What about the fundamentals of nursing-its interventions and its continuity among older people in need of home- or facility-based care: a scoping review

AIM

This scoping review investigated and descriptively summarised previous research about fundamental nursing, its focus (what care needs are described, how is it described and by whom is it described), continuity of care (is it described in relation to fundamental nursing) and possible nursing interventions or activities targeting older people's fundamentals of care needs in home- or facility-based care.

METHODS

This scoping review was carried out following the steps of Arksey and O'Malley's methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed via NIH, CINAHL via EBSCO and PsycInfo via ProQuest for the time period between January 2002 and May 2023.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies were included where the majority had been conducted in a facility-based care context. Nutrition-or rather nutritional care activities targeting eating and drinking-was the most frequently described fundamental care needs addressed. After this came personal care such as cleansing, dressing, oral care, skin, and foot care. Few studies addressed more than one fundamental care need at the time. The nursing staff described fundamental nursing as complex, comprehensive, and demanding. Older people and relatives described a gap between the fundamental nursing provided and their perceived need for support. Less attention was given to older peoples relational and psychosocial needs. Identified nursing interventions mainly targeted physical care needs. Our findings also implied that interventions focusing on fundamental nursing were described as feasible in practice with favourable or moderate results, while long-term effects were difficult to detect. No studies were identified focusing on fundamental nursing in relation to outcomes such as continuity of care.

CONCLUSION

Fundamental nursing was mainly described in relation to physical care needs, which were essentially conducted within facility-based care contexts. Interventions and activities primarily focused on one fundamental need at the time, mainly within the physical domain. No nursing interventions were identified focusing on relational and psychosocial needs where continuity of care can be viewed as a relevant outcome. Such limited focus are especially concerning as research has highlighted the importance of that older people with complex care needs can benefit from a holistic and person-centred approach i.e. fundamental nursing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XJ39E Protocol: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069798.

Usability and application of a data integration technique (following the thread) for multi- and mixed methods research: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The scope of methodological development and innovation in multi- and mixed methods design is endless and, at times, challenging. The latter is especially true with regards to the integration of data generated through different methods. About a decade ago, Professor Jo Moran-Ellis and her colleagues at the University of Sussex suggested a framework for analytical integration known as "following a thread." Despite an increased focus within health services research on different perspectives and approaches to successful data integration, the framework's usability and application have not yet been well described.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to integrate and synthesise published accounts of the framework and its applications.

DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES

Seven electronic databases were utilised. Included were peer-reviewed scientific papers published in English from 2006 - 2018. The authors independently screened eligible publications by title and abstract.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in our systematic review. One notable finding is that in almost half of the cases (n = 6), the framework had been applied as an analytical integration framework in single studies using multiple qualitative methods. Overall, the descriptions and accounts of the framework were sparse and lacked transparency. Accounts of the analytical integration framework could be said to fall within three overarching areas: (1) applications of the framework, (2) justifications for analytical integration, and (3) benefits and shortfalls of the framework.

CONCLUSION

Data integration is often one of the major method steps in multi- and mixed methods designs. To further the future development of methodologically sound frameworks for analytical integration, it is essential that they are sufficiently described so as to ensure validation of the framework's usability and replicability. "Following a thread" appears to be an promising analytical integration framework, particularly in that it can be applied with the same datatypes as well as between different types of data.

Challenges of conducting experimental studies within a clinical nursing context

In recent years, several distinguished scholars have advocated for nursing research that may carry strong evidence for practice. Their advocacy have highlighted that nursing science has reached a point where as nurse researchers we need to develop the questions we ask and design studies that have the power to produce solid, translational, evidence-based knowledge. To do so, we need to carry out experimental tests on complex, everyday nursing interventions and activities. We also need to create public space to present accounts of our endeavours pursuing this type of design in clinical practice. This paper will discuss some of the most important insights gained from conducting a quasi-experimental study in which the aim was to investigate the effect of a theory-based intervention, targeting knowledge and attitudes among registered nurses regarding cancer pain management. The importance of careful practical and methodological planning is emphasised, and the need for participation-friendly interventions is discussed.

Developing a framework for admission and discharge: a nurse-led initiative within a mental health setting

Admission to a mental health inpatient setting is one important aspect of care which requires collaborative working between Community Mental Health Teams (CMHTs) and ward staff. However, links are not always formalized. The failure of effective gatekeeping coupled with inconsistent admission and discharge practices further complicates the situation for all those involved. A number of local changes, for example, adoption of a centralized bed bureau, together with policy changes, initiated a nurse-led practice development project. It was predicted that by creating a framework for more formalized communication between the different disciplines admission and discharge processes would be improved, thus enhancing service users' satisfaction and empowering all staff participating in the process. During the project, 132 service users were notified as potentially requiring admission. Admissions were avoided and diverted for 22 of them. The quality of the communication and information shared between the CMHTs and ward staff was significantly improved. Accessing inpatient beds, at times still remained problematic, as beds could only remain ring-fenced on 65% of occasions. This initiative, conducted within a 'real world setting', showed that it is possible to improve admission and discharge practices by creating a framework for a formalized communication process between disciplines.