Prevention of restenosis with intravascular beta-radiotherapy

Beta radiation has been clearly shown, in a specific dose range, to be highly effective in the inhibition of the restenotic process after balloon or stent injury in animal experiments, as well as in randomized, placebo-controlled human trials. The major advantage of beta radiation, in comparison with gamma radiation, is a significantly lower radiation exposure to the personnel and patient, and easier adaptability to existing cardiac catheterization laboratories. Rapidly accumulating evidence indicates that the two major problems, late thrombosis and edge stenosis, may be minimized with prolonged antiplatelet therapy (6 months or more) and broader radiation coverage of the intervention site. Although there may be better, safer, and easier options to reduce restenosis in the years to come, intravascular radiotherapy is the first breakthrough modality that has been shown to significantly reduce restenosis after percutaneous vascular interventions.

Intracoronary radiotherapy for prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions

More than 50 different pharmacological and mechanical interventions have been tested to date for prevention of vascular restenosis without success. Intracoronary radiotherapy is the first one showing promise of significantly attenuating neointimal proliferation, causing positive vascular remodelling and thus inhibiting restenosis. This promising modality has moved from animal experiments via safety and feasibility testing into the phase of clinical trials of efficacy in large numbers of patients. While ongoing research continues to search for new sources and delivery techniques, currently available technology is being optimized. The randomized clinical trials conducted to date have shown consistently a reduction of target site restenosis rates by 55-79%. Lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events after radiotherapy has also been demonstrated, primarily as a result of reduction in target site and target vessel revascularization rates. However, experimental and clinical research has identified two major complications of this approach: stenosis at the ends of the radiation zone ('edge effect' or 'candywrapper') as well as late thrombosis (beyond 30 days after intervention) of the angioplasty or stent site. If these two adverse effects can be minimized, intracoronary radiotherapy may prove to be a major breakthrough in percutaneous coronary interventions.

Inhibition of restenosis with beta-emitting radiotherapy: Report of the Proliferation Reduction with Vascular Energy Trial (PREVENT)

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary gamma- and beta-radiation have reduced restenosis in animal models. In the clinical setting, the effectiveness of beta-emitters has not been studied in a broad spectrum of patients, particularly those receiving stents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A prospective, randomized, sham-controlled study of intracoronary radiotherapy with the beta-emitting (32)P source wire, using a centering catheter and automated source delivery unit, was conducted. A total of 105 patients with de novo (70%) or restenotic (30%) lesions who were treated by stenting (61%) or balloon angioplasty (39%) received 0 (control), 16, 20, or 24 Gy to a depth of 1 mm in the artery wall. Angiography at 6 months showed a target site late loss index of 11+/-36% in radiotherapy patients versus 55+/-30% in controls (P:<0.0001). A low late loss index was seen in stented and balloon-treated patients and was similar across the 16, 20, and 24 Gy radiotherapy groups. Restenosis (>/=50%) rates were significantly lower in radiotherapy patients at the target site (8% versus 39%; P:=0.012) and at target site plus adjacent segments (22% versus 50%; P:=0.018). Target lesion revascularization was needed in 5 radiotherapy patients (6%) and 6 controls (24%; P:<0.05). Stenosis adjacent to the target site and late thrombotic events reduced the overall clinical benefit of radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

beta-radiotherapy with a centered (32)P source is safe and highly effective in inhibiting restenosis at the target site after stent or balloon angioplasty. However, minimizing edge narrowing and late thrombotic events must be accomplished to maximize the clinical benefit of this modality.

Clinical experience with a spiral balloon centering catheter for the delivery of intracoronary radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To develop and evaluate an intravascular radiation delivery catheter that incorporates a centering mechanism and that allows side branch and distal artery perfusion.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Galileo Centering Catheter (Guidant Vascular Interventions, Houston, TX) incorporates a rapid exchange tip design. A unique spiral balloon allows centering and facilitates perfusion to the distal artery and side branches. The catheter contains a dedicated dead-end lumen for source wire delivery to the lesion site. The treatment area is precisely defined by radiopaque markers.

RESULTS

In three clinical trials to date, radiation (or placebo) was delivered successfully to 300 of 312 patients (96%). With balloon inflation, TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow was achieved in side branches in 82% and in the distal artery in 77% of patients. Despite treatment (dwell) times ranging from 87 to 948 s (mean = 250 s), only 8% of patients required fractionation of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The Galileo Centering Catheter is a safe and highly effective method for delivering intracoronary radiation therapy. Its unique design provides centering of the source while allowing side branch and distal coronary perfusion during treatment. This catheter would facilitate intracoronary radiation therapy and allow uniform and reproducible dose delivery to the target in the artery wall.

The cardiac endothelium: functional morphology, development, and physiology

Cardiac endothelial cells, regardless of whether they are from endocardial or from coronary (micro)vascular origin, directly modulate performance of the subjacent cardiomyocytes, resulting in control of the onset of ventricular relaxation and rapid filling of the heart. This review summarizes major features of the morphology, embryology, and comparative physiology of cardiac endothelial cells as well as the experimental observations on how cardiac endothelial cells affect the mechanical performance of the heart. As for the underlying mechanisms of the interaction between cardiac endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes, two working hypotheses have been postulated over the past years; (1) interaction mediated through a trans-endothelial physicochemical gradient for various ions (active blood-heart barrier), and (2) interaction mediated through the release by the cardiac endothelial cells of various cardioactive substances, eg, nitric oxide, endothelin, and prostacyclin. These two mechanisms may act in concert or in parallel.