1
|
Vengurlekar SS, Heitkamp J, McCush F, Velagaleti PR, Brisson JH, Bramer SL. A sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for the determination of dextromethorphan and metabolites in human urine--application for drug interaction studies assessing potential CYP3A and CYP2D6 inhibition. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2002; 30:113-24. [PMID: 12151071 DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(02)00134-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The commonly used antitussive dextromethorphan can be used to simultaneously assess potential cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and CYP2D6 inhibition during drug development. The metabolism of dextromethorphan to dextrorphan and subsequently to 3-hydroxymorphinan are via the 2D6 pathway, while the metabolism of dextromethorphan to 3-methoxymorphinan is via the 3A pathway. A sensitive and specific LC-MS/MS assay has been developed to determine the human urine concentrations of dextromethorphan and three metabolites (dextrorphan, 3-methoxymorphinan and 3-hydroxymorphinan) in support of drug interaction studies. Urine samples (0.5 ml), after enzymatic hydrolysis of the conjugates and containing 3-ethylmorphine as an internal standard, were extracted with chloroform under basic conditions. Following concentration and reconstitution, the samples were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The assay was linear over the range of 5.00-500 ng/ml for dextromethorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan; and 200-3000 ng/ml for dextrorphan and 3-hydroxymorphinan using a Perkin-Elmer Sciex triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (API 300). The intra- and inter-day relative standard deviation (RSD) across three validation runs over the entire concentration range for all analytes was less than 15%. Accuracy determined at three or four concentrations (9.00, 200, and 400 ng/ml for dextromethorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan; 250, 400, 1300 and 2500 ng/ml for dextrorphan and 3-hydroxymorphinan) ranged between 96.3 and 113.8%. The stability of analytes in urine was demonstrated for 9 months at -20 degrees C, 24 h under ambient conditions and for up to three freeze/thaw cycles. The method described herein is suitable for the rapid and efficient measurement of dextromethorphan and different metabolites to estimate potential CYP3A inhibition by drug candidates and for screening of extensive and poor metabolizers of CYP2D6 in the heterogeneous population. The method has subsequently been validated on a Sciex API 3000 with lower limit of quantitation; 1.00 ng/ml for dextromethorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan; 60.0 ng/ml for dextrorphan and 100 ng/ml for 3-hydroxymorphinan.
Collapse
|
|
23 |
30 |
2
|
McCush F, Wang E, Yunis C, Schwartz P, Baltrukonis D. Anti-drug Antibody Magnitude and Clinical Relevance Using Signal to Noise (S/N): Bococizumab Case Study. AAPS J 2023; 25:85. [PMID: 37658997 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-023-00846-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Historically, the biopharmaceutical industry has used titer to characterize the magnitude of an anti-drug antibody (ADA) response. While reporting levels of antibodies in terms of titer is generally understood and accepted by regulatory and medical communities, titer values are inherently variable given the multiple serial dilutions and reporting a value either directly before or interpolated at the assay cut point on the lower plateau of the assay curve range. Using S/N is an appealing alternative approach to titer as it simplifies analysis with less dilutions, significantly reducing testing, time, and resources and provides a more precise value potentially differentiating low-level ADA responses. Current bridging electrochemiluminescence (ECL) ADA assays using Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) platform are also significantly more sensitive and drug tolerant with wider assay ranges compared to historic ELISA platforms; therefore, ADA response based on S/N may help differentiate and identify those ADA samples that are more likely to be clinically relevant. Bococizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9), which reduces plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Bococizumab was discontinued during Phase 3 clinical development based in part on the high rate of ADA and wide variation in LDL cholesterol responses among patients. The impact of anti-bococizumab antibodies on pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints was originally assessed using titer. Retrospective analysis of anti-bococizumab ADA responses using S/N ratios illustrates that S/N is an acceptable alternative to titer for characterizing the magnitude of ADA response and interpretation of clinically relevant ADA.
Collapse
|
|
2 |
5 |
3
|
Lee SD, Wasan KM, Calcagni A, Avery M, McCush F, Chen C. The in Vitro Plasma Distribution of a Novel Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitor, Torcetrapib, Is Influenced by Differences in Plasma Lipid Concentrations. Pharm Res 2006; 23:1025-30. [PMID: 16715393 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-006-9908-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2005] [Accepted: 01/05/2006] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the lipoprotein distribution of Torcetrapib in normolipidemic or hyperlipidemic human plasma and assess any changes in distribution due to lipid profile. METHODS Torcetrapib was incubated with human plasma samples, and the distribution was measured across four fractions: triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL), low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and lipoprotein-deficient plasma fraction. Two stocks of human plasma were used, one considered normolipidemic (total cholesterol concentration = 164 mg/dL, triglycerides concentration = 139 mg/dL, protein concentration = 912 mg/dL), the other hyperlipidemic (total cholesterol = 260 mg/dL, triglycerides = 775 mg/dL, protein = 917 mg/dL). The plasma samples were incubated with Torcetrapib at 37 degrees C, and the incubation was stopped with the addition of sodium bromide and cooling to 4 degrees C. The plasma samples were then separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation to their lipoprotein fractions. The resulting lipoprotein fractions and an aliquot of incubated plasma were analyzed by a validated gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry analytical method. The distribution of Torcetrapib was determined first with varying incubation times, then with several concentrations. RESULTS At concentrations of 250 and 500 ng/mL, Torcetrapib distributed evenly across the four fractions in normolipidemic plasma. At the same concentrations in hyperlipidemic plasma, approximately 84% of Torcetrapib was found in the TRL fraction, with the remaining 16% evenly partitioned between the low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and lipoprotein-deficient plasma fractions. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that lipid profile affects the distribution of Torcetrapib in hyperlipidemic human plasma lipoprotein fractions. The preferential distribution of Torcetrapib into the TRL fraction in hyperlipidemic plasma needs to be investigated to see if it will affect the pharmacological effect of Torcetrapib in vivo.
Collapse
|
|
19 |
5 |
4
|
Sumner G, Keller S, Huleatt J, Staack RF, Wagner L, Azadeh M, Bandukwala A, Cao L, Du X, Salinas GF, Garofolo F, Harris S, Hopper S, Irwin C, Ji Q, Joseph J, King L, Kinhikar A, Lu Y, Luo R, Mabrouk O, Malvaux L, Marshall JC, McGuire K, Mikol V, Neely R, Qiu X, Saito Y, Salaun B, Scully I, Smeraglia J, Solstad T, Stoop J, Tang H, Teixeira P, Wang Y, Wright M, Mendez L, Beaver C, Eacret J, Au-Yeung A, Decman V, Dessy F, Eck S, Goihberg P, Alcaide EG, Gonneau C, Grugan K, Hedrick MN, Kar S, Sehra S, Stevens E, Stevens C, Sun Y, McCush F, Williams L, Fischer S, Wu B, Jordan G, Burns C, Cludts I, Coble K, Grimaldi C, Henderson N, Joyce A, Lotz G, Lu Y, Luo L, Neff F, Sperinde G, Stubenrauch KG, Wang Y, Ware M, Xu W. 2022 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: Enzyme Assay Validation, BAV for Primary End Points, Vaccine Functional Assays, Cytometry in Tissue, LBA in Rare Matrices, Complex NAb Assays, Spectral Cytometry, Endogenous Analytes, Extracellular Vesicles Part 2 - Recommendations on Biomarkers/CDx, Flow Cytometry, Ligand-Binding Assays Development & Validation; Emerging Technologies; Critical Reagents Deep Characterization. Bioanalysis 2023; 15:861-903. [PMID: 37584363 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2023-0151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The 16th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (16th WRIB) took place in Atlanta, GA, USA on September 26-30, 2022. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 16th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on ICH M10 BMV final guideline (focused on this guideline training, interpretation, adoption and transition); mass spectrometry innovation (focused on novel technologies, novel modalities, and novel challenges); and flow cytometry bioanalysis (rising of the 3rd most common/important technology in bioanalytical labs) were the special features of the 16th edition. As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2022 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2022 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 2) covers the recommendations on LBA, Biomarkers/CDx and Cytometry. Part 1 (Mass Spectrometry and ICH M10) and Part 3 (Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity) are published in volume 15 of Bioanalysis, issues 16 and 14 (2023), respectively.
Collapse
|
|
2 |
4 |
5
|
Myler H, Pedras-Vasconcelos J, Lester T, Civoli F, Xu W, Wu B, Vainshtein I, Luo L, Hassanein M, Liu S, Ramaswamy SS, Mora J, Pennucci J, McCush F, Lavelle A, Jani D, Ambakhutwala A, Baltrukonis D, Barker B, Carmean R, Chung S, Dai S, DeWall S, Dholakiya SL, Dodge R, Finco D, Yan H, Hays A, Hu Z, Inzano C, Kamen L, Lai CH, Meyer E, Nelson R, Paudel A, Phillips K, Poupart ME, Qu Q, Abhari MR, Ryding J, Sheldon C, Spriggs F, Warrino D, Wu Y, Yang L, Pasas-Farmer S. Neutralizing Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization. AAPS J 2023; 25:69. [PMID: 37421491 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-023-00830-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Evolving immunogenicity assay performance expectations and a lack of harmonized neutralizing antibody validation testing and reporting tools have resulted in significant time spent by health authorities and sponsors on resolving filing queries. A team of experts within the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists' Therapeutic Product Immunogenicity Community across industry and the Food and Drug Administration addressed challenges unique to cell-based and non-cell-based neutralizing antibody assays. Harmonization of validation expectations and data reporting will facilitate filings to health authorities and are described in this manuscript. This team provides validation testing and reporting strategies and tools for the following assessments: (1) format selection; (2) cut point; (3) assay acceptance criteria; (4) control precision; (5) sensitivity including positive control selection and performance tracking; (6) negative control selection; (7) selectivity/specificity including matrix interference, hemolysis, lipemia, bilirubin, concomitant medications, and structurally similar analytes; (8) drug tolerance; (9) target tolerance; (10) sample stability; and (11) assay robustness.
Collapse
|
|
2 |
3 |
6
|
Wojcik J, Sikorski T, Wang J, Huang Y, Sugimoto H, Baratta M, Ciccimaro E, Green R, Jian W, Kar S, Kim YJ, Lassman M, Mohapatra S, Qian M, Rosenbaum AI, Sarvaiya H, Tian Y, Vainshtein I, Yuan L, Tao L, Ji A, Kochansky C, Qiu H, Maes E, Chen LZ, Cooley M, Dufield D, Hyer E, Johnson J, Li W, Liu A, Lu Y, Meissen J, Palandra J, Tang X, Vigil A, Wei W, Vinter S, Xue Y, Yang L, Zheng N, Benson K, McCush F, Liang Z, Abberley L, Andisik M, Araya M, Cho SJ, Colligan L, Dasgupta A, Dudek M, Edmison A, Fischer S, Folian B, Garofolo F, Ishii-Watabe A, Ivanova D, Gijsel SKD, Luo L, McGuinness M, 'Day CO, Salehzadeh-Asl R, Neto JT, Verhaeghe T, Wan K, Whale E, Yan W, Yang E, Zhang J. 2024 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: Three Way-Cross Validation; Urine Clinical Analysis; Automated Methods; Regulatory Queries on Plasma Protein Binding; Automated Biospecimen Management; ELN Migration; Ultra-Sensitivity Mass Spectrometry ( Part 1A - Recommendations on Advanced Strategies for Mass Spectrometry Assays, Chromatography, Sample Preparation and BMV/Regulated Bioanalysis Part 1B - Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Regulated Bioanalysis/BMV). Bioanalysis 2025; 17:299-337. [PMID: 39862144 DOI: 10.1080/17576180.2025.2450194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2025] [Accepted: 01/03/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025] Open
Abstract
The 18th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (18th WRIB) took place in San Antonio, TX, USA on May 6-10, 2024. Over 1100 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 18th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week to allow an exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis of biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines.Moreover, in-depth workshops on "IVDR Implementation in EU & Changes for LDT in the US" and on "Harmonization of Vaccine Clinical Assays Validation" were the special features of the 18th edition.As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues.This 2024 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2024 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons.This publication (Part 1) covers in Part 1A the Recommendations on Mass Spectrometry Assays and Regulated Bioanalysis/BMV and in Part 1B the Regulatory Inputs on these topics. Part 3 (Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity) and Part 2 (Biomarkers/BAV, IVD/CDx, LBA and Cell-Based Assays) are published in volume 17 of Bioanalysis, issues 3 and 4 (2025), respectively.
Collapse
|
|
1 |
|
7
|
Baratta M, Jian W, Hengel S, Kaur S, Cunliffe J, Boer J, Hughes N, Kar S, Kellie J, Kim YJ, Lassman M, Mehl J, Morgan L, Palandra J, Sarvaiya H, Zeng J, Zheng N, Wang J, Yuan L, Ji A, Kochansky C, Tao L, Huang Y, Maes E, Barbero L, Contrepois K, Ferrari L, Fu Y, Johnson J, Jones B, Kansal M, Lu Y, Post N, Shen H(H, Xue Y(YJ, Zhang Y(C, Biswas G, Cho S(J, Edmison A, Benson K, Abberley L, Azadeh M, Francis J, Garofolo F, Gupta S, Ivanova I(D, Ishii-Watabe A, Karnik S, Kassim S, Kavetska O, Keller S, Kossary E, Li W, McCush F, Mendes DN, Abhari MR, Scheibner K, Sikorski T, Staack RF, Tabler E, Tang H, Wan K, Wang YM, Whale E, Yang L, Zimmer J, Bandukwala A, Du X, Kholmanskikh O, Gijsel SKD, Wadhwa M, Xu J, Buoninfante A, Cludts I, Diebold S, Maxfield K, Mayer C, Pedras-Vasconcelos J, Abhari MR, Shubow S, Tanaka Y, Tounekti O, Verthelyi D, Wagner L. 2023 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: Deuterated Drugs; LNP; Tumor/FFPE Biopsy; Targeted Proteomics; Small Molecule Covalent Inhibitors; Chiral Bioanalysis; Remote Regulatory Assessments; Sample Reconciliation/Chain of Custody (PART 1A - Recommendations on Mass Spectrometry, Chromatography, Sample Preparation Latest Developments, Challenges, and Solutions and BMV/Regulated Bioanalysis PART 1B - Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Regulated Bioanalysis/BMV, Biomarkers/IVD/CDx/BAV, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine). Bioanalysis 2024; 16:307-364. [PMID: 38913185 PMCID: PMC11216509 DOI: 10.1080/17576180.2024.2347153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The 17th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (17th WRIB) took place in Orlando, FL, USA on June 19-23, 2023. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 17th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week to allow an exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis of biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines.Moreover, in-depth workshops on "EU IVDR 2017/746 Implementation and impact for the Global Biomarker Community: How to Comply with this NEW Regulation" and on "US FDA/OSIS Remote Regulatory Assessments (RRAs)" were the special features of the 17th edition.As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues.This 2023 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2023 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons.This publication covers the recommendations on Mass Spectrometry Assays, Regulated Bioanalysis/BMV (Part 1A) and Regulatory Inputs (Part 1B). Part 2 (Biomarkers, IVD/CDx, LBA and Cell-Based Assays) and Part 3 (Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity) are published in volume 16 of Bioanalysis, issues 7 and 8 (2024), respectively.
Collapse
|
report |
1 |
|
8
|
Mora J, Palmer R, Wagner L, Wu B, Partridge M, Meena, Sonderegger I, Smeraglia J, Bivi N, Dakappagari N, Diebold S, Garofolo F, Grimaldi C, Kalina W, Kamerud J, Kar S, Marshall JC, Mayer C, Melton A, Merdek K, Nolan K, Picard S, Shao W, Seitzer J, Tanaka Y, Tounekti O, Vigil A, Walravens K, Xu J, Xu W, Xu Y, Yang L, Zhu L, Verthelyi D, Kubiak RJ, Coble K, Gupta S, Abhari MR, Richards S, Song Y, Ullmann M, Calderon B, Cludts I, Gunn GR, Gupta S, Ishii-Watabe A, Manangeeswaran M, Maxfield K, McCush F, O'Day C, Peng K, Poetzl J, Rasamoelisolo M, Saad OM, Scheibner K, Shubow S, Song S, Thacker S. 2023 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: ISR for ADA Assays, the Rise of dPCR vs qPCR, International Reference Standards for Vaccine Assays, Anti-AAV TAb Post-Dose Assessment, NanoString Validation, ELISpot as Gold Standard (Part 3 - Recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell Therapy, Vaccines Immunogenicity & Technologies; Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity & Risk Assessment; ADA/NAb Assay/Reporting Harmonization). Bioanalysis 2024; 16:77-119. [PMID: 38389403 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2024-0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The 17th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (17th WRIB) took place in Orlando, FL, USA on June 19-23, 2023. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 17th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week to allow an exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis of biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on "EU IVDR 2017/746 Implementation and impact for the Global Biomarker Community: How to Comply with these NEW Regulations" and on "US FDA/OSIS Remote Regulatory Assessments (RRAs)" were the special features of the 17th edition. As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2023 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2023 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 3) covers the recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity. Part 1A (Mass Spectrometry Assays and Regulated Bioanalysis/BMV), P1B (Regulatory Inputs) and Part 2 (Biomarkers, IVD/CDx, LBA and Cell-Based Assays) are published in volume 16 of Bioanalysis, issues 8 and 9 (2024), respectively.
Collapse
|
|
1 |
|