1
|
Metzner G, Horstmann S, Barth M, Giesler JM, Jünemann S, Kaier K, Schlett C, Schroeder N, Siebolds M, Sinss F, van Staa J, Glattacker M, Renner I. Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:475. [PMID: 35410201 PMCID: PMC8996544 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07787-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Family risk factors, e.g. low socioeconomic status or parental mental health disorders, can affect children’s health and development. Thus, targeted preventive services for families with psychosocial burden are crucial. The German Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) program is a preventive approach that aims to strengthen parent’s resources by supportive services. However, research has revealed that only a proportion of the families considered to have substantial risk factors access the ECI program. To increase pediatricians’ skills in identifying risk factors, and to improve the cross-sectoral collaboration between relevant professionals and the referral of families to supportive services, the PATH-intervention (Pediatric Attention To Help) was developed. The PATH-intervention includes interprofessional quality circles and a one-day training program for the pediatricians. This study aims to evaluate this complex cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden. Methods Using a prospective quasi-experimental, controlled (matched-pair), longitudinal mixed-method design, we will compare families under treatment of pediatricians trained in the PATH-intervention with families under treatment of a control group of pediatricians. Participating families are asked to complete online-surveys. As a primary outcome, we will examine the use of supportive services of the ECI by burdened families. Secondary outcomes are the proportion of correctly identified families with psychosocial burden by the pediatricians, as well as information provision and motivation of the families to use the supportive services. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness ratio will be investigated. In the process evaluation, we will qualitatively explore the acceptance of the PATH-intervention of all involved stakeholders and the treatment fidelity of the trained pediatricians. Discussion This study will determine whether the PATH-intervention enables the pediatricians to identify and recommend supportive services to burdened families, as well as the families’ use of the supportive services of the ECI. Qualitative data will give insight into the acceptance of the intervention from the perspective of all stakeholders and the treatment fidelity. Results of this study could be the starting point for the broader implementation of the PATH-intervention as standard care. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00023461 (3rd December 2020); WHO UTN: U1111- 260-6575. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07787-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Metzner
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 49, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Sabine Horstmann
- National Centre for Early Prevention, Federal Centre for Health Education, Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Germany
| | - Michael Barth
- Center for Pediatrics, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Mathildenstraße 1, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen M Giesler
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 49, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Jünemann
- National Centre for Early Prevention, Federal Centre for Health Education, Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Germany
| | - Klaus Kaier
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Zinkmattenstr. 6a, 79108, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Schlett
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 49, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nora Schroeder
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 49, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marcus Siebolds
- Department of Health Care, Catholic University of Applied Sciences, Wörthstraße 10, 50668, Köln, Germany
| | - Frank Sinss
- National Centre for Early Prevention, Federal Centre for Health Education, Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Germany
| | - Juliane van Staa
- National Centre for Early Prevention, Federal Centre for Health Education, Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Germany
| | - Manuela Glattacker
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 49, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ilona Renner
- National Centre for Early Prevention, Federal Centre for Health Education, Maarweg 149-161, 50825, Köln, Germany
| |
Collapse
|