[The Change in Antimicrobial Resistance During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Türkiye]

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most important problems threatening human health worldwide. The impact of the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on AMR continues to be discussed. Some researchers argue that the pandemic will increase AMR rates, while others suggest the opposite. The aim of this study was to investigate the change in AMR of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus strains in three cross-sectional periods in Türkiye, the first one before the COVID-19 pandemic, the second and the third one during the pandemic. The change in antibiotic susceptibility in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from urine, blood, and lower respiratory tract samples of patients hospitalized in intensive care units and wards of hospitals before (November 2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (November 2020 and July 2021) was investigated in this study. A total of 17 voluntary hospitals, members of the Antibiotic Susceptibility Surveillance Study Group (ADSI) of the Society for Clinical Microbiology Specialists (KLIMUD), participated in the study. Identification of bacteria was performed with automated bacterial identification systems (VITEK2, bioMérieux, France or Phoenix, BD, USA). Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed in one center with the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method and in other centers with automated antibiotic susceptibility test systems (VITEK2, bioMérieux, France or Phoenix, BD, USA), and the results were evaluated according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria. Antibiotic susceptibility ratios were statistically analyzed using either the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Antibiotic susceptibility test results of a total of 4030 strains; 1152, 1139, and 1739 belonging to November 2019, November 2020, and July 2021, respectively; were examined. While cefotaxime and ceftazidime susceptibility rates in E.coli strains increased during the pandemic period compared to previous period (p= 0.04, p= 0.001, respectively); nitrofurantoin sensitivity (p= 0.02) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) ratios (p< 0.001) were found to be decreased. It was determined that the susceptibility rates of all other examined antimicrobials did not change statistically. It was observed that the susceptibility rates of all antibiotics in K.pneumoniae isolates decreased during the pandemic period, but the ESBL rates increased between 2019-2020 (p= 0.01) and decreased between 2020-2021 (p= 0.02). It was found that ESBL rates increased before and after the pandemic. It was observed that the susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (p= 0.0001), levofloxacin (p= 0.003), and gentamicin (p= 0.005) in S.aureus strains increased during the pandemic period. No significant changes were observed in other antibiotic susceptibility rates. Methicillin resistance of S.aureus (MRSA) strains decreased between 2019-2020 (p= 0.03) and increased again in 2021 (p= 0.04) and returned to the pre-pandemic rate. Our study results suggest that the measures taken to reduce the spread of COVID-19 with the pandemic (such as quarantine practices, increased hand hygiene, mask use, and national/international travel restriction) may reduce the spread of bacteria such as ESBL-producing E.coli and the rate of MRSA, which is considered as a hand hygiene indicator. The increase in the later stages of the pandemic recalls the relaxation in compliance with hand hygiene rules. The decrease in the susceptibility rate of K.pneumoniae isolates to antibiotics and the increase in the ESBL rate may be due to inappropriate and excessive use of antibiotics during the pandemic period. However, we believe that these data should be supported by studies to be conducted nowadays when all the rules and measures are back as if the pandemic has ended.

An outbreak investigation of Burkholderia cepacia infections related with contaminated chlorhexidine mouthwash solution in a tertiary care center in Turkey

BACKGROUND

We report a nosocomial outbreak caused by Burkholderia cepacia that occurred among six patients admitted in the medical and surgical intensive care unit between 04 March 2019 and 02 April 2019 in Istanbul, Turkey.

METHODS

The outbreak investigation was launched on 11 March 2019 five days after the detection of B. cepacia in four different patients. We defined potential reservoirs and started environmental screening. We sampled the liquid solutions used in patient care activities. Pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed to determine the genetic relatedness of environmental and patient samples.

RESULTS

Burkholderia cepacia was isolated in tracheal aspiration cultures of six patients. Three out of six patients developed healthcare-associated pneumoniae due to B. cepacia. Environmental cultures in the ICUs revealed B. cepacia growth in 2% chlorhexidine-gluconate mouthwash solution that been used in the colonized patients as well as in samples obtained from the unused products. PFGE revealed the patient and a specific batch of chlorhexidine mouthwash solution samples had a 96% similarity.

CONCLUSION

Contamination of medical solutions used in critical patient care could cause outbreaks and should be detected early by infection control teams.

Alterations in AdeS and AdeR regulatory proteins in 1-(1-naphthylmethyl)-piperazine responsive colistin resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii

Colistin resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains are of great concern worldwide. However, the role of efflux pumps in colistin resistance needs to be elucidated. We investigated the changes in colistin MICs of 29 colistin resistant A. baumannii isolates in response to resistance-nodulation-division (RND)-type efflux pump inhibitor (EPI) and the alterations in AdeR and AdeS two-component regulatory proteins previously associated with the overproduction of AdeAB. The EPI, 1-(1-naphthylmethyl)-piperazine (NMP), led to significant reductions in colistin MICs. At least one of the following amino acid substitutions was found in AdeS proteins from 18 of the isolates: L172P, A94V, V27I, V32I, G186V, and G164A. Besides, A136V and V120I alterations were identified in AdeR from five isolates. Therefore, EPI-responsive colistin resistance in our isolates is most likely due to the action of an RND-type efflux system. The underlying mechanism of resistance might be the result of certain AdeRS alterations, leading to AdeAB overexpression.

The diagnostic value of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor compared with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in children with febrile neutropenia

The aim of the present study was to determine the diagnostic value of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia. A prospective case-control study was performed. Patients included 29 children with febrile neutropenia (FN) and 27 control subjects without any infection or immunosuppressive condition. Blood samples were obtained on the day of admission and on the 4th to 7th days of the hospital stay. The median (minimum-maximum) serum levels of suPAR obtained on the first day of the admission were 2.08 (0.93-9.42) and 2.22 (1.08-5.13) ng/mL for the FN group and the control group, respectively. The median serum levels of suPAR in the FN and control groups were not significantly different (P = .053). The mean serum suPAR level was significantly higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors in the FN group (P < .05). In the FN group, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUCROC) for suPAR was 0.546, but no optimum cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), or positive predictive value (PPV) was obtained. We conclude that suPAR is not useful as a diagnostic biomarker in children with febrile neutropenia; however, persistent high serum suPAR level may predict mortality in FN in children.