Tailored Vessel-Catheter Diameter Ratio in a Direct Aspiration First-Pass Technique: Is It a Matter of Caliber?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aspiration technique has gained a prominent role in mechanical thrombectomy. The thrombectomy goal is successful revascularization (modified TICI ≥ 2b) and first-pass effect. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the vessel-catheter ratio on the modified TICI ≥ 2b and first-pass effect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. From January 2018 to April 2020, 111/206 (53.9%) were eligible after applying the exclusion criteria. Culprit vessel diameters were measured by 2 neuroradiologists, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used for assessing the vessel-catheter ratio cutoff for modified TICI ≥ 2b and the first-pass effect. Time to groin puncture and fibrinolysis were weighted using logistic regression. All possible intervals (interval size, 0.1; sliding interval, 0.01) of the vessel-catheter ratio were plotted, and the best and worst intervals were compared using the χ² test.

RESULTS

Modified TICI ≥ 2b outcome was achieved in 75/111 (67.5%), and first-pass effect was achieved in 53/75 (70.6%). The MCA diameter was 2.1 mm with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92. The optimal vessel-catheter ratio cutoffs for modified TICI ≥ 2b were ≤1.51 (accuracy = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.76; P = 0.001), and for first-pass effect, they were significant (≤1.33; P = .31). The modified TICI ≥ 2b odds ratio and relative risk were 9.2 (95% CI, 2.4-36.2; P = 0.002) and 3.2 (95% CI, 1.2-8.7; P = .024). The odds ratio remained significant after logistic regression (7.4; 95% CI, 1.7-32.5; P = .008). First-pass effect odds ratio and relative risk were not significant (2.1 and 1.5; P > .05, respectively). The modified TICI ≥ 2b best and worst vessel-catheter ratio intervals were not significantly different (55.6% versus 85.7%, P = .12). The first-pass effect best vessel-catheter ratio interval was significantly higher compared with the worst one (78.6% versus 40.0%, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

The aspiration catheter should be selected according to culprit vessel diameter. The optimal vessel-catheter ratio cutoffs were ≤1.51 for modified TICI ≥ 2b with an odds ratio of 9.2 and a relative risk of 3.2.

Immuno-oncology and interventional oncology: a winning combination. The latest scientific evidence

OBJECTIVE

Interventional oncology (IO) is an emergent field in interventional radiology that can be considered the fourth pillar of oncology. Interventional oncology has the unique capability to treat malignancy in a loco-regional fashion enabling curative (percutaneous ablation), disease stabilization (intra-arterial chemo/radioembolization), and palliative treatment (such as biliary drainage or nephrostomy). The whole arsenal of IO acts by inducing necrosis and apoptosis, with interactions with the tumour's microenvironment potentially crucial for oncological outcomes. Considering that tumour's microenvironment is a pivotal target for both immuno-oncology and interventional-oncology, the interactions between these two anti-tumour weapons must be investigated to understand their synergy. Interestingly, substantial efforts have been directed to understand which technique combinations are best for specific tumours. This review article summarizes the latest scientific evidence highlighting the future prospective of this winning combination, integrating evidence-reported literature and experience-based perceptions.

Evolving concepts and management of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair: where do we stand in 2019?

In recent years, there has been tremendous progress in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) techniques and devices. This process has seen a change in incidence, risk factors, and treatment of endoleaks as well as in follow-up protocols after EVAR. In particular, recent literature has highlighted new concepts in the evaluation and prevention/treatment of type I and II endoleak after standard EVAR. There is also recent evidence regarding new imaging protocols for follow-up after EVAR, which include magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. This comprehensive review aims to outline the most recent concepts on imaging follow-up, pathophysiology/risk factors, and management of endoleaks.

[Recurrent abdominal pain and "chronic appendicitis"]

BACKGROUND

Chronic appendicitis may be the cause of recurrent abdominal pain. This hypothesis is the subject of controversy. The aim is to clarify the possible existence of a chronic inflammation of the appendix by a clinical and histopathologic study.

METHODS

The case history and the preoperative symptoms and serum findings of 269 patients with appendectomy have been studied. All the appendices have been histologically examined. Chronic appendicitis was diagnosed when at least two typical histological factors of chronic inflammation were present. The histological findings of the appendices have been correlated with preoperative clinical and serum findings of the patients. 14-46 months after the appendectomy, the patients have been examined.

RESULTS

Histological examination revealed 187 cases (69.5%) with acute appendicitis, 44 cases (16.3%) with non disease of appendix and 38 cases (14.2%) with chronic appendicitis. Recurrent abdominal pain and normal leukocyte count were closely correlated (chi 2 = 18.3, p < 0.001; chi 2 = 21.3, p < 0.001 respectively) with diagnosis of chronic appendicitis. 81.8% of 33 patients with chronic appendicitis who underwent follow-up had relief of all the symptoms after appendectomy.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, the study seems to confirm the existence of a clinico-pathological condition that can be defined as chronic appendicitis, resolvable with appendectomy.