The role of iodinated contrast media in computed tomography structured Reporting and Data Systems (RADS): a narrative review

Background and Objective

In recent years, there has been a large-scale dissemination of guidelines in radiology in the form of Reporting & Data Systems (RADS). The use of iodinated contrast media (ICM) has a fundamental role in enhancing the diagnostic capabilities of computed tomography (CT) but poses certain risks. The scope of the present review is to summarize the current role of ICM only in clinical reporting guidelines for CT that have adopted the "RADS" approach, focusing on three specific questions per each RADS: (I) what is the scope of the scoring system; (II) how is ICM used in the scoring system; (III) what is the impact of ICM enhancement on the scoring.

Methods

We analyzed the original articles for each of the latest versions of RADS that can be used in CT [PubMed articles between January, 2005 and March, 2023 in English and American College of Radiology (ACR) official website].

Key Content and Findings

We found 14 RADS suitable for use in CT out of 28 RADS described in the literature. Four RADS were validated by the ACR: Colonography-RADS (C-RADS), Liver Imaging-RADS (LI-RADS), Lung CT Screening-RADS (Lung-RADS), and Neck Imaging-RADS (NI-RADS). One RADS was validated by the ACR in collaboration with other cardiovascular scientific societies: Coronary Artery Disease-RADS 2.0 (CAD-RADS). Nine RADS were proposed by other scientific groups: Bone Tumor Imaging-RADS (BTI-RADS), Bone‑RADS, Coronary Artery Calcium Data & Reporting System (CAC-DRS), Coronavirus Disease 2019 Imaging-RADS (COVID-RADS), COVID-19-RADS (CO-RADS), Interstitial Lung Fibrosis Imaging-RADS (ILF-RADS), Lung-RADS (LU-RADS), Node-RADS, and Viral Pneumonia Imaging-RADS (VP-RADS).

Conclusions

This overview suggests that ICM is not strictly necessary for the study of bones and calcifications (CAC-DRS, BTI-RADS, Bone-RADS), lung parenchyma (Lung-RADS, LU-RADS, COVID-RADS, CO-RADS, VP-RADS and ILF-RADS), and in CT colonography (C-RADS). On the other hand, ICM plays a key role in CT angiography (CAD-RADS), in the study of liver parenchyma (LI-RADS), and in the evaluation of soft tissues and lymph nodes (NI-RADS, Node-RADS). Future studies are needed in order to evaluate the impact of the new iodinated and non-iodinate contrast media, artificial intelligence tools and dual energy CT in the assignment of RADS scores.

Can optimized model-based iterative reconstruction improve the contrast of liver lesions in CT?

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography is a standard imaging procedure for the detection of liver lesions, such as metastases, which can often be small and poorly contrasted, and therefore hard to detect. Advances in image reconstruction have shown promise in reducing image noise and improving low-contrast detectability.

PURPOSE

To examine a novel, specialized, model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) technique for improved low-contrast liver lesion detection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patient images with reported poorly contrasted focal liver lesions were retrospectively reconstructed with the low-contrast attenuating algorithm (FIRST-LCD) from primary raw data. Liver-to-lesion contrast, signal-to-noise, and contrast-to-noise ratios for background and liver noise for each lesion were compared for all three FIRST-LCD presets with the established hybrid iterative reconstruction method (AIDR-3D). An additional visual conspicuity score was given by two experienced radiologists for each lesion.

RESULTS

A total of 82 lesions in 57 examinations were included in the analysis. All three FIRST-LCD algorithms provided statistically significant increases in liver-to-lesion contrast, with FIRST_MILD showing the largest increase (40.47 HU in AIDR-3D; 45.84 HU in FIRST_MILD; P < 0.001). Substantial improvement was shown in contrast-to-noise metrics. Visual analysis of the lesions shows decreased lesion visibility with all FIRST methods in comparison to AIDR-3D, with FIRST_STR showing the closest results (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Objective image metrics show promise for MBIR methods in improving the detectability of low-contrast liver lesions; however, subjective image quality may be perceived as inferior. Further improvements are necessary to enhance image quality and lesion detection.

Impact of double reading on NI-RADS diagnostic accuracy in reporting oral squamous cell carcinoma surveillance imaging - a single-center study

OBJECTIVES

The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is an increasingly utilized risk stratification tool for imaging surveillance after treatment for head and neck cancer. This study aims to measure the impact of supervision by subspecialized radiologists on diagnostic accuracy of NI-RADS when initial reading is performed by residents.

METHODS

150 CT and MRI datasets were initially read by two trained residents, and then supervised by two subspecialized radiologists. Recurrence rates by NI-RADS category were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. After dichotomization of the NI-RADS system (category 1 vs categories 2 + 3+4 and categories 1 + 2 vs 3 + 4), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were calculated.

RESULTS

26% of the reports were modified by the supervising radiologists. Area under the curve of ROC plots values of the supervision session were higher than those of the initial reading session for both the primary site (0.89 vs 0.86) and the neck (0.94 vs 0.91), but the difference was not statistically significant. For dichotomized NI-RADS category assignments, differences between the initial reading and the supervision session were statistically significant regarding specificity and PPV for the primary site (1 + 2 vs 3 + 4 and 1 vs 2 + 3+4) or even for both sites combined (1 vs 2 + 3+4).

CONCLUSION

NI-RADS enables trained resident radiologists to report surveillance imaging in patients with treated oral squamous cell carcinoma with high discriminatory power. Additional supervision by a subspecialized head and neck radiologist particularly improves specificity of radiological reports.

Multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography-based tomoelastography of the parotid glands-feasibility and reference values

OBJECTIVES

Accurate radiological differentiation of parotid tumors remains challenging despite recent technical advances in quantitative medical imaging. Multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) could provide additional information on viscoelastic properties of normal and abnormal biological tissues. This study investigates the feasibility of MRE of the parotid glands in healthy participants and provides first reference values.

METHODS

20 healthy participants underwent multifrequency MRE of both parotid glands at 3 Tesla. Shear waves at frequencies of 25, 30, 40, and 50 Hz were introduced into the participants' heads through the occiput using pressurized-air actuators. Shear wave speed (SWS) and loss angle of the shear modulus (φ) were reconstructed by tomoelastography post-processing as surrogate parameters for tissue stiffness and viscosity or fluidity. 10 participants underwent repeated MRE to determine test-retest reliability based on intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

All MRE datasets acquired could be included in the analysis. Mean SWS was 0.97 ± 0.13 m/s, and mean φ was 0.59 ± 0.05 rad, each for both sides combined and without notable lateral difference (p = 0.88/0.87). Test-retest reliability was good for SWS (ICC = 0.84 for both sides/ICC = 0.77 for the right side/ICC = 0.79 for the left side) and good to excellent for φ(ICC = 0.94/0.86/0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Multifrequency MRE of the parotid glands is feasible and reliable. This technique, therefore, is a promising method for investigating the viscoelastic properties of salivary gland tumors in future studies.

Reliability of NI-RADS criteria in the interpretation of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging considering the potential role of diffusion-weighted imaging

OBJECTIVES

To assess inter- and intrareader agreement of the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) used in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), which is currently not part of the NI-RADS criteria.

METHODS

This retrospective study included anonymized surveillance contrast-enhanced MRI datasets of 104 patients treated for different head and neck cancers. Three radiologists experienced in head and neck imaging reported findings for the primary site and the neck using NI-RADS criteria in a first step and evaluated DWI sequences for the primary site in a second step. Thirty randomly selected imaging datasets were again presented to the readers. Kappa statistics and observed agreement (A_o) were calculated.

RESULTS

Interreader agreement across all MRI datasets was moderate (κ_Fleiss = 0.53) for NI-RADS categories assigned to the primary site, substantial for NI-RADS categories of the neck (κ_Fleiss = 0.67), and almost perfect for DWI of the primary site (κ_Fleiss = 0.83). Interreader agreement for the primary site was particularly low in cases of cancer recurrence (κ_Fleiss = 0.35) and when categories 2a, 2b, and 3 were combined (κ_Fleiss = 0.30). Intrareader agreement was considerably lower for NI-RADS categories of the primary site (range A_o = 53.3-70.0%) than for NI-RADS categories of the neck (range A_o = 83.3-90.0%) and DWI of the primary site (range A_o = 93.3-100.0%).

CONCLUSION

Interreader agreement of NI-RADS for reporting contrast-enhanced MRI findings is acceptable for the neck but limited for the primary site. Here, DWI has the potential to serve as a reliable additional criterion.

KEY POINTS

• NI-RADS was originally designed for contrast-enhanced computed tomography with or without positron emission tomography but can also be used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging alone. • Overall interreader agreement was acceptable for NI-RADS categories assigned to the neck but should be improved for the primary site, where it was inferior to DWI; similar tendencies were found for intrareader agreement. • DWI is currently no criterion of NI-RADS, but has shown potential to improve its reliability, especially for categories 2a, 2b, and 3 of the primary site.

Inter- and Intrareader Agreement of NI-RADS in the Interpretation of Surveillance Contrast-Enhanced CT after Treatment of Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System was introduced to assess the probability of recurrence in surveillance imaging after treatment of head and neck cancer. This study investigated inter- and intrareader agreement in interpreting contrast-enhanced CT after treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed CT datasets of 101 patients. Four radiologists provided the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System reports for the primary site and neck (cervical lymph nodes). The Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W), Fleiss κ (κ_F), the Kendall's rank correlation coefficient (τ_B), and weighted κ statistics (κ_w) were calculated to assess inter- and intrareader agreement.

RESULTS

Overall, interreader agreement was strong or moderate for both the primary site (W = 0.74, κ_F = 0.48) and the neck (W = 0.80, κ_F = 0.50), depending on the statistics applied. Interreader agreement was higher in patients with proved recurrence at the primary site (W = 0.96 versus 0.56, κ_F = 0.65 versus 0.30) or in the neck (W = 0.78 versus 0.56, κ_F = 0.41 versus 0.29). Intrareader agreement was moderate to strong or almost perfect at the primary site (range τ_B = 0.67-0.82, κ_w = 0.85-0.96) and strong or almost perfect in the neck (range τ_B = 0.76-0.86, κ_w = 0.89-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System used for surveillance contrast-enhanced CT after treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma provides acceptable score reproducibility with limitations in patients with posttherapeutic changes but no cancer recurrence.

Radiation exposure of radiologists during different types of CT-guided interventions: an evaluation using dosimeters placed above and under lead protection

Background

Computed tomography (CT) is widely used not only for diagnostic purposes but also for image guidance during different types of interventions. Therefore, radiation exposure of both patients and interventional radiologists remains a much-discussed topic.

Purpose

To quantify radiation exposure of interventional radiologists during multiple CT-guided interventions using dosimeters placed under and outside standard protective lead clothing.

Material and Methods

A total of 113 consecutive interventions covering three different types of procedures (grouped as periradicular infiltration therapy, biopsies, and drain placement) and performed using routine clinical protocols were prospectively analyzed. The interventions were performed by two radiologists of different experience levels with identically placed dosimeters outside and underneath their protective clothing. Personal doses (right hand, eye lens, thyroid gland, thorax, gonads) were cumulatively measured for each type of intervention and separately for the two radiologists.

Results

Personal dose was below the detection limit of the dosimeters during periradicular infiltration therapy. In the biopsy and drain placement groups, the highest dose was found for the right hand (maximum cumulative dose = 1.84 ± 1.30 mSv in 19 consecutive drain placements). Under the protective gear, exposure was only observed for drain placements performed by the less experienced radiologist (maximum = 0.05 ± 0.04 mSv for the eye lens).

Conclusion

Personal doses measured here were far below annual thresholds published by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Therefore, performing multiple CT-guided interventions appears to be safe for interventional radiologists in terms of radiation exposure.

Periradicular infiltration of the lumbar spine: is iterative reconstruction software necessary to establish ultra-low-dose protocols? A quantitative and qualitative approach

PURPOSE

Computed tomography (CT)-guided periradicular infiltration therapy has emerged as an effective treatment option for patients with low back pain. Concern about radiation exposure requires approaches allowing significant dose reduction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the need for iterative reconstruction software in CT-guided periradicular infiltration therapy with an ultra-low-dose protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients underwent CT-guided periradicular infiltration therapy of the lumbar spine using an ultra-low-dose protocol with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) for image reconstruction. In addition, images were reconstructed with filtered back-projection (FBP). Four experienced raters evaluated both reconstruction types for conspicuity of anatomical and instrumental features important for ensuring safe patient treatment. Image noise was measured as a quantitative marker of image quality.

RESULTS

Interrater agreement was good for both AIDR 3D (Kendall's W = 0.83) and FBP (0.78) reconstructions. Readers assigned the same scores for all features and both reconstruction algorithms in 81.3% of cases. Image noise was significantly lower (average SD of 60.07 vs. 99.54, p < 0.05) for AIDR 3D-reconstructed images.

CONCLUSION

Although it significantly lowers image noise, iterative reconstruction software is not mandatory to achieve adequate image quality with an ultra-low-dose CT protocol for guiding periradicular infiltration therapy of the lumbar spine.

Periradicular Infiltration of the Cervical Spine: How New CT Scanner Techniques and Protocol Modifications Contribute to the Achievement of Low-Dose Interventions

PURPOSE

 CT-guided periradicular infiltration of the cervical spine is an effective symptomatic treatment in patients with radiculopathy-associated pain syndromes. This study evaluates the robustness and safety of a low-dose protocol on a CT scanner with iterative reconstruction software.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A total of 183 patients who underwent periradicular infiltration therapy of the cervical spine were included in this study. 82 interventions were performed on a new CT scanner with a new intervention protocol using an iterative reconstruction algorithm. Spot scanning was implemented for planning and a basic low-dose setup of 80 kVp and 5 mAs was established during intermittent fluoroscopy. The comparison group included 101 prior interventions on a scanner without iterative reconstruction. The dose-length product (DLP), number of acquisitions, pain reduction on a numeric analog scale, and protocol changes to achieve a safe intervention were recorded.

RESULTS

 The median DLP for the whole intervention was 24.3 mGy*cm in the comparison group and 1.8 mGy*cm in the study group. The median pain reduction was -3 in the study group and -2 in the comparison group. A 5 mAs increase in the tube current-time product was required in 5 patients of the study group.

CONCLUSION

 Implementation of a new scanner and intervention protocol resulted in a 92.6 % dose reduction without a compromise in safety and pain relief. The dose needed here is more than 75 % lower than doses used for similar interventions in published studies. An increase of the tube current-time product was needed in only 6 % of interventions.

KEY POINTS

  · The presented ultra-low-dose protocol allows for a significant dose reduction without compromising outcome.. · The protocol includes spot scanning for planning purposes and a basic setup of 80 kVp and 5 mAs.. · The iterative reconstruction algorithm is activated during fluoroscopy..

CITATION FORMAT

· Elsholtz FH, Kamp JE, Vahldiek JL et al. Periradicular Infiltration of the Cervical Spine: How New CT Scanner Techniques and Protocol Modifications Contribute to the Achievement of Low-Dose Interventions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2019; 191: 54 - 61.

Periradicular infiltration of the lumbar spine: testing the robustness of an interventional ultra-low-dose protocol at different body mass index levels

Background Computed tomography (CT)-guided periradicular infiltration remains a frequent interventional procedure for treatment of low back pain. Purpose To present an interventional ultra-low-dose protocol for CT-guided periradicular infiltration therapy and assess its application at different body mass index (BMI) levels. Material and Methods Over a period of 14 months, 79 patients underwent 183 CT-guided interventions for single-site lumbar periradicular therapy using an ultra-low-dose protocol with a basic setup of 100 kV and 5 mAs. Procedures were performed via intermittent fluoroscopy. A retrospective review was performed to analyze the parameters tube current and tube voltage, dose-length product, and BMI. Results The interventional ultra-low-dose protocol allowed safe treatment of 91.1% of the patients without a need for adapting the protocol. In seven patients with a higher BMI (range, 31-38 kg/m²; mean, 34 kg/m²), the tube current had to be increased to retain sufficient image quality. Only patients with a BMI of 30 and higher showed a significant correlation between BMI and dose-length product ( P value = 0.02), resulting in a slightly increased dose ( P value = 0.002). Conclusion The protocol presented for the interventional part of CT-guided periradicular infiltration allows to safely treat patients with a median calculated effective dose of 0.045 mSv (converted from a dose-length-product of 2.26 mGy*cm). Patients with a BMI of 30 and higher required a higher calculated effective dose with just one patient slightly exceeding 0.1 mSv.