPHOVENOUS ANASTOMOSIS FOR THE TREATMENT OF LYMPHEDEMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND META-ANALYSIS. Lymphology 2021. [DOI: 10.2458/lymph.4670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been described as an effective treatment for early stages of lymphedema (LE). The aim of this study was to deepen the evaluation of the effectiveness of LVA by performing a meta-analysis to provide information about its utility in specific anatomical sites, clinical stages, duration of lymphedema, and surgical technique. A systematic literature search using PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database was performed in November 2019. Only original studies in which exclusively LVA was performed for primary and/or secondary lymphedema in humans were eligible for data extraction. A meta-analysis was performed on articles with a well-defined endpoint and a subgroup analysis was conducted in relation to surgical technique, duration of lymphedema, stage of pathology. Forty-eight studies, including 6 clinical trials and 42 low-risk bias observational studies were included in our meta-analysis. 1,281 subjects were included and the majority of articles reported a pre-post analysis. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis appears to result effectively in treatment of lymphedema with an odds ratio of 0.07 (CI: 0.04, 0.13, p<0.001). All subgroup meta-analyses were statistically significant for LVAs specifically with regard to anatomical site, clinical stage, duration of LE, or type of microsurgical procedure (p<0.05).
Our meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy of LVAs for the treatment of lymphedema, even when subgroup analysis was performed for clinical stage, duration of pathology, anatomical site of lymphedema, or type of microsurgical procedure. Further prospective trials with a common clearly defined outcome measure are warranted for an unbiased evaluation.
Collapse
|
|
4 |
1 |
4
|
Bousquet J, Bewick M, Cano A, Eklund P, Fico G, Goswami N, Guldemond N, Henderson D, Hinkema M, Liotta G, Mair A, Molloy W, Monaco A, Monsonis-Paya I, Nizinska A, Papadopoulos H, Pavlickova A, Pecorelli S, Prados-Torres A, Roller-Wirnsberger R, Somekh D, Vera-Muñoz C, Visser F, Farrell J, Malva J, Andersen Ranberg K, Camuzat T, Carriazo A, Crooks G, Gutter Z, Iaccarino G, de Keenoy EM, Moda G, Rodriguez-Mañas L, Vontetsianos T, Abreu C, Alonso J, Alonso-Bouzon C, Ankri J, Arredondo M, Avolio F, Bedbrook A, Białoszewski A, Blain H, Bourret R, Cabrera-Umpierrez M, Catala A, O'Caoimh R, Cesari M, Chavannes N, Correia-Da-Sousa J, Dedeu T, Ferrando M, Ferri M, Fokkens W, Garcia-Lizana F, Guérin O, Hellings P, Haahtela T, Illario M, Inzerilli M, Lodrup Carlsen K, Kardas P, Keil T, Maggio M, Mendez-Zorrilla A, Menditto E, Mercier J, Michel J, Murray R, Nogues M, O'Byrne-Maguire I, Pappa D, Parent A, Pastorino M, Robalo-Cordeiro C, Samolinski B, Siciliano P, Teixeira A, Tsartara S, Valiulis A, Vandenplas O, Vasankari T, Vellas B, Vollenbroek-Hutten M, Wickman M, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T, Barbagallo M, Canonica G, Klimek L, Maggi S, Aberer W, Akdis C, Adcock I, Agache I, Albera C, Alonso-Trujillo F, Angel Guarcia M, Annesi-Maesano I, et alBousquet J, Bewick M, Cano A, Eklund P, Fico G, Goswami N, Guldemond N, Henderson D, Hinkema M, Liotta G, Mair A, Molloy W, Monaco A, Monsonis-Paya I, Nizinska A, Papadopoulos H, Pavlickova A, Pecorelli S, Prados-Torres A, Roller-Wirnsberger R, Somekh D, Vera-Muñoz C, Visser F, Farrell J, Malva J, Andersen Ranberg K, Camuzat T, Carriazo A, Crooks G, Gutter Z, Iaccarino G, de Keenoy EM, Moda G, Rodriguez-Mañas L, Vontetsianos T, Abreu C, Alonso J, Alonso-Bouzon C, Ankri J, Arredondo M, Avolio F, Bedbrook A, Białoszewski A, Blain H, Bourret R, Cabrera-Umpierrez M, Catala A, O'Caoimh R, Cesari M, Chavannes N, Correia-Da-Sousa J, Dedeu T, Ferrando M, Ferri M, Fokkens W, Garcia-Lizana F, Guérin O, Hellings P, Haahtela T, Illario M, Inzerilli M, Lodrup Carlsen K, Kardas P, Keil T, Maggio M, Mendez-Zorrilla A, Menditto E, Mercier J, Michel J, Murray R, Nogues M, O'Byrne-Maguire I, Pappa D, Parent A, Pastorino M, Robalo-Cordeiro C, Samolinski B, Siciliano P, Teixeira A, Tsartara S, Valiulis A, Vandenplas O, Vasankari T, Vellas B, Vollenbroek-Hutten M, Wickman M, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T, Barbagallo M, Canonica G, Klimek L, Maggi S, Aberer W, Akdis C, Adcock I, Agache I, Albera C, Alonso-Trujillo F, Angel Guarcia M, Annesi-Maesano I, Apostolo J, Arshad S, Attalin V, Avignon A, Bachert C, Baroni I, Bel E, Benson M, Bescos C, Blasi F, Barbara C, Bergmann K, Bernard P, Bonini S, Bousquet P, Branchini B, Brightling C, Bruguière V, Bunu C, Bush A, Caimmi D, Calderon M, Canovas G, Cardona V, Carlsen K, Cesario A, Chkhartishvili E, Chiron R, Chivato T, Chung K, D'Angelantonio M, de Carlo G, Cholley D, Chorin F, Combe B, Compas B, Costa D, Costa E, Coste O, Coupet AL, Crepaldi G, Custovic A, Dahl R, Dahlen S, Demoly P, Devillier P, Didier A, Dinh-Xuan A, Djukanovic R, Dokic D, du Toit G, Dubakiene R, Dupeyron A, Emuzyte R, Fiocchi A, Wagner A, Fletcher M, Fonseca J, Fougère B, Gamkrelidze A, Garces G, Garcia-Aymeric J, Garcia-Zapirain B, Gemicioğlu B, Gouder C, Hellquist-Dahl B, Hermosilla-Gimeno I, Héve D, Holland C, Humbert M, Hyland M, Johnston S, Just J, Jutel M, Kaidashev I, Kaitov M, Kalayci O, Kalyoncu A, Keijser W, Kerstjens H, Knezović J, Kowalski M, Koppelman G, Kotska T, Kovac M, Kull I, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Lepore V, Macnee W, Maggio M, Magnan A, Majer I, Manning P, Marcucci M, Marti T, Masoli M, Melen E, Miculinic N, Mihaltan F, Milenkovic B, Millot-Keurinck J, Mlinarić H, Momas I, Montefort S, Morais-Almeida M, Moreno-Casbas T, Mösges R, Mullol J, Nadif R, Nalin M, Navarro-Pardo E, Nekam K, Ninot G, Paccard D, Pais S, Palummeri E, Panzner P, Papadopoulos N, Papanikolaou C, Passalacqua G, Pastor E, Perrot M, Plavec D, Popov T, Postma D, Price D, Raffort N, Reuzeau J, Robine J, Rodenas F, Robusto F, Roche N, Romano A, Romano V, Rosado-Pinto J, Roubille F, Ruiz F, Ryan D, Salcedo T, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schulz H, Schunemann H, Serrano E, Sheikh A, Shields M, Siafakas N, Scichilone N, Siciliano P, Skrindo I, Smit H, Sourdet S, Sousa-Costa E, Spranger O, Sooronbaev T, Sruk V, Sterk P, Todo-Bom A, Touchon J, Tramontano D, Triggiani M, Tsartara S, Valero A, Valovirta E, van Ganse E, van Hage M, van den Berge M, Vandenplas O, Ventura M, Vergara I, Vezzani G, Vidal D, Viegi G, Wagemann M, Whalley B, Wickman M, Wilson N, Yiallouros P, Žagar M, Zaidi A, Zidarn M, Hoogerwerf E, Usero J, Zuffada R, Senn A, de Oliveira-Alves B. Erratum to: Building bridges for innovation in ageing: Synergies between action groups of the EIP on AHA. J Nutr Health Aging 2023; 27:688. [DOI: 10.1007/s12603-016-0850-7] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
|
2 |
1 |
5
|
Bertero E, Robusto F, Rulli E, D'Ettorre A, Staszewsky L, Maack C, Lepore V, Latini R, Ameri P. Cancer incidence and mortality according to pre-existing heart failure in a community-based cohort. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Studies assessing whether heart failure (HF) is associated with an excess risk of cancer and cancer-related mortality yielded conflicting results. Here, we assessed the incidence and mortality of cancer according to the presence of HF in a community-based cohort.
Methods
By reviewing the health care records of the Puglia region in Italy, we first selected individuals ≥50-year-old, with no history of cancer within 3 years before the baseline evaluation and ≥5 years of follow-up, during the period from January 1st, 2005 to December 31st, 2013. Next, we matched 1:1 104,020 subjects with HF at baseline and 104,020 controls based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Drug-Derived Complexity Index, and follow-up duration. Cancer incidence and mortality were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models. Fine and Grey's regression model was also used to compare cancer-specific mortality while taking into account the competing risk of non-cancer death.
Results
Overall, the mean age of the study population was 76±10 years and the mean follow-up was 5.7 years. The incidence rate of cancer in HF patients and controls was 21.36 (95% CI, 20.98–21.74) and 12.42 (95% CI, 12.14–12.72) per 1000 person/years, respectively, corresponding to a 76% higher risk of incident cancer in HF patients (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.71–1.81). HF patients also died from cancer more frequently than controls (HR 4.11; 95% CI, 3.86–4.38; Figure 1). This excess mortality was highest when age was <70 years (HR 7.54, 95% CI 6.33–8.98), and declined in subjects aged 70–79 years (HR 3.80, 95% CI 3.44–4.19) and ≥80 years (HR 3.10, 95% CI 2.81–3.43). The association of HF with cancer mortality was confirmed in the competing risk analysis (HR 3.48, 95% CI 3.27–3.72), as well as the interaction with age: <70 years of age: HR 6.65, 95% CI 5.60–7.94; 70–80 years: HR 3.14, 95% CI 2.84–3.48; and ≥80 years: HR 2.81, 95% CI 2.55–3.10.
The HF-related risk applied to the majority of cancer types, with the exception of neoplasm of the male reproductive system. Interestingly, among HF patients a high consumption of loop diuretic (>37.5 mg/d of furosemide) was associated with a higher mortality for cancer (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.26–1.42 vs. ≤37.5 mg/d).
Conclusions
The analysis of this large community-based sample suggests that HF does portend an increased risk of cancer and cancer-related mortality, which is blunted, yet remains substantial, with increasing age and competing risk of dying from other causes. The risk of cancer may be heightened when HF is poorly compensated.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1. Cancer mortality in HF patient
Collapse
|
|
4 |
|
6
|
Bertero E, Robusto F, Rulli E, D‘Ettore A, Staszewsky L, Maack C, Lepore V, Latini R, Ameri P. P148 CANCER INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY ACCORDING TO PRE–EXISTING HEART FAILURE IN A COMMUNITY–BASED COHORT. Eur Heart J Suppl 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/suac012.143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Studies assessing whether heart failure (HF) is associated with an excess risk of cancer and cancer–related mortality yielded conflicting results. Here, we assessed the incidence and mortality of cancer according to the presence of HF in a community–based cohort.
Methods
By reviewing the health care records of the Puglia region in Italy, we first selected the individuals ≥50–year–old, with no history of cancer within 3 years before the baseline evaluation and ≥5 years of follow–up, during the period from January 1st, 2005 to December 31st, 2013. Next, we matched 1:1 104,020 subjects with HF at baseline and 104,020 controls based on age, sex, Drug–Derived Complexity Index, and follow–up duration. Cancer incidence and mortality were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression models. Fine and Grey’s regression model was also used to compare cancer–specific mortality while taking into account the competing risk of non–cancer death.
Results
Overall, the mean age of the study population was 76±10 years and the mean follow–up was 5.7 years. The incidence rate of cancer in HF patients and controls was 21.36 (95%CI, 20.98–21.74) and 12.42 (95%CI, 12.14–12.72) per 1000 person/years, respectively, corresponding to a 76% higher risk of incident cancer in HF patients (HR, 1.76; 95%CI, 1.71–1.81). HF patients also died from cancer more frequently than controls (HR 4.11; 95%CI, 3.86–4.38; Figure 1). This excess mortality was highest when age was <70 years (HR 7.54, 95%CI 6.33–8.98), and declined in subjects aged 70–79 years (HR 3.80, 95%CI 3.44–4.19) and ≥80 years (HR 3.10, 95%CI 2.81–3.43). The association of HF with cancer mortality was confirmed in the competing risk analysis (subdistribution HR 3.48, 95%CI 3.27–3.72), as well as the interaction with age: <70 years of age: SHR 6.65, 95%CI 5.60–7.94; 70–80 years: SHR 3.14, 95%CI 2.84–3.48; and ≥80 years: SHR 2.81, 95%CI 2.55–3.10. The HF–related risk applied to the majority of cancer types. Interestingly, among HF patients a high consumption of loop diuretic (≥80 mg/d of furosemide equivalents for ≥30 days in the year before the index date) was associated with a higher mortality for cancer (HR 1.35, 95%CI 1.19–1.53 vs. ≤37.5 mg/d).
Conclusions
The analysis of this large community–based sample suggests that HF does portend an increased risk of cancer and cancer–related mortality, which is blunted, yet remains substantial, with increasing age and competing risk of dying from other causes.
Collapse
|
|
3 |
|
7
|
Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Fini S, Funaioli S, Olmi G, Robusto F. Experimentally validated structural finite element method analysis of a tibial intramedullary nail: Optimal choice of the contact settings. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2018; 233:193-206. [PMID: 30565500 DOI: 10.1177/0954411918819111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
This article focuses on the static structural analysis of a tibial intramedullary nail, carried out by the finite element method. The investigated subject is concerned with the issue of frictional contacts that, generating a non-linear problem, play an important role in numerical analyses. Experimental tests were also developed on tibial intramedullary nail specimens. The experimental results, in terms of force-displacement, were used to calibrate and validate the finite element analysis, by tuning the contact parameters available in the software.
Collapse
|
Validation Study |
7 |
|
8
|
Giudice G, Nacchiero E, Robusto F, Campisi CC, Campisi C. OPTIMIZING THE STAGING OF MELANOMA PATIENTS FOR THEIR BEST SURGICAL MANAGEMENT. Lymphology 2015; 48:163-174. [PMID: 27164762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Interval nodes (IN) are defined as lymph nodes that lie along the course of lymphatic collecting vessels between a primary tumor site and a draining node field. Sometimes INs contain metastases and a consensus on their surgical management is needed. Therefore, to optimize the surgical management of melanoma patients with metastatic lymphatic involvement, especially when the sentinel lymph node biopsy identifies an unusual drainage field, we identified patients treated at the Department of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery of Bari between July 1994 and December 2012 identified with a primary-cutaneous melanoma who underwent lymphoscintigraphy and subsequent positive-IN the lymphadenectomy to evaluate the impact of this procedure on overall survival and disease-free-period. 51 patients presented INs, and lymphadenectomy (LA) of the subsequent lymphatic field was performed in 13 subjects with positive-IN. In 4 cases additional lymphatic metastases were detected in the usual basin beyond the IN+. Recurrence-free period and survival rate at 5 years were higher in patients with positive-IN who underwent LA than in subjects who underwent LA due to positive lymph nodes in the usual field. Immediate lymphadenectomy of the subsequent lymphatic field in patients with positive-INs may afford patients earlier stage treatment of their disease and improved prognosis.
Collapse
|
|
10 |
|
9
|
Nacchiero E, Maruccia M, Elia R, Robusto F, Giudice G, Manrique OJ, Campisi CC, Giudice G. Lymphovenous anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Lymphology 2020; 53:172-194. [PMID: 33721924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been described as an effective treatment for early stages of lymphedema (LE). The aim of this study was to deepen the evaluation of the effectiveness of LVA by performing a metaanalysis to provide information about its utility in specific anatomical sites, clinical stages, duration of lymphedema, and surgical technique. A systematic literature search using PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database was performed in November 2019. Only original studies in which exclusively LVA was performed for primary and/or secondary lymphedema in humans were eligible for data extraction. A meta-analysis was performed on articles with a well-defined endpoint and a subgroup analysis was conducted in relation to surgical technique, duration of lymphedema, stage of pathology. Forty-eight studies, including 6 clinical trials and 42 lowrisk bias observational studies were included in our meta-analysis. 1,281 subjects were included and the majority of articles reported a pre-post analysis. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis appears to result effectively in treatment of lymphedema with an odds ratio of 0.07 (CI: 0.04, 0.13, p<0.001). All subgroup metaanalyses were statistically significant for LVAs specifically with regard to anatomical site, clinical stage, duration of LE, or type of microsurgical procedure (p<0.05). Our meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy of LVAs for the treatment of lymphedema, even when subgroup analysis was performed for clinical stage, duration of pathology, anatomical site of lymphedema, or type of microsurgical procedure. Further prospective trials with a common clearly defined outcome measure are warranted for an unbiased evaluation.
Collapse
|
Meta-Analysis |
5 |
|