The Development of a New International Generic Measure (EQ-HWB): Face Validity and Psychometric Stages in Argentina

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to present the face validity and psychometric stages performed in Spanish in Argentina, the only Spanish-speaking country of an international collaboration that undertook the construction of a new measure that can be used in economic evaluation across health, social care, and public health, the EQ EQ-HWB (EQ Health and Wellbeing). We also explored the relationship among 3-level version EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L), 5-level version EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), and EQ-HWB.

METHODS

Face validity was based on semistructured face to face interviews of a purposive sample to explore translatability of language and concepts of 97 candidate items, translated into Argentina Spanish. The psychometric evaluation using an online panel assessed the psychometric properties of 64 items that were carried forward (floor and ceiling effects, item correlations, known-group differences in relevant prespecified subgroups by the international and local teams, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and item response theory). EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and EQ-HWB correlations were explored.

RESULTS

In the face validity stage, 24 interviews with carers, general public, patients, and users of social services were included. Most items showed adequate face validity. In the psychometric assessment, 497 participants were recruited (64% reporting a long-term health condition). Most of the items showed adequate psychometrics in an Argentinian context. EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L had strong correlations, and EQ-HWB was moderately correlated to EQ visual analog scale. The Argentina team recommended 23 of the final 25 items.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of Spanish items contributed to the overall development of EQ-HWB and helped inform the design of an internationally relevant 25-item and a short 9-item measure intended to be used in economic evaluations.

Rotavirus Vaccine Impact since Its Introduction in the National Immunization Program of Argentina

INTRODUCTION

Rotavirus (RV) is the most common cause of childhood diarrhea. Argentina introduced RV vaccination in the National Immunization Program in January 2015. This study evaluates the impact of RV vaccine implementation on the burden of acute diarrheal disease (ADD) and RV positive cases, and hospitalizations among children in Argentina.

METHODS

A counterfactual time-series analysis was performed. Data on ADD (2013-2018) and RV diarrhea (2012-2018) cases in children aged < 5 years were collected from the National Healthcare Surveillance System (clinical and laboratory data). Data on hospital discharges following ADD and RV diarrhea (2011-2017) were retrieved from the Health Statistics and Information Office. All data were classified by the age groups < 1 year, < 2 years, 2-5 years. Vaccine impact was defined as the difference between the predicted time trend (simulated using 2012-2014 data) and the actual post-vaccination data (2015-2018).

RESULTS

A significant reduction of 22.1% of notified ADD cases and 15.4% of hospital discharges following ADD among children < 2 years was observed in the 3 years after RV vaccine implementation. Data also showed a significant decline of 54.0% and 59.4% of notified RV cases in children < 2 and < 1 years, respectively, and a reduction of 39.3% and 40.8% in RV hospital discharges for the same age groups.

CONCLUSION

This study shows a significant reduction in notified ADD cases and RV cases and hospital discharges following ADD and RV cases in children < 2 years after RV vaccine introduction in Argentina in 2015.

Cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in Latin America and the Caribbean: an analysis in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Peru

OBJECTIVE

Our study analyzes the cost-effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccination campaigns in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Peru.

METHODS

Using a previously published SVEIR model, we analyzed the impact of a vaccination campaign (2021) from a national healthcare perspective. The primary outcomes were quality adjusted life years (QALYs) lost and total costs. Other outcomes included COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, deaths, and life years. We applied a discount rate of 3% for health outcomes. We modeled a realistic vaccination campaign in each country (the realistic country-specific campaign). Additionally, we assessed a standard campaign (similar, "typical" for all countries), and an optimized campaign (similar in all countries with higher but plausible population coverage). One-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed.

FINDINGS

Vaccination was health improving as well as cost-saving in almost all countries and scenarios. Our analysis shows that vaccination in this group of countries prevented 573,141 deaths (508,826 standard; 685,442 optimized) and gained 5.07 million QALYs (4.53 standard; 6.03 optimized). Despite the incremental costs of vaccination campaigns, they had a total net cost saving to the health system of US$16.29 billion (US$16.47 standard; US$18.58 optimized). The realistic (base case) vaccination campaign in Chile was the only scenario, which was not cost saving, but it was still highly cost-effective with an ICER of US$22 per QALY gained. Main findings were robust in the sensitivity analyses.

INTERPRETATION

The COVID-19 vaccination campaign in seven Latin American and Caribbean countries -that comprise nearly 80% of the region- was beneficial for population health and was also cost-saving or highly cost-effective.

A Systematic Review of Value Criteria for Next-Generation Sequencing/Comprehensive Genomic Profiling to Inform Value Framework Development

OBJECTIVES

To comprehensively identify and map an exhaustive list of value criteria for the assessment of next-generation sequencing/comprehensive genomic profiling (NGS/CGP), to be used as an aid in decision making.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to identify existing value frameworks (VFs) applicable to any type of healthcare technology. VFs and criteria were mapped to a previously published Latin American (LA) VF to harmonize definitions and identify additional criteria and or subcriteria. Based on this analysis, we extracted a comprehensive, evidence-based list of criteria and subcriteria to be considered in the design of a NGS/CGP VF.

RESULTS

A total of 42 additional VFs were compared with the LA VF, 88% were developed in high-income countries, 30% targeted genomic testing, and 16% specifically targeted oncology. A total of 242 criteria and subcriteria were extracted; 227 (94%) were fully/partially included in the LA VF; and 15 (6%) were new. Clinical benefit and economic aspects were the most common criteria. VFs oriented to genomic testing showed significant overlap with other VFs. Considering all criteria and subcriteria, a total of 18 criteria and 36 individual subcriteria were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides an evidence-based set of criteria and subcriteria for healthcare decision making useful for NGS/CGP as well as other health technologies. The resulting list can be beneficial to inform decision making and will serve as a foundation to co-create a multistakeholder NGS/CGP VF that is aligned with the needs and values of health systems and could help to improve patient access to high-value technologies.

Immunogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccines During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Comparison of Pregnant Versus Nonpregnant Persons

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic induced the rapid deployment of novel vaccines with pregnant persons identified as an at-risk population due to their increased risk of severe outcomes. Limited data on the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant persons were available at the time of implementation. To address this data gap, we developed a living systematic review summarizing emerging evidence on vaccine immunogenicity in pregnancy.

METHODS

Following Cochrane, World Health Organization, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we included studies on COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. We carried out comprehensive biweekly literature searches from March 2022 to October 2023, covering multiple databases. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by pairs of authors independently. Immunogenicity outcomes, primarily post-vaccination neutralizing or binding antibody concentrations, were analyzed descriptively. Post-vaccination antibody ratios in pregnant versus nonpregnant individuals were calculated for the subset of studies that included nonpregnant comparators.

RESULTS

By October 2023, our review encompassed 62 studies predominantly analyzing maternal sera (87%), with limited investigation regarding cord, neonatal and infant sera. Most studies investigated mRNA vaccines (97%) and focused on primary vaccination (82%), with some investigating booster doses (15%). Immunogenicity end points included spike-specific IgG (84%) and neutralizing antibodies (24%), with limited data on T-cell responses (3%). Antibodies were detectable after primary vaccination in most pregnant individuals, with similar or modestly attenuated concentrations compared to nonpregnant individuals (ratios > 0.7 for 5/6 estimates of spike-specific IgG), albeit with modest differences in antibody quality and kinetics. Long-term antibody-waning trajectories were similar between pregnant and nonpregnant individuals for up to 8 months after vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

mRNA COVID-19 vaccines induce a robust antibody response during pregnancy comparable (or modestly attenuated) relative to nonpregnant individuals. Immunogenicity data on non-mRNA vaccines are notably underrepresented in the existing literature.

Budget Impact Analysis of Olaparib in Combination with Bevacizumab for Maintenance Therapy for Ovarian Cancer in Argentina

OBJECTIVES

To perform a budget impact analysis (BIA) of introducing olaparib as maintenance therapy in women who have BRCA mutations (BRCAm) with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) in combination with bevacizumab in Argentina.

METHODS

A BIA model was used to analyse over a 5-year time horizon the change in the health system's budget following the adoption of olaparib as maintenance therapy in BRCAm patients with PSROC. The BIA for each year was estimated by comparing the cost difference between the current scenario (treatment with bevacizumab) and the new scenario (the addition of olaparib) for a third-party payer. The BIA is estimated at the national health system level, and by healthcare sectors in Argentina (public sector, social security and private sector). International and national epidemiological data were used to determine the target patient population. Clinical efficacy, safety outcomes and duration of treatments were obtained from the pivotal clinical study report. Relevant direct medical costs were obtained from public data in Argentina and expert consultation. All the costs are reported in US dollars as of October 2022 ($1 = 152.59 Argentine pesos). A scenario analysis assessed the full coverage of the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) test in Argentina. In addition, one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the model robustness.

RESULTS

For a third-party payer with a cohort of 1,000,000 women covered, the estimated target population was 2 individuals in year 1 and 6 individuals in year 5. The incorporation of olaparib, with a wholesale price per pack of $3176.32, was associated with a weighted average of the budget impact per member per month (PMPM) of $0.062 for the national health system, being above the estimated health system budget impact threshold ($0.0153). By healthcare sector, the results of budget impact PMPM for year 5 ranged between $0.08 (public sector) and $0.114 (private sector). For all perspectives, the variables that most influenced the budget impact was the incidence of ovarian cancer, the drug acquisition cost and the treatment duration.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of olaparib for the treatment of BRCAm women with PSROC has a high budget impact for all three health systems in Argentina.

Estimation of the population at high risk of developing lung cancer in Chile using simplified eligibility criteria

OBJECTIVES

Several countries in different global regions are implementing lung cancer (LC) screening programmes. This study aimed to estimate the proportion of the Chilean population ≥15 years who are at high risk of developing LC.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Data from the Chilean National Health Survey were used in this study. Information on age and history of tobacco consumption were retrieved to estimate national and regional proportions of the Chilean population ≥15 years who are at high risk of developing LC, according to the inclusion criteria in the NELSON trial, NLST trial and USPSTF2021 recommendations. Stratified analyses were performed by sex and quartiles of monthly household income.

RESULTS

An estimated 292,158 (2.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.8), 174,196 (1.3%; 95% CI 0.9-1.7) and 404,751 (3.1%; 95% CI 2.4-3.8) of Chileans are at high risk of LC according to NELSON and NLST trial inclusion criteria and USPSTF2021 recommendations, respectively. Proportions of males who are at high risk were higher in comparison to females. The highest proportion of people who are at high risk was found in the lowest household income quartile. Regionally, the lowest percentage of Chileans who are at high risk was found in La Araucanía and the highest in Magallanes y Antártica.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a relevant number of Chileans who are at high risk of developing LC. Policymakers in Chile should enhance tobacco control efforts to reduce the prevalence of tobacco smoking and also explore the implementation of LC screening programmes to reduce the burden of LC.

Mortalidad, Secuelas Clínicas y Calidad de Vida Luego del Alta de Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos en Pacientes con COVID-19: Estudio Multicéntrico Descriptivo en Argentina

OBJECTIVE

Patients with COVID-19 who require hospitalization in an intensive care unit, in addition to being at risk of presenting premature death, have higher rates of complications. This study aimed to describe mortality, rehospitalizations, quality of life, and symptoms related to postintensive care syndrome (PICS) and prolonged COVID-19 in patients with COVID-19 discharged from the intensive care unit in hospitals in Argentina.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 4 centers in the Autonomous City and province of Buenos Aires as of December 2022. The variables of interest were mortality after discharge, rehospitalization, health-related quality of life, post-COVID-19-related symptoms, cognitive status, and PICS. Data collection was by telephone interview between 6 and 18 months after discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients/families were contacted. Mortality was 7.3% (95% CI: 3.87-13.22) at 14.46 months of follow-up after discharge. Patients reported a reduction of the EQ-5D-3L visual analog scale of 13.8 points, reaching a mean of 78.05 (95% CI: 73.7-82.4) at the time of the interview. Notably, 54.4% of patients (95% CI: 41.5-66.6) reported cognitive impairment and 66.7% (95% CI: 53.7-77.5) developed PICS, whereas 37.5% (95% CI: 26-50.9) had no symptoms of prolonged COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

The results showed a significant impact on the outcomes studied, consistent with international evidence.

Toward the Implementation of a Value Framework for Diagnostic Technologies: Operationalization, Piloting, and Validation in Latin America

OBJECTIVES

In 2020, a group of 30 stakeholders from Latin America established 15 criteria for a diagnostic technologies value framework (D-VF) to help assess and inform decisions on diagnostic technologies. This article aims to present the operationalization, piloting, and initial validation of the framework for its implementation.

METHODS

This work was carried out collaboratively with a variety of stakeholders. Three sequential phases were undertaken: (1) operationalization of the D-VF through a literature search for conceptual definitions and assessment tools, (2) piloting of the D-VF through a rapid health technology assessment document applying the methodology of the framework, and (3) a face validation process conducted through a virtual workshop, where usefulness and implementation aspects of the framework were assessed.

RESULTS

The operationalization of the framework was conducted, and a methodological user guide was published. The D-VF criteria were applied in a health technology assessment document on human papilloma virus testing in cervical cancer screening. Also, an open-access training program was developed. Stakeholders agreed on the usefulness of the D-VF for assessment and decision-making stages of diagnostic technologies. However, they highlighted the need to improve technical capacities and the potential for added complexity when applying a D-VF with many criteria. The absence of an established value framework for diagnostic technologies in Latin America and the potential for strengthening technical capacities made the project valuable to those involved.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic technologies value framework was shown to be fit for implementation in real-life decision-making settings after the operationalization, piloting, and initial validation phases. Further experiences are important to support its implementation.

Trastuzumab-emtansine versus other anti-HER2 regimens in early or unresectable or metastatic HER-2 positive breast cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE.

Motivation for the study. Treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer were evaluated, focusing on the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) compared to other anti-HER2 therapies. Main findings. Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) and PyroCap emerged as promising alternatives, showing substantial improvements in progression-free survival for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. T-DM1 showed superior efficacy to the other treatments. Implications. Our findings could inform healthcare decision-making processes to optimize strategies for HER2-positive breast cancer, and potentially improve health outcomes and quality of life. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) versus other anti-HER2 therapies in HER2+ breast cancer (BC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS.

We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our study focused on patients undergoing treatment for unresectable locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or metastatic breast cancer (mBC), which included regimens involving trastuzumab and taxanes. Additionally, we considered cases within the first 6 months of treatment for HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC).

RESULTS.

A total of 23 RCTs and 41 reports were included in our analysis. LABC and mBC showed no statistically significant difference in any of the comparisons of T-DM1 versus the other anti-HER2+ therapies. When assessing progression-free survival (PFS), trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) and PyroCap demonstrated greater efficacy compared to other treatments (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.75-4.63 and HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.35-2.44; respectively), while T-DM1 alone exhibited superior effectiveness compared to LapCap (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.55-0.77), TrasCap (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46-0.91), LapCapCitu (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.33-1.10), Nera (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.39-0.77), and Cap (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.28-0.49).

CONCLUSIONS.

NMA allows a ranking based on the comparative efficacy and safety among the interventions available. Although superior to other schemes, T-DM1 showed a lower efficacy performance in PFS and overall response rate and a trend towards worse overall survival than T-DXd.

Budget impact of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Argentina

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer (LC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality in Argentina. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) had demonstrated higher efficacy than chest radiography as a screening method for early detection and reducing LC mortality. This study estimates the Budget Impact of implementing annual LDCT screening for individuals aged 55-74 with at least 30 pack-years of smoking in Argentina.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A budgetary impact model for a dynamic cohort was developed from the Argentine health system's perspective, accounting for LC incidents, prevalents and death probability, distinguishing by disease stage and survival years. Model parameters were sourced from literature and official databases, with costs expressed in 2023 USD.

RESULTS

In Argentina, 726,420 individuals were eligible for annual LC screening. The average annual budget was USD 196,611,452 in the current scenario and USD 207,439,560 in the projected scenario, leading to a 5.20% incremental cost due to more false positives in LDCT and screening costs. The budget impact per member per month was USD 0.019, slightly above the estimated threshold of USD 0.015.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of LDCT for LC screening increased the health system budget in Argentina but improved early disease detection.

Impact of Lung Cancer on Health-Related Quality of Life, Financial Toxicity, and Household Economics in Patients From the Public and the Private Healthcare Sector in Argentina

OBJECTIVES

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is Argentina's first cause of cancer death. Most patients have an advanced stage at diagnosis, with poor expected survival. This study aimed to characterize the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and economic impact of patients treated in the private healthcare sector and compare it with that of the public sector.

METHODS

We undertook an observational cross-sectional study that extended a previous study to a referral private center in Argentina. Outcomes included the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L (to assess HRQOL), Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (financial toxicity instrument), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - General Health (to assess productivity loss), and out-of-pocket expenses in adults diagnosed of NSCLC.

RESULTS

We included 30 consecutive patients from a private healthcare center (July 2021 to March 2022), totaling 131 patients (n = 101 from previous public study). The whole sample had low quality of life and relevant economic impact. Patients in the private healthcare sector showed lower disease severity and higher educational level and household income. In addition, private healthcare system patients showed higher utility (0.77 vs 0.73; P < .05) and lower impairment of daily activities (41% vs 59%; P = .01). Private health system patients also showed lower financial toxicity as measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity score (23.9 vs 20.14; P < .05) but showed no differences when financial toxicity was assessed as a dichotomic variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with NSCLC treated in a private healthcare center in Argentina showed a relevant HRQOL and economic impact, this impact was smaller than the one observed in publicly funded hospitals.