Unsupervised clustering to differentiate rheumatoid arthritis patients based on proteomic signatures

OBJECTIVE

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have different presentations and prognoses. Cluster analysis based on proteomic signatures creates independent phenogroups of patients with different pathophysiological backgrounds. We aimed to identify distinct pathophysiological clusters of RA patients based on circulating proteomic biomarkers.

METHOD

This was a cohort study including 399 RA patients. Clustering was performed on 94 circulating proteins (92 CVDII Olink®, high-sensitivity troponin T, and C-reactive protein). Unsupervised clustering was performed using a partitioning cluster algorithm.

RESULTS

The clustering algorithm identified two distinct clusters: cluster 1 (n = 223) and cluster 2 (n = 176). Compared with cluster 1, cluster 2 included older patients with a higher burden of comorbidities (cardiovascular and RA related), more erosive and longer RA duration, more dyspnoea and fatigue, walking a shorter distance in the Six-Minute Walk Test, with more severe diastolic dysfunction, and a 4.5-fold higher risk of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily-related pathways were mainly responsible for the model's discriminative ability.

CONCLUSION

Using unsupervised cluster analysis based on proteomic phenotypes, we identified two clusters of RA patients with distinct biomarkers profiles, clinical characteristics, and different outcomes that could reflect different pathophysiological backgrounds. TNF receptor superfamily-related proteins may be used to distinguish subgroups.

Ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) in a population-based cohort of middle-aged individuals: The STANISLAS cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Data exploring normal values of different ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) parameters and their association with anthropometric and cardiovascular (CV) factors are scarce. We aim to report values of two different methods of VAC assessment according to age and sex and explore their association with CV factors within a large population-based cohort of middle-aged individuals.

METHODS

For 1333 (mean age 48 ± 14) individuals participating in the 4th visit of the STANISLAS cohort, VAC was assessed by two methods [1]: arterial elastance (Ea)/end-systolic elastance (Ees) and [2] Pulse wave velocity (PWV)/Global longitudinal strain (GLS).

RESULTS

The mean values of Ea/Ees and PWV/GLS were 1.06 ± 0.20 and 0.42 ± 0.12, respectively. The two methods of VAC assessment were poorly correlated (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.14 (0.08; 0.19)). Increased PWV/GLS was associated with older age and a higher degree of cardiovascular risk factors (i.e., BMI, blood pressure, LDL, diabetes, hypertension) in the whole population as well as in the parent generation. In contrast, higher Ea/Ees were associated with decreasing age, and lower prevalence of risk factors in the whole cohort but neutrally associated with risk factors in the parent generation.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher PWV/GLS is significantly associated with CV factors regardless of age. In contrast, worse Ea/Ees is associated with a better CV risk profile when considering individuals aged 30 to 70 but neutrally associated with CV factors when considering only older patients. These results may suggest that PWV/GLS should preferably be used to explore VAC. In addition, age-individualized threshold of Ea/Ees should be used.

NT-proBNP and stem cell factor plasma concentrations are independently associated with cardiovascular outcomes in end-stage renal disease hemodialysis patients

Aims

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) treated by chronic hemodialysis (HD) is associated with poor cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, with no available evidence-based therapeutics. A multiplexed proteomic approach may identify new pathophysiological pathways associated with CV outcomes, potentially actionable for precision medicine.

Methods and results

The AURORA trial was an international, multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial involving 2776 patients undergoing maintenance HD. Rosuvastatin vs. placebo had no significant effect on the composite primary endpoint of death from CV causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke. We first compared CV risk-matched cases and controls (n = 410) to identify novel biomarkers using a multiplex proximity extension immunoassay (276 proteomic biomarkers assessed with Olink^TM). We replicated our findings in 200 unmatched cases and 200 controls. External validation was conducted from a multicentre real-life Danish cohort [Aarhus-Aalborg (AA), n = 331 patients] in which 92 Olink^TM biomarkers were assessed. In AURORA, only N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, positive association) and stem cell factor (SCF) (negative association) were found consistently associated with the trial's primary outcome across exploration and replication phases, independently from the baseline characteristics. Stem cell factor displayed a lower added predictive ability compared with NT-ProBNP. In the AA cohort, in multivariable analyses, BNP was found significantly associated with major CV events, while higher SCF was associated with less frequent CV deaths.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that NT-proBNP and SCF may help identify ESRD patients with respectively high and low CV risk, beyond classical clinical predictors and also point at novel pathways for prevention and treatment.

Association of heart rate with heart failure outcomes and the effects of empagliflozin in patients with preserved ejection fraction – EMPEROR-Preserved trial

Background and objective

High resting heart rate (HR) associates with cardiovascular death (CVD) and heart failure hospitalisation (HFH) in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but data are sparse in patients with preserved (HFpEF) or mildly reduced (HFmrEF) ejection fraction. Empagliflozin reduced the risk of CVD and HFH in HFpEF in the EMPEROR-Preserved trial. This study analyses the influence of HR on outcomes in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% in EMPEROR-Preserved and evaluates the effects of empagliflozin across HR categories.

Methods

Patients (n=5988) with HFpEF (LVEF >40%) were categorised to HR <70 beats per minute (bpm), 70–75 bpm and >75 bpm. The composite of CVD or HFH (primary outcome), first HFH, CVD, recurrent HFH and all-cause mortality were studied in the HR groups and in patients separated by sinus rhythm (SR) or atrial fibrillation (AF) and true HFpEF (EF ≥50%) or HFmrEF (EF 40–49%).

Results

Empagliflozin did not influence HR over time. At HR >75 bpm, the primary outcome (hazard ratio: 1.31, 1.13–1.52, p=0.0003), time to first HFH (hazard ratio: 1.25, 1.04–1.49, p=0.02), recurrent HFH (hazard ratio: 1.29, 1.05–1.60, p=0.02), CVD (hazard ratio: 1.49, 1.21–1.84, p=0.0001) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.49, 1.28–1.73, p<0.0001) were increased compared to HR of <70 bpm with HR 70–75 bpm showing intermediate results. The influence of HR on the primary outcome was only observed in SR (p trend=0.005), but not in AF (p trend=0.55). Patients with true HFpEF (≥50%) or HFmrEF (40–49%) showed similar effects. The treatment effects of empagliflozin to reduce the primary outcome, time to first HFH and recurrent HFH were not modified by HR.

Conclusions

HR in SR, but not in AF, predicts heart failure outcomes in HFpEF and HFmrEF, but the effects of empagliflozin were not modified by HR.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Boehringer Ingelheim & Eli Lilly and Company Diabetes Alliance

Trial leadership by women is associated with racial diversity among heart failure clinical trial participants: a systematic bibliometric review 2000–2020

Background

For the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to be generalizable, they should report on and include the broad range of patients who have the disease.

Purpose

We assessed temporal trends and trial factors associated with 1) the reporting of race or ethnicity data and 2) the enrolment of Black, Indigenous, and people of colour (BIPOC) in Heart Failure (HF) RCTs.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL for RCTs that recruited adults with HF and were published in journals with an impact factor ≥10 between January 1, 2000 and June 17, 2020. We extracted data in duplicate and used the Cochran-Armitage and Jonchkeere-Terpstra tests to examine temporal trends. We used multivariable regression to assess the independent association between trial factors and the outcomes of interest.

Results

A total of 414 RCTs met inclusion criteria, of which a vast majority (90.6%; 95% CI 87.4–93.2%) were coordinated in either Europe or North America. Only 157 of the 414 RCTs (37.9%; 95% CI 33.2–42.8%) reported race/ethnicity data; among the 158,200 participants in these trials, only 29,512 (18.7%; 95% CI 18.5–18.9%) were BIPOC. There was a significant increase in the reporting of race or ethnicity data (from 26.9% in 2000–2001 to 54.2% in 2019–2020, p<0.001) and in enrollment of BIPOC (from 16.5% in 2000–2001 to 23.9% in 2019–2020, p=0.038) between 2000–2020. Trial leadership by a woman was associated with twice the adjusted odds of reporting of race or ethnicity data (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1–3.8; p=0.028) and an 8.4% (95% CI 1.9–15.0%; p=0.012) adjusted increase in enrollment of BIPOC. The race/ethnicity of trial leaders was not available for analysis.

Conclusions

Among HF RCTs published between 2000–2020, <38% reported data on race or ethnicity, although this increased over time. Among trials reporting such data, <19% of participants were BIPOC, with modest increases in enrollment over time. Trials led by women had greater adjusted odds of reporting race/ethnicity data and enrollment of BIPOC.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): CIHR

Global representation of heart failure clinical trial leaders and collaborators: a systematic bibliometric review 2000–2020

Aims

Heart Failure (HF) has a disproportionate burden in low- and middle-income countries. The geographic representation of those who lead HF randomized clinical trials (RCTs) may not reflect the geographic burden of disease. We assessed temporal trends and trial characteristics associated with leadership outside Europe and North America, and explored whether there was a geographic association between trial leadership and participant enrolment.

Methods and results

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL for HF RCTs published in journals with an impact factor ≥10 between January 1, 2000, and June 17, 2020. We used the Jonckheere-Terpstra test to assess temporal trends and multivariable logistic regression models to determine associations between predictor and outcome variables.

There were 414 eligible RCTs. Only 80 of 828 trial leaders (9.7%; 95% CI: 7.8% to 11.8%), and 453 of 4656 collaborators (9.7%; 95% CI: 8.8% to 10.6%) were from regions outside Europe and North America, with no temporal change in geographic representation. The odds of trial leadership outside Europe and North America were significantly lower with industry versus public funding (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.75; P=0.008). Trial leadership outside Europe and North America was associated with enrolment of patients outside Europe and North America (OR: 10.0; 95% CI 5.6–19.0; P<0.001).

Conclusion

Trial leadership outside Europe and North America is rare, particularly in industry funded trials, and is associated with participant enrolment in regions with disproportionate disease burden. Building research capacity and networks in under-represented regions could increase generalizability of trial results.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

The association of smoking to cardiovascular death differs according to age and sex following myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction

Background

Smoking is associated with higher morbidity and mortality following myocardial infarction (MI), but reports of the impact on cardiovascular (CV) death in aged and female patients experiencing MI complicated with left ventricular dysfunction or overt heart failure are limited.

Methods

In an individual patient data meta-analysis of high-risk MI patients, the association of smoking to CV death was investigated. Cox proportional hazard models exploring smoking status and risk according to age and sex were performed to study the relationship of smoking to independently adjudicated CV death endpoints.

Results

28,771 patients from the CAPRICORN, EPHESUS, OPTIMAAL and VALIANT trials were assessed. 18,325 (64%) reported smoking (9185 (32%) current and 9051 (32%) past), 2662 (9%) were above ≥80 years and 8607 (30%) were women. Overall, using non-smokers as referent, the association of smoking to CV mortality was neutral (HR=1.07, 0.98 to 1.16, p=0.12 for active smoking and HR=1.10, 1.02 to 1.18, p=0.01 for past smoking). The associations for active and past smokers with outcome, adjusted for age and sex in the overall study sample and according to different age and sex categories, are presented in figure 1. In analyses that included interaction terms, the association for active smokers depended on age and sex; the risk of CV mortality was weakened in women (interaction HR=0.81, 0.69 to 0.96, p=0.01) and older age (interaction HR per 10 years increase=0.88, 0,82 to 0.95, p=0.001). In contrast, the association to CV death for past smokers was not modified by sex or age (p=0.86 and p=0.17 respectively).

Conclusions

The association of smoking to CV death differed according to age and sex in MI complicated with left ventricular dysfunction or overt heart failure. Significant association of active and/or past smoking with increased risk of CV death was mainly observed in the 60–69 years category. The underlying reasons of the lack of association of smoking with outcome in older patients in this specific context should be explored further in future studies.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Symptomatic endpoint responder rates to BAROSTIM Therapy

Background

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have varying responses to symptomatic endpoints with device-based HF therapies.

Purpose

Evaluate the symptomatic response to baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) at six months.

Methods

In a trial of subjects with NYHA Class II (recently III) or III HFrEF, left ventricular EF≤35%, guideline directed medical HF therapy (GDMT), no indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy, and NT-proBNP<1600 pg/ml, 264 subjects were randomized to BAROSTIM therapy plus GDMT (BAT group) or GDMT alone (Control group). Six-minute hall walk (6MHW), Minnesota Living with HF (QOL) and NYHA Class were analyzed. Clinically relevant responders were defined by 6-month improvement in 6MHW>10%, QOL>5 points or improvement in at least one NYHA class; super responders were defined by 6-month improvement in 6MHW>20%, QOL>10 points or improvement to NYHA class I.

Results

Both clinically relevant and super responders were significantly higher in BAT versus Control subjects for all symptomatic endpoints. In BAT subjects, 72% had clinically relevant improvements in ≥2 endpoints compared to 29% of Control subjects (p<0.001), and 28% of BAT subjects had super responder improvements in ≥2 endpoints versus 10% of Control subjects (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Among subjects with symptomatic HFrEF, treatment with BAT resulted in clinically relevant and super responder rates. The BAT clinically relevant and super responder rates are similar to those seen with CRT, in CRT-indicated patients.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): CVRx, Inc.

Non-fatal cardiovascular events preceding sudden cardiac death in patients with an acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure: insights from the High-Risk-Myocardial-Infarction database

Background

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is responsible for 20–40% of mortality following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The risk of SCD is even higher among patients with AMI complicated by heart failure (HF) (either clinically apparent HF or left ventricular dysfunction). The temporal relationship between an AMI complicated by HF and subsequent SCD and the association of non-fatal cardiovascular (CV) events following AMI with SCD has yet to be described.

Purpose

Among patients with AMI complicated by HF, we evaluated the probability and temporal association of subsequent non-fatal cardiovascular (CV) events (HF hospitalization, recurrent MI, or stroke) and SCD.

Methods

The High-Risk Myocardial Infarction (HRMI) database contains 28,771 patients with signs of HF or reduced LV ejection fraction (<40%) after AMI. Among patients with an AMI complicated by HF, we used adjudicated cause of death from the HRMI Database to identify: 1) the temporal distribution of SCD among patients following an index AMI; 2) the probability of having SCD following a non-fatal CV event following the index AMI.

Results

Median follow-up was 1.9 years. Mean age was 65.0±11.5 years and 70% were male. The incidence of CV death was 7.9 per 100 patient-year [py] and for SCD was 3.1 per 100py (40% of CV deaths). SCD rates were highest in the early period (<90 days) after AMI and decreased over time. Recurrent MI preceded 9.6% of SCD after a median time of 145 days; HF hospitalization preceded 17.0% of SCD after a median 144 days; and stroke preceded 2.7% of SCD after a median of 138 days (vs. non-sudden CV death: MI 46.6% at 1 days, HF hospitalization: 30.9% at 67 days, stroke 12.9% at 9 days). The incidence of SCD preceded by HF hospitalization was significantly higher than SCD without preceding HF hospitalization.

Conclusion

Among patients with AMI complicated by HF, SCD predominantly occurred in the early “high-risk” period after AMI; SCD rates decreased afterwards. Patients with non-fatal HF hospitalizations during follow-up may have a higher subsequent SCD risk. Preventing HF onset after MI may help decreasing SCD.

Proportion of sudden cardiac death

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Lucien Award, McGill University

Global differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the paragon-hf trial

Background

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a global public health problem with important regional differences. We investigated these differences in the PARAGON-HF trial, the largest, most inclusive global HFpEF trial.

Methods

We studied differences in clinical characteristics, outcomes and regional treatment effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan in 4796 patients with HFpEF from the PARAGON-HF trial, grouped according to geographic region.

Results

Regional differences in patient characteristics and comorbidities were observed (Figure 1): patients from Western Europe were oldest (75±7 years) with the highest prevalence of atrial fibrillation (36%); Central/Eastern European patients were youngest (71±8 years) with the highest prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD, 49%); North American patients had the highest prevalence of obesity (64%) with metabolic syndrome; Latin American patients were youngest and had a high prevalence of obesity (53%); Asia-Pacific patients had a high prevalence of diabetes (44%) despite low prevalence of obesity (26%). Rates of the primary composite endpoint of total hospitalizations for HF and death from cardiovascular causes was lowest in patients from Central Europe (9 per 100 patient years) and highest in patients from North America (28 per 100 patient years), which was primarily driven by a greater number of total hospitalizations for HF and independent of confounders. In the total population, sacubitril–valsartan did not result in a significantly lower rate of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes with no significant heterogeneity in treatment response to sacubitril-valsartan across regions.

Conclusion

This first report on regional differences in the largest prospective global trial in HFpEF suggests substantial regional heterogeneity with respect to phenotype, outcomes and quality of life.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Study funded by Novartis

Impact of timing of randomization after an acute coronary syndrome and subsequent events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an analysis of the EXAMINE trial

Background

The timing of enrolment following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may influence cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and potentially treatment effect in clinical trials. Using a large contemporary trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) post-ACS, we examined the impact of timing of enrolment on subsequent CV outcomes.

Methods

EXAMINE was a randomized trial of alogliptin versus placebo in 5380 patients with T2DM and a recent ACS. The primary outcome was a composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], or non-fatal stroke. The median follow-up was 18 months. In this post hoc analysis, we examined the occurrence of subsequent CV events by timing of enrollment divided by tertiles of time from ACS to randomization: 8–34, 35–56, and 57–141 days.

Results

Patients randomized early (compared to the latest times) had less comorbidities at baseline including a history of heart failure (HF; 24.7% vs. 33.0%), prior coronary artery bypass graft (9.6% vs. 15.9%), or atrial fibrillation (5.9% vs. 9.4%). Despite the reduced comorbidity burden, the risk of the primary outcome was highest in patients randomized early compared to the latest time (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.47; 95% CI 1.21–1.74) (Figure 1). Similarly, patients randomized early had an increased risk of recurrent MI (aHR 1.51; 95% CI 1.17–1.96) and HF hospitalization (1.49; 95% CI 1.05–2.10).

Conclusion

In a contemporary cohort of T2DM with a recent ACS, early randomization following the ACS increases the risk of CV events including recurrent MI and HF hospitalization. This should be taken into account when designing future clinical trials.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Takeda Pharmaceutical

Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on cognitive function in patients with HFpEF: a prespecified analysis of PARAGON-HF

Background

A theoretical concern has been raised about detrimental effects of sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) on cognitive function as neprilysin is one of many pathways involved in clearance of amyloid beta peptides from brain tissue.

Purpose

To examine effect of sac/val, compared with valsartan, on cognitive function in patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Methods

In the PARAGON-HF trial, cognitive function was tested in a subgroup of patients at baseline and follow-up, using Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] having a maximum score of 30 (higher scores reflect better cognitive function). Change in MMSE score from baseline to 96 wks was a prespecified exploratory endpoint. Other post hoc analyses included “cognitive decline” (fall in MMSE ≥3 pts) and assessment of cognition-related adverse events (AEs).

Results

Among 2895 patients (60% of total) in PARAGON-HF with baseline MMSE measurement, mean (SD) score was 27.4 (3.0) in patients receiving sac/val (1453) and 27.4 (2.9) in patients receiving valsartan (1442). There was no difference between sac/val and valsartan in MMSE score change from baseline to wk 96: sac/val −0.02 (SE 0.07) and valsartan 0.00 (0.07); between-treatment difference −0.02 (95% CI: −0.22 to 0.18); p-value = 0.83. Cognitive decline at 96 weeks occurred in 115 of 1071 evaluable patients (10.7%) in sac/val group and 121 of 1053 patients (11.5%) in valsartan group; risk ratio 0.97 (0.75–1.26), p-value = 0.82. Cognition-related AEs were more frequent, than in PARADIGM-HF (likely as patients in PARAGON-HF were older) but, as in PARADIGM-HF, did not differ between sac/val and comparator treatment (Table).

Conclusions

Cognitive change, measured by MMSE, did not differ between treatment with sac/val & valsartan in patients with HFpEF.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): PARAGON-HF study was funded by Novartis Pharma.

Reduced cognitive function is associated with poor outcomes in HFpEF: a post hoc analysis from PARAGON-HF

Background

Little is known about the prevalence and consequences of cognitive impairment in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Purpose

To describe the prevalence of cognitive impairment in HFpEF and the association between cognitive function and outcomes in patients with HFpEF.

Methods

In the Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction trial (PARAGON-HF), cognitive function was tested in a subgroup of patients at baseline and during follow-up, using the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] which has a maximum score of 30, with a higher score reflecting better cognitive function. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to baseline score: ≤24 representing cognitive impairment, 25–27 reflecting borderline cognitive impairment and ≥28 normal cognition. The primary endpoint used in this analysis was a composite of first heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or cardiovascular death (CVD). We examined the relationship between baseline MMSE score and this outcome, its components and all-cause mortality. We adjusted for other standard prognostic variables, including NT-proBNP (see Table footnote).

Results

Among the 2895 patients (60% of total) in PARAGON-HF with a baseline MMSE measurement, 415 (14.3%) had a score ≤24, 671 (23.2%) a score 25–27 and 1809 (62.5%) a score ≥28. Over a median follow-up of 35 (IQR 30–41) months, the unadjusted and adjusted risks of the primary composite (Table), its components and all-cause death (Figure) were higher in patients with lower baseline MMSE scores.

Conclusions

Even mild cognitive impairment, as measured by the MMSE, is predictive of adverse outcomes in HFpEF

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): PARAGON-HF was funded by Novartis Pharma

Quality of life response to BAROSTIM Therapy

Background

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have poor quality of life as measured by both physical and emotional dimensions.

Purpose

Evaluate the quality of life in subjects with and without baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) at six months.

Methods

In a multicenter randomized trial conducted in subjects with NYHA class II (recently III) or III HFrEF, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, stable optimal guideline directed medical HF therapy (GDMT), no Class 1 indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and NT-proBNP<1600 pg/ml, a total of 264 subjects were randomized to BAROSTIM therapy plus GDMT (BAT group) or GDMT alone (Control group). Quality of life was measured at baseline and six months using the Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire (MLWHF) and the EuroQol 5-Dimension Long (EQ-5D) tool. From the MLWHF questionnaire, both a physical and an emotional dimension was analyzed using subsets of the 21 questions. From the EQ-5D, the five individual dimensions and the overall health status (0–100, where 100 is best) was analyzed.

Results

Of the 264 randomized subjects, 120 BAT and 125 Control subjects had 6-month quality of life data. As shown in the table, treatment with BAT resulted in significant improvements in quality of life overall, as well as in the specific dimensions of the quality of life questionnaires, compared to the Control subjects.

Conclusion

Among subjects with symptomatic HFrEF, treatment with BAT resulted in significant improvement in quality of life at six months.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): CVRx, Inc.

Tumour biomarkers: association with heart failure outcomes

BACKGROUND

There is increasing recognition that heart failure (HF) and cancer are conditions with a number of shared characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the association between tumour biomarkers and HF outcomes.

METHODS

In 2,079 patients of BIOSTAT-CHF cohort, we measured six established tumour biomarkers: CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9, CEA, CYFRA 21-1 and AFP.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 21 months, 555 (27%) patients reached the primary end-point of all-cause mortality. CA125, CYFRA 21-1, CEA and CA19-9 levels were positively correlated with NT-proBNP quartiles (all P < 0.001, P for trend < 0.001) and were, respectively, associated with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% CI 1.12-1.23; P < 0.0001), 1.45 (95% CI 1.30-1.61; P < 0.0001), 1.19 (95% CI 1.09-1.30; P = 0.006) and 1.10 (95% CI 1.05-1.16; P < 0.001) for all-cause mortality after correction for BIOSTAT risk model (age, BUN, NT-proBNP, haemoglobin and beta blocker). All tumour biomarkers (except AFP) had significant associations with secondary end-points (composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, HF hospitalization, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and non-CV mortality). ROC curves showed the AUC of CYFRA 21-1 (0.64) had a noninferior AUC compared with NT-proBNP (0.68) for all-cause mortality (P = 0.08). A combination of CYFRA 21-1 and NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.71) improved the predictive value of the model for all-cause mortality (P = 0.0002 compared with NT-proBNP).

CONCLUSIONS

Several established tumour biomarkers showed independent associations with indices of severity of HF and independent prognostic value for HF outcomes. This demonstrates that pathophysiological pathways sensed by these tumour biomarkers are also dysregulated in HF.

Clinic Versus Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Resistant Hypertension: Impact of Antihypertensive Medication Nonadherence

Clinic-ambulatory blood pressure (BP) difference is influenced by patients- and device-related factors and inadequate clinic-BP measurement. We investigated whether nonadherence to antihypertensive medications may also influence this difference in a post hoc analysis of the DENERHTN trial (Renal Denervation for Hypertension). We pooled the data of 77 out of 106 evaluable patients with apparent resistant hypertension who received a standardized antihypertensive treatment and had both ambulatory BP and drug-screening results available at baseline after 1 month of standardized triple therapy and at 6 months on a median of 5 antihypertensive drugs. After drug assay samplings on study visits, patients took their antihypertensive treatment under supervision immediately after the start of the ambulatory BP recording, and supine clinic BP was measured 24 hours post-dosing; both allowed to calculate the clinic minus daytime ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) difference (clinic-SBP–day-SBP). A total of 29 (37.7%) were found nonadherent to medications at baseline and 38 (49.4%) at 6 months. At baseline, the mean clinic-SBP–day-SBP difference in the nonadherent group was 12.7 mm Hg (95% CI, 7.8–17.7 mm Hg, P <0.001). In contrast, clinic SBP was almost identical to day-SBP in the adherent group (clinic-SBP–day-SBP difference, 0.1 mm Hg; 95% CI, −3.3 to 3.5 mm Hg; P =0.947). Similar observations were made at 6 months. Using receiver operating characteristics curves, we found that a 6 mm Hg cutoff of clinic-SBP–day-SBP difference had 67% sensitivity and 69% specificity to predict nonadherence to the triple therapy at baseline. In conclusion, a large clinic-SBP–day-SBP difference may help discriminating between adherence and nonadherence to treatment in patients with resistant hypertension.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01570777.

Combined baseline and one-month changes in big endothelin-1 and brain natriuretic peptide plasma concentrations predict clinical outcomes in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS) study

OBJECTIVE

Increased levels of neuro-hormonal biomarkers predict poor prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). The predictive value of repeated (one-month interval) brain natriuretic peptides (BNP) and big-endothelin 1 (BigET-1) measurements were investigated in patients with LVSD after AMI.

METHODS

In a sub-study of the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS trial), BNP and BigET-1 were measured at baseline and at 1month in 476 patients.

RESULTS

When included in the same Cox regression model, baseline BNP (p=0.0003) and BigET-1 (p=0.026) as well as the relative changes (after 1month) from baseline in BNP (p=0.049) and BigET-1 (p=0.045) were predictive of the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for worsening heart failure. Adding baseline and changes in BigET-1 to baseline and changes in BNP led to a significant increase in prognostic reclassification as assessed by integrated discrimination improvement index (5.0%, p=0.01 for the primary endpoint).

CONCLUSIONS

Both increased baseline and changes after one month in BigET-1 concentrations were shown to be associated with adverse clinical outcomes, independently from BNP baseline levels and one month changes, in patients after recent AMI complicated with LVSD. This novel result may be of clinical interest since such combined biomarker assessment could improve risk stratification and open new avenues for biomarker-guided targeted therapies.

KEY MESSAGES

In the present study, we report for the first time in a population of patients with reduced LVEF after AMI and signs or symptoms of congestive HF, that increased baseline values of BNP and BigET-1 as well as a further rise of these markers over the first month after AMI, were independently predictive of future cardiovascular events. This approach may therefore be of clinical interest with the potential of improving risk stratification after AMI with reduced LVEF while further opening new avenues for biomarker-guided targeted therapies.

Preventive and chronic mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism is highly beneficial in obese SHHF rats

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation contributes to heart failure (HF) progression. Its overactivity in obesity is thought to accelerate cardiac remodelling and HF development. Given that MR antagonists (MRA) are beneficial in chronic HF patients, we hypothesized that early MRA treatment may target obesity-related disorders and consequently delay the development of HF.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Twenty spontaneously hypertensive HF dyslipidaemic obese SHHF(cp/cp) rats and 18 non-dyslipidaemic lean SHHF(+/+) controls underwent regular monitoring for their metabolic and cardiovascular phenotypes with or without MRA treatment [eplerenone (eple), 100 mg∙kg(-1) ∙day(-1) ] from 1.5 to 12.5 months of age.

KEY RESULTS

Eleven months of eple treatment in obese rats (SHHF(cp/cp) eple) reduced the obesity-related metabolic disorders observed in untreated SHHF(cp/cp) rats by reducing weight gain, triglycerides and total cholesterol levels and by preserving adiponectinaemia. The MRA treatment predominantly preserved diastolic and systolic functions in obese rats by alleviating the eccentric cardiac hypertrophy observed in untreated SHHF(cp/cp) animals and preserving ejection fraction (70 ± 1 vs. 59 ± 1%). The MRA also improved survival independently of these pressure effects.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Early chronic eple treatment resulted in a delay in cardiac remodelling and HF onset in both SHHF(+/+) and SHHF(cp/cp) rats, whereas SHHF(cp/cp) rats further benefited from the MRA treatment through a reduction in their obesity and dyslipidaemia. These findings suggest that preventive MRA therapy may provide greater benefits in obese patients with additional risk factors of developing cardiovascular complications.

Neural modulation for hypertension and heart failure

Hypertension (HTN) and heart failure (HF) have a significant global impact on health, and lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Despite recent advances in pharmacologic and device therapy for these conditions, there is a need for additional treatment modalities. Patients with sub-optimally treated HTN have increased risk for stroke, renal failure and heart failure. The outcome of HF patients remains poor despite modern pharmacological therapy and with established device therapies such as CRT and ICDs. Therefore, the potential role of neuromodulation via renal denervation, baro-reflex modulation and vagal stimulation for the treatment of resistant HTN and HF is being explored. In this manuscript, we review current evidence for neuromodulation in relation to established drug and device therapies and how these therapies may be synergistic in achieving therapy goals in patients with treatment resistant HTN and heart failure. We describe lessons learned from recent neuromodulation trials and outline strategies to improve the potential for success in future trials. This review is based on discussions between scientists, clinical trialists, and regulatory representatives at the 11th annual CardioVascular Clinical Trialist Forum in Washington, DC on December 5-7, 2014.