[Osteosynthesis by intramedullary headless screw in digital fractures: A retrospective scannographic and anatomical study]

INTRODUCTION

Long finger skeletal fractures are common injuries. In displaced forms, surgical treatment is required. With the advent of headless cannulated screws, the technique has been simplified and allows reduction in both planes. The objective of our study was to evaluate the functional recovery of patients operated on by this technique.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We conducted a retrospective single-center study between 2019 and 2022. Eleven patients were followed and 12 fractures analyzed. A radio-clinical follow-up was carried out at 1 month then at the last follow-up with an evaluation of the articular amplitudes and a quality of life score (QuickDash, QD). The time to return to professional and sporting activities, pain (EVA) was collected. An anatomical/scannographic evaluation was performed to assess tendon and cartilage damage.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, the average global flexion was 266° and the extension was total. An average QD score of 15.9 and a Jamar force of 106% compared to the healthy side were observed. The return to physical and professional activities was earlier and the pain quickly tolerable. No secondary displacement was objectified and all were consolidated at the last follow-up, without malunion. No patient had been operated on secondarily.

CONCLUSION

This technique seems to be a safe and non-traumatic. It allows a faster return to sports and professional activities with fewer complications and no need to remove the material.

Influence of the level of arterial resection on the replanting and revascularization results in hand surgery: prospective study over 22 months

The objective of this work was to assess whether the injury mechanisms are responsible for histological arterial lesions. This prospective single-center study included adults with wrist or hand arterial injury. Arterial resection of at least 2 mm from the proximal and distal stumps was performed before the arterial anastomosis. Histological analysis of the arterial stumps was performed. An ultrasound was performed 1 month postoperatively to check arterial patency. A clinical and functional evaluation was done at 1 month postoperative, then every 3 months. From 2018 to 2020, 46 patients were included with a maximum follow-up of 13 months. There were 35 cuts, 2 crush injuries, 8 amputation and 1 blast injury. Macroscopically, 37% of the margins were considered damaged. Histological analysis showed significant damage in 59% of the sections (27 out of 46 patients) with 50% for crush injury, 55% for cuts by mechanical tool, 62% for cuts by power tool, 62% for amputations and 100% for blasts. The failure rate was 9%: 2 replantations and 2 asymptomatic thromboses diagnosed by ultrasound. Postoperative pain on VAS was 1.75/10, range of motion was 87%, Quick DASH was 8%, SF36 PCS was 69% and SF36 MCS was 70%. Factors influencing the success or failure of anastomosis were the mechanism of injury (p = 0.02), associated nerve damage (p = 0.014) and length of proximal arterial cut (p = 0.046). Histological arterial lesions seem to correlate with the injury mechanism. Cuts caused by glass or crush injuries do not seem to require arterial resections of more than 2 mm. A continuation of the study with a larger number of subjects may generate statistically significant results.

Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid osteoarthritis: From the joint to the patient

Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid osteoarthritis (STT OA) is common and often associated with thumb basal joint arthritis. Pain at the base of the thumb on the volar aspect and during resisted extension is characteristic of symptomatic STT OA. If conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment may be offered. In case of STT OA, treatment may range from arthrodesis to trapeziectomy (isolated or associated with ligament reconstruction and/or interposition). Any preoperative intracarpal instability (DISI) can be exacerbated by resecting more than 3 or 4 mm of the distal pole of scaphoid. For peritrapezial osteoarthritis, trapeziectomy is the logical solution, but it exposes the patient to known complications: loss of strength, long recovery, trapeziometacarpal impingement. Initial treatment of thumb basal joint arthritis by arthroplasty is also an option. Treatment of both sites is also possible by interposition of pyrocarbon implants. In all cases (isolated or associated STT OA) and no matter the technique chosen, maintaining the scaphoid height (arthrodesis, resection < 3 mm and/or associated interposition) and performing oblique trapezoidal osteotomy (to prevent scaphoid-metacarpal impingement) are the two crucial elements of surgical treatment.

Long-term functional results of digital replantation: A survey of 28 patients

We sought to evaluate the long-term quality of life and functional outcome of patients who underwent digital replantation after amputation. A retrospective single-center study was conducted of patients treated between January 2010 to May 2016. Twenty-eight patients who underwent successful replantation after single or multiple digital amputation were reviewed in person after at least 2years' follow-up (mean 4.6years). Total active range of motion, grip and pinch strength were assessed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the SF-36 and DASH questionnaires. The patients' occupational status and daily activities were reported. Mean total active range of motion was 42% of the contralateral healthy side. Better active mobility and higher grip strength were found when the amputation was distal to the insertion of the common flexor tendon. Mean grip and pinch strength were 80% and 65%, respectively. Fusion did not significantly influence active mobility. The mean DASH score was 22.3. In our study, 77% of the patients returned to the same job and 75% experienced cold intolerance. The majority of patients who underwent digital replantation maintain a quality of life that allows them to return to work. Fusion, especially in the thumb, can be performed with few functional consequences. Even many years after the replantation procedure, sensory recovery remains poor.

Two-team management of vascular injuries concomitant with osteo-articular injuries in 36 patients over six years

BACKGROUND

Patients with both vascular and osteoarticular injuries require multidisciplinary management. Vascular injuries may be function- and/or life-threatening. The lower limbs are predominantly affected. Traffic, domestic, and work-related accidents contribute most of the cases. The primary objective of this study was to describe the management of patients with concomitant vascular and osteo-articular injuries, with special attention to the rates of amputation and fasciotomy. The secondary objective was to suggest a management sequence to optimise our surgical practice.

HYPOTHESIS

The management sequence is a crucial consideration in patients with both vascular and osteo-articular injuries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 6-year, retrospective, observational study was conducted in patients with concomitant vascular and osteo-articular injuries.

RESULTS

The study included 36 patients with a mean age of 40.6±22.1 years. The main sources of injury were traffic accidents (n=19, 52.8%), crush injury (n=8, 22.2%), and falls (n=5, 13.9%). A compound fracture was present in 20 (55.6%) patients. Evidence of ischaemia in 25 (69.4%) patients, and bleeding in 11 (30.6%) patients. Pre-operative imaging, by ultrasonography or computed tomography, was performed in 27 (75.0%) patients. The lower limb was involved in 30 (83.3%) patients, who had osteoarticular injuries to the femur and leg combined with injury to the popliteal artery. Fasciotomy was performed in 11 (30.6%) patients and secondary amputation in 7 (19.4%) patients. The limb salvage rate was 80.6%. Median patient survival was 9.3 [0-74.8] months.

DISCUSSION

Coordinated work by two surgical teams is crucial to manage concomitant vascular and osteo-articular injuries. The management sequence must be defined clearly. Computed tomography angiography is the investigation of choice and should be performed at the slightest suspicion of vascular injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective observational study.

Radiation exposure and the orthopedic surgeon's hand: Measurement of the equivalent dose over 13 months

Exposure to ionizing radiation in the operating room is governed by practical prevention and protection measures on the international, national and local levels. We evaluated the equivalent dose to the hand of an orthopedic surgeon over 13 months. An orthopedic surgeon wore a ring dosimeter on the ring finger of his right hand for all surgical procedures requiring intraoperative fluoroscopy between March 2014 and April 2015. Monthly doses were evaluated by the IRSN over the study period. The number and type of procedures were compiled as well as the type of fluoroscopy unit used. Four hundred procedures were performed during this period, including 182 with fluoroscopy. The equivalent cumulative dose at the hand was 4,75 mSv. No correlation was found with the type of procedure or type of fluoroscopy unit (conventional or mini C-arm). Equivalent doses were below the annual regulatory limit in France of 500 mSv. These results are consistent with those reported in the literature. However, recent studies have noted that both younger surgeons in training and more experienced surgeons must remember to use radiation protection measures.