Single-dose pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid following administration of immediate-release mycophenolate mofetil in healthy Beagle dogs

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an immunomodulating agent commonly used in human medicine for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases. There is growing evidence that the immunomodulating properties of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a prodrug of MPA, are therapeutically beneficial for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases in dogs. A narrow therapeutic index and high inter-and intra-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability complicate the use of MMF. A better characterization of MPA pharmacokinetics is needed to help establish dosing regimens and standardized treatment protocols for canine patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of MPA in dogs. MMF oral suspension (10 mg/kg) was administered to five healthy beagle dogs. Serial blood samples were collected from 0 to 18 hours after administration. The simultaneous quantification of MPA, and its metabolites MPA-7-O-glucuronide (MPAG), and acyl glucuronide (AcMPAG) was determined by liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS)/MS. MPA peak concentrations were achieved rapidly (median Tmax of 0.5 h). Concentrations fell through 3 hours post-dose and then plateaued around 20% of Cmax. The mean elimination half-life was rapid (5.8 hours) and notable variability was observed in all PK parameters. The PK profiles for the MPAG and AcMPAG metabolites followed a similar pattern as MPA concentration. Future repeat-dose studies will be needed to evaluate steady-state PK parameters and to define therapeutic MPA dose levels.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Immediate- and Modified-Release Mycophenolic Acid Preparations in Healthy Beagle Dogs

Background: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a broad-acting immunomodulating agent that may be therapeutically beneficial for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases in canine patients.

Objectives: To determine the suppressive effects of MPA on T-cell proliferation, and to assess the feasibility of a canine-specific q24 h modified-release MPA formulation (OKV-1001b).

Animals: Fifteen healthy purpose-bred male beagle dogs.

Methods: Two nearly identical open-label fifteen-day studies were conducted in which dogs were randomized to receive mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 10 mg/kg q12h), or two doses of OKV-1001b (270 mg and 180 mg; q24h). Serial pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) samples were collected on Days 1, 8, and 15. MPA plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), while an ex vivo T-cell proliferation assay assessed PD effects. Dogs were continuously monitored for evidence of side effects and gastrointestinal tolerability.

Results: MPA induced inhibition of T-cell proliferation was observed following administration of all MPA preparations in a clear concentration-dependent manner. The PK/PD relationship was maintained across all days and time-points. Data generated herein suggest that MPA plasma concentrations above 600 ng/mL achieve at least 50% inhibition of T-cell proliferation.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance: MPA holds therapeutic potential for treating dogs with immune-mediated disease, but clinical trials will be necessary to determine its safety and efficacy in naturally occurring disease. Likewise, q24h oral modified release MPA preparations that maintain MPA plasma concentrations between 600 and 1,000 ng/mL are warranted for further studies in client-owned dogs.

Mycophenolic acid in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: From humans to dogs

Mycophenolic acid (MPA), a noncompetitive, selective and reversible inhibitor of inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), is an immunosuppressive agent that has a long history in medicine. Mechanistically, the inhibition of IMPDH leads to the selective and eventual arrest of T- and B-lymphocyte proliferation. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), the first MPA-based product to receive marketing approval over two decades ago, was originally indicated for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in human transplant patients. Given its broad immunosuppressive properties and ability to selectively inhibit lymphocyte division and effector functions, the clinical utility of MPA was subsequently explored in a host of autoimmune diseases. Human clinical studies have shown MPA to be safe and effective and support its off-label administration for immune-mediated diseases such as lupus, myasthenia gravis and atopic dermatitis. MMF became generically available in the United States in 2008, and its clinical utility is increasingly being explored as a treatment option for dogs with immune-mediated diseases. This review summarizes the available literature for MPA pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and the current status of MPA as a treatment for client-owned dogs diagnosed with immune-mediated diseases.

Effects of Application Site and Subject Demographics on the Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl HCl Patient-Controlled Transdermal System (PCTS)

INTRODUCTION

The fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS) is a self-contained, preprogrammed, needle-free system currently in development for acute pain management in a medically supervised setting. The objectives of these studies were to evaluate skin application sites for the fentanyl HCl PCTS and to evaluate the effect of patient demographics on its pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

The first study was a randomised, open-label, single-centre, 3-treatment, crossover study in which the fentanyl HCl PCTS was applied to the upper outer arm, lower inner arm or chest of healthy volunteers. Fentanyl 25 microg was then delivered via this system twice during the first 20 minutes of every hour for 24 hours. The pharmacokinetics of fentanyl were determined and analysed for each application site using ANOVA. The second study was a nonrandomised, nonblind, multicentre, sequential treatment study. Healthy volunteers received fentanyl HCl 40 microg via the PCTS three times during the first 30 minutes of each hour for 3 hours. After a 5- to 10-day washout period, fentanyl HCl 120 microg was administered intravenously during the first 30 minutes of each hour for 3 hours as a reference treatment. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for the fentanyl HCl PCTS, and results were analysed using ANOVA. Safety and tolerability were evaluated in both studies.

RESULTS

Application of the system to the upper outer arm or chest resulted in similar maximum serum concentrations (Cmax; 1.193 and 1.176 microg/L, respectively) and areas under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC24-25; 1.033 and 1.015 microg h/L). However, both Cmax and AUC24-25 were less when the system was applied to the lower inner arm (0.859 microg/L and 0.757 microg x h/L). Subject age, bodyweight, sex and ethnicity had no significant effect on pharmacokinetic parameters. No serious adverse events were reported in either study during or after administration of the fentanyl HCl PCTS.

CONCLUSION

Fentanyl HCl is comparably absorbed from the PCTS when it is applied to the upper outer arm or chest. The pharmacokinetics of fentanyl HCl delivered by the PCTS are unaffected by sex, age, race or weight.

Characterisation of the Pharmacokinetics of the Fentanyl HCl Patient-Controlled Transdermal System (PCTS)

INTRODUCTION

The fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS) is a self-contained, preprogrammed, noninvasive analgesic delivery system for acute pain management. We carried out three studies with the following objectives: study I to evaluate the relationship between fentanyl absorption and the magnitude of current applied to the system; study II to determine dose-proportionality for the fentanyl HCl PCTS (25 and 40 microg); and study III to describe the effects of single- and multiple-day administration on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl delivered by the PCTS.

METHODS

All studies were open-label, crossover studies with washout periods between treatments. In study I, randomised participants (n = 36) received three of a potential five fentanyl HCl PCTS prototypes, each of which used a different current magnitude, and each of which was evaluated for 24 hours. In study II, participants (n = 40) received fentanyl (25 microg) from the PCTS for 23.33 hours, followed by fentanyl (40 microg) from the PCTS for 23.33 hours. Intravenous (IV) fentanyl (80 microg/h) was administered intermittently over 24 hours as a reference treatment in Studies I and II. In study III, participants (n = 28) received fentanyl (40 microg) from the PCTS for 20 hours, followed by fentanyl (40 microg) from the PCTS for 68 hours. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum serum fentanyl concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) and terminal half-life (t(1/2)), were determined for each treatment.

RESULTS

The amount of fentanyl absorbed from the PCTS was linearly dependent on the magnitude of current applied to the system, with a current of 170 microA resulting in the absorption of 39.5 microg of fentanyl at hour 23. Mixed-effect ANOVA indicated no significant difference (p > 0.1) in the dose-normalised pharmacokinetics of the fentanyl HCl PCTS 25 and 40 microg. No significant difference existed between the corrected AUC(0-5) of the fentanyl HCl PCTS during the single- and multiple-day treatment periods (0.40 and 0.54 microg x h/L, respectively; p = 0.133). The system was well tolerated, with headache and mild application site erythema being the most common treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

A linear relationship exists between the amount of current applied to the fentanyl HCl PCTS and the amount of fentanyl absorbed. There is dose-proportionality in the pharmacokinetics of the fentanyl HCl PCTS 25 and 40 microg. Multiple-day administration does not affect the pharmacokinetics of the fentanyl HCl PCTS 40 microg. The system was well tolerated, even after repeated application.

The Effect of Dosing Frequency on the Pharmacokinetics of a Fentanyl HCl Patient-Controlled Transdermal System (PCTS)

INTRODUCTION

The fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS) is a noninvasive, needle-free, credit card-sized drug delivery system designed for the on-demand management of acute pain in a medically supervised setting. The objective of these studies was to determine the effect of dosing frequency on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl delivered by the PCTS.

METHODS

All three studies were single-centre, open-label, randomised, crossover studies. The fentanyl HCl PCTS was applied to the upper outer arm of all participants. In the first study, participants (n = 30) received three fentanyl HCl PCTS 25 microg treatments: two sequential doses hourly for 23.33 hours, six sequential doses every 3 hours for 22 hours, and 72 doses continuously over 12 hours. Participants (n = 31) in the second study received three fentanyl HCl PCTS 40 microg treatments: two sequential doses hourly over 23.33 hours, six sequential doses every 3 hours over approximately 10 hours, and 80 doses continuously over 13.33 hours. In the third study, participants (n = 28) received four fentanyl HCl PCTS 40 microg treatments: 6, 18, 36 and 80 doses over 1, 3, 6 and 13.33 hours, respectively. Naltrexone was used to block the opioid effects of fentanyl. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum serum fentanyl concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) and terminal half-life (t(1/2)) were determined.

RESULTS

In the first study, the dose-normalised AUC (AUCn) values for the 2- and 6-dose sequence treatments were not significantly different (p = 0.937), suggesting that the frequency of dosing has little effect on the amount of fentanyl absorbed; however, the AUCn for the 72-dose treatment was significantly lower than that of the other treatments (p = 0.001), which were of longer duration. The results of the second study paralleled those from the first, suggesting that the bioavailability of fentanyl delivered by the PCTS increases as a function of time and is likely to be independent of dosing frequency. Results from the third study suggested that approximately 40% of the nominal 40 microg fentanyl dose is absorbed during the first hour of treatment, with the full nominal dose absorbed after approximately 10 hours. The fentanyl HCl PCTS was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The amount of fentanyl absorbed from the PCTS increases as a function of time and is independent of both dosing frequency and total number of doses delivered. The fentanyl HCl PCTS is generally safe and well tolerated.

Passive absorption of fentanyl from the fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system

BACKGROUND

The fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) is a patient-controlled analgesic delivery system that actively administers bolus doses of fentanyl transdermally upon patient activation.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the amount of fentanyl absorbed from fentanyl ITS via passive absorption over a 24.5-h period.

METHODS

Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were obtained from healthy adults who received fentanyl ITS for 24 h.

FINDINGS

The average absorption rate was 2.3 microg/h. An average total of 57.4 microg fentanyl was absorbed during the study. The mean maximum observed serum fentanyl concentration was 0.06 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that the average amount of fentanyl absorbed passively or via passive delivery from fentanyl ITS is minimal. Maximum serum fentanyl concentrations fell below the range associated with analgesia and respiratory depression. The variability in fentanyl exposure was likely exaggerated by the low amounts of drug absorption resulting in overall fairly low fentanyl concentrations.

Pharmacokinetic profile of a 24-hour controlled-release OROS formulation of hydromorphone in the presence of alcohol

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties of a novel, once-daily, controlled-release formulation of hydromorphone (OROS hydromorphone) in the presence of alcohol.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In a single-centre, open-label, four-treatment, four-period, four-sequence, crossover study, two groups of 24 healthy subjects (fasted or fed) were randomised to receive four single doses of OROS hydromorphone 16 mg with solutions of either 0%, 4%, 20% or 40% alcohol, and with a naltrexone block.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Plasma samples taken predose and at regular intervals up to 48 h after dosing were assayed for hydromorphone concentrations; a mixed-effect analysis of variance was done on log-transformed data. Bioequivalence was concluded if 90% confidence intervals of treatment mean ratios were between 80% and 125%.

RESULTS

Plasma hydromorphone concentrations were slightly higher after dosing with all alcohol treatments in both the fasted and fed subject groups. Median T(max) values were between 12 and 16 h and ranges were similar for all treatments. C(max) values increased after alcohol compared with no alcohol, with the increase slightly lower in the fed state. The greatest mean increase in C(max) observed was 1.3-fold in the fasted state and 1.1-fold in the fed state. Confidence intervals were within 80-125% for AUC but were slightly higher for C(max).

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics of once-daily OROS hydromorphone were only minimally affected by alcohol, with no dose dumping of hydromorphone. The results indicate that the controlled-release properties of this formulation are maintained in the presence of alcohol.

Pharmacokinetic investigation of dose proportionality with a 24-hour controlled-release formulation of hydromorphone

Background

The purpose of this study was investigate the dose proportionality of a novel, once-daily, controlled-release formulation of hydromorphone that utilizes the OROS^® Push-Pull™ osmotic pump technology.

Methods

In an open-label, four-way, crossover study, 32 healthy volunteers were randomized to receive a single dose of OROS^® hydromorphone 8, 16, 32, and 64 mg, with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Opioid antagonism was provided by three or four doses of naltrexone 50 mg, given at 12-hour intervals pre- and post-OROS^® hydromorphone dosing. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected pre-dose and at regular intervals up to 48 hours post-dose (72 hours for the 64-mg dose), and were assayed for hydromorphone concentration to determine peak plasma concentration (C_max), time at which peak plasma concentration was observed (T_max), terminal half-life (t_1/2), and area under the concentration-time curve for zero to time t (AUC_0-t) and zero to infinity (AUC_0–∞). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on untransformed and dose-normalized data for AUC_0-t, AUC_0–∞, and C_max was used to establish dose linearity and proportionality.

Results

The study was completed by 31 of 32 subjects. Median T_max (12.0–16.0 hours) and mean t_1/2 (10.6–11.0 hours) were found to be independent of dose. Regression analyses of C_max, AUC_0–48, and AUC_0–∞ by dose indicated that the relationship was linear (slope, P ≤ 0.05) and that the intercept did not differ significantly from zero (P > 0.05). Similar analyses with dose-normalized parameters also indicated that the slope did not differ significantly from zero (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The pharmacokinetics of OROS^® hydromorphone are linear and dose proportional for the 8, 16, 32, and 64 mg doses.

Trial Registration

Clinical Trials.gov NCT00398957

Pharmacokinetic profile of a 24-hour controlled-release OROS formulation of hydromorphone in the presence and absence of food

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of a novel, once-daily, controlled-release formulation of hydromorphone (OROS hydromorphone) under fasting conditions with that immediately after a high-fat breakfast in healthy volunteers. The effect of the opioid antagonist naltrexone on fasting hydromorphone pharmacokinetics also was evaluated.

METHODS

In an open-label, three-way, crossover study, 30 healthy volunteers were randomized to receive a single dose of 16 mg OROS hydromorphone under fasting conditions, 16 mg OROS hydromorphone under fed conditions, or 16 mg OROS hydromorphone under fasting conditions with a naltrexone 50-mg block. Plasma samples taken pre-dose and at regular intervals up to 48 hours post-dose were assayed for hydromorphone concentrations. Analysis of variance was performed on log-transformed data; for mean ratios of 0.8 to 1.2 (20%), differences were considered minimal. Bioequivalence was reached if 90% confidence intervals (CI) of treatment mean ratios were between 80% and 125%.

RESULTS

The mean geometric ratios of the fed and fasting treatment groups for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-t; AUC0-infinity) were within 20%. Confidence intervals were within 80% to 125% for AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity but were slightly higher for Cmax (105.9% and 133.3%, respectively). With naltrexone block, the hydromorphone Cmax increased by 39% and the terminal half-life decreased by 4.5 hours. There was no significant change in Tmax, AUC0-t or AUC0-infinity.

CONCLUSION

Standard bioavailability measures show minimal effect of food on the bioavailability of hydromorphone from OROS hydromorphone. Naltrexone co-administration results in a slight increase in the rate of absorption but not the extent of absorption.

Clinical spectrum of the osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system (OROS), an advanced oral delivery form

BACKGROUND

The osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system, OROS, is an advanced drug delivery technology that uses osmotic pressure as the driving force to deliver pharmacotherapy, usually once-daily, in several therapeutic areas.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to discuss the evolution of OROS technology and examine the many therapeutic areas where OROS products are being used.

METHODS

A search of Medline and EMBASE were performed using the keywords 'OROS' and 'osmotic delivery' for the period January 1990 to June 2005. Data were also obtained from the manufacturers' websites and associated publications.

RESULTS

OROS technology has evolved over the last 30 years, resulting in four systems: the elementary osmotic pump; the two-layer osmotic push-pull tablet; the advanced longitudinally compressed tablet multilayer formulation; and, the L-OROS system. OROS technology is employed for drug delivery in many therapeutic areas including: cardiovascular medicine, endocrinology, urology, and central nervous system (CNS) therapeutics. Two calcium channel blockers utilizing OROS technology for the treatment of hypertension are nifedipine and verapamil. Glipizide extended-release is used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Doxazosin is used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and oxybutynin for overactive bladder. Most recent developments are with drugs that affect the CNS, including the use of methylphenidate for treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, paliperidone extended-release and OROS hydromorphone, which are under clinical development for schizophrenia and chronic pain, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug delivery using the various OROS products can result in an improved safety profile, stable drug concentrations, uniform drug effects, and reduced dosing frequency. OROS technology has also enabled the use of an effective starting dose, without the need for dose titration, which allows the achievement of symptom control much earlier than that observed with immediate-release preparations. Such attributes can enhance patient compliance and convenience, thereby ensuring efficacy and improving patient outcomes.

Effect of the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine

This study assessed the effect of the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole on the bioavailability of the extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine. Forty-four healthy volunteers received each of 4 treatments in a 4-period crossover design. The treatments consisted of osmotically controlled extended-release oxybutynin chloride tablets at 10 mg/d or extended-release tolterodine tartrate capsules at 4 mg/d, with and without preceding treatment with 20 mg omeprazole daily for 4 days. Blood samples collected predose and at scheduled time points for 36 hours postdose were analyzed for oxybutynin and its active metabolite, N-desethyloxybutynin, or tolterodine and its active 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite, as appropriate. The AUCinfinity ratios for oxybutynin and its metabolite with and without prior omeprazole fell within the 80% to 125% range (accepted as the criterion for bioequivalence), as did those for tolterodine and its active moiety. The peak concentration ratios for oxybutynin and metabolite also conformed to this range; those for tolterodine did not. Increasing gastric pH with omeprazole does not substantially alter the pharmacokinetic properties of extended-release oxybutynin but may alter those of extended-release tolterodine.

Evaluation of the bioequivalence of two transdermal fentanyl systems following single and repeat applications

OBJECTIVE

Transdermal delivery of fentanyl has potential benefits over slow-release morphine, being largely preferred by patients owing to the combination of effective pain relief, a good safety profile and easy, pain-free dosing. The new drug-in-adhesive Durogesic D-TRANS fentanyl Matrix Delivery System (DDTDF) has improved pharmaceutical characteristics and patient acceptability compared to the original Durogesic transdermal reservoir system (fentanyl transdermal reservoir), whilst still providing reliable and consistent delivery of fentanyl. The bioequivalence of these two systems was evaluated in two studies.

RESEARCH DESIGNS AND METHODS

Eighty healthy volunteers received single (72 h) or multiple (288 h) applications of DDTDF and the transdermal reservoir system (100 microg/h) in two separate randomised, crossover bioequivalence studies. Bioequivalence was assessed by calculating the ratio of least squares means based on log-transformed data following single system application and at steady-state during the fourth application.

RESULTS

Both transdermal systems were bioequivalent with respect to all tested pharmacokinetic parameters. Inter-subject variability was comparable between the two systems and was greater than intra-subject variability. Transdermal delivery was well tolerated in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic results demonstrate that DDTDF is bioequivalent to the original fentanyl transdermal reservoir system after single and multiple applications.

Effect of Antacid on the Pharmacokinetics of Extended-Release Formulations of Tolterodine and Oxybutynin

BACKGROUND

In general, extended-release (ER) formulations are designed to prolong the duration of efficacy and reduce the adverse effects of a drug. These formulations often contain the entire daily dose in a single tablet. Therefore, failure of the ER mechanism not only diminishes the desired benefits, but may temporarily expose the patient to drug concentrations higher than those released from a conventional tablet. In this study we determined whether pH has an effect on drug release from the ER formulations of oxybutynin (OROS technology) and tolterodine (membrane coated beads) in vitro and in vivo.

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro studies were based on standardised dissolution experiments for each drug in media of different pH (artificial gastric fluid at pH 1.2, artificial intestinal fluid at pH 7.5, and water). In the two separate, identically designed in vivo studies, single doses of each drug were administered alone and with an antacid to male and female healthy volunteers aged 18-45 years. The randomised, crossover, open-label in vivo studies employed a validated assay to determine plasma concentrations of tolterodine and its metabolite 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HM), or oxybutynin and its metabolite N-desethyloxybutynin.

RESULTS

The in vitro study showed similar slow and steady drug release from ER-oxybutynin in each pH medium, with 64-71% released after 12 hours. Drug release from ER-tolterodine was steady and slow in artificial gastric fluid, with 72.5% of drug released after 12 hours. However, drug release was much faster in artificial intestinal fluid and water, where 69.8% and 69.1%, respectively, of the drug was released within 4 hours. These in vitro results were consistent with the findings of the in vivo studies. In vivo, the pharmacokinetic profile (peak plasma concentration [C(max)] and area under the concentration-time curve) of ER-oxybutynin was similar after administration with or without antacid, whereas C(max) values of both tolterodine and 5-HM increased significantly when ER-tolterodine was administered with antacid (p < or = 0.017 vs ER-tolterodine alone).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in pH affected the release of tolterodine from ER-tolterodine, while they had no effect on the release of oxybutynin from the proprietary ER technology used in ER-oxybutynin. The technology employed in ER formulations thus determines sensitivity of drug release to external factors.

New perspectives on the overactive bladder: pharmacokinetics and bioavailability

In the United States alone, approximately 17 million men and women have symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB). For many years, oxybutynin was the drug of choice for treating OAB. Although it provided effective treatment, multiple daily doses were required, and adverse events, such as dry mouth and constipation, were decided drawbacks. Controlled drug delivery systems seen in commercially available OAB formulations alter the pharmacokinetics of antimuscarinic medications in ways that maintain efficacy and allow once-daily dosing and reduction of adverse events. In the future, OAB medications will not only incorporate new chemical entities, such as the S-enantiomer of oxybutynin, but will also use novel drug delivery technologies, including transdermal patches and bladder implants.

Pharmacokinetics of controlled-release verapamil in healthy volunteers and patients with hypertension or angina

AIMS

To study the dose-ranging population pharmacokinetics of controlled release verapamil in healthy subjects and patients with angina or hypertension. To characterize the pharmacodynamics of controlled-release verapamil in patients with hypertension.

METHODS

Dose-ranging studies were conducted in healthy volunteers and patients with hypertension and angina. Subjects received doses of 120, 180, 360, or 540 mg racemic verapamil as an osmotic controlled-release formulation. A population pharmacokinetic model involving zero-order release of verapamil into the gastrointestinal tract with first-order absorption and elimination was used to describe the steady-state plasma concentration profile for R- and S-verapamil. A population sigmoid E(max) pharmacodynamic model was used to describe the effect of R- and S-verapamil on mean arterial blood pressure.

RESULTS

S-verapamil had an approximate 4-fold greater apparent clearance than R-verapamil in both healthy volunteers and patients. The apparent plasma clearance of R- and S-verapamil in healthy volunteers decreased over the dose range of 120-540 mg. A similar dose-dependent decrease in apparent plasma clearance was also noted in patients. None of the patient demographic variables examined (age, total body weight, lean body weight, body mass index, and height) explained the variability in verapamil pharmacokinetics. The pharmacodynamic model describing the relationship between verapamil plasma concentration and mean arterial blood pressure indicated that the S-verapamil had a 3.6-fold lower estimated EC(50) compared to R-verapamil.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this dose-ranging pharmacokinetic investigation in healthy volunteers and patients are consistent with previous reports in healthy subjects. S-verapamil is cleared more rapidly than R-verapamil and the estimated EC(50) for S-verapamil was 3.6-fold lower than for R-verapamil. Estimated EC(50) values for R- and S-verapamil decreased with increasing age and decreasing weight.

Effect of OROS controlled-release delivery on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxybutynin chloride

Aims : Dry mouth is a common side-effect seen with immediate-release oxybutynin (IR-Oxy). Ditropan XL [(Oxy-XL), a controlled-release formulation of oxybutynin chloride, is a once-daily oral dosage form that incorporates the OROS technology. Dry mouth as the pharmacodynamic measure was compared between Oxy-XL and IR-Oxy administration. The steady state stereospecific pharmacokinetics were also established for the two formulations and the kinetic-dynamic relationship of oxybutynin was examined.

METHODS

This was a randomized, repeated-dose, double-blind, two-treatment, two-period, crossover study. After a baseline assessment day, volunteers were randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences and received 4 days of each treatment with a washout period of 7 days between treatments. The treatments were: 1) Oxy-XL 10 mg in the morning and placebo 8 h later, and 2) IR-Oxy 5 mg in the morning and again 8 h later. Volunteers assessed dry mouth severity subjectively using a 100 mm visual analogue scale, VAS (Baseline, treatment days 1 and 4) and objectively by collecting saliva (Baseline and treatment day 4) before dosing and every hour after the morning dose for approximately 16 h. Several blood samples were collected during each treatment, with frequent sampling on day 4 to analyse for plasma R- and S-oxybutynin and R- and S-desethyloxybutynin concentrations.

RESULTS

Relatively constant plasma concentrations of oxybutynin and its metabolite were seen over 24 h following Oxy-XL administration with the degree of fluctuation being much lower (P = 0.001; 66% to 81% reduction for the various analytes) than IR-Oxy. Compared with IR-Oxy, Oxy-XL yielded higher (131% and 158% for the R- and S-isomer, respectively) oxybutynin and lower (62% and 78% for the R- and S-isomer, respectively) desethyloxybutynin bioavailability, suggesting reduced first-pass metabolism. Saliva output (area under the effect curve) was significantly higher [P = 0.001; 37% (95% confidence interval: 24, 51%)] with Oxy-XL than with IR-Oxy and, accordingly, dry mouth severity (VAS) integrated over the day was significantly lower with Oxy-XL. The decrease in saliva output and the consequent increase in dry mouth severity correlated with the metabolite R-desethyloxybutynin concentration, and no apparent relationship was observed with the R-oxybutynin concentration. This suggests that the metabolite may contribute to the dry mouth. Therefore, the reduction in metabolite exposure with Oxy-XL may be a possible explanation for the observed decrease in dry mouth severity with OXY-XL compared with IR-Oxy.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxy-XL maintains relatively constant plasma drug and metabolite concentrations and minimizes first-pass metabolism of oxybutynin. The metabolite appears to contribute to dry mouth associated with oxybutynin, and following Oxy-XL metabolite exposure is reduced compared with IR-Oxy. Consequently less dry mouth was observed with Oxy-XL as compared with IR-Oxy.

A Semiparametric Deconvolution Model to Establish In Vivo–In Vitro Correlation Applied to OROS Oxybutynin

In vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) models may be used to predict in vivo drug concentration-time profiles given in vitro release characteristics of a drug. This prediction is accomplished by incorporating in vitro release characteristics as an input function (A(vitro)) to a pharmacokinetics model. This simple approach often results in biased predictions of observed in vivo drug concentrations, and it can result in rejecting IVIVC. To solve this problem we propose a population IVIVC model that incorporates the in vitro information and allows one to quantify possibly changed in vivo release characteristic. The model assumes linear kinetics and describes the in vivo release as a sum of A(vitro) and a nonparametric function (A(d), a spline) representing the difference in release due to in vivo conditions. The function A(vitro) and its variability enter the model as a prior distribution. The function A(d) is estimated together with its intersubject variability. The number of parameters associated with A(d) defines the model: no parameters indicates perfect IVIVC, a large number of parameters indicates poor IVIVC. The number of parameters is determined using statistical model selection criteria. We demonstrate the approach to solve the IVIVC problem of an oral extended release oxybutynin form (OROS), administered in three pharmacokinetic studies. These studies present a particular challenging case; that is, the relative bioavailability for the OROS administration is >100% compared with that of the immediate-release form. The result of our modeling shows that the apparent lack of IVIVC can be overcome: in vivo concentration can be predicted (within or across data sets) based on in vitro release rate together with a simple form of systematic deviation from the in vitro release.

A comparison of the effects on saliva output of oxybutynin chloride and tolterodine tartrate

BACKGROUND

Oxybutynin chloride and tolterodine tartrate are anticholinergic agents used to suppress involuntary bladder contractions in urinary incontinence. They act by inhibiting binding of acetylcholine to the muscarinic receptors in the detrusor muscle of the bladder. The same types of muscarinic receptors are found in the salivary glands; thus anticholinergic agents may decrease saliva production and cause dry mouth, a commonly cited reason for discontinuation of therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to compare saliva output, which is an objective measure of dry mouth, in subjects taking immediate- or extended-release oxybutynin, tolterodine, or placebo.

METHODS

This was a single-site, single-dose, randomized, double-blind, 4-treatment, 4-period crossover study. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment sequences that included extended-release oxybutynin 10 mg, tolterodine 2 mg, immediate-release oxybutynin 5 mg, and placebo. Saliva output was measured objectively before dosing with each treatment and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after dosing.

RESULTS

Thirty-six healthy adult volunteers (22 women and 14 men) participated in the study. They ranged in age from 19 to 42 years (mean, 27 years). Thirty-one were white, 3 Asian, and 2 black. There were no significant differences in predose saliva output between the 4 study groups. With placebo, saliva output increased throughout the day. Saliva output was maintained at predose levels throughout the day with extended-release oxybutynin. Two hours after dosing with tolterodine and immediate-release oxybutynin, saliva output decreased nearly 0.5 g in specimens collected over 2 minutes. All 3 active treatments were associated with lower saliva output compared with placebo. Extended-release oxybutynin and tolterodine were similar with respect to area under the saliva concentration-time curve but were associated with significantly greater saliva output than was immediate-release oxybutynin (P < 0.01). There were no serious adverse events (AEs) in this study. AEs were similar between treatments, although the incidence of headache was higher in the active-treatment groups than with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective assessment of saliva output in healthy adult volunteers indicated that extended-release oxybutynin and tolterodine had less impact on saliva output than did conventional immediate-release oxybutynin, suggesting that they may yield lower levels of dry mouth.

Lack of effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of an extended-release oxybutynin formulation

The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of 15 mg oxybutynin XL was evaluated in a single-dose, randomized, crossover, open-label study in healthy volunteers. A validated, stereospecific, high-performance liquid chromatography assay was used to simultaneously determine the plasma concentrations of R- and S-oxybutynin and active metabolite R- and S-desethyloxybutynin. The mean AUC and Cmax values for each of the four analytes in the fed treatment were within +/- 20% of the fasting treatment values. The 90% confidence intervals for the treatment ratios (fed/fasted) for log-transformed Cmax and AUCinf values for the drug isomers and AUCinf values for the metabolite isomers were all within the 80% to 125% range. Only the ranges for the Cmax values for R- and S-desethyloxybutynin were slightly wider but were well within the 70% to 143% criteria recommended for Cmax when comparing effect of food. Lack of effect of food on oxybutynin XL is consistent with the previous observation that the osmotically controlled formulations are nearly insensitive to the gastrointestinal environment, including food. Oxybutynin XL was well tolerated, and the safety results were comparable whether administered alone or with food. In conclusion, oxybutynin XL administration does not require any caution to be exercised regarding food.

Effect of dosing time on the total intestinal transit time of non-disintegrating systems

The total gastrointestinal transit time of nondisintegrating tablets may be affected by dosing time; available literature on this topic is inconclusive. OROS systems are nondisintegrating osmotically driven tablets that release drug over a period of time during their transit through the gastrointestinal tract and are excreted intact in the feces. Total transit times following morning administration of OROS systems pooled from various studies (n = 1,163 systems) showed a distribution with peak frequencies clustering around 24 and 48 h and following night administration (n = 80 systems) was found to cluster around 12 and 36 h. The total transit time distribution appears to be different following morning and night administration. However, on reanalyzing the data considering clock time when the tablet was collected rather than time post-administration, most of the difference between the distribution patterns disappeared. This suggested that total transit times after morning or night administration may be related to the bowel movement habits of the study population. Therefore, OROS systems total transit time were compared to the intrinsic bowel movement pattern of the general population reported in the literature and indeed a good correlation was seen between the two. The total transit time appears to be determined by two factors: the defecation frequency and the probability of its inclusion in the defecation event which is related to its location in the GI tract. A tablet is more likely to be excreted if it is further down in the GI tract. The total transit time data for OROS systems suggest that with the morning dosing the tablet is more likely to be excreted in the bowel movement the next morning. With the night time dosing the tablet may not be far enough in the colon to be excreted in the next morning bowel movement and therefore, it is more likely to be excreted the following morning.

Modeling of circadian testosterone in healthy men and hypogonadal men

The testosterone circadian rhythm has been reported extensively in the literature and has been described by a cosine function. Typically, these data are measured at frequent and regular (e.g., hourly) intervals. However, modeling circadian rhythm with data collected sparsely at irregular intervals and/or data that are not collected at the same time in all individuals has not been reported. The population nonlinear mixed-effects approach can handle such data and also allows covariates to be incorporated into the model. Frequent hourly testosterone concentration data available in the literature for young and elderly healthy volunteers were analyzed first. In the elderly, blunted or completely absent circadian rhythm has been reported, but a full circadian model was significantly better than a model containing one or no circadian component. Therefore, data from both the elderly and young were modeled together, and age was included as a categorical variable (young or elderly). Consistent with literature, the rhythm-adjusted mean testosterone concentrations was lower, and the deviation from the mean, especially to the maximum daily value, was less than half in the elderly (7%) compared to young subjects (16%). The testosterone concentration data measured infrequently and at varying intervals in young normal men and hypogonadal men were evaluated next. Although not measured at regular frequency in each individual, the data were obtained at different clock times for different subjects. Since for population mixed-effects analysis, data from all subjects are pooled, there was enough information to profile the 24-hour circadian cycle. In healthy young subjects, the mean Cnadir, Cpeak, Tnadir, and Tpeak values estimated from the model were 420 ng/dL, 577 ng/dL, 21:42 hours, and 0600 hours, respectively, and were similar to the parameters obtained for the frequently sampled young subjects. In hypogonadal men (testosterone concentrations < 300 ng/dL), the mean testosterone concentrations were much lower than the healthy young or elderly men, and a straight-line model was the best descriptor (i.e., no circadian rhythm was detected). It was also shown that with the application of a transdermal testosterone system, the mean testosterone concentrations in the treated men were within the 95% confidence interval for healthy young men. The results presented here suggest that the advantages of the analysis approach--namely, handling of covariates and handling of sparse, infrequently collected data--can be used in characterizing testosterone circadian rhythm or the lack of it.

Reproducible fentanyl doses delivered intermittently at different time intervals from an electrotransport system

The electrotransport transdermal fentanyl system (ET [fentanyl]), uses a small electrical current to enhance delivery of fentanyl to systemic circulation. Intermittent doses can be administered by periodic application of the current. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of the frequency of intermittent drug delivery by ET (fentanyl) and compare the drug delivery to systemic circulation by ET (fentanyl) with intravenous administration. The topical safety was also determined for the ET (fentanyl) system. Nine adult male volunteers completed this three-treatment, randomized, 24-h, crossover study. ET (fentanyl) treatments with 200 microA direct current applied for 30 min at frequent (hourly) or infrequent (4-hourly) intervals over a 24-h period were compared. Also, the drug delivery to systemic circulation from ET (fentanyl) was compared with intravenous fentanyl 75 microg infused over 30 min every 4 h over a 24-hour period. The mean serum fentanyl concentration achieved with the hourly ET (fentanyl) regimen was higher than that for the 4-hourly ET (fentanyl) regimen as expected from the higher frequency of drug doses. The amount of fentanyl delivered estimated per dose from the ET (fentanyl) system using the iv fentanyl treatment as the reference was similar for the two ET regimens throughout the dosing period. This indicates consistent drug delivery regardless of the frequency of ET dosing. The majority of subjects reported either no, or barely perceptible, erythema 24 h after removal of the system.

Quantitative characterization of therapeutic index: application of mixed-effects modeling to evaluate oxybutynin dose-efficacy and dose-side effect relationships

BACKGROUND

Describing a therapeutic index for a drug is important for evaluating safe and effective dosage regimens. Therapeutic index can be evaluated as the relative position of the dose-efficacy and the dose-side effect curves. Oxybutynin XL (Ditropan XL), a once-daily oral controlled-release formulation for oxybutynin chloride, is being developed. Oxybutynin XL efficacy and side-effect data obtained from two parallel-group, randomized, controlled clinical trials were modeled to evaluate the therapeutic index.

METHODS

A nonlinear mixed-effects model was used to characterize the oxybutynin dose-efficacy and dose-dry mouth relationship. Weekly urge urinary incontinence episodes, the primary efficacy variable, is a discrete variable (counts) with only non-negative integer values and was therefore modeled as a Poisson variable. The probability of dry mouth severity (the most frequently reported side effect), assessed on a categorical four-point scale, was modeled with a proportional odds model. In the modeling process, it was assumed that the time effect was the same for the active and placebo treatments and that the drug effect was additive.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The urge urinary incontinence episodes declined log-linearly, and no significant difference was observed between the two formulations. However, there was a trend toward higher efficacy with oxybutynin XL than with immediate-release oxybutynin at the same dose in one study. Dose-dry mouth analysis showed that the probability of dry mouth with an increasing dose was significantly lower with oxybutynin XL than with immediate-release oxybutynin in the second study, and a similar trend was observed in the first study. By combining the dose-urge urinary incontinence and dose-dry mouth relationship, a wider therapeutic index was predicted for oxybutynin XL than for immediate-release oxybutynin.

Pharmacokinetics of an oral once-a-day controlled-release oxybutynin formulation compared with immediate-release oxybutynin

Oxybutynin is used for the treatment of urge urinary incontinence. In this randomized, open-label, two-way crossover, multiple-dose study, the pharmacokinetics of a once-daily, controlled-release formulation, OROS oxybutynin chloride, was compared with that of immediate-release (IR) oxybutynin (Ditropan). Thirteen healthy female volunteers received three 5 mg OROS oxybutynin chloride tablets once daily for 4 days or IR oxybutynin 5 mg administered every 8 hours for 4 days. On day 1, with OROS oxybutynin chloride, mean plasma concentrations rose slowly over approximately 6 hours following dosing (mean Cmax 4.2 ng/mL) and remained fairly constant over the 24-hour dosing interval, whereas with IR oxybutynin, mean plasma concentrations rose rapidly within the first hour after dosing (mean Cmax 12.0 ng/mL), then declined. The mean oxybutynin degree of fluctuation was much lower for OROS oxybutynin chloride (78%) than for IR oxybutynin (371%). For both formulations, the plasma concentration-time profiles for the metabolite N-desethyloxybutynin paralleled those of oxybutynin but at higher concentrations. Steady-state oxybutynin concentrations were achieved by day 3 for both formulations. Mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values for both oxybutynin and its metabolite were similar between day 1 and day 4 for each treatment, suggesting time-invariant pharmacokinetics. With OROS oxybutynin chloride, mean relative bioavailability was higher (153%) for oxybutynin and lower (69%) for N-desethyloxybutynin compared with IR oxybutynin. This increased bioavailability may be due to reduced first-pass metabolism; within 3 to 5 hours after dosing, OROS systems are thought to reach the colon, where cytochrome P450-mediated oxidation (oxybutynin's primary metabolic pathway) may be less extensive than in the small intestine. Fewer subjects reported any adverse event with OROS oxybutynin chloride than with IR oxybutynin (including dry mouth, oxybutynin's most frequently reported anticholinergic adverse effect).

Effects of nandrolone decanoate therapy in borderline hypogonadal men with HIV-associated weight loss

Serum testosterone concentrations are frequently in the low-normal range (lowest quartile, <500 ng/dl) in men with AIDS-wasting syndrome (AWS) and in other chronic wasting disorders. The response of patients in this group to androgen treatment has not been determined, however. Eighteen men with AWS (mean +/- standard error [SE]: 87% +/- 1% usual body weight; CD4 count 90 +/- 24) and borderline low serum testosterone concentrations (382 +/- 33 ng/dl) completed a 21-day placebo-controlled inpatient metabolic ward study comparing intramuscular (i.m.) placebo (n = 7) with low-dose (65 mg/week; n = 4) and high-dose (200 mg/week; n = 7) nandrolone decanoate, a testosterone analogue. Nitrogen balance, stable isotope-mass spectrometric measurement of de novo lipogenesis (DNL), resting energy expenditure, and gonadal hormone levels were measured. Both low-dose and high-dose nandrolone resulted in significant nitrogen retention (33-52 g nitrogen/14 days, representing gains of 0.5 to 0.9 kg lean tissue/week) compared with placebo (loss of 11 g nitrogen/week). This was reflected biochemically in a borderline significant reduction of high DNL (p < .06). Serum testosterone and gonadotropins were suppressed whereas resting energy expenditure was unchanged by nandrolone treatment. In 10 study subjects completing a 12-week open-label follow-up phase, body weight increased by 4.9 +/- 1.2 kg, including 3.1 +/- 0.5 kg lean body mass, and treadmill exercise performance also improved. In summary, nandrolone decanoate therapy in the absence of an exercise program in borderline hypogonadal men with AWS caused substantial nitrogen retention compared with placebo, similar in extent to the nitrogen retention previously achieved with recombinant growth hormone. It is reasonable to expand the criteria for androgen treatment in AWS to include at least patients in the lowest quartile of serum testosterone.

Fentanyl delivery from an electrotransport system: delivery is a function of total current, not duration of current

This open-label, parallel study of 28 men was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of fentanyl delivered by the E-TRANS (fentanyl) electrotransport transdermal system (ALZA Corporation, Palo Alto, CA). The E-TRANS (fentanyl) system provided electrically assisted, transdermal, continuous delivery of fentanyl. Treatments consisted of no current (group A); a constant current of 100 microA for 26 hours plus 4 additional doses at varying currents for varying times during hour 25 (groups B, C, D); a constant current of 100 microA for 26 hours plus 4 additional doses at 1,200 microA over 2.5 minutes during hour 1 (group E); or 500 microA for 0.5 hours and 100 microA for 3.5 hours (group F). No fentanyl was detected in serum when no current had been applied. Mean serum fentanyl concentrations were similar regardless of current duration during hour 25 (treatments B, C, D). Increases in mean serum fentanyl concentrations were significantly lower during additional dosing for treatment E compared with treatments B, C, and D. Serum fentanyl concentrations sufficient for analgesia (1-3 ng/mL) were attained in treatments using the E-TRANS (fentanyl) system with basal current of 100 microA for 26 hours. There were no safety issues after treatment with E-TRANS (fentanyl) system with concurrent opioid antagonist (naltrexone) administration. The only adverse event requiring treatment was a headache (n = 1). The majority of subjects had no or barely perceptible erythema at the application site 24 hours after system removal. Application of E-TRANS (fentanyl) resulted in therapeutically significant serum fentanyl concentrations over a range of applied currents. Overall serum fentanyl concentrations were higher when the skin had been primed by constant-current fentanyl delivery.

Effect of current density on pharmacokinetics following continuous or intermittent input from a fentanyl electrotransport system

The pharmacokinetics of fentanyl were determined in two open-label crossover studies following 24-h periods of delivery by an electrotransport transdermal system (E-TRANS [fentanyl] system) in young healthy male volunteers. A direct current was applied continuously in study 1 (at 50, 100, and 200 microA; surface area = 5 cm2; n = 8), but in study 2 it was limited to the first 20 min of each hour (at 150, 200, and 250 microA; surface area = 2 cm2; n = 12). The opioid effects of fentanyl were blocked with naltrexone administered every 12 h. With increasing electrical current, the increase in serum fentanyl concentration, amount absorbed, and AUC values were proportional in study 2 but not in study 1. It is hypothesized that the lack of proportionality in study 1 is due to lower current density (microA/cm2) in this study. It appears that for fentanyl, the current density should be about 75 microA/cm2 or greater for a linear relation between current and amount absorbed as seen in study 2. Compared with intravenously infused fentanyl, the serum concentrations resulting from E-TRANS (fentanyl) system application revealed a slightly dampened rate of increase (stratum-corneum barrier effect) and decrease in serum concentrations, and a similar intersubject variability in fentanyl AUC values. Fentanyl pharmacokinetics with either E-TRANS (fentanyl) or intravenous infusion were time-invariant over a 24-h application period, with similar mean half-life values (about 15-18 h). E-TRANS (fentanyl) administration (either continuous or intermittent input) was safe and well tolerated. Adverse effects were mild to moderate; they consisted mainly of local erythema and pruritus (which resolved in most patients within 24 h after system removal) and occasional opioid effects.

Insulin drug delivery systems: rectal gels

In continuation of a previous study on insulin gels administered deep rectally by means of an applicator, 16 further rectal formulations were evaluated, using the nondiabetic White New Zealand rabbit as animal model. The highest pharmacologic availability, P.A., defined as the ratio of the areas under the % glucose reduction-time curves rectally versus I.V., corrected for dose size and body weight, in the previous experiments was about 29%. In the present study the highest mean P.A. was 42% and 31%, both obtained with Gelucire bases (50/22 and 44/14), pH 8 buffer solution and sodium deoxycholate, using Cab-O-Sil as stiffening agent. Simple gels prepared from gelatine and polyethylene glycol, or Veegum, resulted in mean P.A. of about 23 and 24%, respectively. Addition of Gelucire or sodium deoxycholate did not result in a further increase of P.A. of the latter two gels.

In vitro evaluation of a sustained-release veterinary peroral pellet preparation

In a preceding in vivo study in horses, wide interindividual variation was found in the extent of bioavailability and time to reach peak concentration after peroral administration of one specific theophylline sustained-release dosage form. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the factors of potency, the pH of dissolution medium, the enzymes in the dissolution medium, and the crushing of the pellets on in vitro performance. The results show a wide variation in potency for the individual units, an increase in release rate with increasing pH, and an increase in release rate if the pellets are crushed. The wide variation in potency explains the variation found in absolute bioavailability, and the increase in release rate when the pellets are crushed explains the differences seen in peak plasma times, since the pellets will be chewed to varying degrees by the horse.