Bone Mineral Density T-Score is an Independent Predictor of Major Blood Loss in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of low bone mineral density (BMD), as assessed by preoperative Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scans, on intraoperative blood loss following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

METHODS

Patients who received spinal fusion for ASD (>5 levels fused) at a single academic center from 2010-2018 were included in this study. The lowest preoperative T-score was recorded for patients who had preoperative DEXA scans within a year of surgery. Patients with liver/kidney disease or on prescription anticoagulant medication were excluded. Major blood loss was a binary variable defined as above or below the 90th percentile of our cohort. Binomial regression was performed controlling for age, number of vertebrae fused, 3-column osteotomy, primary vs. revision surgery, preoperative platelet count, and if the patient was taking medication for osteoporosis.

RESULTS

91 patients were identified in the cohort. Mean age was 63 ± 11.6 years, 81% female. 56 (62%) of cases included revision of previous instrumentation. Patients had a mean SVA of 9.6 ± 8.6 cm and median of 9 vertebrae fused (range 5-22). The average T-score was -1.2 ± 1.0. Each point lower T-score was associated with significantly higher odds of major blood loss (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.0 - 5.9) when controlling for age, number of vertebrae fused, 3-column osteotomy, preoperative platelet count and primary vs. revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative T-score is independently associated with increased odds of major blood loss in ASD surgery.

Laminectomy vs Fusion for Intradural Extramedullary Tumors

BACKGROUND

Laminectomy (LA) and LA with fusion (LAF) have been demonstrated as surgical techniques that treat intradural extramedullary tumors (IDEMTs). The purpose of the present study was to compare the rate of 30-day complications following LA vs LAF for IDEMTs.

METHODS

Patients undergoing LA for IDEMTs from 2012 to 2018 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients undergoing LA for IDEMTs were substratified into 2 cohorts: those who received LAF and those who did not. In this analysis, preoperative patient characteristics and demographic variables were assessed. 30-day wound, sepsis, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and thromboembolic complications, as well as mortality, postoperative transfusions, extended length of stay, and reoperation, were assessed. Bivariate analyses, including χ ² and t tests, and multivariable logistical regression were performed.

RESULTS

Of 2027 total patients undergoing LA for IDEMTs, 181 (9%) also had fusion. There were 72/373 (19%) LAF in the cervical region, 67/801 (8%) LAF in the thoracic region, and 42/776 (5%) LAF in the lumbar region. Following adjustment, patients who received LAF were more likely to have increased length of stay (OR 2.73, P < 0.001) and increased rate of postoperative transfusion (OR 3.15, P < 0.001). Patients undergoing LA in the cervical spine for IDEMTs tended to receive additional fusion (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased length of stay and rate of postoperative transfusion were associated with LAF for IDEMTs. LA in the cervical spine for IDEMTs was associated with additional fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Predictors of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury, Stroke, and Mortality in Patients with Cervical Spine Trauma

BACKGROUND

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI), defined as blunt traumatic injury to the carotid or vertebral arteries, is associated with significant risk of stroke and mortality. Cervical spine trauma is a recognized risk factor for BCVI.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify significant predictors of BCVI and its sequelae in patients with known cervical spine injury.

METHODS

Patients from 2007 to 2018 with blunt cervical spine injury diagnoses were identified in the National Trauma Data Bank. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify patient baseline and injury characteristics associated with BCVI, stroke, and mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 229,254 patients with cervical spine injury due to blunt trauma. The overall rate of BCVI was 1.6%. Factors associated with BCVI in patients with cervical spine injury included lower Glasgow Coma Scale, motor vehicle crash, higher Injury Severity Score, concomitant traumatic brain or spinal cord injury, and current smoking status. BCVI was a strong predictor of stroke (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 5.7-12.0) and was associated with mortality (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.2). Stroke occurred in 3.3% of patients with BCVI versus 0.02% for patients without BCVI.

CONCLUSIONS

While BCVI is rare following cervical spine injury due to blunt trauma, it is a significant predictor of stroke and mortality. The risk factors associated with BCVI, stroke, and mortality identified here should be used in the development of more effective predictive tools to improve care.

Prescription Patterns, Associated Factors, and Outcomes of Opioids for Operative Foot and Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Pain management after foot and ankle surgery must surmount unique challenges that are not present in orthopaedic surgery performed on other parts of the body. However, disparate and inconsistent evidence makes it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from individual studies.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review, we asked: what are (1) the patterns of opioid use or prescription (quantity, duration, incidence of persistent use), (2) factors associated with increased or decreased risk of persistent opioid use, and (3) the clinical outcomes (principally pain relief and adverse events) associated with opioid use in patients undergoing foot or ankle fracture surgery?

METHODS

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for our review. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science on October 15, 2021. We included studies published from 2010 to 2021 that assessed patterns of opioid use, factors associated with increased or decreased opioid use, and other outcomes associated with opioid use after foot or ankle fracture surgery (principally pain relief and adverse events). We excluded studies on pediatric populations and studies focused on acute postoperative pain where short-term opioid use (< 1 week) was a secondary outcome only. A total of 1713 articles were assessed and 18 were included. The quality of the 16 included retrospective observational studies and two randomized trials was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria and the Jadad scale, respectively; study quality was determined to be low to moderate for observational studies and good for randomized trials. Mean patient age ranged from 42 to 53 years. Fractures studied included unimalleolar, bimalleolar, trimalleolar, and pilon fractures.

RESULTS

Proportions of postoperative persistent opioid use (defined as use beyond 3 or 6 months postoperatively) ranged from 2.6% (546 of 20,992) to 18.5% (32 of 173) and reached 39% (28 of 72) when including patients with prior opioid use. Among the numerous associations reported by observational studies, two or more preoperative opioid prescriptions had the strongest overall association with increased opioid use, but this was assessed by only one study (OR 11.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.16 to 13.30]; p < 0.001). Meanwhile, spinal and regional anesthesia (-13.5 to -41.1 oral morphine equivalents (OME) difference; all p < 0.01) and postoperative ketorolac use (40 OME difference; p = 0.037) were associated with decreased opioid consumption in two observational studies and a randomized trial, respectively. Three observational studies found that opioid use preoperatively was associated with a higher proportion of emergency department visits and readmission (OR 1.41 to 17.4; all p < 0.001), and opioid use at 2 weeks postoperatively was associated with slightly higher pain scores compared with nonopioid regimens (β = 0.042; p < 0.001 and Likert scale 2.5 versus 1.6; p < 0.05) in one study.

CONCLUSION

Even after noting possible inflation of the harms of opioids in this review, our findings nonetheless highlight the need for opioid prescription guidelines specific for foot and ankle surgery. In this context, surgeons should utilize short (< 1 week) opioid prescriptions, regional anesthesia, and multimodal pain management techniques, especially in patients at increased risk of prolonged opioid use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Opioid Use for Operative Foot and Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review

Category:

Ankle; Trauma

Introduction/Purpose:

Patients treated operatively for foot and ankle fractures may be at higher risk of undertreated pain as well as overuse of opioid medications. We sought to synthesize the recent literature investigating use of opioids for analgesia following foot and ankle fracture surgery. To accomplish this, we aimed to determine the patterns of opioid use and prescription (e.g., quantity, duration, incidence of persistent use), risk or protective factors for persistent opioid use, and clinical outcomes (e.g., relief of pain, adverse events) associated with opioid use in this population.

Methods:

We followed PRISMA guidelines for our review. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science. We included studies published from 2010 to present that assessed patterns of opioid use, risk factors for increased opioid use, and outcomes associated with opioid use following foot/ankle fracture surgery. Two reviewers performed title/abstract screening and full-text review. The quality of included studies was evaluated using MINORS criteria.

Results:

In our review, 1713 articles were assessed and 18 were included (Figure 1). MINORS scores ranged from 13 to 18, indicating moderate study quality. Overall, there was wide variability in opioid use between and within studies. Rates of postoperative persistent opioid use ranged from 7-39%. Risk factors for increased opioid use included preoperative opioid exposure, mental health disorders, tobacco consumption, and certain injury patterns. Protective factors were spinal anesthesia, peripheral nerve block, and postoperative ketorolac. Opioid use was not associated with decreased pain or improved satisfaction. Opioid use was associated with increased rates of pain-related emergency department visits and readmission. Preoperative opioid use was associated with the greatest odds of increased postoperative use.

Conclusion:

There is a high incidence of persistent opioid use after foot and ankle fracture surgery. Opioid use was associated with negative health outcomes without decreasing pain levels or increasing patient satisfaction after foot/ankle fracture surgery. The wide variability of reported opioid use emphasizes the need for standardized guidelines for postoperative opioid use in this patient population, and our findings suggest that lower opioid prescription may be advisable.

Total Knee Arthroplasty after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is increasing in the United States, particularly in the older athlete. Patients who undergo ACL reconstruction are at higher risk for undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) later in life. TKA in patients with prior ACL reconstruction has been associated with longer operative time due in-part to difficulty with exposure and retained hardware. Outcomes after TKA in patients with prior ACL reconstruction are not well defined, with some reports showing increased rate of complications and higher risk of reoperation compared with routine primary TKA, but these results are based on small and nonrandomized cohorts. Future research is needed to determine whether graft choice or fixation technique for ACL reconstruction influences outcomes after subsequent TKA. Furthermore, whether outcomes are affected by choice of TKA implant design for patients with prior ACL reconstruction warrants further study. This review analyzes the epidemiology, operative considerations, and outcomes of TKA following ACL reconstruction.

30-day postoperative sepsis risk factors following laminectomy for intradural extramedullary tumors

BACKGROUND

Posterior laminectomy (LA) for resection of intradural extramedullary tumors (IDEMTs) is associated with postoperative complications, including sepsis. Sepsis is an uncommon but serious complication that can lead to increased morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and greater costs. Given the susceptibility of a solid tumor patients to sepsis-related complications, it is important to recognize IDEMT patients as a unique population when assessing the risk factors for sepsis after laminectomy.

METHODS

The study design was a retrospective cohort study. Adult patients undergoing LA for IDEMTs from 2012 to 2018 were identified in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Baseline patient characteristics/comorbidities, operative and hospital variables, and 30-day postoperative complications were collected.

RESULTS

Of 2,027 total patients undergoing LA for IDEMTs, 38 (2%) had postoperative sepsis. On bivariate analysis sepsis was associated with superficial surgical site infection [odds ratio (OR) 11.62, P<0.001], deep surgical site infection (OR 10.67, P<0.001), deep vein thrombosis (OR 10.75, P<0.001), pulmonary embolism (OR 15.27, P<0.001), transfusion (OR 6.18, P<0.001), length of stay greater than five days (OR 5.41, P<0.001), and return to the operating room within thirty days (OR 8.72, P<0.001). Subsequent multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors for sepsis and septic shock: operative time ≥50th percentile (OR 2.11, P=0.032), higher anesthesia class (OR 1.76, P=0.046), dependent functional status (OR 2.23, P=0.001), diabetes (OR 2.31, P=0.037), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 3.56, P=0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings can help spine surgeons identify high-risk patients and proactively deploy measures to avoid this potentially devastating complication in individuals who may be more vulnerable than the general elective spine population.

Laminectomy Versus Laminectomy with Fusion for Intradural Extramedullary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to systematically compare the reported outcomes between laminectomy and laminectomy with fixation/fusion (LF) for the treatment of intradural extramedullary tumors (IDEMTs). Our secondary objective was to compare the outcomes between different laminectomy exposure techniques.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were queried for literature on laminectomy and LF for IDEMTs. Reports of transforaminal approaches, interlaminar approaches, corpectomy, pediatrics patients, intramedullary tumors, technical studies, animal or cadaver studies, and literature reviews were excluded. The outcome measures recorded were pain, neurologic function, functional independence, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and wound infection. Where possible, the laminectomy technique (partial laminectomy [PL] vs. total laminectomy [TL]) was specified. Stata, version 17, was used for the fixed effects inverse variance meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1849 reports assessed, 17 were included. The meta-analysis revealed that laminectomy (PL or TL) resulted in higher rates of postoperative sagittal instability compared with LF (odds ratio, 1.81; P < 0.001). No differences in any other postoperative outcome were observed between laminectomy and LF (P = 0.44). The systematic review also revealed no differences in postoperative pain, neurologic function, or functional independence or disability between PL and TL. Some evidence suggested that TL might result in greater rates of sagittal instability compared with PL.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences between LF, PL, or TL in pain, neurologic deficit, functional independence, cerebrospinal fluid leak, or wound infection were reported. Laminectomy had greater odds of sagittal instability compared with LF. Patients with preoperative sagittal instability requiring extensive removal of the posterior spinal column to achieve adequate resection of large tumors might benefit from LF.

Survival bias may explain the appearance of the obesity paradox in hip fracture patients

Patients with low-energy hip fractures do not follow the obesity paradox as previously reported. In datasets where injury mechanism is not available, the use of age >50 years (as opposed to commonly used >65 years) as a surrogate for a low-energy hip fracture patients may be a more robust inclusion criterion.  PURPOSE: In elderly patients with a hip fracture, limited data suggests that obese patients counterintuitively have improved survival compared to normal-weight patients. This "obesity paradox" may be the byproduct of selection bias. We hypothesized that the obesity paradox would not apply to elderly hip fracture patients.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project dataset identified 71,685 hip fracture patients ≥50 years-of-age with complete body mass index (BMI) data that underwent surgery. Patients were stratified into under and over 75-year-old cohorts (n=18,956 and 52,729, respectively). Within each age group, patients were stratified by BMI class and compared with respect to preoperative characteristics and 30-day mortality. Significant univariate characteristics (p<0.1) were included in multivariate analysis to determine the independent effect of obesity class on 30-day mortality (p<0.05).

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis of <75-year-old patients with class-III obesity were more likely to die within 30-days than similarly aged normal-weight patients (OR 1.91, CI 1.06-3.42, p=0.030). Multivariate analysis of ≥75-year-old overweight (OR 0.69, CI 0.62-0.77, p<0.001), class-I obese (OR 0.62, CI 0.51-0.74, p<0.001), or class-II obese (OR=0.69, CI 0.50-0.95, p=0.022) patients were less likely to die within 30-days when compared to similarly aged normal-weight patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that obesity is a risk factor for mortality in low-energy hip fracture patients, but the appearance of the "obesity paradox" in elderly hip fracture patients results from statistical bias that is only evident upon subgroup analysis.

The CARDE-B Scoring System Predicts 30-Day Mortality After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There exists a substantial risk of having a perioperative complication after revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The complex shared decision-making between surgeon and patient would benefit from a high-fidelity tool to identify patients at risk for mortality after revision TJA. Therefore, we developed the CARDE-B score. CARDE-B is an acronym for congestive heart failure, albumin or malnutrition (<3.5 mg/dL), renal failure on dialysis, dependence for daily living, elderly (>65 years of age), and body mass index <25 kg/m2. We developed and validated the CARDE-B score to determine the risk of death within 30 days of a revision TJA.

METHODS

A total of 13,118 revision TJAs (40% hip and 60% knee) from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database were analyzed. A simple 1-point scoring system, CARDE-B, was created for predicting 30-day mortality after revision TJA, based on a logistic regression model. The CARDE-B scoring system assigns 1 point to each criterion in the acronym: congestive heart failure, albumin (<3.5 mg/dL), renal failure on dialysis, dependence for daily living, elderly (>65 years of age), and body mass index of <25 kg/m2. The CARDE-B scoring system was compared with 2 commonly utilized scores: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification and the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5). The area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess the accuracy of each model. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to assess goodness of fit. Finally, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used for external validation of the CARDE-B score in 19,153 patients who underwent revision TJA in 2017.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients (0.7%) did not survive 30 days after revision TJA. The AUC for the logistic regression model was 0.88 in both the derivation and internal validation samples using NSQIP. The predicted probability of 30-day mortality after revision TJA increased stepwise from <0.01% for a CARDE-B score of 0 points to 39% for a CARDE-B score of 5 points. The AUC for the CARDE-B score predicting 30-day mortality after revision TJA was 0.85. This was more accurate (p < 0.001) than the ASA physical status classification (AUC, 0.77) and the mFI-5 (AUC, 0.67). The AUC for the CARDE-B score in the NIS external validation set was 0.75. The Hosmer-Lemeshow p value for goodness of fit was 0.34, indicating goodness of fit in the external validation sample.

CONCLUSIONS

The CARDE-B score is a simple system that predicts the risk of death within 30 days of a revision TJA, offering surgeons and patients a valuable and validated risk-stratification tool.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.