Cross-Seal IDE Trial: Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of the Cross-Seal Suture-Mediated Vascular Closure Device System

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of interventional procedures require large-sheath technology (>12F) with a favorable outcome with endovascular rather than open surgical access. However, vascular complications are a limitation for the management of these patients. This trial aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of the Cross-Seal suture-mediated vascular closure device in obtaining hemostasis at the target limb access site following interventional procedures using 8F to 18F procedural sheaths.

METHODS

The Cross-Seal IDE trial (Investigational Device Exemption) was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study in subjects undergoing percutaneous endovascular procedures utilizing 8F to 18F ID procedural sheaths. The primary efficacy end point was time to hemostasis at the target limb access site. The primary safety end point was freedom from major complications of the target limb access site within 30 days post procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 147 subjects were enrolled between August 9, 2019, and March 12, 2020. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement was performed in 53.7% (79/147) and percutaneous endovascular abdominal/thoracic aortic aneurysm repair in 46.3% (68/147) of subjects. The mean sheath ID was 15.5±1.8 mm. The primary effectiveness end point of time to hemostasis was 0.4±1.4 minutes. An adjunctive intervention was required in 9.2% (13/142) of subjects, of which 2.1% (3/142) were surgical and 5.6% (8/142) endovascular. Technical success was achieved in 92.3% (131/142) of subjects. Freedom from major complications of the target limb access site was 94.3% (83/88).

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients undergoing percutaneous endovascular procedures utilizing 8F to 18F ID procedural sheath, Cross-Seal suture-mediated vascular closure device achieved favorable effectiveness and safety in the closure of the large-bore arteriotomy.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03756558.

Wire-Interwoven Nitinol Stent Outcome in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: Twelve-Month Results of the SUPERB Trial

BACKGROUND

Stent-based therapy in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in patients with peripheral artery disease is compromised by restenosis and risk of stent fracture or distortion. A novel self-expanding nitinol stent was developed that incorporates an interwoven-wire design (Supera stent, IDEV Technologies, Inc, Webster, TX) to confer greater radial strength, flexibility, and fracture resistance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective, multicenter, investigational device exemption, single-arm trial enrolled 264 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease undergoing percutaneous treatment of de novo or restenotic lesions of the superficial femoral or proximal popliteal (femoropopliteal) artery. Freedom from death, target lesion revascularization, or any amputation of the index limb at 30 days (+ 7 days) postprocedure was achieved in 99.2% (258/260) of patients (P < 0.001). Primary patency at 12 months (360 ± 30 days) was achieved in 78.9% (180/228) of the population (P < 0.001). Primary patency by Kaplan-Meier analysis at 12 months (360 days) was 86.3%. No stent fracture was observed by independent core laboratory analysis in the 243 stents (228 patients) evaluated at 12 months. Clinical assessment at 12 months demonstrated improvement by at least 1 Rutherford-Becker category in 88.7% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The SUPERB Trial, an investigational device exemption study using an interwoven nitinol wire stent in the femoropopliteal artery, achieved the efficacy and safety performance goals predesignated by the Food and Drug Administration. On the basis of the high primary patency rate, absence of stent fracture, and significant improvements in functional and quality-of-life measures, the Supera stent provides safe and effective treatment of femoropopliteal lesions in symptomatic patients with peripheral artery disease.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00933270.

Effect of clopidogrel pretreatment on inflammatory marker expression in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Platelets play an important role in the inflammatory response. In a nonrandomized comparison, we examined the effect of clopidogrel pretreatment on platelet inflammatory marker expression in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Platelet expression of the inflammatory markers CD40 ligand (L) and CD62 P-selectin (P) and serum levels of interleukin-6 and CD40L were compared in patients pretreated (>24 hours before PCI) or not pretreated with clopidogrel. Blood samples were obtained before and after the procedure, and from 18 to 24 hours later. Marker expression in resting and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (50 micromol/L) and thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) (10 micromol/L) activated samples was quantified by flow cytometry. Serum CD40L and interleukin (IL)-6 levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Seventy-nine patients were recruited into the study. Forty-two percent were pretreated with clopidogrel for a median of 5 days (range 1 to 1,325). Clopidogrel pretreatment was associated with lower ADP-activated platelet CD40L expression in baseline and postprocedural samples. Similarly, platelet CD62P expression at all time points in ADP-activated and in baseline and postprocedural TRAP-activated samples was lower in patients pretreated with clopidogrel. These differences remained after multivariate adjustment between the groups. Serum CD40L levels increased from 2.13 +/- 2.37 ng/ml at baseline to 4.77 +/- 3.86 ng/ml at 18 to 24 hours after the procedure (p <0.0001). Similarly, serum IL-6 levels increased at 18 to 24 hours after the procedure (14.8 +/- 42.0 pg/ml before vs 25.5 +/- 36.0 pg/ml at 18 to 24 hours after the procedure, p <0.0001). Clopidogrel pretreatment did not affect serum IL-6 or CD40L levels. Thus, clopidogrel pretreatment reduces platelet inflammatory marker expression in patients undergoing PCI.

Prolonged urokinase infusion for chronic total native coronary occlusions: clinical, angiographic, and treatment observations

Prolonged intravascular infusion of urokinase has proven beneficial in reestablishing patency of chronically occluded peripheral arteries and saphenous vein grafts. This study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of prolonged urokinase infusion as a prelude to angioplasty in chronically occluded native coronary arteries, that had failed standard angioplasty techniques. Twenty-five patients with objective evidence for ischemia in the distribution of a chronic coronary occlusion were referred for percutaneous intervention. Patients were assessed for any potential exclusions from lytic therapy. Urokinase infusion through both a SOS wire and a stable guiding catheter was continued at 100,000-240,000 units/hr for 8-25 hr; patients then underwent attempted balloon angioplasty. Mean duration of urokinase infusion was 20.6 +/- 7.7 hr (total dose 163,000 +/- 52,447 units/hr). Fibrinogen levels dropped slightly with this (300 +/- 129 to 203 +/- 81 mg/dl, P = 0.02). Angiography posturokinase showed improvement in 7 (28%) with regard to coronary flow (> or = 1 TIMI-grade). Angioplasty was successful in 13 (52%), with final angiographic result revealing thrombus in 5 (20%), or dissection 8 (32%). The infusions were well-tolerated with a low incidence of chest pain, 2 (8%) or ischemic ECG response, 2 (8%); myocardial infarction, 2 (8%); or significant bleeding 2 (8%). All patients survived the procedure, with a length-of-hospital stay = 5.1 +/- 4 days. Use of prolonged preangioplasty intracoronary urokinase infusion can be done safely with success in roughly one-half of patients with chronic total native coronary occlusions who have failed prior attempts at percutaneous intervention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)