Sustained impact of an antibiotic stewardship initiative targeting asymptomatic bacteriuria and pyuria in the emergency department

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a multifaceted initiative resulted in maintained reduction in inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic pyuria (ASP) or bacteriuria (ASB) in the emergency department (ED).

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective study.

METHODS

Beginning in December 2015, a series of interventions were implemented to decrease the inappropriate treatment of ASP or ASB in the ED. Patients discharged from the ED from August to October 2015 (preintervention period), from December 2016 to February 2017 (postintervention period 1), and from November 2019 to January 2020 (postintervention period 2) were included if they had pyuria and/or bacteriuria without urinary symptoms. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients prescribed antibiotics within 72 hours of discharge from the ED. The secondary outcome was the number of patients returning to the ED with symptomatic UTI within 30 days of discharge.

RESULTS

We detected a significant decrease in the proportion of patients with ASP or ASB who were inappropriately treated when comparing the preintervention group and post-intervention group 1 (100% vs 32.4%; P < .001). This reduced frequency of inappropriate treatment was noted 3 years after the intervention, with 28% of patients receiving treatment for ASP or ASB in postintervention group 2. (P was not significant fin the comparison with postintervention group 1.) Among the 3 groups analyzed, we detected no difference in the numbers of patients returning to the ED with a symptomatic UTI within 30 days of ED discharge regardless of whether patients received antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

A multifaceted intervention resulted in a significant decrease in inappropriate use of antibiotics for ASP and/or ASB that was maintained 3 years after implementation.

51. Sustained Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship (AS) Initiative Targeting Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Pyuria in the Emergency Department (ED)

Background

The sustainability of unique AS initiatives are largely unstudied. A multi-faceted initiative to reduce inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic pyuria (ASP) and asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) in the ED was implemented at our institution in 2016. A pre-post intervention analysis demonstrated reduction in the inappropriate treatment (tx) of ASP/ASB from 100% to 32% (p< 0.001) following the intervention. The purpose of this present study was to determine the sustained impact of the initiative and determine if re-education provided in Oct 2020 could further reduce inappropriate tx.

Methods

This was a retrospective, interrupted time series study conducted at an 885 bed academic medical center. Patients (pts) discharged from the ED in Nov 2019 – Feb 2020 (group 1) and Nov 2020 – Feb 2021 (group 2) were retrospectively screened in chronologic order until 50 pts in each group met study criteria. Similar to the 2016 study, pts were included if they were ≥ 18 years old and had a positive urine culture or pyuria. Pts were excluded if they had symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI), another infection requiring antibiotics (ABX), indwelling catheter, ureteral stent, or nephrostomy tube, or if pregnant or immunocompromised. The primary outcome was the proportion of pts prescribed ABX within 72 hrs of ED discharge. The secondary outcome was the number of pts returning to the ED with symptomatic UTI within 30 days of discharge. Group 1 was compared to the 2016 study’s post group to determine the sustained impact of the initial initiative; group 2 was compared to group 1 to determine the impact of re-education, which involved a presentation to ED providers and a posted algorithm and fact sheet.

Results

Results from all time periods are summarized in Table 1. Improvement in inappropriate tx was still noted 3 years after the intervention (28% vs 32%; p = NS). Re-education did not further improve inappropriate prescribing, with 28% of group 2 pts still receiving tx.

Table 1.

Conclusion

The decrease in inappropriate use of ABX for ASP/ASB was still noted 3 years after implementation of a multi-faceted AS initiative. Re-education did not result in further improvement.

Disclosures

James Johnson, PharmD, FLGT (Shareholder) Vera Luther, MD, Nothing to disclose

1878. Expanding Kentucky’s “One and Done” Tradition: Lipoglycopeptide Administration in the Emergency Department at a Tertiary, Academic Medical Center

Background

Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) incidence continues to rise, accounting for around 3.5 million emergency department (ED) visits per year in the United States. Dalbavancin and oritavancin are lipoglycopeptides with long half-lives allowing for single dose treatment options for eligible patients presenting with ABSSSIs in the ED, avoiding an inpatient admission. The objective of this study was to investigate the financial outcomes of utilizing these agents in the ED.

Methods

This was a single-center, retrospective study in adult patients with ABSSSIs that received a lipoglycopeptide in the ED at an academic medical center from April 2016 to February 2018. A multidisciplinary institutional guideline was developed and implemented in April 2016. Data were documented in the electronic medical record and/or REDCap™ database. A comparator group was identified by utilizing similar ICD-10 codes for patients that were admitted for ABSSSI. Variable direct cost-avoidance was examined to explore the financial implication of lipoglycopeptide treatment in this population.

Results

The average length of stay in the comparator group who were admitted for ABSSSIs during the predefined time period was 4.3 days. Because patients receiving a lipoglycopeptide did not require admission for intravenous antibiotics, 94.6 patient-days were avoided increasing the capacity by 14.1 patients. Overall, 22 patients received either dalbavancin (n = 18) or oritavancin (n = 4). The age was 40.8 ± 13.2 years for the study group with 55% male. The age of the comparator group was 40.5 ± 19.7 years. All patients were discharged home from the ED without being admitted. Two patients were readmitted for treatment failure requiring IV antibiotics. Despite 2 of 22 patients receiving a lipoglycopeptide without insurance, the variable direct cost avoidance was $4,560 per case, or $1,060 per day.

Conclusion

The use of lipoglycopeptides offers patient convenience and financial benefits, warranting its consideration for use in the ED at tertiary academic medical centers.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.