Coronary artery stenosis and vulnerable plaque quantification on CCTA by deep learning methods

Introduction

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a reliable non-invasive modality to assess coronary artery stenosis (CAS) severity and vulnerable plaque (VP). However, comprehensive CCTA assessment, especially VP, is time-consuming and dependent on reader expertise, limiting CCTA's true potential.

Purpose

In this study, we aim to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) based system capable of evaluating CAS severity and characterising VP on CCTA.

Methods

A DL system was trained to assess CAS severity on 3909 expert annotated vessels. A subset of 824 vessels was used to train the model to assess for the presence of VP. The model was based on a 2D U-Net and 3D convolutional neural network architecture. The system automatically performed vessel tracking and segmentation to quantify stenosis severity and characterise the presence of VP. CAS severity was categorised as 0%, 1–49% and ≥50%. VP was defined as: low attenuation plaque (LAP; ≤30 Hounsfield units), positive remodelling (PR; ≥10% diameter) and spotty calcification (SC; <3mm). The model was then tested on 1435 vessels for CAS (mean calcium score 197±502) and a subset of 365 vessels for VP (mean calcium score 419±551), and its diagnostic performance compared with expert readers.

Results

The CAS testing data had a prevalence of 75% (1080/1435), 18% (257/1435) and 6.8% (98/1435) for 0%, 1–49% and ≥50% stenosis, respectively. VP was present in 20% (72/365) in the respective dataset with 44% (32/72) LAP, 19% (14/72) PR and 36% (26/72) SC. Average analysis time for CAS severity and VP was 3.7±2.0s and 3.5±1.8s, respectively. Diagnostic performance of our system is summarised in Tables 1 (CAS severity) and 2 (VP characteristics).

Conclusions

We developed an DL based system capable of rapidly evaluating CAS severity and characterising VP on CCTA. Our system demonstrated high specificity and accuracy for both CAS severity and VP quantification when compared with expert readers.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Perspective: Challenges in the Aerospace Marketplace and Growth Opportunities for Thermal Spray

The market needs for increased engine efficiency and environmentally friendly solutions remain the key drivers for the aerospace industry. These efficiency gains will be achieved by meeting the challenges of higher engine operating temperatures, weight reduction, and novel surface solutions for increased component longevity. A critical question to address is if the thermal spray (TS) industry can continue to meet the challenges and demands seen by the airlines and the engine manufacturers. In addition to non-aerospace influences, the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically affected the landscape of industry growth, not only directly on airlines but also on the associated supply chain. This article reviews this market, its suppliers, and identifies the challenges and opportunities for future growth. Primary focus is on technology and what will be required to bring about reliable, robust, and cost-effective TS solutions into the marketplace. Several issues affecting the global landscape of the aerospace industry are discussed including (1) sustainability, (2) technology, (3) cost of ownership, (4) evolving marketplace, (5) workforce and behavior, and (6) supply chain vitality. An important question to address is if the TS industry can accelerate development with its supply chain and have the ability to commercialize technology more efficiently. Despite the market setbacks from the pandemic and previous issues with the Boeing 737 MAX fleet, the aerospace industry is poised to make significant advancements. These will create new opportunities for thermal spray technology in materials, equipment, and processes. To deliver on them, the implementation of Industry 4.0 along with the investment in human resources is more critical than ever. Based on the findings, the authors project a bright long-term future for both the aerospace and thermal spray industries.

Is end-organ surveillance necessary in patients with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip resurfacings?

Aims

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was used to assess whether cardiac function or tissue composition was affected in patients with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties (MoMHRA) when compared with a group of controls, and to assess if metal ion levels correlated with any of the functional or structural parameters studied.

Patients and Methods

In all, 30 participants with no significant cardiac history were enrolled: 20 patients with well-functioning MoMHRA at mean follow-up of 8.3 years post-procedure (ten unilateral, ten bilateral; 17 men, three women) and a case-matched control group of ten non-MoM total hip arthroplasty patients (six men, four women). The mean age of the whole cohort (study group and controls) at the time of surgery was 50.6 years (41.0 to 64.0). Serum levels of cobalt and chromium were measured, and all patients underwent CMR imaging, including cine, T2* measurements, T1 and T2 mapping, late gadolinium enhancement, and strain measurements.

Results

None of the MoMHRA patients showed clinically significant cardiac functional abnormality. The MoMHRA patients had larger indexed right and left end diastolic volumes (left ventricular (LV): 74 ml/m2 vs 67 ml/m2, p = 0.045; right ventricular: 80 ml/m2 vs 71 ml/m2, p = 0.02). There was a small decrease in T2 time in the MoMHRA patients (median 49 ms vs 54 ms; p = 0.0003). Higher metal ion levels were associated with larger LV volumes and with shorter T2 time.

Conclusion

Although cardiac function is not clinically adversely affected in patients with well-functioning MoMHRA, modern imaging is able to demonstrate subtle changes in structure and function of the heart. As these changes correlate with systemic ion measurements, they may be consequences of wear debris deposition. Longer, longitudinal studies are necessary to determine whether cardiac function will become affected. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:540–546.