Comparison of Premier™ Rotaclone®, ProSpecT™, and RIDASCREEN® rotavirus enzyme immunoassay kits for detection of rotavirus antigen in stool specimens

BACKGROUND

Rotaviruses are the major cause of severe dehydrating diarrhea in children throughout the world. Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have been the standard method for detection of rotavirus in stool specimens since the 1980s. The World Health Organization (WHO) Rotavirus Surveillance Network has proposed including three EIA kits in the WHO-GSM (Global Management System/Système Mondial de Gestion) catalog for easy procurement of EIA kits by participating rotavirus surveillance network laboratories.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of 3 commercially available enzyme immunoassay kits: Premier™ Rotaclone® (Meridian Bioscience, Inc.), ProSpecT™ (Oxoid, Ltd.) and RIDASCREEN® (R-biopharm AG) for rotavirus diagnostics.

STUDY DESIGN

Using reverse-transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) as the gold standard, the 3 EIA kits were evaluated by testing a stool panel consisting of 56 rotavirus-positive and 54 rotavirus negative samples.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of the Premier™ Rotaclone®, ProSpecT™ and RIDASCREEN® kits were 76.8%, 75% and 82.1%, respectively, but did not differ significantly. The specificity of all the 3 kits was 100%. The use of RT-PCR as a gold standard lowered the observed sensitivity of all 3 EIA kits but helps to reduce equivocal results that can be seen when another EIA or other non-molecular methods are used as the reference assay in comparison studies.

CONCLUSION

Our study found that all three kits are suitable for use by rotavirus surveillance programs.

Symptomatic infection and detection of vaccine and vaccine-reassortant rotavirus strains in 5 children: a case series

Vaccine or vaccine-reassortant rotavirus strains were detected in fecal specimens from 5 of 106 (4.7%) immunocompetent children who required treatment for rotavirus gastroenteritis at a large pediatric hospital in Texas in 2009-2010. Four strains were related to pentavalent rotavirus vaccine, whereas one was related to monovalent rotavirus vaccine. The contribution of these strains to each patient's illness was unclear given that 2 patients had prominent respiratory symptoms and 2 were concurrently infected with another pathogen (group F adenovirus and norovirus). Continued monitoring is necessary to assess the role of vaccine strains and vaccine-reassortant strains in pediatric rotavirus infections.