Evaluation of Acute Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 Plasma Levels in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with and without Intracranial Lesions

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the association of plasma ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) with intracranial abnormalities visible on a computed tomography (CT) scan (CT positive) and injury severity in acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). For these purposes, a cohort of 109 adult TBI patients was recruited within 6 h from the injury event. A hyperacute subcohort of 20 patients who had their blood collected within 2 h from injury was analyzed separately for early acute biomarker levels. Levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 were analyzed using the prototype Abbott i-STAT™ TBI Plasma Test (Abbott Laboratories, Abbot Park, IL), alongside S100B measurement (Elecsys; Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany). In the hyperacute subcohort, GFAP and UCH-L1, but not S100B, levels were significantly higher in the CT-positive group compared to CT-negative patients. AUC values for differentiation between CT-positive and CT-negative patients were 0.97 for GFAP, 0.87 for UCH-L1, and 0.60 for S100B. Severity discrimination, defined by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, was then analyzed in the total patient cohort. Levels of all three biomarkers were significantly different between mild (GCS, 13-15) and moderate/severe (GCS, 3-12) injury groups. UCH-L1 showed the highest area under the curve value for severity discrimination (0.94), followed by GFAP (0.91) and S100B (0.83). These results support the clinical utility of GFAP and UCH-L1 as TBI biomarkers able to rule out CT-positive injury in acute TBI. Moreover, excellent differentiation of GFAP and UCH-L1 between mild and moderate/severe TBI groups affirms their close association with the underlying pathology.

Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements from Two Prototype Assays: The Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT Assays

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) may aid in the evaluation of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this analysis was to compare GFAP and UCH-L1 values measured using a handheld device compared with a core laboratory platform. We analyzed plasma samples from patients with TBI and healthy controls enrolled in the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) cohort study. GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured twice in each subject using prototype assays, first with the Abbott i-STAT™ handheld device, and second with the Abbott ARCHITECT^® platform. We then quantified the agreement in biomarker values obtained using these two methods. GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured twice in 570 and 572 samples, respectively. GFAP values measured by the ARCHITECT platform (median 143.3 [interquartile range (IQR): 19.8–925.8] pg/mL) were higher than values measured by the i-STAT (median 116.0 [IQR: 9.2–856.5] pg/mL). GFAP values from the two platforms were strongly correlated (p = 0.985). Similarly, UCH-L1 values measured by the ARCHITECT platform (median 163.9 [IQR: 82.5–412.4] pg/mL) were higher than values measured by the i-STAT (median 122.5 [IQR: 63.0–297.3] pg/mL). UCH-L1 values from the two platforms were strongly correlated (p = 0.933). Passing-Bablok regression equations were developed to estimate the relationship between the two platforms, specifically to predict i-STAT values from the ARCHITECT platform. GFAP and UCH-L1 values measured using the prototype assays on the Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT platforms are strongly correlated and values from either platform may be converted to the other.

Stability of pro-gastrin-releasing peptide in serum versus plasma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Although serum assays for pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) assays have been commercially available in Japan for several years, the stability of ProGRP in serum and plasma has not been well documented. We investigated the stability of ProGRP in serum and plasma with fresh and stored (frozen) specimens, as well as the cause of the observed instability in serum.

METHODS/RESULTS

ProGRP concentrations in fresh serum were decreased by 6-28% after room temperature storage for 2 h and by 8-32% after 2-8 degrees C storage for 24 h. The average change in ProGRP concentrations in fresh plasma was within +/-10% of baseline for more than 4 h at room temperature and for more than 24 h at 2-8 degrees C. The incubation of a serine protease, thrombin (activated blood coagulation factor II), in a buffer solution containing ProGRP caused decreases in ProGRP concentrations. Following the addition of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, a serine protease inhibitor, to serum, the serum stability for ProGRP was similar to that in plasma. ProGRP is significantly more stable in plasma than in serum. We speculate that thrombin in serum is one of the factors that inactivate ProGRP in serum by proteolysis of the ProGRP antigen.

CONCLUSION

The use of plasma samples for ProGRP may improve the clinical reliability of this marker by minimizing preanalytical changes in ProGRP concentrations.