1
|
Kim HR, Awad MM, Navarro A, Gottfried M, Peters S, Csőszi T, Cheema PK, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Wollner M, Yang JCH, Mazieres J, Orlandi FJ, Luft A, Gümüş M, Kato T, Kalemkerian GP, Luo Y, Santorelli ML, Pietanza MC, Rudin CM. Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life in KEYNOTE-604: Pembrolizumab or Placebo Added to Etoposide and Platinum as First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage SCLC. JTO Clin Res Rep 2023; 4:100572. [PMID: 37954964 PMCID: PMC10637979 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-604 study (NCT03066778), pembrolizumab plus etoposide and platinum chemotherapy (EP) significantly (p = 0.0023) improved progression-free survival versus placebo plus EP in previously untreated extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). We present health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results from KEYNOTE-604. Methods Patients with stage IV SCLC were randomized 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks for 35 cycles plus four cycles of EP. Secondary end points included mean change from baseline to week 18 in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) scale and time to deterioration in the composite outcome of cough, chest pain, or dyspnea from QLQ-C30 and QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13. Two-sided, nominal p values are reported. Results A total of 439 patients completed at least one QLQ-C30 and QLQ-Lung Cancer Module 13 assessment (pembrolizumab + EP, n = 221; placebo + EP, n = 218). GHS/QoL scores improved from baseline to week 18: least squares mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) changes were 8.7 (5.3-12.1) for pembrolizumab plus EP and 4.2 (0.9-7.5) for placebo plus EP. Between-group differences in least squares mean scores were improved for pembrolizumab plus EP (4.4 [95% CI: 0.2-8.7], p = 0.040]). Median time to deterioration for the composite end point was not reached and 8.7 (95% CI: 5.9-not reached) months, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.80 [95% CI: 0.56-1.14], p = 0.208). Conclusions First-line pembrolizumab plus EP therapy maintained HRQoL in patients with ES-SCLC and may be associated with greater improvement than placebo plus EP. Together with the efficacy and safety findings in KEYNOTE-604, HRQoL data support the benefit of pembrolizumab in ES-SCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Ryun Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mark M. Awad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alejandro Navarro
- Clinical Research Department (VHIO) and Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maya Gottfried
- Oncology Department, Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Saba, Israel
| | - Solange Peters
- Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Tibor Csőszi
- Department of Oncology, Hetenyi G Korhaz Onkologiai Kozpont, Szolnok, Hungary
| | - Parneet K. Cheema
- Division of Medical Oncology, William Osler Health System, University of Toronto, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil de Gran Canaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Mirjana Wollner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - James Chih-Hsin Yang
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital and Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Julien Mazieres
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Alexander Luft
- Department of Oncology No. 1 (Thoracic Surgery), Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Mahmut Gümüş
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Terufumi Kato
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Gregory P. Kalemkerian
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Yiwen Luo
- Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey
| | - Melissa L. Santorelli
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey
| | | | - Charles M. Rudin
- Department of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Monteiro FSM, Schutz FA, Morbeck IAP, Bastos DA, de Padua FV, Costa LAGA, Maia MC, Rinck JA, Zequi SDC, da Trindade KM, Alfer W, Nahas WC, Dos Santos LV, Ferrigno R, da Rosa DAR, Sade JP, Orlandi FJ, de Oliveira FNG, Soares A. Consensus on Treatment and Follow-Up for Biochemical Recurrence in Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Report From the First Global Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference for Developing Countries. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7:538-544. [PMID: 33856897 PMCID: PMC8162965 DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To present a summary of the treatment and follow-up recommendations for the biochemical recurrence in castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa) acquired through a questionnaire administered to 99 PCa experts from developing countries during the Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference for Developing Countries. METHODS A total of 27 questions were identified as related to this topic from more than 300 questions. The clinician's responses were tallied and presented in a percentage format. Topics included the use of imaging for staging biochemical recurrence, treatment recommendations for three different clinical scenarios, the field of radiation recommended, and follow-up. Each question had 5-7 relevant response options, including “abstain” and/or “unqualified to answer,” and investigated not only recommendations but also if a limitation in resources would change the recommendation. RESULTS For most questions, a clear majority (> 50%) of clinicians agreed on a recommended treatment for imaging, treatment scenarios, and follow-up, although only a few topics reached a consensus > 75%. Limited resources did affect several areas of treatment, although in many cases, they reinforced more stringent criteria for treatment such as prostate-specific antigen values > 0.2 ng/mL and STAMPEDE inclusion criteria as a basis for recommending treatment. CONCLUSION A majority of clinicians working in developing countries with limited resources use similar cutoff points and selection criteria to manage patients treated for biochemically recurrent castration-sensitive PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando S M Monteiro
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Hospital Santa Lucia, Brasilia, Brazil.,Hospital Universitario de Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil
| | - Fabio A Schutz
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Beneficencia Portuguesa de São Paulo-BP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Igor A P Morbeck
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasília, Brazil.,Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil
| | - Diogo A Bastos
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Hospital Sirio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fernando V de Padua
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasília, Brazil.,Hospital de Base de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil
| | - Leonardo A G A Costa
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Grupo Oncologia D'Or, Fortaleza, Brazil
| | - Manuel C Maia
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Centro de Oncologia do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.,Hospital Universitário Evangélico Mackenzie, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Jose A Rinck
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Karine M da Trindade
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Oncocentro, Fortaleza, Brazil.,Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil
| | | | - William C Nahas
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Diogo A R da Rosa
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Grupo Oncoclinicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Juan P Sade
- Hospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Fernando N G de Oliveira
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,CLION-Clínica de Oncologia, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Andrey Soares
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.,Centro Paulista de Oncologia/Oncoclínicas, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sendur MN, Reck M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Park K, Lee DH, Cicin I, Yumuk PF, Orlandi FJ, Leal TA, Molinier O, Soparattanapaisarn N, Langleben A, Califano R, Medgyasszay B, Hsia TC, Otterson GA, Xu L, Burke TA, Samkari A, Boyer MJ. Health-related quality of life for pembrolizumab (pembro) plus ipilimumab (ipi) versus pembro plus placebo in patients with metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 50%: KEYNOTE-598. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.9038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9038 Background: In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-598 study (NCT03302234), OS (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.85–1.37; P = 0.74) and PFS (1.06; 95% CI, 0.86–1.30; P = 0.72) were not improved for pembro + ipi vs pembro + placebo in patients (pts) with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% and without EGFR/ALK genomic alterations. Incidence of treatment-related grade 3–5 AEs, fatal AEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation was higher with pembro + ipi vs pembro + placebo. We present prespecified patient-reported outcome (PRO) analyses from KEYNOTE-598. Methods: Pts (n = 568) with previously untreated stage IV NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% were randomized 1:1 to pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles + ipi 1 mg/kg or placebo Q6W for up to 18 cycles. The EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-LC13, EQ-5D-5L, and NSCLC-SAQ were administered at cycles 1‒7, then every 3 cycles through cycle 19, and every 4 cycles until PD or a maximum of 35 cycles. Change from baseline in global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL) score from the QLQ-C30 and the time to true deterioration (TTD) in the composite endpoint of cough (LC13), chest pain (LC13), or dyspnea (C30) were secondary objectives in KEYNOTE-598. Change from baseline in GHS/QoL was analyzed using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model with missing at random assumption. Difference in TTD was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model and stratified log-rank test. PROs were analyzed in all pts who completed ≥1 PRO assessment and received ≥1 dose of study treatment. P values are two-sided and nominal. Results: As of data cutoff (Sept 1, 2020), PRO analyses included 280 pts in the pembro + ipi group and 280 pts in the pembro + placebo group. QLQ-C30 completion rates were 95.7% in the pembro + ipi group vs 96.1% in the pembro + placebo group at baseline and 63.6% vs 70.0% at week 18. QLQ-LC13 completion rates were 95.4% vs 96.4% at baseline and 63.6% vs 69.6% at week 18. Mean QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL scores at baseline were 62.8 in the pembro + ipi group and 64.2 in the pembro + placebo group and were similar between the groups across the follow-up period. Least squares (LS) mean (95% CI) change from baseline to week 18 in GHS/QoL scores was improved in both groups (pembro + ipi: 3.7 [0.9‒6.5]; pembro + placebo: 4.1 [1.4‒6.9]), with no significant difference between groups (LS mean difference −0.4 [−4.0 to 3.1], P = 0.82). Median TTD in composite of cough, chest pain, or dyspnea was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 13.0 mo–NR) in the pembro + ipi group vs 20.0 (95% CI, 12.7–NR) mo in the pembro + placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.74‒1.30]; P = 0.91). Conclusions: There was no difference in health-related QoL or TTD in lung cancer symptoms between pembro + ipi and pembro + placebo in pts with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. Clinical trial information: NCT03302234.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Nahit Sendur
- Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine and Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Martin Reck
- LungenClinic, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil de Gran Canaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Keunchil Park
- Samsung Medical Center at Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Adrian Langleben
- St. Mary’s Hospital–ODIM, McGill University Department of Oncology, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Raffaele Califano
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, and Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Te-Chun Hsia
- China Medical University and China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Lu Xu
- Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salinas C, Pinto Negrete FE, Saavedra MP, Orlandi FJ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin in stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A local experience with LATAM patients. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e20535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e20535 Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related death worldwide and so is expected in Chile in 2021 accoding to Globocan, with a 12.4% mortality rate last year. Among NSCLC, 35 to 40% present as locally advanced disease, most of them non surgical candidates. Current standard of treatment is platinum-based doublet with concurrent Radiotherapy plus adyuvant durvalumab since 2018. Still many controversies related to different approaches are not settled. Few literature is available concerning a less aggressive approach in order to achieve a more tolerable treatment for the patient preserving effectiveness. Many patients compromise the treatment compliance due to early toxicities. We present our preliminary results of local data consisting in weekly cisplatin plus concurrent standard dose of radiotherapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of local database for stage III unresectable NSCLC between 2013 to 2019. Baseline clinical data , treatment modality, toxicities and response rates were recorded for all patients. Outcomes were analyzed by measuring overall response rate (ORR) , progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v5.0 and treatment response by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Results: 54% of the patients were men, 68%ECOG 0 and 32% ECOG 1. Mean BMI of 26 kg / m2. 100% smokers with average 39 packages per year and 71% had some other comorbidity;. 26% had emphysema. Histologic confirmation of 74%adenocarcinom and as. 26% squamous cell carcinoma. Staging analysis showed 23% stage IIIA, 54% stage IIIB, and 23% stage IIIC. Only 6 patients received adjuvant treatment before being diagnosed with stage III disease. Chemoradiotherapy is carried out as follows: 86% cisplatin (median 54.4 mg/m2) as a single weekly dose combined with standard radiotherapy of 60 Gy /30 Fr in a concurrent modality in ???. 74.2% completed follow up after CRT and the remaining 50% received adyuvant durvalumab. 71% of the patients reported some degree (mild, moderate or severe?) of toxicity related to the treatment; 37.1% grade 2 actinic pneumonitis, 11.4% grade 2 actinic esophagitis and 11.4% grade 1 acute renal failure among the most significant. No CTCAE 5.0 grade 4 and 5 toxicities were reported. 82.8% progressed in 15 months average (mean??); with 17% with current stable disease. The ORR was 48,5%. The mOS was 23 months (95% CI [16,7-29,3]) and the mPFS was 10 months (95% CI [8.25-11.75]. Conclusions: Since PACIFIC trial, stage III unresectable NSCLC have experienced a pivotal change in management. Unfortunately, our Public Health Insurance System does not cover access for all pts. This approach reaches similar results described in earlier trials published in the area and could be an option in certain clinical settings.
Collapse
|
5
|
Boyer M, Şendur MAN, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Park K, Lee DH, Çiçin I, Yumuk PF, Orlandi FJ, Leal TA, Molinier O, Soparattanapaisarn N, Langleben A, Califano R, Medgyasszay B, Hsia TC, Otterson GA, Xu L, Piperdi B, Samkari A, Reck M. Pembrolizumab Plus Ipilimumab or Placebo for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score ≥ 50%: Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III KEYNOTE-598 Study. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2327-2338. [PMID: 33513313 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pembrolizumab monotherapy is standard first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50% without actionable driver mutations. It is not known whether adding ipilimumab to pembrolizumab improves efficacy over pembrolizumab alone in this population. METHODS In the randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-598 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03302234), eligible patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and no sensitizing EGFR or ALK aberrations were randomly allocated 1:1 to ipilimumab 1 mg/kg or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 18 doses; all participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 35 doses. Primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS Of the 568 participants, 284 were randomly allocated to each group. Median overall survival was 21.4 months for pembrolizumab-ipilimumab versus 21.9 months for pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.37; P = .74). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 months for pembrolizumab-ipilimumab versus 8.4 months for pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.30; P = .72). Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 62.4% of pembrolizumab-ipilimumab recipients versus 50.2% of pembrolizumab-placebo recipients and led to death in 13.1% versus 7.5%. The external data and safety monitoring committee recommended that the study be stopped for futility and that participants discontinue ipilimumab and placebo. CONCLUSION Adding ipilimumab to pembrolizumab does not improve efficacy and is associated with greater toxicity than pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and no targetable EGFR or ALK aberrations. These data do not support use of pembrolizumab-ipilimumab in place of pembrolizumab monotherapy in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mehmet A N Şendur
- Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine and Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil de Gran Canaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Keunchil Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | - Ticiana A Leal
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI
| | | | | | - Adrian Langleben
- St Mary's Hospital - ODIM, McGill University Department of Oncology, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Raffaele Califano
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, and Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Te-Chun Hsia
- China Medical University and China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Gregory A Otterson
- The Ohio State University-James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Lu Xu
- Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ
| | | | | | - Martin Reck
- LungenClinic, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rudin CM, Awad MM, Navarro A, Gottfried M, Peters S, Csőszi T, Cheema PK, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Wollner M, Yang JCH, Mazieres J, Orlandi FJ, Luft A, Gümüş M, Kato T, Kalemkerian GP, Luo Y, Ebiana V, Pietanza MC, Kim HR. Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Etoposide and Platinum as First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III KEYNOTE-604 Study. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2369-2379. [PMID: 32468956 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.00793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 371] [Impact Index Per Article: 92.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pembrolizumab monotherapy has shown antitumor activity in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-604 study compared pembrolizumab plus etoposide and platinum (EP) with placebo plus EP for patients with previously untreated extensive-stage (ES) SCLC. METHODS Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks or saline placebo for up to 35 cycles plus 4 cycles of EP. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST version 1.1, blinded central review) and overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population. Objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response were secondary end points. Prespecified efficacy boundaries were one-sided P = .0048 for PFS and .0128 for OS. RESULTS Of the 453 participants, 228 were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus EP and 225 to placebo plus EP. Pembrolizumab plus EP significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.91; P = .0023). Twelve-month PFS estimates were 13.6% with pembrolizumab plus EP and 3.1% with placebo plus EP. Although pembrolizumab plus EP prolonged OS, the significance threshold was not met (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98; P = .0164). Twenty-four-month OS estimates were 22.5% and 11.2%, respectively. ORR was 70.6% in the pembrolizumab plus EP group and 61.8% in the placebo plus EP group; the estimated proportion of responders remaining in response at 12 months was 19.3% and 3.3%, respectively. In the pembrolizumab plus EP and placebo plus EP groups, respectively, any-cause adverse events were grade 3-4 in 76.7% and 74.9%, grade 5 in 6.3% and 5.4%, and led to discontinuation of any drug in 14.8% and 6.3%. CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab plus EP significantly improved PFS compared with placebo plus EP as first-line therapy for patients with ES-SCLC. No unexpected toxicities were seen with pembrolizumab plus EP. These data support the benefit of pembrolizumab in ES-SCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alejandro Navarro
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Tibor Csőszi
- Hetényi Géza Kórház Onkológiai Központ, Szolnok, Hungary
| | - Parneet K Cheema
- William Osler Health System, University of Toronto, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil de Gran Canaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | | | - James Chih-Hsin Yang
- National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Julien Mazieres
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Alexander Luft
- Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Mahmut Gümüş
- Istanbul Medeniyet University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Hye Ryun Kim
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rudin CM, Awad MM, Navarro A, Gottfried M, Peters S, Csőszi T, Cheema PK, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Wollner M, Czyzewicz G, Yang JCH, Mazieres J, Orlandi FJ, Luft A, Gumus M, Kato T, Kalemkerian GP, Luo Y, Pietanza MC, Kim HR. KEYNOTE-604: Pembrolizumab (pembro) or placebo plus etoposide and platinum (EP) as first-line therapy for extensive-stage (ES) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.9001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9001 Background: Pembro monotherapy showed durable antitumor activity as third-line or later therapy for metastatic SCLC, leading to FDA approval in that setting. KEYNOTE-604 was a double-blind, phase 3 study of pembro + EP vs placebo + EP as first-line therapy for ES-SCLC (NCT03066778). Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with previously untreated ES-SCLC and no untreated CNS metastases were randomized 1:1 to pembro 200 mg Q3W or saline placebo for up to 35 cycles plus 4 cycles of standard-dose EP. Pts with CR or PR after cycle 4 could receive PCI at investigator discretion. Randomization was stratified by platinum choice (carboplatin vs cisplatin), ECOG PS (0 vs 1), and LDH (≤ULN vs > ULN). Primary endpoints were OS and PFS (RECIST v1.1, blinded central review) in the ITT population. ORR, DOR, and safety were secondary endpoints. OS and PFS treatment differences were assessed by the stratified log-rank test. The protocol specified 2 interim analyses (IAs) and a final analysis (FA). Prespecified efficacy boundaries were one-sided P = 0.0048 for PFS at IA2 (prespecified final PFS analysis) and 0.0128 for OS at FA. Results: 453 pts were randomized. 223/228 pts assigned to pembro + EP and 222/225 assigned to placebo + EP received ≥1 dose of assigned treatment; 1 pt assigned to pembro + EP received placebo + EP in error. Median age was 65 y, 74% had ECOG PS 1, and 57% had LDH > ULN; more pts in the pembro + EP arm had baseline brain metastases (14% vs 10%). At FA (median follow-up, 21.6 mo), 9% of pts in the pembro + EP arm and 1% in the placebo + EP arm remained on study treatment; 12% and 14% received PCI. At IA2 (median follow-up, 13.5 mo), pembro + EP significantly improved PFS in the ITT population (HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.61-0.91], P = 0.0023; median 4.5 vs 4.3 mo). At FA, pembro + EP prolonged OS in the ITT population, but the significance threshold was not met (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.64-0.98], P = 0.0164; median 10.8 vs 9.7 mo). In a post hoc analysis of OS in the as-treated population, the nominal P value was smaller than the significance threshold (HR 0.78 [95% CI 0.63-0.97], P = 0.0124). ORR at FA was 71% for pembro + EP vs 62% for placebo + EP; median DOR was 4.2 vs 3.7 mo. Observed AEs were as expected; any-cause AEs were grade 3-4 in 77% vs 75%, grade 5 in 6% vs 5%, and led to discontinuation in 15% vs 6%. Conclusions: Pembro + EP significantly improved PFS and prolonged OS compared with placebo + EP as first-line therapy for pts with ES-SCLC. No unexpected toxicities were seen with pembro + EP. These data support the benefit of pembro-containing regimens for ES-SCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03066778.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alejandro Navarro
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d´Hebron University Hospital/Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Tibor Csőszi
- Hetenyi G Korhaz, Onkologiai Kozpont, Szolnok, Hungary
| | | | - Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil de Gran Canaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, Spain
| | | | | | - James Chih-Hsin Yang
- National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Julien Mazieres
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Alexander Luft
- Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Mahmut Gumus
- Istanbul Medeniyet University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, Mok TSK, West H, Nishio M, Papadimitrakopoulou V, Orlandi FJ, Stroyakovskiy D, Thomas CA, Nogami N, Barlesi F, Lee A, Shankar G, Yu W, Ballinger M, Bara I, Sandler A, Reck M. IMpower150: Analysis of efficacy in patients (pts) with liver metastases (mets). J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.9012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9012 Background: Atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) + chemo (carboplatin + paclitaxel [CP]; ABCP) showed improved PFS and OS vs bev + CP (BCP) in pts with chemo-naive NSCLC (IMpower150). Benefit with ABCP vs BCP extended to key subgroups, including pts with baseline (BL) liver mets, which is a poor prognostic factor in metastatic NSCLC. Similar outcomes were not seen with atezo + chemo (IMpower150 [atezo + CP; ACP]; IMpower130; IMpower132), suggesting that the addition of bev to atezo + chemo is important for conferring clinical benefit in these pts. Here we further explore characteristics and responses of pts with BL liver mets in IMpower150. Methods: 1202 ITT pts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive ABCP, ACP or BCP. Doses were: A, 1200 mg; B, 15 mg/kg; C, AUC 6 mg/mL/min; P, 200 mg/m2. Coprimary endpoints were OS and investigator-assessed PFS in ITT–wild-type pts. Exploratory analyses included efficacy and safety in pts with liver mets. Results: The data capture ≥ 20-mo follow-up in ITT pts (data cutoff: Jan 22, 2018). 162 pts had BL liver mets (ABCP, n = 52; ACP; n = 53; BCP, n = 57), with a median of 3 metastatic sites and median BL tumor SLD of 109 mm (range, 10-249). BL characteristics in these pts were generally balanced across study arms. PFS and OS were improved with ABCP vs BCP (Table). Gr 3-4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 52.1%, 36.5% and 54.5% of pts with liver mets in the ABCP, ACP and BCP arms, respectively. Conclusions: ABCP reduced the risk of death in pts with liver mets by 48% vs BCP and may represent an important new treatment option for this population. Clinical trial information: NCT02366143. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Makoto Nishio
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Naoyuki Nogami
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Fabrice Barlesi
- Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department, Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Wei Yu
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Ilze Bara
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Martin Reck
- LungenClinic, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|