Long-term fatigue and quality of life among epithelial ovarian cancer survivors: a GINECO case/control VIVROVAIRE I study

BACKGROUND

Few data are available on long-term fatigue (LTF) and quality of life (QoL) among epithelial ovarian cancer survivors (EOCS). In this case-control study, we compared LTF, symptoms and several QoL domains in EOCS relapse-free ≥3 years after first-line treatment and age-matched healthy women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

EOCS were recruited from 25 cooperative GINECO centers in France. Controls were randomly selected from the electoral rolls. All participants completed validated self-reported questionnaires: fatigue (FACIT-F), QoL (FACT-G/O), neurotoxicity (FACT-Ntx), anxiety/depression (HADS), sleep disturbance (ISI), and physical activity (IPAQ). Severe LTF (SLTF) was defined as a FACIT-F score <37/52. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to analyze SLTF and its influencing factors in EOCS.

RESULTS

A total of 318 EOCS and 318 controls were included. EOCS were 63-year-old on average, with FIGO stage I/II (50%), III/IV (48%); 99% had received platinum and taxane chemotherapy, with an average 6-year follow-up. There were no differences between the two groups in socio-demographic characteristics and global QoL. EOCS had poorer FACIT-F scores (40 versus 45, P < 0.0001), lower functional well-being scores (18 versus 20, P = 0.0002), poorer FACT-O scores (31 versus 34 P < 0.0001), and poorer FACT-Ntx scores (35 versus 39, P < 0.0001). They also reported more SLTF (26% versus 13%, P = 0.0004), poorer sleep quality (63% versus 47%, P = 0.0003), and more depression (22% versus 13%, P = 0.01). Fewer than 20% of EOCS and controls exercised regularly. In multivariate analyses, EOCS with high levels of depression, neurotoxicity, and sleep disturbance had an increased risk of developing SLTF (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compared with controls, EOCS presented similar QoL but persistent LTF, EOC-related symptoms, neurotoxicity, depression, and sleep disturbance. Depression, neuropathy, and sleep disturbance are the main conditions associated with severe LTF.

Carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients: results from a subset analysis of the CALYPSO phase III trial

BACKGROUND

To perform a subset analysis of patients with partially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) who received either CD [carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)] or CP (carboplatin-paclitaxel) in the CALYPSO trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CALYPSO, an international phase III, non-inferiority trial, enrolled women with ROC that relapsed >6 months following first- or second-line therapy. Patients were randomized to CD or CP. Patients with a treatment-free interval of >6 and ≤ 12 months were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS), the primary end point of CALYPSO trial, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 344 partially platinum-sensitive patients were included (N = 161, CD and N = 183, CP). The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.73 (95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.90; P = 0.004 for superiority) in favor of CD. Median PFS times were 9.4 months (CD) and 8.8 months (CP). Toxicities more common with CP versus CD included grade 3/4 neutropenia (50% versus 39%; P = 0.015), grade 2 alopecia (86% versus 9%; P < 0.001), neuropathy and hypersensitivity reactions. Hand-foot syndrome was more common with CD; however, grade 3/4 reactions were low (one patient in each arm).

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin-PLD has a more favorable risk-benefit profile than CP in patients with partially platinum-sensitive ROC and should be considered an effective treatment option for these patients.

[Cancers of unknown origin: 311 cases]

Carcinoma of unknown primary site has been defined as a metastatic disease without known primary site (upon clinical, radiological or endoscopic examination) at the initial therapeutic decision. The incidence of such carcinomas is between 1.6 and 15% of all adult's tumors. The goals of this retrospective and monocentric study were 1) the incidence of these carcinoma; 2) the utility to identify the primary site; 3) the efficacy of treatment in terms of survival; and 4) the prognostic factors to optimize strategic choices. Between January 1980 to December 1995, 311 cases were identified; this represents 1.6% of all cases treated in our center. Histological analyses of metastases revealed adenocarcinoma: 164 cases (92 males, 72 females; 29 well differentiated, 11 poorly differentiated and 41 undifferentiated); squamous cell carcinoma: 90 cases (78 males, 12 females); undifferentiated carcinoma: 27 cases (21 males, 6 females); neuro-endocrine tumor: 10 cases; and others: 20 cases. Median age was 61.1 years (30-94). Half of the patients had a PS between 0 and 1. The carcinoma was revealed by only one site of metastases in 35% of the cases (lymph node 72.9%, bone 35.5%, liver 19.4% and lung 16.5%). The primary carcinoma was found in only 6% of the cases. Median survival of all patients was only 9 months. Multivariate analyses by the Cox method show four positive prognostic factors: sex (female), performance status (PS < 2), histological analyses (squamous cell carcinoma), only one site of metastases.