Efficacy and safety of infliximab and adalimumab in Crohn's disease: a single centre study

BACKGROUND

Infliximab and adalimumab are highly effective in Crohn's Disease (CD). This is supported by clinical trials and open-label studies using either infliximab or adalimumab, thus not allowing a proper comparison between these anti-TNFs in CD.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab and adalimumab in active CD.

METHODS

In a longitudinal study, CD patients with indication for anti-TNFs were treated with infliximab or adalimumab.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were treated with infliximab (n = 44) or adalimumab (n = 49). In the infliximab group, the induction was completed by 77.3% of patients, due to no response (n = 2), delayed hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) or infusion reactions (n = 8). Maintenance with infliximab was completed by 60% of patients, due to clinical worsening or loss of efficacy (n = 5), DHR or infusion reactions (n = 5). In the adalimumab group, all patients completed the induction, while maintenance was completed by 67% of patients, due to clinical worsening or loss of efficacy (n = 8), DHR (n = 1), other causes (n = 7). In both groups, the CDAI significantly reduced at baseline vs. each visit (P < 0.04). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis performed to evaluate the risk of steroid-free remission in patients treated with infliximab vs. adalimumab detected no differences (log-rank test P = 0.4). Cox proportional-hazards regression identified two predictors of steroid-free remission using anti-TNFs: no smokers [HR = 2.94 (1.52-5.70), P = 0.001] and non stricturing non penetrating behaviour [HR = 3.116 (1.06-9.13), P = 0.03826].

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab and adalimumab showed a similar efficacy. No smoking and non-stricturing non-penetrating behaviour were predictors of steroid-free remission.

Endoscopic vs ultrasonographic findings related to Crohn's disease recurrence: a prospective longitudinal study at 3 years

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ileocolonoscopy (IC) is the gold standard for assessing Crohn's Disease (CD) recurrence after ileo-colonic resection. In a prospective longitudinal study we compared findings related to CD recurrence when using techniques visualizing either the luminal or the extraluminal surface (IC and small bowel follow through, SBFT vs Small Intestine Contrast Ultrasonography, SICUS).

METHODS

From 2003 to 2008, 25 CD patients undergoing ileo-colonic resection were enrolled. Clinical assessment (CDAI) was performed at 1, 2 and 3 years. IC was performed at 1 (n=25) and 3 years (n=15), SBFT at 2 years (n=21) and SICUS at 1 (n=25), 2 (n=21) and 3 years (n=15). Recurrence was assessed by SBFT and SICUS (bowel wall thickness, BWT) when using IC as gold standard.

RESULTS

At 1 year, all patients were inactive and recurrence was detected by IC in 24/25 (96%) and by SICUS in 25/25 patients. At 2 years, 6/21 patients (29%) were active and recurrence was detected by SBFT in 12/21 (57%) and by SICUS in 21/21 patients. At 3 years, 5/15 patients (33%) were active, IC showed recurrence in 14/15 (93%), and SICUS in 15/15 patients. The endoscopic score at 1 year was higher in patients developing relapse at 2 years (n=5) than in patients maintaining remission (n=10) (median: 4, range 3-4 vs 2, range 0-3; p=0.003). The same finding was not observed by using SICUS (median BWT at 1 year: 5, range 4-7 vs 3.7, range 3.5-6; p=0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Although IC and SICUS provide a different view of the bowel wall, in experienced hands SICUS provides findings compatible with endoscopic recurrence after ileo-colonic resection for CD. Discrepant findings may be observed in a low proportion of patients with minor lesions related to CD recurrence.

Non-invasive techniques for assessing postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease

Postoperative recurrence after ileo-colonic resection is a feature of Crohn's Disease (CD), almost 73% of patients show endoscopic recurrence at 1 year and 90% at 3 years. After surgical resection for CD, symptoms may be related to the surgical resection itself. Moreover, the development of an early severe endoscopic recurrence within 1 year represents a risk factor for early clinical recurrence. On the basis of these observations, the early detection and assessment of asymptomatic endoscopic recurrence may allow a timely and appropriate treatment of CD patients after ileo-colonic resection. At this purpose, conventional colonoscopy with ileoscopy currently represents the gold standard for assessing CD recurrence, graded according to the Rutgeerts' score. Lesions compatible with CD recurrence can be also detected by conventional radiology, including small bowel follow through and enema, both associated with a high radiation exposure. Due to the ineluctable course of CD after resection, and to the need of a proper follow up for assessing CD recurrence, several alternative, non invasive techniques have been searched in order to assess the post-operative recurrence, including: faecal alpha 1-antitrypsin clearance, faecal calprotectin, 99Tc-HMPAO scintigraphy, virtual colonoscopy, ultrasonography and, more recently, wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) and Small Intestine Contrast Ultrasonography (SICUS). Among these, current evidences suggest that in experienced hands, ultrasound examination by SICUS represents a non-invasive technique useful for assessing recurrence in CD patients under regular follow up after surgery. The same findings are suggested for WCE, although the impact risk related to the recurrence or to the surgical anastomosis itself limits the use of this non-invasive technique for assessing CD recurrence after surgery.