The rs2601796 variant in ADCY9 gene is associated with severe asthma and less bronchodilator response

Asthma is a respiratory disease caused by the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. The adenylyl cyclase type 9 (ADCY9) enzyme produces the cyclic-adenosinemonophosphate (cAMP), important mediator involved in bronchodilation and immunomodulatory response. The aim of this study was to investigate if rs2601796 and rs2532019 variants in the ADCY9 gene are associated with asthma and lung function. The study comprised 1,052 subjects. Logistic regressions were done using PLINK 1.9 adjusted by sex, age, BMI, smoke and principal components. Bronchodilator responsiveness was assessed using the percentage of difference in FEV1 before and after the bronchodilator use. The in silico analysis for gene expression was performed in the GTEx Portal. The variant rs2601796 (AA/AG genotype) was positively associated with asthma severity (OR: 1.60 IC95%: 1.08-2.39) and with obstruction in individuals with severe asthma (OR: 3.10, IC95%: 1.11-8.62). Individuals with severe asthma and the AA/AG genotype of rs2601796 had less responsiveness to bronchodilators and also a lower expression of ADCY9 in lung and whole blood. The variant rs2532019 (TT/GT genotype) also downregulated the ADCY9 gene expression, but no significant association with the studied phenotypes was found. Thus, the variant in ADCY9 was associated with worse asthma outcomes, including a lower response to bronchodilators, likely due to the impact on its gene expression rate. This variant may be useful in the future to assist in personalized management of patients with asthma.

Handgrip strength as a diagnostic tool for frailty risk in elderly patients with moderate to severe asthma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate handgrip strength (HGS) as a diagnostic tool for frailty risk in elderly patients with asthma, as well as to investigate the prevalence of frailty in this population.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study including 96 patients ≥ 60 years of age diagnosed with moderate to severe asthma and treated at a tertiary referral center in Brazil. We measured HGS using a calibrated hydraulic hand dynamometer. We used a frailty scale and the AUC to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the HGS test.

RESULTS

The median age of participants was 67 years. Most (78%) were women and non-White (91%) of low socioeconomic status. HGS identified those at risk for frailty, with an AUC of 71.6% (61.5-80.4%; p < 0.002), as well as a sensitivity of 73.58% and a specificity of 67.53%, on the basis of a cutoff of ≤ 19 kgf.

CONCLUSIONS

HGS appears to be a simple, reliable tool for clinicians to determine frailty risk in older asthma patients in a point-of-care setting.

Impact of frailty in elderly patients with moderate to severe asthma

Frailty assessment has been identified as critical approach in chronic respiratory diseases with substantial impact in the health status and functionality in later life. Aging modifies the immune response leading to a chronic pro-inflammatory state and increased susceptibility to airway infections. Since epigenetic changes, airway epithelium dysfunction and inflammatory cytokine activity seem to be more pronounced in the immunosenescence, elderly asthmatics are at higher risk of poor clinical outcomes. Therefore, we hypothesize that frailty would be associated with the degree of asthma control in elderly patients with moderate to severe asthma. The aims of this study are to investigate association between frailty and asthma control in patients over 60 years old to estimate the prevalence of frailty in this study population. We plan to conduct a cross-sectional study with at least 120 patients above 60 years old with diagnostic of moderate to severe asthma according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, treated at a referral outpatient clinic. We defined asthma control by the six-domain Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) and frailty phenotype in accordance with Fried scale and visual scale of frailty (VS-Frailty). We hope to analyze the multidimensional relationships between frailty and asthma and contribute to innovative therapeutic plans in geriatric asthma.

Urinary Cotinine as a Biomarker of Cigarette Smoke Exposure: A Method to Differentiate Among Active, Second-Hand, and Non-Smoker Circumstances

Objective:

To review the literature on the use of urinary cotinine as a biological marker of cigarette smoke exposure.

Methods:

Narrative review of original and review articles on the topic of interest, published in Portuguese or English by June 2018, and selected in the following online databases: PubMed and Virtual Health Library (VHL).

Results:

Urinary cotinine is usually the recommended biomarker to estimate exposure to cigarette smoke, and can be used alone or, preferably, in association with questionnaires. Different analytical techniques can be used to quantify urinary cotinine and are differently performed because of urine sample interfering factors.

Conclusion:

The precise classification of smoking status is essential. It is advisable to use objective measurements regarding smoking habits since self-reported smoking may not always represent the true smoking status of the individual, particularly in groups that are more vulnerable to omitting the information of questionnaries, in addition, it has possible biases of memory. The accurate assessment of smoking is crucial to improve clinical management and counseling for different diseases as well as the establishment of preventive strategies. So, the use of urinary cotinine as a biomarker of cigarette smoke exposure seems to be a suitable assay to distinguish non-smokers from passive and active smokers.

Severe asthma and eligibility for biologics in a Brazilian cohort

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe the eligibility for biologic therapies for severe asthma (SA) in a cohort of patients attending the Program for Control of Asthma (ProAR) in Bahia, Brazil.

METHODS

Data from SA patients (≥18 years old) attending the ProAR, that were included in a case-control study conducted from 2013 to 2015, were used to reassess patients according to a modified ERS/ATS 2014 SA criteria. Patients were then classified according to the eligibility for SA biological therapy based on current prescription labels.

RESULTS

From 544 patients in the cohort, 531 (97.6%) were included and 172 (32.4%) were identified as SA patients according to the ERS/ATS 2014 modified criteria. Of these 172 patients, 69 (40.1%) were ineligible for any of the biologicals approved for asthma (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab and benralizumab), 60 (34.9%) patients were eligible for one of the biological therapies, and 10 (5.8%) patients were eligible for all biological therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of patients with SA were eligible for biologic therapy in our study, but none of them received this form of treatment. Almost half of them were not eligible to any of the approved biologics, however. The variability and overlap in patients' eligibility highlight the importance of evaluating each patient individually for a more personalized treatment approach. While there is a need to increase access for some of those eligible that may really need a biologic treatment, continuous efforts are required to develop alternatives to those who are not eligible.