Türkmen İÇ, Usubütün A, Çakir A, Aydin Ö, Bolat FA, Akbulut M, Altinay S, Arici S, Aslan F, Astarci M, Bağir EK, Baş Y, Başsüllü N, Çelik B, Çetiner H, Çobanoğlu B, Aydin A, Demir H, Doğan HT, Eken KG, Erhan SŞ, Erdoğan G, Erdoğan KE, Eren F, Ersöz Ş, Firat P, Gürses İ, Haberal N, Kahraman DS, Kamali GH, Karabulut YY, Kefeli M, Koyuncuoğlu M, Köseoğlu RD, Müezzinoğlu B, Onal B, Önder S, Özcan Z, Kimiloğlu E, Özer H, Sönmez FC, Şahin S, Şahin N, Yalta T. What does the Data of 354,725 Patients from Turkey Tell Us About Cervical Smear Epithelial Cell Abnormalities? - The Epithelial Cell Abnormality Rate is Increasing - Quality Control Studies and Corrective Activity are Musts.
Turk Patoloji Derg 2018;
33:134-143. [PMID:
28272675 DOI:
10.5146/tjpath.2016.01380]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
There is no other screening program close to the success rate of PAP test. Cervical cytology constitutes a large workload so that quality control in cervical cytology is important for the quality assurance of pathology laboratories.
MATERIAL AND METHOD
In this study, we collected the cervical cytology results from all over Turkey and discussed the parameters influencing the quality of the PAP test. The study was conducted with Turkish gynaecopathology working group and 38 centers (totally 45 hospitals) agreed to contribute from 24 different cities. The study was designed to cover the cervical cytology results during 2013. The results were evaluated from the data based on an online questionnaire.
RESULTS
The total number of Epithelial Cell Abnormality was 18,020 and the global Epithelial Cell Abnormality rate was 5.08% in the total 354,725 smears and ranging between 0.3% to 16.64% among centers. The Atypical squamous cells /Squamous intraepithelial lesion ratios changed within the range of 0.21-13.94 with an average of 2.61. When the centers were asked whether they performed quality assurance studies, only 14 out of 28 centers, which shared the information, had such a control study and some quality parameters were better in these centers.
CONCLUSION
There is an increase in the global Epithelial Cell Abnormality rate and there are great differences among centers. Quality control studies including the Atypical squamous cells/Squamous intraepithelial lesion ratio are important. Corrective and preventive action according to quality control parameters is a must. A cervical cytology subspecialist in every center can be utopic but a dedicated pathologist in the center is certainly needed.
Collapse