Enhanced Recovery Protocol: Implementation at a County Institution with Limited Resources

The benefits of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) in colorectal surgery have been well described; however, data on the implementation process is minimal, especially in a resource-limited institution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes during implementation of a physician-driven ERP at a public-funded institution. We retrospectively reviewed all elective colorectal surgery during a transition from standard care to an ERP (implemented via a standard order sheet). Data regarding use of care plan, length of stay (LOS), and rates of postoperative complications and readmission were recorded. One hundred eleven patients were included in the study; however, complete use of the ERP after its introduction occurred in a total of 50 patients for a compliance rate of 60 per cent (95% confidence interval [CI], 49 to 70). Late implementation of ERP diet, analgesics, and activity were the most common process errors. Full application of the ERP reduced mean LOS by 3 days ( P = 0.002), and there was a trend toward decreased postoperative morbidity without an increase in readmission rate ( P = 0.61). Full implementation of an ERP for colorectal surgery faces many challenges in a resource-limited county institution; however, when fully applied, the ERP safely reduced overall LOS, which is important in cost containment.

Enhanced recovery protocol: implementation at a county institution with limited resources

The benefits of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) in colorectal surgery have been well described; however, data on the implementation process is minimal, especially in a resource-limited institution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes during implementation of a physician-driven ERP at a public-funded institution. We retrospectively reviewed all elective colorectal surgery during a transition from standard care to an ERP (implemented via a standard order sheet). Data regarding use of care plan, length of stay (LOS), and rates of postoperative complications and readmission were recorded. One hundred eleven patients were included in the study; however, complete use of the ERP after its introduction occurred in a total of 50 patients for a compliance rate of 60 per cent (95% confidence interval [CI], 49 to 70). Late implementation of ERP diet, analgesics, and activity were the most common process errors. Full application of the ERP reduced mean LOS by 3 days (P=0.002), and there was a trend toward decreased postoperative morbidity without an increase in readmission rate (P=0.61). Full implementation of an ERP for colorectal surgery faces many challenges in a resource-limited county institution; however, when fully applied, the ERP safely reduced overall LOS, which is important in cost containment.

Exporting a technical skills evaluation technology to other sites

BACKGROUND

The Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) is a multistation performance-based examination that assesses the technical skills of surgery residents. This study explores the implementation issues involved in remote administration of the OSATS focusing on feasibility and the psychometric properties of the examination.

METHODS

An eight-station OSATS was administered to surgical residents in Los Angeles and Chicago. The University of Toronto and the local institutions shared responsibility for organization and administration of the examination.

RESULTS

There was good reliability for both the checklist (alpha = 0.68 for LA, 0.73 for Chicago) and global rating forms (alpha = 0.82 for both sites). Both iterations also showed evidence of construct validity, with a significant effect of training year for the checklist and global rating forms at both sites (analysis of variance: F = 8.66 to 19.93, P <0.01). Despite some challenges, the model of central organization and peripheral delivery was effective for the administration of the examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Two iterations of the OSATS at remote sites demonstrated psychometric properties that are highly consistent with previously reported data suggesting that the examination is portable. Both faculty and residents indicated satisfaction with the examination experience. A model of central administration with peripheral delivery was feasible and effective.